An overview of real-time radar data handling and compression

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ground Based Meteorological Radars Presented By: David Franc NOAAs National Weather Service September 2005.
Advertisements

7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
NEXRAD TAC Norman, OK March 21-22, 2006 Clutter Mitigation Decision (CMD) system Status and Demonstration Studies Mike Dixon, Cathy Kessinger, and John.
Clear air echoes (few small insects) -12 dBZ. Echoes in clear air from insects Common is summer. Watch for echoes to expand area as sun sets and insects.
Review of the current and likely future global NWP requirements for Weather Radar data Enrico Fucile (ECMWF) Eric WATTRELOT & Jean-François MAHFOUF (Météo-France/CNRM/GMAP)
VCPs for Staggered PRT Sebastián Torres and David Warde CIMMS/NSSL Data Quality MOU – Technical Interchange Meeting Fall 2008.
© Crown copyright Met Office RAINGAIN Kick-Off Meeting Benefits of High Spatial and Temporal Resolution for Urban Catchments from existing Radars.
Improved Automation and Performance of VORTRAC Intensity Guidance Wen-Chau Lee (NCAR) Paul Harasti (NRL) Michael Bell ( U of Hawaii) Chris Landsea & Stacy.
Carlos A. Rodríguez Rivera Mentor: Dr. Robert Palmer Carlos A. Rodríguez Rivera Mentor: Dr. Robert Palmer Is Spectral Processing Important for Future WSR-88D.
School of Computing Science Simon Fraser University
Surveillance Weather Radar 2000 AD. Weather Radar Technology- Merits in Chronological Order WSR-57 WSR-88D WSR-07PD.
Basic RADAR Principles Prof. Sandra Cruz-Pol, Ph.D. Electrical and Computer Engineering UPRM.
11/18/02Technical Interchange Meeting Progress in FY-02 Research RDA –Capability to collect time series data –Control of phase shifter Phase coding –Sigmet’s.
Sebastián Torres Weather Radar Research Innovative Techniques to Improve Weather Observations.
WSR‐88D Dynamic Scanning
296.3Page 1 CPS 296.3:Algorithms in the Real World Data Compression: Lecture 2.5.
CODAR Ben Kravitz September 29, Outline What is CODAR? Doppler shift Bragg scatter How CODAR works What CODAR can tell us.
Oct. 12, National Severe Storms Laboratory & University of Oklahoma Information briefing to the NEXRAD Technical Advisory.
Image Compression Supervised By: Mr.Nael Alian Student: Anwaar Ahmed Abu-AlQomboz ID: IT College “Multimedia”
Marr CollegeHigher ComputingSlide 1 Higher Computing: COMPUTER SYSTEMS Part 1: Data Representation – 6 hours.
Real-time Doppler Wind Quality Control and Analysis Qin Xu National Severe Storms Laboratory/NOAA Pengfei Zhang, Shun Liu, and Liping Liu CIMMS/University.
RAdio Detection And Ranging. Was originally for military use 1.Sent out electromagnetic radiation (Active) 2.Bounced off an object and returned to a listening.
Initial Implementation of Super-Resolution Data on the NEXRAD Network Dr. Sebastian Torres CIMMS/NSSL A presentation to the Data Quality Team June 15,
Advances in digital image compression techniques Guojun Lu, Computer Communications, Vol. 16, No. 4, Apr, 1993, pp
CASA Update for MPAR Group David McLaughlin University of Massachusetts – Amherst V. Chandrasakar Colorado State University March 20, 2007 – OFCM/Silver.
EumetCal Examples.
WEATHER SIGNALS Chapter 4 (Focus is on weather signals or echoes from radar resolution volumes filled with countless discrete scatterers---rain, insects,
Class 9 LBSC 690 Information Technology Multimedia.
Technical Interchange Meeting – ROC / NSSL / NCAR ROC / NSSL / NCAR TIM Boulder CO 11 May 2005 Real-time time-series implementation of the Radar Echo Classifier.
CI VERIFICATION METHODOLOGY & PRELIMINARY RESULTS
JPEG Image Compression Standard Introduction Lossless and Lossy Coding Schemes JPEG Standard Details Summary.
Comp 335 File Structures Data Compression. Why Study Data Compression? Conserves storage space Files can be transmitted faster because there are less.
Principals of Radar. F NWS Radar Characteristics 28 foot dish Pulse Width 0.95° Peak Power 750kW –Avg. Power 1.5kW Discrete Pulse Transmissions.
Information Systems Design and Development Media Types Computing Science.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
Statistical Analysis of S-Pol Polarimetric Radar Data from NAME 2004 Timothy J. Lang, Robert Cifelli, Steven A. Rutledge, Angela Rowe, and Lee Nelson Colorado.
Travis Smith U. Of Oklahoma & National Severe Storms Laboratory Severe Convection and Climate Workshop 14 Mar 2013 The Multi-Year Reanalysis of Remotely.
Component 1.9 Security and Data Management
Monitoring weather and climate from space
A Moment Radar Data Emulator: The Current Progress and Future Direction Ryan M. May.
JPEG Compression What is JPEG? Motivation
Data Compression for PDS4
Weather Radar the WSR-88D
Data Compression.
Radar Observation of Severe Weather
JPEG.
Data Compression.
Data Compression CS 147 Minh Nguyen.
High resolution radar data and products over the Continental United States National Severe Storms Laboratory Norman OK, USA.
A Real-Time Automated Method to Determine Forecast Confidence Associated with Tornado Warnings Using Spring 2008 NWS Tornado Warnings John Cintineo Cornell.
Software Equipment Survey
An overview by: Thomas Jones December 2, 2002
Remote Demos Remote Demo.
the University of Oklahoma
Automated Extraction of Storm Characteristics
Why Compress? To reduce the volume of data to be transmitted (text, fax, images) To reduce the bandwidth required for transmission and to reduce storage.
HF Radar Systems Engineering Plan
Examples of spectral fields
Advanced Radar Systems
Topic 3: Data Compression.
A Real-Time Learning Technique to Predict Cloud-To-Ground Lightning
UNIT IV.
De-aliasing of Doppler radar winds
Judith Molka-Danielsen, Oct. 02, 2000
Weather Radar the WSR-88D
Deep Neural Networks for Onboard Intelligence
Aiding Severe Weather Forecasting
TELNET BY , S.AISHWARYA III-IT.
Govt. Polytechnic Dhangar(Fatehabad)
Using Industrial Operating Models for Cost Benefit Analysis
Presentation transcript:

An overview of real-time radar data handling and compression Valliappa Lakshmanan National Severe Storms Laboratory & University of Oklahoma http://cimms.ou.edu/~lakshman/ 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Real-time radar data handling and compression Data characteristics Real-time handling Compression Summary 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Operational radar network Weather Surveillance Radar 1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) 142 radars in CONUS 11 in Hawaii Alaska S-band Reflectivity to 460km Velocity to 230km 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Operational radar data Each radar operates according in one of several volume coverage patterns NWS forecast offices choose VCP for “their” radars All VCPs involve several elevation angles Resolution (current) 0.95 degrees 1km (ref) 0.25 km (velocity) Tilt in 20-60s Volume in 4-10 min Super-resolution 0.25km x 0.5 deg Faster VCPs 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Radar data: levels Level-I (or I&Q data) Signal processed at radar 64 values at each range gate Not transmitted/stored routinely Level-II (moment data) Reflectivity, Velocity, Spectrum Width 3 scalar values at each range gate (pixel) Distributed via LDM (more on this later) Level-III (products) Produced by algorithms in the Radar Product Generator Distributed via NOAA Port Somewhat obsolete, now that Level-II is available in real-time Better products can be created in real-time off-site 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Size of radar data Focus on Level II Size of radar data depends on the VCP Clear-air VCPs have fewer (4-5) tilts collected more slowly 7.1 MB in 990 seconds for VCP 31 0.6 GB per day Bandwidth: 7.3 kB/s Storm-type VCPs have more tilts, therefore more data 15 MB in 460 seconds for VCP 12 2.8 GB per day Bandwidth: 33.4 kB/s A CONUS radar processing system needs to process 142 radars On a typical storm day, 1/3 of CONUS radars are in storm mode: 200 GB Mean: 60.6 GB/day when compressed Bandwidth: 736 kB/s (peak: 1771 kB/s) 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Real-time radar data handling and compression Data characteristics Real-time handling Compression Summary 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Real-time Distribution 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Distribution: components Radar Interface and Data Distribution System (RIDDS) Taps into radar stream at RPG Transmits over NWS network to regional server Regional servers on Abilene network Load dependent on geography Southern region average bandwidth: 484 kB/s Western region average bandwidth: 74 kB/s Real-time data may be requested via Local Directory Manager (LDM) Developed by Unidata Peer-to-peer realtime data distribution Top-tier providers: Oklahoma, Purdue, Maryland Transmission is in chunks of radials (all 3 moments) 50 radials at a time Compressed using bzip2 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Real-time radar data handling and compression Data characteristics Real-time handling Compression Summary 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

bzip2! Not further compressible gzip bzip2 Linear prediction, Custom compression methods can work better than bzip2 Example: V. Lakshmanan, “Lossless coding and compression of radar reflectivity data,” in 30th International Conference on Radar Meteorology, pp. 50–52, American Meteorological Society, (Munich), July 2001 Not further compressible gzip bzip2 Linear prediction, Run length encoding, Huffman coding 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

So why bzip2? Order of improvement of custom compression over bzip2: 10% Maintenance of compress/uncompress software has significant costs Every user of radar data would have to implement uncompress code Costs are spread out over many organizations: really adds up 10% decrease in bandwidth/space not worth the increased cost Would be different if this would bring bandwidth below some cost point Example: T1 line or dial-up? Choose among publicly available, non-proprietary compression formats gzip, bzip2, etc. Burrows-Wheeler (bzip2) performs best, so chosen 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Preprocessing Some preprocessing done at radar site to improve compressibility Level I: signal-to-noise threshold Level II: height threshold Both done at radar site Part of radar system No cost on part of users Compression algorithm is still bzip2 Theoretically “lossy” compression But loss is on part of image not useful to end-users (JPEG?) 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Compressibility But … Compression has uses beyond saving storage and bandwidth The ideas behind compressibility have wider use 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Instrument artifacts Mostly good data Instrument artifact 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Quality control of radar data QC needs to be done before data are fed to automated algorithms Done by means of machine intelligence algorithms Helps distinguish ground clutter, biological contamination etc. But … Hard to distinguish between stratiform rain and instrument artifacts Both fill the radar volume With reflectivity values around 30-50 dBZ Velocity and spectrum width do not help Texture-based quality control doesn’t help Reflectivity fields in both cases are locally smooth 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Shannon entropy Theoretical maximum compressibility based on information content No need to actually compress file Simply compute Shannon’s information measure (entropy) The information content in the two fields (globally) is different Stratiform rain has high information content Even if most of the radar volume is not filled Instrument artifacts have low information content Even though most of the radar volume is filled Can easily detect changes in entropy Reject instrument artifacts even if it comes during a time period of rain 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Real-time radar data handling and compression Data characteristics Real-time handling Compression Summary 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu

Summary Radar data is transmitted routinely in real-time to interested users Compressed in chunks of 50 radials each Peer-to-peer sharing (software: LDM) Compressed using bzip2 Custom compression techniques are not cost-effective Perform better than bzip2 But incremental (10%) improvement not worth the increased cost Compression ideas have other uses For example in quality control of radar data 11/24/2018 lakshman@ou.edu