Studying Hector: meteorology and tracer transport

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
Advertisements

The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
R. Forbes, 17 Nov 09 ECMWF Clouds and Radiation University of Reading ECMWF Cloud and Radiation Parametrization: Recent Activities Richard Forbes, Maike.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
Hector simulation We found simulation largely depending on: Model initialization scheme Lateral boundary conditions Physical processes represented in the.
Introduction. A major focus of SCOUT-O3 is the tropics and a key issue here is testing how well existing global 3D models perform in this region. This.
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
Stratosphere–Troposphere Exchange: Isabel RamosÁlvaro.
Forecasting and Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) NOWcasting Description of atmospheric models Specific Models Types of variables and how to determine.
Numerical simulations of the severe rainfall in Pula, Croatia, on 25 th September 2010 Antonio Stanešić, Stjepan Ivatek-Šahdan, Martina Tudor and Dunja.
WWOSC 2014, Aug 16 – 21, Montreal 1 Impact of initial ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model.
ISDA 2014, Feb 24 – 28, Munich 1 Impact of ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model Florian.
Cloud Resolving Model Studies of Tropical Deep Convection Observed During HIBISCUS By Daniel Grosvenor, Thomas W. Choularton, & Hugh Coe - The University.
MIR OZONE ISSUES Horizontal (STE) and vertical transport (long life time in UTLS) Photochemical production by precursors (biomass burning, lightning,..)
In this study, HWRF model simulations for two events were evaluated by analyzing the mean sea level pressure, precipitation, wind fields and hydrometeors.
Workshop Bauru STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF THE 8 FEB 2001 CONVECTIVE SYSTEM ON THE UTLS AIR COMPOSITION V. Marécal 1, E. D. Rivière 1, G. Held 2, S.
Profilers & Surface Gauges NE Corner of Stuart Hwy & McMillans 2835-MHz Precip. Profiler: km 920-MHz Wind Profiler: km 50-MHz Wind Profiler:
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
13 June, 2013 Dymecs Meeting, Reading Tropical convective organisation in the UM Chris Holloway NCAS-Climate, Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading.
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
For more information about this poster please contact Gerard Devine, School of Earth and Environment, Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Towards parametrized GEC current sources for the CESM model FESD project meeting February 2014 Wiebke Deierling, Andreas Baumgaertner, Tina Kalb.
COST 723 WORKSHOP – SOFIA, BULGARIA MAY 2006 USE OF RADIOSONDE DATA FOR VALIDATION OF REGIONAL CLIMATE MODELLING SIMULATIONS OVER CYPRUS Panos Hadjinicolaou.
On the Definition of Precipitation Efficiency Sui, C.-H., X. Li, and M.-J. Yang, 2007: On the definition of precipitation efficiency. J. Atmos. Sci., 64,
Three real case simulations by Meso-NH validated against satellite observations J.-P. Chaboureau and J.-P. Pinty Laboratoire d’Aérologie, Toulouse 1.Elbe.
APR CRM simulations of the development of convection – some sensitivities Jon Petch Richard Forbes Met Office Andy Brown ECMWF October 29 th 2003.
Oct. 28 th th SRNWP, Bad Orb H.-S. Bauer, V. Wulfmeyer and F. Vandenberghe Comparison of different data assimilation techniques for a convective.
Trials of a 1km Version of the Unified Model for Short Range Forecasting of Convective Events Humphrey Lean, Susan Ballard, Peter Clark, Mark Dixon, Zhihong.
Joint SRNWP/COST-717 WG-3 session, Lisbon Stefan Klink Data Assimilation Section Early results with rainfall assimilation.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 DEVELOPMENT OF 1- 4KM RESOLUTION DATA ASSIMILATION FOR NOWCASTING AT THE MET OFFICE Sue Ballard, September 2005 Z. Li, M.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Simulations of MAP IOPs with Lokal Modell: impact of nudging on forecast precipitation Francesco Boccanera, Andrea Montani ARPA – Servizio Idro-Meteorologico.
Remote sensing and modeling of cloud contents and precipitation efficiency Chung-Hsiung Sui Institute of Hydrological Sciences National Central University.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 Precipitating Shallow Cumulus Case Intercomparison For the 9th GCSS Boundary Layer Cloud Workshop, September 2006, GISS.
High resolution models: Tropical Convection and Transport through the Tropical Tropopause Layer Maria Russo, Scott Hosking, Peter Braesicke, John Pyle.
© Crown copyright Met Office Convection Permitting Modelling Humphrey Lean et al. Reading, UK Leeds April 2014.
Grupo de Meteorologia e Climatologia na Universidade de Aveiro Alfredo Rocha, Tiago Luna, Juan Ferreira, Ana Carvalho and João.
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
Numerical simulations of the severe rainfall in Pula, Croatia, on 25 th September 2010 Antonio Stanešić, Stjepan Ivatek-Šahdan, Martina Tudor and Dunja.
Diagnosing the Intensity of Super Typhoon Haiyan
Characteristics of precipitating convection in the UM at Δx≈200m-2km
B3. Microphysical Processes
A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California
Evaluation of TM5 performance for assimilation purpose
Tropical Convection and MJO
Tropical Convective Transport and TTL Structure in the UM global model
WRF model runs of 2 and 3 August
Verification of dynamically downscaled results around Japan Islands
Daniel Kirk-Davidoff (University of Maryland) Amy Solomon (NOAA PSD)
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
Convective Scale Modelling Humphrey Lean et. al
Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia
COPE: The COnvective Precipitation Experiment. Met Office interests
The representation of ice hydrometeors in ECHAM-HAM
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
WRF Modelling of Volcanic Ash Dispersion
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms
Inna M. Gubenko and Konstantin G
Convective and orographically-induced precipitation study
Extratropical stratoshere-troposphere exchange in a 20-km-mesh AGCM
Sensitivity of WRF microphysics to aerosol concentration
A CASE STUDY OF GRAVITY WAVE GENERATION BY HECTOR CONVECTION
Cloud fraction and Ice Water Content in Various Weather Regimes
Effects of 3D radiation on cloud evolution
Lightning Assimilation Techniques
Kurowski, M .J., K. Suselj, W. W. Grabowski, and J. Teixeira, 2018
Sensitivity to WRF microphysics/ Cu parametrisation
Presentation transcript:

Studying Hector: meteorology and tracer transport Maria Russo1, Charles Chemel2, John Pyle1 NCAS Climate, University of Cambridge NCAS Weather, University of Hertfordshire Manchester, 21 May 2009

Overview Hector case study 30 Nov ‘05. In collaboration with Charles Chemel Models: WRF and UKMO-UM at 1km resolution Impact of Hector on UTLS water vapour Effect of resolution and convective parametrisation on the vertical transport of tracers Model: UKMO-UM at 60, 12 and 1km Using passive tracers with 6hr lifetime to study fast transport processes

“Quantifying the imprint of a severe Hector Thunderstorm during ACTIVE/SCOUT-O3 onto the Water Content in the UTLS” Chemel et al., Monthly Weather Review, in press 1. Hector case study: 30 Nov ’05 Horizontal resolution: 1km Vertical resolution in UTLS: 100m for WRF and 500m for UM Simulation started: 28 Nov for WRF, 29 Nov for UM Initial and lateral boundary data: ECMWF for WRF, UKMet Office for UM

Precipitation rate (mm/hr) Radar data WRF UM

Hygrometeors CPOL Radar data WRF UM

The effect of Hector on the water vapour in the UTLS Water vapour difference between 18:30 and 15:30 LT

Conclusions Hector was simulated with WRF and UM and results have been compared to observations Both models get a realistic timing of convection but WRF overestimates precipitation while the UM underestimates it. The top of the storm is similar in the 2 models, but the vertical distribution of hygrometeors is quite different. In both models Hector produces a moistening of the UTLS, although the moistening is larger with the UM than with WRF

Effect of resolution and convective parametrisation on the vertical transport of tracers GLOBAL FORECAST ~60km 12km 1km

Experimental setup 0Z 3Z 0Z 3h 45h 28/11/2005 30/11/2005 3 hour spin-up followed by 45 hour run (48h in total) Convection: parametrized for 12, 60km, explicit for 1km Initial conditions are the same for all resolutions LBC for 12 and 1km are derived from the global model run 4 passive tracers with 6h mean lifetime: zero initial concentration + tracer concentration in its source layer is kept fixed throughout the run. TRACER1 TRACER2 TRACER3 TRACER4 Source layer ~0-500m ~2-4km ~4-6km ~14-16km

Tracer 1: 45h mean profile 1km 12km 60km Domain Storm ------- Rain ------- No-rain

Tracer 2: 45h mean profile 1km 12km 60km Domain Storm ------- Rain ------- No-rain

Tracer 3: 45h mean profile 1km 12km 60km Domain Storm ------- Rain ------- No-rain

Tracer 4: 45h mean profile 1km 12km 60km Domain Storm ------- Rain ------- No-rain

Effect of tracer lifetime:

Conclusions The vertical distribution of tracers (and cloud ice) is very similar in 12 and 60 km model runs. In the 1km model run, the surface tracers (1 and 2) are subject to less vertical transport compared to runs with parametrized convection, while tracer 3 and 4 reach higher than in the runs with parametrized convection. Sampling at storm locations highlights the difference between average vertical transport and convective transport.