Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD- CAM block materials Isil Cekic-Nagas, DDS, PhD, Gulfem Ergun, DDS, PhD, Ferhan Egilmez, DDS, PhD, Pekka Kalevi Vallittu, CDT, DDS, PhD, Lippo Veli Juhana Lassila, DDS, MsC, Eng Journal of Prosthodontic Research Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 265-273 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003 Copyright © 2016 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Schematic micro-shear test set-up. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2016 60, 265-273DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003) Copyright © 2016 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Micro-shear bond strength values (MPa) and standard deviations of the tested groups after 2-day water storage. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2016 60, 265-273DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003) Copyright © 2016 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Micro-shear bond strength values (MPa) and standard deviations of the tested groups after thermocycle. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2016 60, 265-273DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003) Copyright © 2016 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions
Fig. 4 The modes of bond failure. The stereomicroscope photographs above legends show representative failure modes for each corresponding type of failure. A, B, C: side of ceramic. D, E, F: side of resin cement, at 40× magnification. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2016 60, 265-273DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003) Copyright © 2016 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions
Fig. 5 SEM photomicrographs of ceramic surfaces. Representative images of HF-treated and ground ceramic surfaces (A, Cerasmart; B, Lava Ultimate; and C, Vita Enamic) (Original magnification: 500×, bar=2μm). Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2016 60, 265-273DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003) Copyright © 2016 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions