Working Group Re-charter Draft Charter Reference Materials

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
May 2010 Slide 1 SG Communications Boot Camp Matt Gillmore 03/07/11.
Advertisements

PNFS, 61 th IETF, DC1 pNFS: Requirements 61 th IETF – DC November 10, 2004.
0 Chicago, IL March 6 th, 2007 Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection HITSP Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection Date:
CCAMP Working Group Milestone Discussion IETF 84 84th IETF CCAMP Working Group 1.
A Framework for Management and Control of Optical Interfaces supporting G draft-kunze-g management-control-framework-02 March rd IETF.
CLUE Framework IETF 84 July 30 – Aug 3, 2012 Mark Duckworth Allyn Romanow Brian Baldino Andy Pepperell.
SIP working group status Keith Drage, Dean Willis.
WG RAQMON Internet-Drafts RMON MIB WG Meeting Washington, Nov. 11, 2004.
MANET Where are we? Where are we going? Adrian Farrel Routing AD Honolulu – November 2015 – IETF-91.
11 Technical Session 3 – Rulemaking Process: NRC and Industry Perspectives on Improving Quality, Timeliness, and Consistency in 10 CFR 50.55a Raymond (Ray)
Doc: Submission September 2003 Dorothy Stanley (Agere Systems) IETF Liaison Report September 2003 Dorothy Stanley – Agere Systems IEEE.
SIPREC Conference Recording (draft-kyzivat-siprec-conference-use-cases-01) IETF 89, March 7, 2014 Authors: Michael Yan, Paul Kyzivat, Simon Romano.
Submission February 2010 Don Sturek, PG&ESlide 1 Submission Title: [OpenSG San Francisco Bootcamp – Network Interoperability] Date Submitted: [February.
1 What’s Next for Financial Management Line of Business (FMLoB)? AGA/GWSCPA 6 th Annual Conference Dianne Copeland, Director, FSIO May 8, 2007.
Submission February 2014 Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AR 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
IETF Trade WG Adelaide, South Australia 29 March 2000 Donald E. Eastlake, 3rd
July 27, 2009IETF NEA Meeting1 NEA Working Group IETF 75 Co-chairs: Steve Hanna
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Liaison Report Date Submitted: July 20, 2006 Presented at IEEE.
RADEXT WG IETF 91 Rechartering. Why? Current charter doesn’t allow us to take on new work that is waiting in the queue Has an anachronistic Diameter entanglement.
NFSv4 Namespace & Migration Charles Fan Rainfinity.
IETF-90 (Toronto) DHC WG Meeting Wednesday, July 23, GMT IETF-90 DHC WG1 Last Updated: 07/21/ :10 EDT.
Abierman-netconf-mar07 1 NETCONF WG 68 th IETF Prague, CZ March 19, 2007.
File: /ram/wgchairs.sxi Date: 7 January, 2016 Slide 1 Process and Tools (PROTO) Team General Area Meeting IETF59, Seoul, Korea -- March 2004
RObust Header Compression WG (ROHC) 66 th IETF Montreal, Canada, July 11, 2006 Meeting Chair: Carsten Bormann WG Chair: Lars-Erik Jonsson.
Requirements and Selection Process for RADIUS Crypto-Agility December 5, 2007 David B. Nelson IETF 70 Vancouver, BC.
SE513 Software Quality Assurance Lecture10: Documentation and Quality Records Control Galin, SQA from Theory to Education Limited.
68th IETF Prague March 2007 Agenda and WG Status On-line Agenda and Slides at:
Internet and Management Support for Storage (IMSS) Working Group Elizabeth Rodriguez, Chair Charter: Subscribe.
IDR WG Document Status Update Sue Hares, Yakov Rekhter November 2005.
Traceroute Storage Format and Metrics draft-niccolini-ippm-storetraceroutes-03 Saverio Niccolini, Sandra Tartarelli, Juergen Quittek Network Laboratories,
IPCDN Working Group cable-gateway MIBs Update 57 th IETF Vienna, Austria July 16, 2003 Kevin Luehrs Project Director, CableHome Engineering CableLabs.
May 2010 Slide 1 SG Communications Boot Camp Matt Gillmore 11/1/2010.
IETF 83 CloudLog Gene Golovinsky March 25-30, 2012.
1 Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses Jung-Soo Park, Myung-Ki Shin ETRI 54th IETF – Yokohama, Japan draft-ietf-ipv6-link-scoped-mcast-01.txt.
Goals: WGLC draft-ietf-lemonade-goals-04 Kue Wong
RADEXT WG RADIUS Attribute Guidelines
Documentation control
SCC P2P – Collaboration Made Easy Contract Management training
NFS Version 4 WG 55th IETF Brian Pawlowski – co-chair
ATIS Cybersecurity DOCUMENT #: GSC13-GTSC6-12 FOR: Presentation
WG Technical Editor’s Report
Legacy NFS provides sharing, but does not scale
CAPWAP Working Group IETF 66 Montreal
IP Telephony (iptel) IETF 56
draft-xie-ccamp-lsp-dppm-01.txt Presenter: Dan Li Authors: Guowu Xie
Migration-Issues-xx Where it’s been and might be going
draft-ipdvb-sec-01.txt ULE Security Requirements
WG Technical Editor’s Report
STIR WG IETF-100 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-01) November, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das,
By co-authors Sheng Jiang & Toerless Eckert
ECN Experimentation draft-black-ecn-experimentation
David Noveck IETF99 at Prague July 20, 2017
Multi-server Namespace in NFSv4.x Previous and Pending Updates
STIR WG IETF-99 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-00) July, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das, and An.
March 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SG FANE PAR & CSD Comment resolution March.
Bev Crair Engineering Manager Sun Microsystems, Inc.
STIR WG IETF-102 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-06) July 18, 2018 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das, and.
PNFS Block Status - EMC.
March 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SG FANE PAR & CSD Comment resolution March.
NDIA PMSC Guides Working Group
WLTP GTR 15 WLTP-09-18e Report by Drafting Coordinator, Serge Dubuc
Global Grid Forum (GGF) Orientation
WG Technical Editor’s Report
Major PAR form questions
IETF Liaison Report January 2004 Dorothy Stanley – Agere Systems
IETF-104 (Prague) DHC WG Next steps
RFC 4601 Revision Prague, March 2011 Rishabh Parekh (Cisco)
TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (TCPM) Working Group Status
IETF 87 DHC WG Berlin, Germany Thursday, 1 August, 2013
HOME AFFAIRS IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (hanis)
Presentation transcript:

Working Group Re-charter Draft Charter Reference Materials David Noveck IETF99 at Prague July 20, 2017

Current Draft Charter Proposal General Section NFS Version 4 is the IETF standard  for file sharing. To maintain NFS Version 4's utility and currency, the working group is chartered to maintain the existing NFSv4.0, NFSv4.1, and NFSv4.2 protocols and specifications of related ONC components such as those defining RPC, XDR, and RPCSECGSS. In addition, extensions will be developed, as necessary, to correct problems with the protocols as currently specified, to accommodate needed file system semantics, and to respond to technological developments in the areas of networking and persistent storage/memory. 7/20/2017 IETF99 nfsv4wg -- Draft Charter Reference Materials

Current Draft Charter Proposal Maintenance Section (Slide one of two) The working group has found that as NFSv4 implementations mature and deployments continue, clarifications and corrections to existing RFCs are needed. These specification updates help vendors in delivering high-quality and interoperable implementations.  The working group is chartered with the vetting of the issues and determining correctness of submitted errata. The working group is also responsible for approving changes to RPC- and NFS-related IANA registries. 7/20/2017 IETF99 nfsv4wg -- Draft Charter Reference Materials

Current Draft Charter Proposal Maintenance Section (Slide two of two) In addition, some areas may need more concentrated work to correct the specifications already published, to deal with unanticipated interactions between features, or to respond to changed IESG expectations with regard to areas such as security.  Since necessary changes in such cases are generally not appropriate for the errata system, the working group will assist in publication of best practices RFCs and of RFCs that provide editorial modification or technical updates to original RFCs.  Since the new NFSv4 versioning framework has been approved, such technical updates to NFSv4 minor versions could include limited XDR changes. 7/20/2017 IETF99 nfsv4wg -- Draft Charter Reference Materials

Current Draft Charter Proposal Extension Section (Slide one of two) The NFSv4 protocol is designed to allow extension by the addition of new operations, new attributes, the creation of minor versions, and the definition of new pNFS layout types.  Similarly, associated ONC protocol components that have a versioning/extension  framework can be incrementally extended, when necessary. The working group will discuss proposals for such extensions and assure they have adequate technical review, including discussion of their interaction with existing features, before adopting them as working group items and helping to draft specification documents. 7/20/2017 IETF99 nfsv4wg -- Draft Charter Reference Materials

Current Draft Charter Proposal Extension Section (Slide two of two) Some likely motivations for such extensions would be to: Maximize NFS performance on advanced network fabrics. Accommodate new storage technologies. Provide facilities useful in management of NFS-accessed storage in large-scale virtualization environments. Provide more effective NFS response to security challenges. 7/20/2017 IETF99 nfsv4wg -- Draft Charter Reference Materials

Current Draft Milestone Proposal Because the previous charter was at variance with the work the group was actually doing, the list of pending milestones that can determined now is quite limited.  To accommodate this situation and in light of the fact that maintenance activities are inherently unpredictable, new milestones that fall within the scope specified within the charter can be added after working group consensus on acceptance and approval by the responsible Area Director. Date               Milestone March 2018    WGLC for draft-ietf-nfsv4-migration-issues (Informational) 7/20/2017 IETF99 nfsv4wg -- Draft Charter Reference Materials