draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RSVP-TE Extensions for SRLG Configuration of FA
Advertisements

Draft-liu-mpls-rsvp-te-gr-frr-00 By H. Autumn Liu & Sriganesh Kini 76 th IETF, Hiroshima Japan.
1 Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-05 Author.
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-01 Chandrasekar Ramachandran Markus.
Pseudowire Endpoint Fast Failure Protection draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-00 Rahul Aggarwal Yimin Shen
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 12 FastReRoute (FRR) - Big Picture.
1 LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-00 Nitin BahadurJuniper Networks Kireeti KompellaJuniper Networks IETF 69, MPLS WG,
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
1 LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01 Nitin BahadurJuniper Networks Kireeti KompellaJuniper Networks George SwallowCisco.
IETF 68, MPLS WG, Prague P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-01.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal.
P2MP MPLS-TE FRR with P2MP Bypass Tunnel draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-00.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal (Juniper) IETF 67, MPLS WG,
Protection and Restoration Definitions A major application for MPLS.
1 IETF- 56 – TE WG- SAN FRANCISCO Inter-AS MPLS Traffic Engineering draft-vasseur-inter-AS-TE-00.txt Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang.
PIM Extension For Tunnel Based Multicast Fast Reroute (TMFRR) draft-lwei-pim-tmfrr-00 IETF 76, Hiroshima.
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-00 Chandra Ramachandran Yakov Rekhter.
Upstream LSR Redundancy for Multi-point LDP Tunnels draft-pdutta-mpls-mldp-up-redundancy-00.txt IETF-81 Pranjal Kumar Dutta Wim Henderickx Alcatel-Lucent.
Establishing P2MP MPLS TE LSPs draft-raggarwa-mpls-p2mp-te-02.txt Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks.
Connecting SPRING Islands over IP Networks draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-00 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Siva Sivabalan (Cisco) IETF89,
February 2006 MPLS Interop 2008 # 1 MPLS-TP OAM OAM for an MPLS Transport Profile Loa Andersson, Acreo AB IAB, MPLS WG co-chair.
82 nd Taipei Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Huawei.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions For Fast Reroute of Bidirectional Co-routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-00.txt Author list: Mike Taillon
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-03
draft-sitaraman-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-01
Konstantin agouros Omkar deshpande
Requirements for LER Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets
Residence Time Measurement draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-02
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-05
Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang - Infonet
P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels
RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-01 Author list: Rakesh.
draft-atlas-rtgwg-mrt-mc-arch-02
Presenter: Jeffrey Zhang
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
Use Cases for Using PCE to act as a Central Controller (PCECC) Component draft-zhao-teas-pce-central-controller-use-cases-00.txt 95th Buenos Aires.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-02
Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)
An analysis of scaling issues in MPLS-TE backbone networks
Yimin Shen (Juniper) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc)
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-04
PLR Designation in RSVP-TE FRR
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-06 Authors: Mike Taillon.
RFC 3036 FECs RFC 3036 defines FECs used to bind labels to address prefixes in routing table Two FECs defined: Address Prefix FEC Host Address FEC Not.
LDP Extensions for RMR draft-esale-mpls-ldp-rmr- extensions
Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter-domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-01.txt Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems.
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
CHAPTER 8 Network Management
N. Kumar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, Z. Ali (Presenter) - Cisco Systems
Zhenbin Li, Shunwan Zhuang Huawei Technologies
WG Document Status Compiled By: Matt Hartley, Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram IETF 99 - TEAS Working Group.
WG Document Status Compiled By: Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Encapsulation for BIER in Non-MPLS IPv6 Networks
draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-00
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-08 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-07 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-01
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
Ryan Zheng Lizhong Jin Thomas Nadeau George Swallow
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
YANG Data Models for TE <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-16> Latest YANG
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-08
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
Venkatesan Mahalingam
FlexE Design Team Presenter: Mach
draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-00
IP RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for P2P IP-TE LSP Tunnels Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Vishnu Pavan Beeram, Juniper.
draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo-02
Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang
Supporting Flexible Algorithm Prefix SIDs in LSP Ping/Traceroute
IETF-103, November 2018, Bangkok
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-21 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07 Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Rakesh.
Inter-AS OAM for SR Networks IETF 105, Montreal
Presentation transcript:

draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00 Node protection for RSVP-TE tunnels on a shared MPLS forwarding plane draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00 Chandra Ramachandran (csekar@juniper.net) Vishnu Pavan Beeram (vbeeram@juniper.net) Harish Sitaraman (hsitaraman@juniper.net)

draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00 Motivation With the procedures specified in [draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp- shared-labels], a shared MPLS forwarding plane can be realized by allowing the TE link label to be shared by LSPs traversing the link. Includes guidelines for providing facility backup link protection at a PLR. This draft proposes guidelines for providing facility backup node protection at a PLR for Segment Routed RSVP-TE tunnels.

Node Protection B C D E At PLR B: draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00 Node Protection At PLR B: Different node protecting bypass depending on next-next-hop LSR (MP) Cannot use the same TE link label for B-C for LSPs unless next-next-hop LSR is also shared Node protecting Bypass B-D 100 200 B C D 300 Node protecting Bypass B-E E

PLR Procedures for protecting Next-Hop Non-Delegation LSR draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00 PLR Procedures for protecting Next-Hop Non-Delegation LSR At LSR C, allocate: 321 for the TE link C-B to reach the next-next-hop LSR A 326 for the TE link C-B to reach the next-next-hop LSR F 345 for the TE link C-D to reach the next-next-hop LSR E 348 for the TE link C-D to reach the next-next-hop LSR H etc. Forwarding actions at PLR C: Pop the TE link label and forward the packet to the next-hop LSR Pop the TE link label and the label beneath it and forward the packet over the node protecting bypass tunnel to the next-next-hop LSR (Merge Point). 326 321 348 345 A B C D E 376 378 F G H I

PLR Procedures for protecting Next-Hop Delegation LSR draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00 PLR Procedures for protecting Next-Hop Delegation LSR ETLD: 2 DHLD: 2 ETLD: 1 DHLD: 2 ETLD: 2 DHLD: 4 ETLD: 1 DHLD: 4 ETLD: 4 DHLD: 4 1300d 1500d A B C D E F ETLD: 3 DHLD: 4 1900d L K J I H G ETLD: 2 DHLD:4 ETLD: 3 DHLD:4 ETLD: 4 DHLD: 4 ETLD: 1 DHLD: 4 ETLD: 2 DHLD: 4 ETLD at LSR C = MIN(computed ETLD = 4, previous hop DHLD = 2). Forwarding actions at PLR B: Pop the TE link label and forward the packet to the next-hop LSR C Pop the TE link label and the label beneath it and and push the label stack on behalf of the next hop delegation LSR C and forwards the packet over the node protecting bypass tunnel to the next-next-hop LSR D (Merge Point).

Backwards Compatibility draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00 Backwards Compatibility ETLD: 2 DHLD: 2 ETLD: 1 DHLD: 2 ETLD: 4 ETLD: 3 DHLD: 4 ETLD: 2 DHLD: 4 1300d A B C D E F ETLD: 1 DHLD: 4 1500d L K J I H G ETLD: 4 DHLD:4 ETLD: 1 DHLD:4 ETLD: 2 DHLD: 4 ETLD: 3 DHLD: 4 ETLD: 4 DHLD: 4 1700d Delegation hop C does not support the DHLD extensions and hence sets ETLD normally. B cannot push the entire label stack that C would push as a delegation hop. Instead, B can offer link protection.

Next Steps Request WG feedback draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00 Next Steps Request WG feedback