Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ACCJC Rubric and Beyond Julie Bruno, Sierra College Susan Clifford, ACCJC Fred Hochstaedter Monterey Peninsula College.
Advertisements

Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
Stephanie Curry-Reedley College James Todd- ASCCC Area A Representative.
Accomplishing the Mission Mission and institutional effectiveness expectations in the revised Accreditation Standards Prepared for MPC Academic Senate.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Classified Leadership Institute 2016 Hope Ell Theresa Rees Misty Burruel Sherrie Guerrero ACCREDITATION, PROGRAM REVIEW, AND THE CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONAL.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Erik Shearer, Professor of Art, Accreditation Faculty Co-chair
Policies, Processes, and Practices, Oh My!
Committee Orientation
Accreditation Self-Study
Learning by Doing: Participating on an Evaluation Team
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Accreditation 2016 Session 1.
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
Randy Beach, south representative CraiG Rutan, Area D representative
Program Review and Integrated Planning: A Conversation About Data
Curriculum and Accreditation
October 9, 2015 Daniel Wanner, Los Angeles City College
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Stephanie Curry, Reedley College Jarek Janio, Santa Ana College
Curriculum and Accreditation
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
All About Resources: Standard III
Assessment Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/14/2018
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College
Standard III Resources
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Dolores Davison—Area B Representative
Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: Understanding Standard I WITH GUIDANCE ON I.B.3 AND I.B.6 Stephanie Droker, Vice.
Accreditation Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: The College Mission & The 2015 Student Success Scorecard.
Accreditation and curriculum
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Yuba Community College District Board of Trustees Meeting
For Excellence in Accreditation… “Moorpark it”
ISER Committee Presentations
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Presented To: College Planning Council
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Eligibility Requirements and Commission Policies
ACCREDITATION 101 Sam Foster, ASCCC Area D Representative
Overview of accjc stanard IV
ISER Committee Presentation-College Council
February 21-22, 2018.
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015
Craig Rutan, Accreditation and Assessment Committee Chair
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Presented To: College Planning Council
Foothill College Strategic Objective - Governance
Inquiry into Effective Practices of SLO Assessment AScCC Educational policies committee Anna Bruzzese ASCCC South Representative; ASCCC Educational Policies.
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Maria del Rosario C. Biddenback, Napa Valley College

Breakout Outcome Attendees discuss Standard I and effective practices for meeting relevant ACCJC eligibility requirements and policies. Not sure of the thought behind this slide.

ASCCC Paper Effective practices in Accreditation: A Guide to Support Colleges in the Accreditation Cycle (Adopted Fall 2015)

Standard IA: Mission Makes sure that all college programs and services align with the mission Mission must contain: broad educational purpose, intended student population, types of degrees and certificated offered (need to address if in the bachelors degree pilot) and a commitment to student learning and achievement Mission must be linked to: Decision Making, Planning and Resource Allocation Achievement of the mission must be qualitatively and quantitatively shown through data and data analysis

Effective Practices: IA Review your mission systematically, not just the year before a visit. Reference you mission in all your planning documents Use the mission as a guiding force for resource allocation Publish the mission far and wide on campus in documents to the public Require each program to write how they address the mission through the program review process Identify specific data that can show college is meeting its mission

Standard IB: Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness Focus on Data and Dialog Data: Student Learning Outcomes Student Equity Data Achievement Data Intuitional Set Standards Disaggregated Data Dialog: Indentify Performance Gaps Implement Improvement Plans

Effective Practices: 1B Identify processes and procedures for collecting and analyzing and using outcome data for student learning and achievement Collect disaggregated data on achievement of student learning outcomes and use that data in discussions of student equity Create and assess intuitional set standards Identify short and long-range needs based on data

Standard IC: Institutional Integrity Providing Clear and Accurate information to faculty, staff, students and the public. Information should be provided: Online College Catalog Correspondence with the Commission Need to regularly review its policies, procedures and publications Academic Freedom and Academic honesty/dishonesty

Effective Practices: IC Confirm all information in institutional documents and publications are clear and accurate Confirm that students can complete degrees and certificated in a reasonable time Make sure that the college/district has an academic freedom statement, a policy on academic integrity (including academic honesty/dishonesty) Provide evidence that policies and procedures are followed.

Eligibility Requirements linked to Standard I ERs 6 (Mission) 11 (Student Learning and Achievement) 13 (Academic Freedom) 19 (Institutional Planning and Evaluation) 20 ( Integrity in Communication with the Public) 21 ( Integrity in Relations with the Accrediting Commission)

Widely distribute and Publish Need to widely distribute data and information related to Standard I Information should be distributed to faculty, staff, administration and the community

Faculty Involvement in Standard I Faculty (Academic Senates) should be involved through: Assessment of the current mission and revisions Making sure that the mission is part of the program review process Producing, Collecting and Reviewing Student learning outcomes Identify strategies for improvement based on data and dialog Creating and discussion of Institutional Set Standards Reviewing the colleges Academic Freedom Policy Crafting academic dishonesty policy (cheating and plagiarism)

“ Questions?