Math Compaction Mitch aulakh

Background Investigation of EAP Data and ongoing efforts to fully implement an integrated pathway Combined ready and conditional rates stayed high for our summative students How do we ensure that we continue to serve the students that are reaching for the highest level of math possible?

What Courses do Our Summative Students Take? MVUSD 2013-14 Summative Math Student Course Breakdown Course title Number Percent Adv Alg II/Trig 1 0.2% Adv Trig 76 14.0% AP Calculus AB 97 17.8% AP Calculus BC AP Statistics 12 2.2% Calculus 27 5.0% Other 11 2.0% Math Stdy IB SL Pre Calculus 291 53.5% Prob & Stats Total 544   25.2%

Comparing Old Methods 8th Grade Algebra 1 Pre-Algebra Grade 8* Algebra 1 (39.9% State) (37.1 % County) Grade 9 Geometry Grade 10 Algebra II Grade 11 Pre-Calc “The K-7 standards contain the prerequisites to prepare students for Algebra I by 8th grade…” pg. 84 *Data reflect CST taking rates for 2012-13

Comparing Old Methods 7th Grade Algebra 1 (6.0% State) (7.6% County) Grade 8 Geometry Grade 9 Algebra II Grade 10 Pre-Calc Grade 11 Calculus AB or BC *Data reflect CST taking rates for 2012-13

Breaking Down New Standards RP NS EE F G SP Total Grade 6 7 15 12 4 9 47 Grade 7 11 6 13 43 Grade 8 2 5 36 14 28 31 22 26 126 RN Q CN VM SSE APR CED REI IF BF LE TF Int 1 3 2 4 7 9 6 Int 2 5 1 8 Int 3 Total 11 12 25 CO SRT C GPE GMD MG ID IC CP MD Total Int 1 10 3 11 59 Int 2 9 5 2 68 Int 3 1 4 6 52 13 12 15 179

Integrated Math Rollout Implement one year of integrated pathway to start students on a cohort Mix of integrated and traditional math pathways temporarily At what point do we begin compaction? Do we double up on classes, create accelerated tracks, look for dual enrollment opportunities, etc…? What does the research say as far effective practices for acceleration?

Questions? maulakh@murrieta.k12.ca.us