Pressure Equipment Workshop September 2007 – Day 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information and communicationDirectorate general for Energy and Transport1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG TREN – E3 MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS.
Advertisements

Comparison between American and European Pressure Vessel Rules
The New EMC Directive 2004/108/EC and the DTI transposition Brian Jones and Peter Howick.
Manfred Kochsiek Wilfried Schulz Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig und Berlin Modernisation of Legal Metrology in Germany.
S3: Module D Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Session 3: Conformity Assessment Module D Peter Ulbig, Harry Stolz Belgrade, 31 October.
Materials Bratislava 11/12/13 April 2005 Presented by Peter Hanmore For the benefit of business and people TAIEX Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
GRPE GRPE CGH 2 Experts (A sub-group of the GRPE Informal Group “Hydrogen/Fuel Cell”) JASIC Presentation At The GRPE CGH 2 Experts Meeting.
Ed Haynes (CEN Consultant)
Phare SL Implementation of Technical Regulations on Company Level Breakout session Gas appliance directive Expert: Hans-Peter Nowak Chamber of Commerce.
Air Conditioning International Mechanical Code
Working Group 1 - Market Surveillance of pressure cookers CYPRUS PED Workshop 3-5 October 2005 Presented by: Mr. Stephanos Achillides, Labour Inspection.
Assemblies Intentions and enforcement. Intentions Free movement  CE marking for vessels, accessories and assemblies Well-defined responsibilities  Manufacturer,
TÜV Slovakia, NB Working Group III. - ASSEMBLIES Bratislava, 12. April 2005 DG Enterprise and Industry, European Commission and Slovak Office of.
1 PED: equivalent overall level of safety PED Annex 1, clause 7: The following provision apply as a general rule. However, where they are not applied,
1 Comparative Study: EN – ASME VIII Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive Warsaw, June, 2004 Dr. Reinhard Preiss TÜV Austria Krugerstrasse.
Standardisointi TAIEX workshop Bratislava Implementation of the Pressure Equipment directive, PED PED - modules and WP- Guidelines Anja-Leena Tyry.
The Pressure Equipment Directive and Innovation Guy BAYLAC Technical Advisor of EPERC TP European Commission/TAIEX PED Worshop in.
National Legislation on in- service inspections and the PED.
PED and Swedish regulations
05/01/20161 Benny Hoff TÜV NORD Sweden AB AFS 2005:3 Inspection of pressure equipment.
PED Workshop, Bratislava April 2005 PED and Presumption of Conformity Product Standards for pressure vessels, boilers and piping, and “Horizontal” standards.
06/02/20161 Benny Hoff TÜV NORD Sweden AB AFS 2005:2 Installations.
DESIGN AND IN-SERVICE INSPECTIONS Guy BAYLAC Technical Advisor to EPERC TAIEX Workshop, Working Group 4 Bratislava – 12 April 2005.
TAIEX Poland, June 2004 Comparison and Presumption of Conformity of some standardisation systems Ed Haynes CEN Consultant Pressure Equipment.
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PED AND GUIDELINES Ed Haynes (CEN Consultant)
Benny Hoff TÜV NORD Sweden AB
SAFETY AND INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS FOR TEL-2 INSTALLATION IN THE LAB Paolo Magagnin (BE-BI-ML) 24 – April
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop (11-13 June 2014)
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
- Generals for PED matters - Definition of pressure vessel and classes - Who is who according to PED - Definition of pressure vessel + codes for XFEL -
1 Pressure equipment directive 97/23/EC PED. 2 Scope of validity  design  manufacture  conformity assessment of pressure equipment and assembly with.
Introduction to the CPR. Transition from CPD to CPR, key dates TAIEX Workshop INT MARKET CPR and CE marking, Baku, 23 and 24 February 2015.
Logo area Compliance with CERN Safety Rules – Role of CERN Health, Safety & Environment protection (HSE) Unit C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE) International.
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
Chapter 37: Fluid Containment
The application of the PED on the design codes for cryogenic equipment and future developments foreseen in this field Paris, 06/09/2016 l Hervé BARTHELEMY.
Water-tube Boilers Description of water tube boilers including operation, types and benefits. A brief synopsis on how they are applied to combined heat.
Unit 37: Fluid containment Dr
Presented by.
Strategy for conformity of non-standard cryogenic equipment
Third Party Activities for FH1 Project
CENF - LBNF cryostat Relevant safety codes
Thomas Otto, TE Department, CERN
EU legislation on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Unit 37: Fluid containment Dr
Workshop on the Implementation of the Pressure Equipment Directive
PED Conformity assessment of materials Poul Holmegaard
Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4
Harmonized Standards / Materials Josef L
Conformity Assessment of assemblies
Assemblies Intentions and enforcement
For the benefit of business and people
Pressure Equipment Workshop September 2007 – Day 2
Surveillance of Notified Bodies in Member States
TAIEX workshop Bratislava Implementation of the Pressure Equipment directive, PED PED - modules and WP- Guidelines Anja-Leena Tyry.
TAIEX “How the PED Applies to
Changes in EN
on Pressure Equipment (PED): Past experience and future challenges
Marcel Broekhoven, Guy Baylac
NON-PROFIT COMPANY FOR QUALITY CONTROL AND INNOVATION IN BULDING
INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC
Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Riga,
EU Water Framework Directive
Pressure Equipment (PED):
Rules for Mechanical Design and Pressure Testing for Detector vessel
Boiler Safety Valve Regulations
Pressure Equipment (PED) --- Baltic Pressure Equipment Workshop
National Legislation in the Pressure Sector and the PED
Design and integration of safety equipment and safety aspects in the LHC tunnel (cryogenic safety only) Vittorio Parma Th.Otto.
Presentation transcript:

Pressure Equipment Workshop September 2007 – Day 1 Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) Classification Ed Haynes, Guy Baylac

Criteria for classification Two fluid groups - Group 1: Positive list of 7 dangerous fluid types as defined by Directive 67/548/EEC - Group 2: Other fluids Physical state of fluid - gaseous, - liquid Indication of stored “energy” PS·V or PS·DN (piping etc

Determination of applicable category Classification Group 1 fluid Group 2 fluid Vessels gaseous Table 1 Table 2 liquid Table 3 Table 4 Piping Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9 Pressure Accessories volume according to tables 1-4 DN according to tables 6-9 Safety general Category IV specific Category of respective equipment Assemblies According to highest element (except safety acc.)

Conformity assessment tables (A) Vessels for dangerous gases Vessels for non-dangerous liquids (Table 1) (Table 4)

Conformity assessment tables (B) Piping for dangerous gases Piping for non-dangerous liquids Table 6 Table 9

Examples for single items Use rules in PED Annex II tables or software available from some Notified Bodies Related Guidelines – series 2 on http://ec.europa.eu/entreprise/pressure_equipment/index Note – guidelines are indicative. They are not exhaustive and not legally binding. You must read all the text – the following examples are only extracts

Extracts of some Guidelines There is a contradiction between the requirements in article 3 paragraph 1.4 and those in annex II point 3. Can pressure accessories be classified as "article 3.3" as indicated in the tables in annex II or must all of them satisfy the essential requirements as indicated in article 3 paragraph 1.4? SHORT ANSWER – use Annex II Guideline 2/2: The Directive uses the notion of DN. How to apply the Directive for classifying the tubular products or accessories for which the notion of DN does not exist (copper tubes, plastic valves, hollow sections....)? SHORT ANSWER internal cross-section

Extracts of some Guidelines How should vessels and piping for superheated water be classified? SHORT ANSWER see tables 2, 5 and/or 7 Guideline 2/4: (Controversial) Which type of pressure equipment is a heat exchanger ? Guideline 2/5: Some warm water generators having a volume greater than 2 L are intended to generate water at a temperature less than 110 °C, but are fitted with a safety temperature limiter which is set to a temperature of 120 °C. What value of maximum allowable temperature, TS, shall be declared by the manufacturer ? SHORT ANSWER TS = 120 degrees C

Extracts of some Guidelines Guideline 2/6: How should a fired or otherwise heated equipment be classified if a fluid other than water is being heated ? SHORT ANSWER – NOT table 5 Guideline 2/7: Article 9 classifies fluids with reference to Article 2 (2) of Directive 67/548/EEC. Does this mean that all fluids classified as dangerous are group 1? A LONG ANSWER Guideline 2/8: How should a vessel which is intended to contain water below 100 °C be classified when there is a marginal gas cover ? SHORT ANSWER – table 4

Extracts of some Guidelines Guideline 2/9: Which pressure and volume values must be used to determine the category of vessels used as gas-loaded accumulators, or other vessels with a flexible or non fixed membrane, given that these are made up of two chambers with different fluids? SHORT ANSWER – Article 9.3 Guideline 2/10: If a vessel contains a fluid which meets the conditions of the introductory paragraph to Article 3, paragraph 1.1(a) (e.g. air) and a liquid which meets the conditions of the introductory paragraph to Article 3, paragraph 1.1(b) (e.g. water) - how shall the vessel be classified? SHORT ANSWER – Higher category - see also 2/8 and 2/9

Extracts of some Guidelines Guideline 2/11: When is it possible for a manufacturer to apply a module from a higher category and what are the consequences ? IMPORTANT PART OF ANSWER – The module used for conformity assessment does not change the classification of the equipment Guideline 2/15: Does the classification of the pressure cookers in category III for the assessment of the design mean that also the ESRs are linked to category III? SHORT ANSWER – NO

Assemblies Related Guidelines – series 3 on http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pressure_equipment/index Note – guidelines are indicative. They are not exhaustive and not legally binding. You must read all the text – the following examples are only extracts

Extract of some Guidelines Guideline 3/1: Must the global conformity assessment procedure be applied to assemblies covered by article 3.2.1, e.g. to boilers, even if the assembling is done under the responsibility of the user? SHORT ANSWER – NO Guideline 3/2: Are joining operations on site covered by the PED? ANSWER IN TWO PARTS Guideline 3/3: The effect of the derogation in Article 3.2.3 from the introductory paragraph in Article 3.2 is not clear. In the circumstances, how should Article 3.2.3 be applied ? ANSWER IS COMPLICATED

Extract of some Guidelines Guideline 3/4: What shall be the minimum extent of the assembly "boiler" which shall be subjected to a global conformity assessment procedure in accordance with article 3 section 2.1 ? SHORT ANSWER See EN 12952-1 Guideline 3/5: Shall the assemblies defined in the article 3 paragraph 2.3 carry the CE-marking? SHORT ANSWER – YES … but Guideline 3/6: Must a hydrostatic pressure test be carried out on an assembly and should the value laid down in section 7.4 then be followed ? COMPLEX ANSWER