Judicial decisions Colin Bouchard.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Supreme Court Nullification Enter John Calhoun

Advertisements

The Marshall Court Refers to the time period where John Marshall served on the Supreme Court, while upholding Federalist beliefs. During this period.

Objectives Describe the feeling of national unity that followed the War of Explain how Congress tried to strengthen the national economy. Discuss.

The Marshal Court How was the Federalist party able to stay relevant despite not winning any presidential elections since the John Adam’s administration?

The Marshall Court Mr. Johnson AP US History.

John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Landmark Cases in Support of an Important Concept.

John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court

The Marshall Court. Marshall was born in the foothills of the Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains in 1755, far from the wealthy tobacco and slave Tidewater.

John Marshall, Chief Justice

Federalism and the Supreme Court McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)

7.2 Nationalism at Center Stage Mr. Manelski CPUSH.

The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?

John Marshall and the Marshall Court By Meghan Gabel and Kathleen Reilly.

Courts The point of the courts is to provide a place where we can argue about matters relating to the law. The point of lawyers is to help people argue.

John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 

Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing attorney. 2 nd cousin of.

Marshall Court I.Chief Justice John Marshall A. Dominates Supreme Court B. Strengthened federal govt. at the expense of state governments.

Supreme Court Cases Overview. Marbury v. Madison Marbury sued Sec of State Madison for his appointment to be a judge (midnight judges – Adams administration)

NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT Mr. Sandford AP United States History.

Chapter 6 A Changing Nation During the early 1800s, the federal government increases its authority. At the same time, the Monroe Doctrine expands.

Supreme Court Cases The John Marshall Court strengthened the federal government by supporting.

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION Topic 3: The Marshall Court (Judicial Nationalism)

Chapter 10 A Changing Nation.

Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835.

Alek Henningsgard.  Maryland  James W. McCulloch  Second bank of the United States.

TEKS 8C: Calculate percent composition and empirical and molecular formulas. Politics, Henry Clay John C. Calhoun Daniel Webster Stephen Harth.

The Emergence of the Supreme Court The Marshall Court

Supreme Court of the United States  SCOTUS Branch of gov’t which interprets/applies the law Makes sure laws/gov’t action are constitutional  Judicial.

Building a Nation’s Identity

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION

NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT

Building a National Identity

VUS5e John Marshall How did Chief Justice John Marshall, a Virginian, contribute to the growth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s importance in relation to the.

The Federalist Judiciary

John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court

John Marshall's supreme court

Chapter 10 A Changing Nation.

Terms and People Henry Clay – Kentucky Congressman who favored federal action to improve the economy John C. Calhoun – South Carolina Congressman who opposed.

The Marshall Court.

Objectives Describe the feeling of national unity that followed the War of Explain how Congress tried to strengthen the national economy. Discuss.

Objectives Describe the feeling of national unity that followed the War of Explain how Congress tried to strengthen the national economy. Discuss.

No fighting political parties

The Marshall Court 6.3.

2.04 Assess political events, issues, and personalities that contributed to sectionalism and nationalism.

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION

Reviewing Marshall Court Decisions

The Marshall Court- A Stronger National Govt.

NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT

Growth of the Supreme Court

Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?

Objectives Describe the feeling of national unity that followed the War of Explain how Congress tried to strengthen the national economy. Discuss.

Defining the Powers of the National Government

Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?

The power of Judicial Review

Topic: Evaluating the Decisions of the Marshall Court

Supreme Court Cases of the early Republic

5-4: Nationalism 1820s-1850s.

Politics, Henry Clay John C. Calhoun Daniel Webster.

Building a National Identity

Chapter 10 Section 1 Building a National Identity.

JOHN MARSHALL Born in Virginia, 1755

JOHN MARSHALL Born in Virginia, 1755

A Changing Nation.

Do Now (Background Essay)

Marshall Court AIM: Did the Supreme Court under John Marshall Give Too Much Power to the Federal Government at the Expense of the State Governments?

Objectives Describe the feeling of national unity that followed the War of Explain how Congress tried to strengthen the national economy. Discuss.

Chapter 10.1 Building a National Identity

The Legacy of the Marshall Court

The Marshall Court.

Presentation transcript:

Judicial decisions Colin Bouchard

Essential Question: How did Supreme Court decisions at this time(1819-1824) promote economic development in early 19th century America?

John Marshall Born 1765 Believed in strong centralized government Fourth Chief Justice for over 30 years Ruled many influential cases

Dartmouth College Vs. Woodward State of Hampshire(Woodward) wanted to change Dartmouth College from private to public college Dartmouth had a charter(contract) to be built a private school Marshall ruled in favour of Dartmouth Paved the way for unbreakable contracts

McCulloch V.S Maryland Maryland levied 15 percent tax on foreign banks McCulloch represented the federal government Marshall ruled in favour of McCulloch Affirmed congress’ “implied powers” Sped up growth of federal powers

Gibbons V.S Ogden Both argued they had rights to control steamboats in New York Gibbons had license from Federal Government Ogden had license from New York state Marshall ruled for Gibbons States cannot make laws that impede interstate commerce Encouraged interstate commerce and national markets

Charles River Bridge Case Charles River Bridge Company granted charter to run toll booth by state State then opened free bridge, basically destroying the Charles River Bridge Company Marshall ruled for the state Needs of the community overrule contract rights