The for optimal quality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program and Implementation. Plans for the next 90 minutes and beyond! Define quality assurance for a program Implementation plans Utilization of.
Advertisements

Fundamentals and Best Practices for outcomes and success.
1 Mystery Shopping SHIP Directors’ Conference June 11, 2007 Julie Leonard & Erika Melman BearingPoint, Inc.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Focus Groups for the Health Workforce Retention Study.
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
In Focus-I & R Excellence Quality, Training, & Coaching-Best Practices for I & R Contact Centers Amy Latzer Chief Operations Officer Alliance of Information.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
MN SW-PBIS Training Kevin Filter School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) 1.
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
A partnership of the Healthcare Association of New York State and the Greater New York Hospital Association NYSPFP Preventable Readmissions Pilot Project.
Critical Friends to Support ERWC Fidelity Kathleen D. Rowlands ERWC i3 Coaches.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
WELCOME BACK DAY 4 PRACTICE 1 You’ve earned this! 2.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Making Health and Safety Meetings Work If you had to identify, in one word, the reason why the human race has not achieved, and never will achieve, its.
SUPPORTING PEOPLE PROVIDER FORUMS An overview of Supporting People’s new approach to Performance Monitoring and Quality Assurance.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Performance Management
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Bellringer On the sticky note provided, please write your favorite summer activity from the following choices: Going to the Beach Camping Gardening Traveling.
Session VI: Communication Plan
Performance Management and Employee Development
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
BSBWOR301 Organise personal work priorities and development
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
As You Enter Take a moment to network and exchange contact information from those in the room you do not have yet.
TAIS Overview for Districts
Welcome to the DE-PBS Cadre Meeting
Assessment & Evaluation workshop
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
MTM Measurement Initiative
Human Resources Competency Framework
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
Phase 4 Milestones.
TCPI Project Pathway: Session 6 of 8 Coordinated Care – Milestone # 8, 9, 10 (11, 12, 13, 14 for primary care)
Project Process Leading for Impact®: Building Future Leaders
My Performance Journey
Please dial into the phone line:
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Creating a vision for continuous improvement
Chicago Public Schools
Engaging People : Performance Monitoring
Core Competencies of a World Class Customer Advisory Board
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Establishing Oversight Mechanisms
Proposal Development Support & Planning
Bulloch Information Session
Team Check-Up Orientation Briefing
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Building a Strategic Plan
Cumberland County Department of Social Services /Adult Protective Services Sonya Hardy.
Module 4 Using Data for Decision Making
An Introduction to Evaluating Federal Title Funding
Where We Are Now 14–2. Where We Are Now 14–2 Major Tasks of Project Closure Evaluate if the project delivered the expected benefits to all stakeholders.
SEIU Local 1000: Improving Results through Better Project Management
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Interviewing…How to answer difficult interview questions
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
Engagement Planning - Communications
Presentation transcript:

The for optimal quality Presenters: Cheryl Stewart, CIRS, CRS Gailen Prepetit, CIRS, CRS

Cheryl Stewart, CIRS, CRS Quality Team United Way of Greater Atlanta 2-1-1  404-614-1031  cstewart@unitedwayatlanta.org 

Rules of Engagement For a Productive Meeting Contribute ideas and solutions Respect differences in others Listen actively Avoid side-bars Be respectful of all team member’s contributions Avoid using cell phones within the meeting Keep information confidential Group rule

“Quality is not an act, it’s a habit. ” “ We are what we repeatedly do “Quality is not an act, it’s a habit.” “ We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act, but a habit.” – Aristotle

Protective Factors: Mitigating the Risk of an Unhealthy Quality Program Review proactive measures/best practices for building an effective quality monitoring program Learn how to develop an effective calibration process Receive some practical tools for gathering and analyzing customer- satisfaction surveys and service outcome measures Capturing Agent Success- learn how to build an effective monitoring form: phone, chat, text

Check Your Pulse Write on one large sticky note what your quality program consists of Share with one other person in the room Share with the whole group what you’ve learned

ASAP Dr. Gailen Prepetit, QA Crisis Town, USA I & R Service

Building Blocks to a Healthy Quality Monitoring Program

SET UP FOR SUCCESS Who will review the data What does your scorecard include? Who will review the data & recommend changes? How many contacts per agent, in what time period will they be evaluated? What KPI’s will you measure? How will you implement changes? SET UP FOR SUCCESS How will the numbers be crunched? Who is performing the monitoring?

Focus on Agent coaching Avoid “us vs. them” mentality Collaborative w/agent involvement Improve not punish Get the whole picture

Dive deeper Monitor high value and critical calls Large donor Target high-value calls for evaluation Dive deeper Monitor high value and critical calls Large donor Crisis calls

Absolutely essential Feedback consistent & impartial Coaching-focused Calibrate regularly Absolutely essential Coaching-focused atmosphere Non-punitive Feedback consistent & impartial Be willing to money & resources invest time,

AIRS STANDARD 27 6. The I & R service conducts regular customer satisfaction/quality assurance surveys with a specified percentage of inquirers to assess overall service performance and I & R service performance and I & R service outcomes.

How do you measure customer satisfaction in your agency How do you measure customer satisfaction in your agency? Service outcomes? Write on separate sticky notes one question that you feel is vital in measuring customer satisfaction (CSAT) and one question that you feel is important in capturing service outcomes (SOM) Post them on the flipchart papers labeled CSAT & SOM

*The goal of the 211 Contact Center is to receive a 95% score or better on the "Yes" responses.

FOLLOW-UP SCRIPT   1.WERE YOU ABLE TO FOLLOW-UP ON THE SERVICE REFERRALS WE GAVE YOU? Yes No (skip to Q8) 2.DID YOU RECEIVE THE ASSISTANCE YOU WERE LOOKING FOR? Yes (skip to Q4) No 3.iF YOU DID NOT RECEIVE THE ASSITANCE, PLEASE SELECT THE REASON Agency out of funds/food/space in shelter Could not contact agency on phone (answering service, no answer, line busy, etc.) No appointment available Ineligible, received services in the past, out of district Place on waiting list Not sure 4.DO YOU THINK YOU WOULD HAVE LEARNED ABOUT THOSE RESOURCES W/O CALLING 211? 5.IF ANSWERED NO ON Q1, HOW DID YOU MEET THE NEED? Still in need of services Family and/or friend(s) Creating a plan to work with the company/organization Assistance received from an organization not referred to me by 211 Other

What Do I Measure In a Call? Write on a sticky note one thing that you think is important to measure in a call or contact? Share with one other person in the room. Share with the rest of the group.

Calibration

Calibration is the process of standardizing the call evaluation and scoring process.

WHO? Agents QA Managers/Team Call Center Managers Senior Leadership Team External stakeholders- i.e., Board, Community Volunteers Cross-functional Teams within the organization Training Manager

WHAT? Standard I & R calls E-scripts (Chat, Text) Crisis Calls Specialty Calls that require a different script

WHEN? Once the group has met its initial calibration goal- bi-weekly sessions Initial roll-out months- weekly sessions are ideal Changes in the center’s business practices Updates to quality standards definitions or QA form Newly hired staff or staff turn-over

WHY? Ensures fairness & objectivity A way to uniformly rate agent performance Improves the monitoring process Limits variation in interpreting performance criteria Customer service is consistent Achieves consistency among the people responsible for scoring

WHERE? Depends on formality of the session – What do you want to do? Depends on the size of the group Varies from team to team

HOW? Prepare in advance: Definitions guide, decide on the participants, schedule date, prepare meeting logistics, select calls (you can send in advance) Schedule at least an hour Set a target variance; i.e. 5 points or 10 percent Designate a facilitator Establish ground rules for calibrating Have all participants use the same monitoring form Participants share & explain scores Facilitator reviews the notes at the end of each session Once calibration is attained, schedule periodic sessions as frequently as possible

Ground Rules for Calibration Agree to confidentiality Listen to the calls without making any facial expressions or using extreme body language Let each call stand on its own (Goal is to look at quality from the customer’s perspective) Be reasonable (Some skills are not possible and/or appropriate for every call) Do not rationalize behavior based on the agent/specialist personality, other agents on the team, or any of the other calls listened to previously

What did you like about today’s session? What could have been better? INFORMAL EVALUATIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------- What did you like about today’s session? What could have been better?

This PP presentation will be available electronically after the conference.

Executive Producer: Cheryl Stewart, CIRS, CRS Executive Producer: Gailen Prepetit, CIRS, CRS Resources: http://www.icmi.ip/ AIRS: Setting the Standards for Information and Referral Services, Version 8.0, 2016 United Way of Greater Atlanta 2-1-1