Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
The Structure of the Human Adenovirus 2 Penton
Biochemical Studies of Mycobacterial Fatty Acid Methyltransferase: A Catalyst for the Enzymatic Production of Biodiesel  Nektaria Petronikolou, Satish K.
Crystal Structure of M. tuberculosis ABC Phosphate Transport Receptor
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Crystal Structure of Streptococcus mutans Pyrophosphatase
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Kinetic Discrimination of tRNA Identity by the Conserved Motif 2 Loop of a Class II Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase  Ethan C. Guth, Christopher S. Francklyn 
Structure of the Universal Stress Protein of Haemophilus influenzae
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Structure of a Human Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate 3-Kinase
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
The Structure of the Human Adenovirus 2 Penton
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
The structural basis for pyrophosphatase catalysis
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages (July 1997)
Structure and function of mutationally generated monomers of dimeric phosphoribosylanthranilate isomerase from Thermotoga maritima  Ralf Thoma, Michael.
A Subdomain Swap Strategy for Reengineering Nonribosomal Peptides
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Structure and Mechanism of Yeast RNA Triphosphatase
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Structure of Escherichia coli Ribose-5-Phosphate Isomerase
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Structure of Human Cytosolic Phenylalanyl-tRNA Synthetase: Evidence for Kingdom- Specific Design of the Active Sites and tRNA Binding Patterns  Igal Finarov,
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Structure of E. coli 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine Nucleosidase Reveals Similarity to the Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylases  Jeffrey E.
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 1095-1106 (November 2001) Structure of Thermotoga maritima Stationary Phase Survival Protein SurE  R.-G. Zhang, T. Skarina, J.E. Katz, S. Beasley, A. Khachatryan, S. Vyas, C.H. Arrowsmith, S. Clarke, A. Edwards, A. Joachimiak, A. Savchenko  Structure  Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages 1095-1106 (November 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X

Figure 1 Structure of SurE (a) Structure of the monomer with the N-terminal domain in red and C-terminal domain in maroon. (b) Structure of the dimer with two-fold dyad in the plane of the figure. Color coding for one monomer is as in (a), and the second monomer is in yellow. N and C termini are labeled in the red/maroon monomer. (c) Specific interactions responsible for the formation of the tetramer in β hairpin region of blue and green monomers. (d) Structure of the SurE tetramer Structure 2001 9, 1095-1106DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X)

Figure 1 Structure of SurE (a) Structure of the monomer with the N-terminal domain in red and C-terminal domain in maroon. (b) Structure of the dimer with two-fold dyad in the plane of the figure. Color coding for one monomer is as in (a), and the second monomer is in yellow. N and C termini are labeled in the red/maroon monomer. (c) Specific interactions responsible for the formation of the tetramer in β hairpin region of blue and green monomers. (d) Structure of the SurE tetramer Structure 2001 9, 1095-1106DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X)

Figure 1 Structure of SurE (a) Structure of the monomer with the N-terminal domain in red and C-terminal domain in maroon. (b) Structure of the dimer with two-fold dyad in the plane of the figure. Color coding for one monomer is as in (a), and the second monomer is in yellow. N and C termini are labeled in the red/maroon monomer. (c) Specific interactions responsible for the formation of the tetramer in β hairpin region of blue and green monomers. (d) Structure of the SurE tetramer Structure 2001 9, 1095-1106DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X)

Figure 1 Structure of SurE (a) Structure of the monomer with the N-terminal domain in red and C-terminal domain in maroon. (b) Structure of the dimer with two-fold dyad in the plane of the figure. Color coding for one monomer is as in (a), and the second monomer is in yellow. N and C termini are labeled in the red/maroon monomer. (c) Specific interactions responsible for the formation of the tetramer in β hairpin region of blue and green monomers. (d) Structure of the SurE tetramer Structure 2001 9, 1095-1106DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X)

Figure 2 Diagram of the Secondary-Structural Elements in the SurE Monomer Structure 2001 9, 1095-1106DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X)

Figure 3 Multiple Sequence Alignment (CLUSTAL W [1.81]) of Proteins Belonging to the SurE Family Completely conserved residues are highlighted with blue or yellow. Amino acids forming the presumed active site are highlighted with yellow Structure 2001 9, 1095-1106DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X)

Figure 4 Enzymatic Analysis of SurE Phosphatase Activity on p-Nitrophenyl Phosphate (PNPP) Assays were done as described in the Experimental Procedures, and each data point reflects the average of three trials, with the error bars reflecting ±1 standard deviation when they are larger than the plotted point. (a) SurE catalyzes the hydrolysis of PNPP in a concentration-dependent manner. Data are shown from three experiments in which 0.1 μg of SurE protein (diamonds) or a buffer control (squares) was incubated in a 250 μl reaction with 100 mM MOPS (pH 6.0 at 75oC), 5% glycerol, and 10 mM MgSO4 at 75oC. (b) SurE phosphatase is activated by magnesium ion. SurE (0.1 μg protein, diamonds) or a buffer control (squares) was incubated at 76°C with increasing concentrations of magnesium sulfate in a 250 μl reaction mixture with 100 mM sodium MOPS (pH 6.1 at 76oC), 5% glycerol, and 15 mM disodium PNPP. (c) SurE is an acid phosphatase. SurE (0.1 μg protein, diamonds) or a buffer control (squares) was incubated at 76°C in a series of 100 mM sodium 2-[N-morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffers adjusted to different pH values at 76°C containing 5% glycerol, 6 mM MgSO4, and 15 mM disodium PNPP. Similar results were found when MOPS or phosphate buffers were used (data not shown). (d) SurE is activated at elevated temperatures and has minimal activity at 40oC. SurE (0.1 μg, diamonds) or a buffer control (squares) was incubated at various temperatures in a 100 mM MOPS buffer (adjusted to pH 6 at 76°C) with 5% glycerol, 10 mM MgSO4, and 15 mM disodium PNPP. The solid line represents the enzyme specific activity and shows a peak at 80oC Structure 2001 9, 1095-1106DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X)

Figure 5 Enzymatic Activity of SurE phosphatase on PNPP, Adenosine-5′-Monophosphate, and α-Napthyl Phosphate Phosphate release was measured with the EnzChek system as described in the Experimental Procedures. The non-SurE-dependent spontaneous hydrolytic activity was subtracted from the SurE activity, and the resultant enzyme specific activity is shown in squares for α-napthyl phosphate (α-NP), in diamonds for adenosine-5′-monophosphate (AMP), and triangles for PNPP. The error bars for each symbol represent ± 1 standard deviation. For each substrate, the best-fit Km curve (as determined by a least-squares fit) is superimposed through the points. The calculated Km and Vmax values for α-NP are 5.0 mM and 233 μmol/min/mg, respectively. For AMP, these values are 3.4 mM and 105 μmol/min/mg, while for PNPP the values are 31.5 mM and 51.6 μmol/min/mg. The kinetics for the PNPP substrate were determined with additional data points at higher concentrations up to 150 mM as shown in Figure 6a Structure 2001 9, 1095-1106DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X)

Figure 6 Presumed Active Site of SurE (a) A stereo view of conserved residues forming a well-defined cluster near the protein surface. Water molecules are represented as pink spheres. (b) Location of the presumed active site in the SurE dimer and its solvent accessibility. Protein is shown as a space-filling model viewed down the two-fold dyad. Residues that are conserved and form the presumed active site are in space-filling representation (red and green in two different subunits, respectively). The conserved Asp88 in both subunits is labeled for reference Structure 2001 9, 1095-1106DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X)

Figure 6 Presumed Active Site of SurE (a) A stereo view of conserved residues forming a well-defined cluster near the protein surface. Water molecules are represented as pink spheres. (b) Location of the presumed active site in the SurE dimer and its solvent accessibility. Protein is shown as a space-filling model viewed down the two-fold dyad. Residues that are conserved and form the presumed active site are in space-filling representation (red and green in two different subunits, respectively). The conserved Asp88 in both subunits is labeled for reference Structure 2001 9, 1095-1106DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00675-X)