GIS Aspect We used GIS to extract the watershed basin we were going to focus on so that we could obtain the NLCD landcover data for the catchments the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spatial Resolution in Digital Images Digital Images –“Size” can change easily (zoom, subset, mosaic) –Pixel size is assumed not to change within an image.
Advertisements

Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 GLOBAL LEGEND GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002.
Hydro Networks in GIS Network model Flow on Networks Hydrologic networks Linear referencing on networks Some slides in this presentation were prepared.
NLCD and MODIS Landuse Processing Tools and Projection Issues in Modeling Limei Ran and Alison Eyth Center for Environmental Modeling for Policy Development.
Habitat Group Lake Champlain Watershed Regional Risk Model Daniel Levy Kelsey Pratt Tyler Lewis.
Presentation by Keith Rikli December 12, 2011 Suitability of Airport Placement near Monterey California.
Tom Craven Matt Simon Anne Trainor.  Construct a RHESSys ecohydrologic model for Sandhills Region.
Snapshot of Northeast Ohio Environment. Overview Topography Watersheds Parks and Conservation Areas Land Cover (developed areas, forests, wetlands, agriculture)
DETERMINING LAND DEVELOPMENT EFFECT ON SURFACE RUNOFF USING GIS.
NUTRIENT RUNOFF EFFECTS ON JORDAN LAKE Brianna Young, Jennifer Jackson and Emily Nurminen.
Introduction to NHDPlus: A Framework for Advanced Water Applications Cindy McKay Horizon Systems Corporation Cindy McKay Horizon Systems Corporation.
C-CAP The Coastal Change Analysis Program Overview of C-CAP Products, Vision, Status, and Related Tools from the Coastal Services Center.
Spatial Processing in R Luke Winslow. Task Calculate a buffer around a lake Create a Shapefile for just the buffer Extract Land/Cover Land/Use for buffer.
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
Hydrologic Cycle and Watersheds. Hydrologic Cycle Components Precipitation Infiltration Percolation Runoff Evapotranspiration.
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
Based on USDA-NASS Data Maps Excel Chart Excel Chart Excel Chart Excel Chart Crop Layers Crop Layers Crop Layers Crop Layers Bar Chart Bar Chart Bar Chart.
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay Carrie Gibson CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Spring Semester.
Proposed Modification to Method for Determining Reasonable In-Season Demand for the Surface Water Coalition: Use of the USDA Crop Data Layer Presented.
This is. Jeopardy Earth Science Water on Earth Surface Water Water Underground Using Freshwater Sources Water to Drink Capture the Chapter
Image Classification: Introduction Lecture Notes 6 prepared by R. Lathrop 11/99 updated 3/04 Readings: ERDAS Field Guide 6th Ed. CH. 6.
NATHAN FOSTER WARM SEASON WORKSHOP 5/2/12 The Flash Flood Potential Index (FFPI) Project at BTV.
Saving the Chesapeake’s Great Rivers and Special Places High Resolution Land Cover Data in the Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Conservancy.
Image Classification: Introduction Lecture Notes 7 prepared by R. Lathrop 11/99 updated 3/04 Readings: ERDAS Field Guide 5th Ed. CH. 6:
Building Analytical Applications Using NHDPlusV2 Presented by: Cindy McKay Horizon Systems Corporation Sponsored by: US EPA, Office of Water.
Fire Emissions from 30,000’ – Regional Haze Planning Needs and Level(s) of Effort Tom Moore & Lee Alter Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Tucson, AZ –
Land Processes Group, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL Response of Atmospheric Model Predictions at Different Grid Resolutions Maudood.
Evan Webb NOAA/National Weather Service Forecast Office Grand Rapids, MI USING GIS TO ENHANCE IMPACT-BASED WEATHER WARNINGS.
Introduction National Hydrography Dataset Plus (NHDPlus) Version 2.
Thematic Workshop on Standardization and Exchange of Land Use and Cover Information Wednesday, April 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois.
Development and Land Use Change: Central Potomac River Watershed
SPARROW Surface Water Quality Workshop October 29-31, 2002 Reston, Virginia Section 5. Comparison of GIS Approaches, Data Sources and Management.
Remote Sensing Classification Systems
ANDERSON (1976) Land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data Level I Level II 1 Urban or Built-up Land 11 Residential.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
Land Cover Characterization Program National Mapping Division EROS Data CenterU. S. Geological Survey The National Land Cover Dataset of the Multi- Resolution.
Linkages between Southern Pine Beetle Outbreaks and Forest Density Dahl Winters December 6, 2006.
DEMs Download from Seamless Server Project Mosaic Calculate Slope Create a DEM (ArcGIS)
1 Contractor for the USGS at the EROS Data Center NHD Plus as a geospatial framework for drought indicators Jim Verdin.
Washington Forest Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project “Using Geospatial Technologies to Implement Program Strategically”
Bi-national Land Cover Change for the Great Lakes Basin.
Experiment domain. Evaporation models Output flux-typesInput variables ModelEpEp E pan ETET rc TT dew U2U2 SWLWLand cover Soil moisture Cloud cover PenmanXXXXXX.
Effects of Rain Water Harvesting on the Hydrograph Tyler Jantzen May 3, 2007 CE 394K.2.
Tom Kutcher Natural Resources Specialist Narragansett Bay NERR Selection of an Effective Classification Scheme.
Hurricane Irene in Connecticut River Milena Spirova CE 394 K 2015.
K. N. Schneider What is a Watershed?  It is also known as a Drainage Basin  A couple of definitions:  EPA: “A watershed is the area of land where.
Bacterial TMDL Model for Copano Bay Research performed by Carrie Gibson at Center for Research in Water Resources Schematic processor tool developed by.
Bdsfbdsfb NHDPlus for Corpus Christi Bay Term Project Report Nishesh Mehta Nishesh Mehta 21 st November st November 2006.
Key Concepts from Exercise 4

Watershed P (in) Q (in) ET +ΔS (in) Rock Creek
STREAM NETWORK DELINEATION USING ARC HYDRO AND TauDEM: A comparison of approaches using The Upper Sevier and the Little Bear River Basins Alphonce C. Guzha.
Best Management Practices Implemented in Lower Bear River
Nutrient Runoff Effects on Jordan Lake
Paraguay Landscape Analysis
Nutrient Runoff Effects on Jordan Lake
What is a buffer? A buffer, also known as a riparian area, is land adjacent to a stream, river, lake or wetland. Buffers are critically important to keeping.
Water Quality Analysis for Selected Streams in Utah and Idaho
Protecting our Watershed
WRAP Wind Blown Fugitive Dust and Ammonia Emissions Updates
Hydro Networks in GIS Review of key concepts in Ex 4
Limei Ran and Alison Eyth
Watersheds and Drainage Basins
Ratio of Water used by Agriculture to Discharge into the Great Salt Lake in the Bear River Basin Presented by: Timothy Shaffer.
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
Preciptation.
Paraguay Landscape Analysis
Presentation of Jordan Case Study Second Management Board Meeting
Presentation of Jordan Case Study First Management Board Meeting
Presentation transcript:

GIS Aspect We used GIS to extract the watershed basin we were going to focus on so that we could obtain the NLCD landcover data for the catchments the development was going to be in.

Catchments of Interest

The Process Clipped Haw River and New Hope watersheds from a file containing the entire water network for the Southeast U.S. Overlaid NHD water body to locate Jordan Lake Overlaid files for primary, secondary, and local roads to get an exact location Overlaid catchment data Added NHD flowline attributes data table Overlaid NED file for the area to view the elevation of catchments

The Process Joined catchment shapefile with NLCD flowline attributes to get CUMNLCD Used identify function to select catchment of interest and obtain information about landcover Compiled data to get total values

NLCD Classifications 11 Open Water 12 Perennial Ice/Snow 21 Developed, Open Space 22 Developed, Low Density 23 Developed, Medium Density 31 Bare Rock/Sand/Clay 32 Quarries/Strip Mines/Gravel Pits 33 Transitional 41 Deciduous Forest 42 Evergreen Forest 43 Mixed Forest 51 Shrub 61 Orchards/Vineyards/Other 71 Grassland/Herbaceous 81 Pasture/Hay 82 Row Crops 83 Small Grains 84 Fallow 85 Urban/Recreational Grasses 91 Woody Wetlands 92 Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands

Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands COMID 8897386 COMID8897026 NLCD # % of landcover Land Area (km^2) Total Land Area (km^2) 11 Open Water 0.164 0.0053 31 Bare Rock/Sand/Clay 0.036 0.0012 33 Transitional 1.47 0.0474 41 Deciduous Forest 62.04 2 57.44 0.562 2.562 42 Evergreen Forest 21.46 0.692 15.63 0.153 0.845 43 Mixed Forest 12.16 0.392 26.84 0.263 0.655 81 Pasture/Hay 1.44 0.046 82 Row Crops 0.15 0.0048 91 Woody Wetlands 0.96 0.031 0.09 0.00088 0.03188 92 Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands 0.11 0.0035 Total Area: 3.226 0.979 4.202

What’s In Store? How will the nutrient runoff rates be affected if we move the development farther upstream?