Josephson supercurrent through a topological insulator surface state

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chiral Tunneling and the Klein Paradox in Graphene M. I. Katsnelson, K
Advertisements

Searching for Majorana fermions in semiconducting nano-wires Pedram Roushan Peter O’Malley John Martinis Department of Physics, UC Santa Barbara Borzoyeh.
Probing Superconductors using Point Contact Andreev Reflection Pratap Raychaudhuri Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai Collaborators: Gap anisotropy.
Solid state midterm report Quantum Hall effect g Chienchung Chen.
M S El Bana 1, 2* and S J Bending 1 1 Department of Physics, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK 2 Department of Physics, Ain Shams University,
Status of TI Materials. Not continuously deformable Topological Invariant Topology & Topological Invariant Number of Holes Manifold of wave functions.
External synchronization Josephson oscillations in intrinsic stack of junctions under microwave irradiation and c-axis magnetic field I.F. Schegolev Memorial.
1 SQUID and Josephson Devices By : Yatin Singhal.
Coherent Quantum Phase Slip Oleg Astafiev NEC Smart Energy Research Laboratories, Japan and The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Japan.
1 Ferromagnetic Josephson Junction and Spin Wave Resonance Nagoya University on September 5,2009 Sadamichi Maekawa (IMR, Tohoku University) Co-workers:
Electron Tunneling and the Josephson Effect. Electron Tunneling through an Insulator.
Superconducting transport  Superconducting model Hamiltonians:  Nambu formalism  Current through a N/S junction  Supercurrent in an atomic contact.
Robustness of Majorana induced Fractional Josephson Effect
RF Superconductivity and the Superheating Field H sh James P. Sethna, Gianluigi Catelani, and Mark Transtrum Superconducting RF cavity Lower losses Limited.
Condensed Matter Physics CEG - Science and microwaves26th Jan 2004 Electronic properties of HTS and novel superconductors Intrinsic Josephson Tunnelling.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
The Three Hallmarks of Superconductivity
SQUID Based Quantum Bits James McNulty. What’s a SQUID? Superconducting Quantum Interference Device.
Submicron structures 26 th January 2004 msc Condensed Matter Physics Photolithography to ~1 μm Used for... Spin injection Flux line dynamics Josephson.
A. Sinchenko, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
Dressed state amplification by a superconducting qubit E. Il‘ichev, Outline Introduction: Qubit-resonator system Parametric amplification Quantum amplifier.
Computational Solid State Physics 計算物性学特論 第9回 9. Transport properties I: Diffusive transport.
J. R. Kirtley et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996),
SQUIDs (Superconducting QUantum Interference Devices)
@Nagoya U. Sept. 5, 2009 Naoto Nagaosa Department of Applied Physics
Type I and Type II superconductivity
Michael Browne 11/26/2007.
Studies of the Cryogenic Part with Load Lock System T. Eisel, F. Haug CERN TE-CRG-CI October 19 th, 2011, Page 1 Superconductivity years Heike Kamerlingh.
Practice of students from ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT 2009
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY Modeling Electron and Spin Transport Through Quantum Well States Xiaoguang Zhang Oak Ridge.
DC-squid for measurements on a Josephson persistent-current qubit Applied Physics Quantum Transport Group Alexander ter Haar May 2000 Supervisors: Ir.
Graphene - Electric Properties
Infrared and magneto- optical studies of topological insulators Saša V. Ðorđević Department of Physics.
Sid Nb device fabrication Superconducting Nb thin film evaporation Evaporate pure Nb to GaAs wafer and test its superconductivity (T c ~9.25k ) Tc~2.5K.
Nikolai Kopnin Theory Group Dynamics of Superfluid 3 He and Superconductors.
2D Topological insulator in HgTe quantum wells Z.D. Kvon Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia 1. Introduction. HgTe quantum wells. 2.
The Puzzling Boundaries of Topological Quantum Matter Michael Levin Collaborators: Chien-Hung Lin (University of Chicago) Chenjie Wang (University of Chicago)
1 Non-uniform superconductivity in superconductor/ferromagnet nanostructures A. Buzdin Institut Universitaire de France, Paris and Condensed Matter Theory.
Chapter 7 in the textbook Introduction and Survey Current density:
Page 1 Jean Delayen Center for Accelerator Science Old Dominion University and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility SURFACE IMPEDANCE COCKCROFT.
Superconductivity, Josephson Junctions, and squids
Thermal and electrical quantum Hall effects in ferromagnet — topological insulator — ferromagnet junction V. Kagalovsky 1 and A. L. Chudnovskiy 2 1 Shamoon.
Igor Lukyanchuk Amiens University
The Hall States and Geometric Phase
RF Nonlinearity in Thin-Film and Bulk Superconductors: A Mechanism for Cavity Q-Drop Behnood G. Ghamsari, Tamin Tai, Steven M. Anlage Center for Nanophysics.
Institute for Photonics and Nanotechnologies
Igor Luk’yanchuk, Yakov Kopelevich
Superconducting Qubits
BCS THEORY BCS theory is the first microscopic theory of superconductivity since its discovery in It explains, The interaction of phonons and electrons.
Electronic structure of topological insulators and superconductors
Yanwen Liu, Weiyi Wang, Cheng Zhang, Ping Ai, Faxian Xiu
4H-SiC substrate preparation - graphitization
Novel Scattering Mechanisms for Nanotube-Silicon Devices
Josephson effect (see also hand-out)
Electrical Properties of Materials
Topological Insulators
Graduate Lecture Series
Design and Realization of Decoherence-Free
Correlations of Electrons in Magnetic Fields
Taras Patlatiuk Zumbühl Group.
Optical signature of topological insulator
Assa Auerbach, Ilya Finkler, Bert Halperin and Amir Yacoby
Persistent spin current
SOC Fermi Gas in 1D Optical Lattice —Exotic pairing states and Topological properties 中科院物理研究所 胡海平 Collaborators : Chen Cheng, Yucheng Wang, Hong-Gang.
Michael Fuhrer Director, FLEET Monash University
Weiyi Wang, Yanwen Liu, Cheng Zhang, Ping Ai, Faxian Xiu
Electronic Conductivity in Solids
Annual Academic Conference of Dept. Physics, Fudan University (2016)
Ginzburg-Landau theory
Presentation transcript:

Josephson supercurrent through a topological insulator surface state Nb/Bi2Te3/Nb junctions Marieke Snelder MESO 2012 - Chernogolovka 17 June 2012

Acknowledgements MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, The Netherlands M. Veldhorst (first author) M. Hoek T. Gang W. van der Wiel A.A. Golubov H. Hilgenkamp (also from Leiden University, The Netherlands) A. Brinkman High Field Magnet Laboratory, Nijmegen, The Netherlands U. Zeitler V. K. Guduru University of Wollongong, Australia X. L. Wang

Motivation S-wave Superconductor TI surface states

Motivation P-wave Superconductor Natural place to look for Majorana fermions (single zero-energy modes)

Motivation V+ V- I+ I- S-wave SC TI Essential: supercurrent must couple to surface states Characterize junction V+ V- I+ I- S-wave SC TI

Content Part 1 Bi2Te3 Part 2 S/TI/S junctions Part 3 Josephson supercurrent through the surface states

Content Part 1 Bi2Te3 Part 2 S/TI/S junctions Part 3 Josephson supercurrent through the surface states

Bi2Te3

Fabrication Mechanical cleavage Photolithography contacts

Hall measurements n=8.3 x 1019 cm-3 μ=250 cm2/Vs (bulk is conductive) lmfp=22 nm μB>>1 So no quantum oscillations expected

Shubnikov-de-Haas oscillations B =Bcos(θ) T Mag ervan uitgaan dat ze SdH kennen? Left graph: Quantum oscillations @T=4.2K Right graph: Oscillations from 2D channel

Shubnikov-de-Haas oscillations Mag ervan uitgaan dat ze SdH kennen? Left graph: Dingle temperature 1.65 K, μ=8300 cm2/Vs Right graph: Effective mass 0.16m0

Shubnikov-de-Haas oscillations B =Bcos(θ) T   I.M. Lifshitz and A.M. Kosevich, Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 636 (1956)

Lifshitz-Kosevich formalism     ;Former is 0.01, later is 10 So in normal case nth minima=0 through 1/B=0

Lifshitz-Kosevich formalism Surface states present @ 1/B=0, n=-1/2 (Berry phase of π)  linear dispersion relation lmfp=105 nm Minima Maxima Non-trivial surface states present

Content Part 1 Bi2Te3 Part 2 S/TI/S junctions Part 3 Josephson supercurrent through the surface states

S/TI/S junctions Nb Nb Bi2Te3 Bi2Te3 Length Nb: blue Bi2Te3: red Width=500 nm 50 100 150 200 250 300 nm Junction lengths

Josephson supercurrent Hallmarks for a Josephson junction: Shapiro steps Modulation Ic versus B-field

First hallmark – Shapiro steps Microwave frequency ω @2eV/ħ=nω Shapiro steps (Energy Cooper pairs resonant to energy microwave) ω = 10 GHz V= n x 20.7 μV T=1.6 K

First hallmark – Shapiro steps

Second hallmark – Ic-B modulation Modulation Ic DC SQUID oscillations B I Josephson supercurrent present M. Veldhorst, C. G. Molenaar et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 072602 (2012)

Second hallmark – Ic-B modulation

Second hallmark – Ic-B modulation Area uncertain: Penetration depth Flux focussing Sinc function only valid for large L and W ratio

Content Part 1 Bi2Te3 Part 2 S/TI/S junctions Part 3 Josephson supercurrent through the surface states

Link supercurrent and surface states We have junctions between 50 and 250 nm and: lmfp=22 nm (bulk states) → diffusive transport lmfp=105 nm (surface states) → ballistic transport Do we have a supercurrent through the surface states?

Link supercurrent and surface states Dirty or clean? Definitely clean

Josephson supercurrent has been realized through the surface states of Bi2Te3 Provides prospects for Majorana devices……but What is the best topological insulator for this purpose? (stability, insulating in the bulk, Dirac cone in the gap) What is the smoking gun experiment with 3D topological insulators to observe Majorana fermions? M. Veldhorst, M. Snelder et al. Nature Materials, 11, 417–421 (May 2012)

Lifshitz-Kosevich formalism Extrapolating till 1/B=0 → nth minima in resistivity is zero at 1/B=0 in ‘normal case’ (Berry phase=0)   E Maxima resistivity Minima resistivity k

Lifshitz-Kosevich formalism Extrapolating till 1/B=0 → Berry phase is π Minima Maxima  

AFM Bi2Te3 flakes Step are unit cells

First hallmark – Shapiro steps Fitting Shapiro steps with Bessel functions Only can be done if IcRn product is larger than the position of the steps (20.7 μV in these measurements)