LEE © Gosselin & Kuban, 2016 Do you really want to lead this effort?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
Advertisements

Academic Search committees (And how to impress them) Chris Wyatt Ph.D.
Supervisor Workplace Skills Series: Delegation
Taking Charge and Finding Support: The Power of Self, Mentors and Peers in Graduate School Success Helenrose Fives AERA 2003, Chicago.
CBR 101 An Introduction to Community Based Research.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
MSCHE Expectations for Governance Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education Annual Conference December 12, 2011.
Module 4 :Session 4 Working with others Developed by Dr J Moorman.
Personal leadership qualities
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
The Kansas Cancer Partnership Evaluation – Fall 2009.
Service Corps Kick-off (insert date). 2 Agenda Introductions Program Overview Nonprofits and Projects Scope-setting Project Management Next Steps Questions.
Company LOGO Revised and Presented by Rob Coffman, CGMP and Patty Barron, CGMP Welcome To the 2015 Chapter Presidents’ Training Minneapolis – April 28,
Ç ç Benefits of Professional Development One of the many values of the VSR program.
MTT Standard 5, Competency 9 Final Assessment Click to begin.
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE AND BOARD – FACULTY RELATIONS Association of Governing Boards 2010 National Conference Tom Longin, Moderator March 22, 2010
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
2016 IABA FOUNDATION ACTUARIAL BOOTCAMP the mentor-mentee relationship
Board Roles & Responsibilities
Session 5: Criteria for Speaking and Listening
Priorities for the Success AT Strategic Action Plan: SUMMARY
INSTRUCTIONAL WALKTHROUGHS
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
Welcome! Enhancing the Care Team May 25, 2017
Mission Motto Learning for Life
Types of Community Engagement Forms among Participating Institutions
Welcome to “High Expectations and Accountability” with Rebecca Friedman Please refer to page 1 of your packet to answer the following questions: 1.
Unlikely Interns: Students with Disabilities Services and Interns
NSSE Data Conversations
Coaching.
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
Our Vision Our vision is to be recognised nationally and internationally as a leader in qualification, assessment and verification.
Project-Based Learning
FRAMEWORKS FOR SUCCESS: manage the volunteer experience
Equity, Opportunity, Results
Safeguarding Across the Generations – A Full Council Approach
Hosting a Study Club with Nobel Biocare Distribution Partners
Overview of the California Child Welfare Core Practice Model (CPM)
Pleased to be sharing the next step in the implementation of the 2020 Workforce Vision with you today The Implementation Plan has been developed.
Critical Element: Faculty Commitment
Agenda Setting One thing I want to get out of this session Activity:
 KEY PRINCIPLES FOR EFFECTIVE EVALUATIONS
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Faculty Meeting Resource
Trans-disciplinary, Immersive Learning
Objective 7.02 Understand team building.
Establishing Oversight Mechanisms
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
New Curriculum / Program of Study
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
ROSE STATE COLLEGE   “CLICK”  Community Learning in Critical Knowledge
MEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT STANDARDS BASED GRADING EXPECTATIONS
Introductions Introduction
CPD: The Coaching & Mentoring Model
Objective 7.02 Understand team building.
Fred Ford Matt Klauza Phillip C. Mancusi Helena Zacharis
Introduction Introduction
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
COMMISSIONER STRATEGIC REVIEW
Introductions Introduction
Objective 7.02 Understand team building.
Community-Engaged Research
A Diverse and Inclusive Board
A Workshop for New Academic Administrators
Workbook for Progressing Strategic Priorities at Local Level
Presentation transcript:

LEE © Gosselin & Kuban, 2016 Do you really want to lead this effort? Are you OK with being vulnerable at times? In front of your colleagues? Your students? Are you OK with having to “roll with it” from time to time? Do you have a faculty partner? A community partner? Is he/she wanting to collaborate with you? Are your respective roles clearly outlined? Do you believe your delegated duties are equitable? Do you trust this faculty peer? Community liaison? Can you list a couple of his/her strengths that could be valuable? Do you have a way to know when you have been successful? How could you measure IMPACT of this effort? For you? Your faculty peer? Your community partner? Your students? Could students join you in the scholarship — conferences and/or publications — of this endeavor? Could your community partner join you in the scholarship — conferences and/or publications — of this? Is there a way for this endeavor to sustain itself … even after your students and/or you leave it? What change(s) might you make should you decide to lead this effort again? Do you — plus your faculty peer & community partner as applicable — (likely) have respective administrative support for this endeavor? Oral? Financial? Have you discussed communication logistics between or among you? Have you brainstormed where this endeavor’s deliverable(s) might ‘go’? Do you plan to recruit specific students for this endeavor? How? What knowledge and/or skills do these students bring to this effort? As a group, what strengths and limitations do you identify? How do you think students might gain from this experience? LEE Will you permit any control of the process to your students? How much oversight will your faculty peer & you provide your students? How involved will your community partner be in the process? What check points — if any — will you implement in order to ensure progress? How will you offer formative & summative feedback? Will you allow students to fail? Then what becomes the contingency plan? Have you considered how / in what capacity(ies) this community partner will work with your students? Do you know what deliverable(s) YOU would like to result from this endeavor? Do you know what deliverable(s) your faculty peer would like to result from this endeavor? Do you know what deliverable(s) your community partner would like to result from this endeavor? Do you know what deliverable(s) your students would like to result from this endeavor? © Gosselin & Kuban, 2016