Le spectre des GRBs dans le modèle EMBH

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GRB : A step in the proof of the uniqueness of the overall GRB structure R. Ruffini, M.G. Bernardini, C.L. Bianco, L. Caito, P. Chardonnet, F. Fraschetti,
Advertisements

GRB : a canonical fake short burst L. Caito, M.G. Bernardini, C.L. Bianco, M.G. Dainotti, R. Guida, R. Ruffini. 3 rd Stueckelberg Workshop July 8–18,
The Science of Gamma-Ray Bursts: caution, extreme physics at play Bruce Gendre ARTEMIS.
Who are the usual suspects? Type I Supernovae No fusion in white dwarf, star is supported only by electron degeneracy pressure. This sets max mass for.
Bruce Gendre Osservatorio di Roma / ASI Science Data Center Recent activities from the TAROT/Zadko network.
2009 July 8 Supernova Remants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era 1 Modeling the Dynamical and Radiative Evolution of a Pulsar Wind Nebula inside.
Accretion in Binaries Two paths for accretion –Roche-lobe overflow –Wind-fed accretion Classes of X-ray binaries –Low-mass (BH and NS) –High-mass (BH and.
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Tsvi Piran Re’em Sari 2nd EUL Workshop on Gamma-Ray Bursts.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Re’em Sari Tsvi Piran GRBs in the Era of Rapid Follow-up.
Electron-positron pair productions in gravitational collapses In collaboration with Wen-Biao Han, & Remo Ruffini ICRANet & Physics Department, University.
Spectral Energy Correlations in BATSE long GRB Guido Barbiellini and Francesco Longo University and INFN, Trieste In collaboration with A.Celotti and Z.Bosnjak.
Gamma-ray bursts Discovered in 1968 by Vela spy satellites
1 Origin of Variability of X-ray and γ-ray Spectra on Daily Scale Radovan Milinčić Astrophysics 711 May 3 rd 2005.
Temporal evolution of thermal emission in GRBs Based on works by Asaf Pe’er (STScI) in collaboration with Felix Ryde (Stockholm) & Ralph Wijers (Amsterdam),
Kick of neutron stars as a possible mechanism for gamma-ray bursts Yong-Feng Huang Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University.
G.E. Romero Instituto Aregntino de Radioastronomía (IAR), Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas, University of La Plata, Argentina.
The general theory of relativity is our most accurate description of gravitation Published by Einstein in 1915, this is a theory of gravity A massive object.
Gamma Ray Bursts and LIGO Emelie Harstad University of Oregon HEP Group Meeting Aug 6, 2007.
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: High Energy I: Gamma-Ray Bursts Geoff Bower.
Gamma Ray Bursts A High Energy Mystery By Tessa Vernstrom Ast 4001, Fall 2007 A High Energy Mystery By Tessa Vernstrom Ast 4001, Fall 2007.
Ch. 5 - Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
Modelling the GRB light curves using a shock wave model
July 2004, Erice1 The performance of MAGIC Telescope for observation of Gamma Ray Bursts Satoko Mizobuchi for MAGIC collaboration Max-Planck-Institute.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed with INTEGRAL and XMM- Newton Sinead McGlynn School of Physics University College Dublin.
She-Sheng XUE ICRANet, Pescara, Italy how the gravitational energy transfers to the electromagnetic energy for Gamma-Ray-Bursts. 1) Electron-positron production,
Review for Quiz 2. Outline of Part 2 Properties of Stars  Distances, luminosities, spectral types, temperatures, sizes  Binary stars, methods of estimating.
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by XMM-Newton Paul O’Brien X-ray and Observational Astronomy Group, University of Leicester Collaborators:- James Reeves, Darach.
Gamma-Ray Bursts Energy problem and beaming * Mergers versus collapsars GRB host galaxies and locations within galaxy Supernova connection Fireball model.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
Is GRB050509b a genuine short? Gustavo de Barros, Maria Grazia Bernardini, Carlo Luciano bianco, Roberto Guida, Remo Ruffini.
Stochastic Wake Field particle acceleration in GRB G. Barbiellini (1), F. Longo (1), N.Omodei (2), P.Tommasini (3), D.Giulietti (3), A.Celotti (4), M.Tavani.
Primordial black holes B. Czerny Copernicus Astronomical Center, Warsaw on behalf of collaboration: D. Cline, B. Czerny, A. Dobrzycki, A. Janiuk, C. Matthey,
Gamma–Ray Bursts, Massive Cores and Particle Physics Remo Ruffini Dipartimento di Fisica – Università di Roma “La Sapienza” ICRANet – Pescara ICRANet –
Gamma-Ray Bursts. Short (sub-second to minutes) flashes of gamma- rays, for ~ 30 years not associated with any counterparts in other wavelength bands.
Alessandra Corsi (1,2) Dafne Guetta (3) & Luigi Piro (2) (1)Università di Roma Sapienza (2)INAF/IASF-Roma (3)INAF/OAR-Roma Fermi Symposium 2009, Washington.
Physical parameters of the relativistic shells in the GRBs S. Simić 1, L. Grassitelli 2 and L. Č. Popović 3,4 1) Faculty of Science, Department of Physics,
GRB and GRB A the flares and the spectral lag M.G. Dainotti M.G.Bernardini, C.L.Bianco, L. Caito, R. Guida, R.Ruffini.
Stochastic wake field particle acceleration in Gamma-Ray Bursts Barbiellini G., Longo F. (1), Omodei N. (2), Giulietti D., Tommassini P. (3), Celotti A.
High energy Astrophysics Mat Page Mullard Space Science Lab, UCL 7. Supernova Remnants.
Chapter 20 Cosmology. Hubble Ultra Deep Field Galaxies and Cosmology A galaxy’s age, its distance, and the age of the universe are all closely related.
Gamma-ray bursts Tomasz Bulik CAM K, Warsaw. Outline ● Observations: prompt gamma emission, afterglows ● Theoretical modeling ● Current challenges in.
She-Sheng XUE ICRANet, Pescara, Italy How the gravitational energy transfers to the electromagnetic energy for Gamma-Ray-Bursts. 1)Electron-positron production,
The Dark Universe Susan Cartwright.
What GRBs can bring to Particle Astrophysics
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
Analogy between laser plasma acceleration and GRB
Lecture 5 Multi-wavelength cosmic background
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Brennan Hughey for the IceCube Collaboration
STARS Visual Vocabulary.
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
Neutrinos as probes of ultra-high energy astrophysical phenomena
GRB-Supernova observations: State of the art
Brennan Hughey for the IceCube Collaboration
PHY 712 Electrodynamics 9-9:50 AM MWF Olin 105 Plan for Lecture 25:
Modelling of non-thermal radiation from pulsar wind nebulae
Photosphere Emission in Gamma-Ray Bursts
Can we probe the Lorentz factor of gamma-ray bursts from GeV-TeV spectra integrated over internal shocks ? Junichi Aoi (YITP, Kyoto Univ.) co-authors:
Afterglow Radiation from Gamma-Ray Bursts
Center for Computational Physics
Nucleosynthesis in jets from Collapsars
Lecture 4: Light extinction: Compton scattering Gamma-Ray Bursts.
Black Holes Escape velocity Event horizon Black hole parameters
PHY 712 Electrodynamics 9-9:50 AM MWF Olin 103 Plan for Lecture 26:
GRB spectral evolution: from complex profile to basic structure
Accelerator Physics Synchrotron Radiation
Stochastic Wake Field particle acceleration in GRB
Presentation transcript:

Le spectre des GRBs dans le modèle EMBH Pascal Chardonnet LAPTH + Collaboration Roma La Sapienza POLAR - January, 18 2008

Discovery of GRBs GRBs unknown until the end of ‘60 neither predicted by astrophysical or cosmological models Discovery by chance by Vela satellite (1973) I revolution (BATSE satellite, ‘90): isotropy of spatial distribution II revolution (BeppoSAX, 1997): discovery of afterglow X cosmological distance (z order of 1)

The EMBH model 1) Spherical symmetry for all the phases. 2) Magnetohydrodynamics and pair equations for the evolution of the plasma in the optically thick phase. Fully radiative condition for the energy emission in the afterglow. 3) nism = 1 particle/cm3 i.e. a constant density interstellar medium. - “Relative Space Time Transformations” (RSTT) paradigm (Ruffini et al., ApJ 555, L107, 2001) - “Interpretation of the Burst Structure” (IBS) paradigm (Ruffini et al., ApJ 555, L113, 2001) - “GRB-supernova Time Sequence” (GSTS) paradigm (Ruffini et al., ApJ 555, L117, 2001)

inhomogeneity of interstellar medium Assumptions Spherical symmetry “Fully radiative” condition Temporal variability of light curve due to inhomogeneity of interstellar medium Thermal distribution of energy in comoving frame

Parameters of the model Edya is the total energy emitted by source B= MBc2/Edya parametrizes baryonic matter protostellar not collapsed R = Aeff/Atot indicates the porosity of interstellar medium <nism> is the particle number density of interstellar medium Edya B

Temporal structure of GRB Collision with baryonic remnant Increase of opacity of pulse Conversion of internal energy in kinetic energy Edya Short GRB Long GRB

The bolometric luminosity of the source Where: De = internal energy developed in the ABM - ISM collision. L = g (1 - (v/c) cosJ) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, ApJ, 581, L19, (2002) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Vitagliano, Xue, “Cosmology and Gravitation”, AIP, (2003)

Bolometric light curve Edya= 4.83 ´1053 erg B = 3.0 ´10-3

GRB 991216 BATSE noise threshold Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, 2001b, ApJ, 555, L113

GRB 991216 A B C D

Temporal substructure of peak D

Emitted luminosity Thermal distribution of energy in comoving system: Tarris the temperature of radiation emitted by dS and observed on the Earth

Luminosity and spectrum:GRB991216 Peak Afterglow c2 = 0.497 GRB 980425, 030329, 031203, 980519, 970228,…

Hard-to-Soft evolution Spectral evolution Hard-to-Soft evolution Time integrated spectrum Non-thermal observed spectrum GRB 980425, 030329, 031203, 980519, 970228,…

Swift era Model verified in a precedently unobserved temporal window (102 -104 sec) Structure of light curve afterglow simply explained the claimed breaks in light curves GRB050315

Conclusions The model presented builts the whole temporal evolution of the GRB, from the progenitor to the non-relativistic phase of the afterglow. Interpretation of temporal structure of GRB: P-GRB e E-APE. The temporal variability of light curve traces the inomogeneities of ISM. Afterglow observations are compatible with thermal spectrum in pulse comoving system. No polarization predicted

Equations for afterglow In the laboratory system with

Arrival time (ta) vs. emission time (t) Power-law slope in the afterglow: Approximate ta computation: Exact ta computation: The observed one is: -1.616 ± 0.067 (Halpern et al, 2000) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, 2002a, A&A, submitted to

Power law of Lorentz g factor (I) Inelastic collision of expanding shell with an infinitesimally thick shell of ISM of mass dm at rest. Energy-momentum conservation and increment of mass: from 1) 3) g0 >> g>> 1

Power law of Lorentz g factor (II) B=10-3 For g0 ~200, power law different from the predicted one (g0 >> g >> 1 not satisfied). The predicted power laws in limits adiabatic and fully radiative are reached only when g tends to infinity and only in a limited region. B=10-6

Prototype GRB 991216 One of the most energetic GRB ever observd: Etot@1053ergs, z = 1.0. Details on temporal structure by BATSE and on afterglow by satellites R-XTE and Chandra (Iron lines). Power law index for afterglow: n=-1.616 ± 0.067.

GRB 991216 - IBS paradigm BATSE noise threshold Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, 2001b, ApJ, 555, L113

GRB 980425 - SN1998bw: A newly formed neutron star (Pian) The newly formed neutron star:

The luminosity of GRB 030329 and SN 2003dh in the EMBH model

The ISM inhomogeneity “mask” <nism> = 1 particle/cm3 i.e. an interstellar medium with variable density but average density of 1 particle/cm3. g = 139.9 g = 200.5 DR= 1015 cm g = 265.4 g = 303.8 g = 57.23 g = 56.24

The ABM pulse visible area Invisible Visible

The observed luminosity: two different time scales t is the photon emission time from the source. tad is the photon arrival time at the detector. Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, ApJ, 555, L107, (2001)

Arrival time ta vs. emission time t Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, ApJ, 555, L107, (2001) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. D, 12, 173, (2003) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Vitagliano, Xue, “Cosmology and Gravitation”, AIP, (2003)

Arrival time ta vs. emission time t Afterglow power-law slope for GRB 991216: Approximate ta computation: Exact ta computation: Observed slope: -1.616 ± 0.067 (Halpern et al, 2000) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. D, 12, 173, (2003) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Vitagliano, Xue, “Cosmology and Gravitation”, AIP, (2003)

Angular dispersion Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, ApJ, 581, L19, (2002) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Vitagliano, Xue, “Cosmology and Gravitation”, AIP, (2003)

The Equitemporal Surfaces Constant speed (r = vt): Ellipsoids of constant eccentricity v/c Numerical integration General case: Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, ApJ, 581, L19, (2002) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Vitagliano, Xue, “Cosmology and Gravitation”, AIP, (2003)

ABM Pulse visible area Invisible Visible Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, ApJ, 581, L19, (2002) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Vitagliano, Xue, “Cosmology and Gravitation”, AIP, (2003)

The bolometric luminosity of the source Where: De = internal energy developed in the ABM - ISM collision. L = g (1 - (v/c) cosJ) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, ApJ, 581, L19, (2002) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Vitagliano, Xue, “Cosmology and Gravitation”, AIP, (2003)

Arrival time ta vs. emission time t + D R r a 1 £ g £ 310 t R D t a t t + D r g @ 4 Rees, Nature, 211, 468, (1966) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, ApJ, 555, L107, (2001) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. D, 12, 173, (2003) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Vitagliano, Xue, “Cosmology and Gravitation”, AIP, (2003)

Relativistic contraction or classical Doppler effect? Doppler contraction: where: - g is the gamma Lorentz factor of the moving source, - T0 is the period of the radiation measured in the comoving frame, - T is the period of the radiation measured by an observer at rest. The arrival time relation: is then just a classical Doppler contraction and has nothing to do with special relativistic effects.

The initial conditions in the EMBH model: The Dyadosphere +Q -Q Preparata, Ruffini, Xue, 1998, A&A 338, L87 see also Ruffini, Vitagliano, Xue, in preparation + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - The initial conditions in the EMBH model: e+e- plasma

R. Ruffini, J.A. Wheeler, “Introducing the Black Hole”, Physics Today, January 1971

Theoretical background of the EMBH model + - Heisenberg, Euler, 1935 Schwinger, 1951 Christodoulou, Ruffini, 1971 Damour & Ruffini 1974 In a Kerr-Newmann black hole vacuum polarization process occurs if 3.2MSun £ MBH £ 7.2·106MSun Maximum energy extractable 1.8·1054 (MBH/MSun) ergs “…naturally leads to a most simple model for the explanation of the recently discovered g-rays bursts”

Theoretical model GRBs originate from the vacuum polarization process á la Heisenberg-Euler-Schwinger in the space-time surrounding a non-rotating electromagnetic black hole Collision PEMB pulse ABM pulse PEM pulse

Observations Irregularity of temporal profile of single event and variability of temporal profile between different events Bimodal distribution of duration Observed spectrum non-thermal..

The g Lorentz factor Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, ApJ, 555, L113, (2001) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. D, 12, 173, (2003) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Vitagliano, Xue, “Cosmology and Gravitation”, AIP, (2003)

Arrival time ta vs. emission time t D D D t a t + D t D t a t t + D r g @ 4 Dta = Dt Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, ApJ, 555, L107, (2001) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Xue, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. D, 12, 173, (2003) Ruffini, Bianco, Chardonnet, Fraschetti, Vitagliano, Xue, “Cosmology and Gravitation”, AIP, (2003)

GRB 991216 BATSE noise threshold

The “Equitemporal” surfaces Invisible region