E. Engeberg University of Akron, USA S. Meek University of Utah, USA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUROPEAN ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH THEMES Rachel Cowan, Dave Reinkensmeyer, Mary Rodgers.
Advertisements

G2 Innovations Inc. The Wright Hand ® Development and Commercialization of a Novel Hand Prosthesis Raquel Lopez, Muris Mujagic, Michael Olsen, Albert Vette,
 The objective of the work of an bio mechatronic is to develop an artificial hand which can be used for functional substitution of the natural hand (prosthetics)
Lecture 12 Dimitar Stefanov. Some more examples of adaptive terminal devices Pneumatic adaptive prosthetic hand.
Design of a Human Hand Prosthesis Paul Ventimiglia Liberal Arts & Engineering Advisors: Taskin Padir and Jerome Schaufeld Abstract Current prosthetic hands.
Lecture 11 Dimitar Stefanov. Upper-Extremity Prostheses (UEP) UEP consist of two components: terminal device crane. The terminal device (end effector)
Decoding Finger Movements using Ultrasound Imaging of Muscle Activity Jayanth Devanathan Conclusions and Further Research Methods Bibliography T0 min T1.
Dept. of Biomedical, Industrial, & Human Factors Engineering 1 Skilled Work Usually hand and finger work Coordinated muscle activity Precise movements.
The DEKA Arm Michael Heath.
No More Peg Legs and Hooks Better Prosthetic Design through Engineering.
Automotive Research Center Robotics and Mechatronics A Nonlinear Tracking Controller for a Haptic Interface Steer-by-Wire Systems A Nonlinear Tracking.
Electromyography, Myoelectric signals and their use in Controlling Prosthetic Limbs Brian Kennedy.
Exponential Tracking Control of Hydraulic Proportional Directional Valve and Cylinder via Integrator Backstepping J. Chen†, W. E. Dixon‡, J. R. Wagner†,
The Advanced Prosthetic Hand Project Jessica Reddy, IMSURE Fellow Mentor: Dr. William C. Tang.
Group of Robotics and Articular Biomechanics
Upper Limb Prostheses Study of prosthetic hand FERRANDINI Emilie ESIL - GBM 3 Mr. BRUNET - Mr. DANIELS - Mr. FRAJUT Study of prosthetic hand.
Medical Informatics Basics
DESIGN OF WIRELESS PROSTHETIC HAND.  Introduction  Why Wireless robotic arm  System Description  Block Diagram  System Operation  Conclusion  References.
OMICS Group Contact us at: OMICS Group International through its Open Access Initiative is committed to make genuine and.
Neural Prosthetic Design
Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering Postgraduate Student Research Forum Feedback and improvement to the control system, Prosthesis functionality.
Sarthak Pati1, Deepak Joshi2, Ashutosh Mishra2 and Sneh Anand2
Lecture 15 Dimitar Stefanov. Multi multifunction control scheme for powered upper-limb prostheses Some examples Pattern-coded systems which use a M- vectors.
Title page Music from Biosignals Vy Nguyen
STUDY, MODEL & INTERFACE WITH MOTOR CORTEX Presented by - Waseem Khatri.
Neuroprosthetics Week 6 Design Issues. Neuroprosthetic Devices Three basic types Three basic types 1. Use neural signals as an input, possibly to control.
Shihua Li; Hao Gu Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on Volume: 8, Issue: 4 Digital Object Identifier: /TII Publication Year:
SEMINAR REPORT ON K.SWATHI. INTRODUCTION Any automatically operated machine that functions in human like manner Any automatically operated machine that.
Student : YI-AN,CHEN 4992C085 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 22, NO. 2, MARCH 2014.
Graz-Brain-Computer Interface: State of Research By Hyun Sang Suh.
Scott Midavaine, OTR Swedish Medical Center.  Discuss how use of technology combined with functional tasks can improve outcomes  Benefits of Neuroprosthesis.
Targeted Reinnervation In Upper-Limb Prostheses Ryan Dolan, BME 281, Section 02
What is Neural Engineering Tae-Seong Kim, Ph.D.. Neural Engineering Neural engineering also known as Ne uroengineering is a discipline that uses engineering.
SensaMove Arm SensaMove Technologies Irena Barbulovic-Nad Stefanie Blain Geneviève Gavigan Rohini Gupta Jennifer Kohlenberg Golnaz Vahedi November 30 th,
TARGETED MUSCLE REINNERVATION Nicholas Mulhern 10/9/12 BME 281.
1 W. Rooney May 20, 2004 Imaging the Awake Animal MRI Efforts Overview.
Myoelectric Prostheses By: Courtney Medeiros BME /26/11.
IFToMM/ ASME International Workshop on Underactuated Grasping August 19, 2010, Montréal, Canada Closing Plenary During the workshop, the participants were.
Towards a Biarticular Prosthesis: Model Development and Sensitivity Analysis of Clutched Spring Parameters Andrea Willson University of Washington VA Center.
Iterative Learning Control in Health Care FAISAL KARIMEE FAIZAN RASOOLEE BIO MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION SEC B.
Arm as Good as New Ethan Leavell Sulamita Staroverova Jalen VanTrease Tolu Amudipe.
Touch Bionics I-Limb ™ Active Prosthetic Limbs Alexander Batrakov.
Naïve Coadaptive Cortical Control Gregory J Gage, Kip A Ludwig, Kevin J Otto, Edward L Ionides and Daryl R Kipke. Journal of Neural Engineering 2 (2005)
Prosthetic Hand Dola Ram,12263,Nit Hamirpur. Prosthetics Disease & amputations have been common throughout history People with visibly different abilities.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Scheme E, Englehart K. Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered.
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Control of Myoelectric Arm Prostheses By. Rory Makuch.
PROSTHETIC LEG PRESENTED BY:-AWAIS IJAZ HASNAT AHMED KHAN.
1. 2 Introduction to Haptics Design of kinesthetic/ force feedback haptic devices Allison M. Okamura Stanford University.
Device for acute rehabilitation of the paretic arm after stroke Team: Carly Brown, Sasha Cai Lesher-Perez, Lee Linstroth and Nathan Kleinhans Advisor:
ELECTRONIC SKIN BME 281 Section 2 October 10, 2015 Greggory D’Ambrosca.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as: Segil JL, Weir RF. Novel postural control algorithm for control of multifunctional myoelectric.
First-Person Tele- Operation of a Humanoid Robot Lars Fritsche, Felix Unverzagt, Jan Peters and Roberto Calandra.
ERC-Starting Grant RESHAPE Restoring the Self with Embodiable Hand ProsthesEs Giovanni Di Pino Neurofisiologia e Neuroingegneria dell’Interazione.
ABSTRACT RESULTS METHODOLOGY CONCLUSION APPROACH BIBLIOGRAPHY CONTACT
Biomechanical Study of Gait Rehabilitation Robot
Laboratorio di Cinematica e Robotica
First-person Teleoperation of Humanoid Robots
HUMANOID ROBOTS USED FOR SURVEILLANCE
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Next-Gen Upper Limb Prosthetics
Bachelor of Engineering Technology (HONS) in Medical Electronics,
Prosthesis & Brain Application (AP & NT)
GESTURE CONTROLLED ROBOTIC ARM
Device for Acute Rehabilitation of the Paretic Hand After Stroke
Tactile Auditory Sensory Substitution
Designing High-Performance Neural Prostheses
Multilayered e-dermis design and characterization.
Tactile features for prosthesis perception.
Prosthesis system diagram.
Schematic signal pathway.
Department of Electrical Engineering National Central University
Presentation transcript:

E. Engeberg University of Akron, USA S. Meek University of Utah, USA Adaptive Object Slip Prevention For Prosthetic Hands Through Proportional-Derivative Shear Force Feedback E. Engeberg University of Akron, USA S. Meek University of Utah, USA Adaptive grip force compensation when grasped objects slip Use of existing sensors already incorporated into commercially available prostheses Distinction between slip and nonslip disturbances applied to grasped objects Caption is optional, use Arial Narrow 20pt

Commercially Available Prostheses Otto Bock’s SensorHand Motion Control Hand

Current Prostheses Touch Bionics i-LIMB Motion Control UA3 with Flexion Wrist and Protouch Hand Otto Bock DynamicArm All suffer from high backlash and static friction. UA3 has only three degrees of freedom controlled by 1 input.

The Motion Control Hand: Force Measurement

Force Control

Proportional Object Slip Prevention

PD Object Slip Prevention

Adaptive Object Slip Prevention

What Adaptive Slip Prevention Does

FFT of Nonslip Events

FFT of Slip Events

Bandpass Slip Filters For Smooth Object Slip Events With Glove

7 Bandpass Filters

Bandpass Slip Filters For Smooth Object Slip Events With Glove

Test Apparatus For Slip Controllers

Experimental Benchtop Results Low Friction High Friction Mean STD Force 1.2 0.4216 1.5 1.2693 Prop. Slip 1.9 0.5676 11.3 4.3474 PD Slip 2.5 0.527 17.9 6.1001 Adaptive 3 0.9428 Did Not Drop

Experimental Benchtop Results: U-test p-Values Low Friction Force Prop. Slip PD Slip Adaptive 1 0.0093 0.0003 0.0334 0.0111 0.2373

Experimental Benchtop Results: U-test p-Values High Friction Force Prop. Slip PD Slip Adaptive 1 0.0001 0.0188

Human Experiments: Slip Prevention

Human Results: Slip Prevention Success Rates Subjective Evaluations Mean STD Force 77.50% 27.12% 5.00 0.00 Prop. Slip 97.50% 7.07% 7.46 1.22 PD Slip 100% 0% 7.68 1.19 Adaptive 95% 9.26% 7.59 1.85

Conclusions Slip can be distinguished from nonslip events with existing sensors Shear force and shear force derivative feedback is useful Adaptive slip prevention is useful to compensate for slippery objects Algorithms can be easily implemented into existing commercially available prostheses

Future Work Test slip prevention controllers with amputees with and without direct neural feedback Develop embedded microcontroller Use normal force derivative feedback to decrease force overshoot when compensating for slip Use sliding mode control to improve control of velocity while opening and closing hand

Overall Control Scheme: Sliding Mode Slip Prevention

Future Work Overall Control Scheme: Hybrid Sliding Mode Backstepping Slip Prevention

References Ashok Muzumdar, Powered Upper Limb Prostheses, Berlin, Germany, Springer, 2004 G. Puchhammer, “The Tactile Slip Sensor: Integration of a Miniaturized Sensory Device on an Myoelectric Hand,” Orthopadie-Technik Quarterly, English, edition I/2000, p. 7-12 P. Kyberd, M. Evans, S. Winkel, “An Intelligent Anthropomorphic Hand With Automatic Grasp,” Robotica, Vol. 16, United Kingdom, 1998, p. 531-536 C. Light, P. Chappell, B. Hudgins, and K. Englehart, “Intelligent multifunction myoelectric control of hand prostheses,” Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, vol. 26, No. 4, July/August, 2002, p. 139-146 P. Kyberd and P. Chappell, “Object Slip Prevention Using a Derived Force Vector,” Mechatronics Vol. 2, (1), Great Britain, 1992, p. 1-13 A. Mingrino, et. al., “Slippage Control In Hand Prostheses by Sensing Grasping Forces and Sliding Motion,” IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, v 3, 1994, p 1803-1809 Y. Yamada, H. Morita, and Y. Umetani, “Slip phase isolating: impulsive signal generating vibrotactile sensor and its application to real-time object regrip control,” Robotica, vol. 18, 2000, p. 43-49 A. Cranny, et. al., “Thick-film force, slip, and temperature sensors for a prosthetic hand,” Meas. Sci. Technol. vol. 16, (2005), United Kingdom, p. 931-941 A. Tura, et. al., “Experimental development of a sensory control system for an upper limb myoelectric prosthesis with cosmetic covering,” Jour. Rehab. Res. Dev., vol. 35, (1), Jan, 1998, p. 14-26 K. Yoshida and R. Riso, “Peripheral Nerve Recording Electrodes and Techniques,” Neuroprosthetics Theory and Practice, Vol. 2, World Scientific Publishing Co., New Jersey, p. 683-744

References I. Birznieks, P. Jenmalm, A. Goodwin, R. Johansson, “Encoding of Direction of Fingertip Forces by Human Tactile Afferents,” Journal of Neuroscience, October 15, 2001, p. 8222-8237 G. Cadoret and A. Smith, “Friction, Not Texture, Dictates Grip Forces Used During Object Manipulation,” Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 75, No. 5, May, 1996, p. 1963-1969 M. Burstedt, J. Flanagan, and R. Johansson, “Control of Grasp Stability in Humans Under Different Frictional Conditions During Multidigit Manipulation,” Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 82, November 1999, pp. 2393-2405 I. Birznieks, M. Burstedt, B. Edin, and R. Johansson, “Mechanisms for Force Adjustments to Unpredictable Frictional Changes at Individual Digits During Two-Fingered Manipulation,” Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 80, October 1998, pp. 1989-2002 S. Jacobsen, D. Knutti, R. Johnson, and H. Sears, “Development of the Utah Artificial Arm,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 29, 1982, 249-269 D. Childress, “Powered Limb Prostheses: Their Clinical Significance,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. BEM-20, May, 1973, p. 200-207 T. Farrell, R. Weir, C. Heckathorne, D. Childress, “The effects of static friction and backlash on extended physiological proprioception control of a powered prosthesis,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 42, May/June, 2005, p. 327-342 H. Sears, J. Shaperman, “Proportional myoelectric hand control: an evaluation,” American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 70 (1), p. 20-28, February, 1991

References G. Dillon and K. Horch, “Direct Neural Sensory Feedback and Control of a Prosthetic Arm,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 4, p. 468-472, 2005 E. Engeberg and S. Meek, “Improved Grasp Force Sensitivity For Prosthetic Hands Through Force Derivative Feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 55, p. 817-821, 2008 E. Engeberg, S. Meek, and M. Minor, “Hybrid Force-Velocity Sliding Mode Control of a Prosthetic Hand,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, to be published, Available: www.ieeexplore.ieee.org

Questions?