Review: Prospects of detection of relic antineutrinos by resonant absorption in electron capturing nuclei. J D Vergados & Yu N Novikov, J. Phys. G: Nucl.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I want thank Aldo Covello for the 11 Spring Seminars on Nuclear Physics in nice areas of the Sorrento Peninsula and the Islands. I was participating in.
Advertisements

Structure of the ECEC candidate daughter 112 Cd P.E. Garrett University of Guelph TRIUMF Excellence Cluster “Universe”, Technische Universität München.
Penning-Trap Mass Spectrometry for Neutrino Physics
My Chapter 29 Lecture.
G. ManganoThe Path to Neutrino Mass Workshop 1  -decaying nuclei as a tool to measure Relic Neutrinos Gianpiero Mangano INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Italy.
These notes were typed in association with Physics for use with the IB Diploma Programme by Michael Dickinson For further reading and explanation see:
Particle Physics and Cosmology Dark Matter. What is our universe made of ? quintessence ! fire, air, water, soil !
P461 - decays II1 Beta Decays Beta decays are proton -> neutrons or neutron -> proton transitions involve W exchange and are weak interaction the last.
Particle Physics and Cosmology cosmological neutrino abundance.
6. Atomic and Nuclear Physics Chapter 6.6 Nuclear Physics.
Lecture 10: Inelastic Scattering from the Proton 7/10/2003
1 TCP06 Parksville 8/5/06 Electron capture branching ratios for the nuclear matrix elements in double-beta decay using TITAN ◆ Nuclear matrix elements.
Lecture 1 Introduction to Nuclear Science. Composition of atoms Atoms are composed of electrons and nuclei. The electrons are held in the atom by a Coulomb.
Zero Threshold Reactions for Detecting Cosmic Relic Neutrinos R. S. Raghavan Virginia Tech XII Neutrino Telescopes Venice March
Can we look back to the Origin of our Universe? Cosmic Photon, Neutrino and Gravitational Wave Backgrounds. Amand Faessler, Erice September 2014 With thanks.
Search for the Cosmic Neutrino Background and the Nuclear Beta Decay.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Nuclear Reactions. Elementary Particles  The only atomic particles that play a part in nuclear reactions are the protons and the neutrons; electrons.
THE CONNECTION OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS WITH COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPHYSICS STEEN HANNESTAD CERN, 1 OCTOBER 2009 e    
Lecture 174/11/ Analysis: (solutions will be posted on the web site under “homework”) basic recipe: about 40% of the marks for knowing the.
Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2003PHYS 5396, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5396 – Lecture #2 Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.What is a neutrino? 2.History of neutrinos.
A monochromatic neutrino beam for  13 and  J. Bernabeu U. de Valencia and IFIC NO-VE III International Workshop on: "NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS IN VENICE"
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
1 Cross sections of neutron reactions in S-Cl-Ar region in the s-process of nucleosynthesis C. Oprea 1, P. J. Szalanski 2, A. Ioan 1, P. M. Potlog 3 1Frank.
Many-Body Effects in a Frozen Rydberg Gas Feng zhigang
Nuclear Pharmacy Lecture 2.
Absorption of Nuclear Radiation & Radiation Effects on Matter: Atomic and Nuclear Physics Dr. David Roelant.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
Electromagnetic (gamma) decay
Jonathan Davis King’s College London
(Xin-Heng Guo, Bing-Lin Young) Beijing Normal University
A Solution to the Li Problem by the Long Lived Stau
Open quantum systems.
Possible Ambiguities of Neutrino-Nucleus
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
Chapter 29: Nuclear Physics
What is the radius (in fm) of {image} ?
CHAPTER 12 The Atomic Nucleus
Amand Faessler, Erice September 2014
From : Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics A.Das and T.Ferbel
Section VI - Weak Interactions
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
Neutron Detection with MoNA LISA
Outside the nucleus, the beta decay {image} will not occur because the neutron and electron have more total mass than the proton. This process can occur.
Nuclear Radioactive Decay
PHY 114 A General Physics II 11 AM-12:15 PM TR Olin 101
Review: Probing Low Energy Neutrino Backgrounds with Neutrino Capture on Beta Decaying Nuclei Cocco A, Magnano G and Messina M 2007 J. Cosmol. Astropart.
Search for f-N Bound State in Jefferson Lab Hall-B
Neutrino diffraction : finite-size correction to Fermi’s golden rule k
On a Search for -Mesic Nuclei at MAMI-C
Ch RADIOACTIVE DECAY We assumed the decay probability  to be (1) small and (2) constant in time. If V‘ is independent of.
Chapter 4 Mechanisms and Models of Nuclear Reactions
Nuclear Decays Unstable nuclei can change N,Z.A to a nuclei at a lower energy (mass) If there is a mass difference such that energy is released, pretty.
Monoenergetic Neutrino Beam for Long Baseline Experiments
Bound β-decay First observation at ESR (163Dy, 187Re, 206,207Tl)
H’(t)=E-M field D  = - fi Transition dipole moment.
We-Fu Chang, Wei-Ping Pan
7Be neutrino line shifts in the sun.
Nuclear Reactions.
Institut de Physique Nucléaire Orsay, France
INFLUENCE OF ELECTRONIC SHELL ON NEUTRINOLESS DOUBLE BETA DECAY
hep-ph Prog. Theor. Phys. 117 Takashi Shimomura (Saitama Univ.)
Muonic Atoms I’d like to talk to you about muonic atoms.
Radioactivity.
Run-Hui Li Yonsei University
PHYS 3446 – Review Review Note Test deferred until Weds.
Nuclear Chemistry Notes
Can new Higgs boson be Dark Matter Candidate in the Economical Model
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
Some Nuclear Physics with Solar Neutrinos
Presentation transcript:

Review: Prospects of detection of relic antineutrinos by resonant absorption in electron capturing nuclei. J D Vergados & Yu N Novikov, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 41 (2014) 125001 Kim, Hanbeom

Introduction The relic neutrino The cosmic neutrino background Analogous to the cosmic background radiation Neutrino decoupling about 1 second after the Big Bang, 1010 K Very low average energy 𝐸 𝜈 ≈0.00055 eV (corresponding to T = 1.95 K) (during the calculation, 𝐸 𝜈 ≈0.0005 eV ) 2018-11-24 KIMS

Introduction Antineutrino absorption Ordinary electron capture Exothermic Week interaction 𝜈 𝑒 + 𝑒 − + 𝑝 + →𝑛 𝜈 𝑒 +(𝐴,𝑍, 𝑍 𝑒 )→ (𝐴,𝑍−1, 𝑍 𝑒 −1) ∗ Ordinary electron capture 𝑝 + + 𝑒 − →𝑛+ 𝜈 𝑒 2018-11-24 KIMS

The Formalism Cross section for a neutrino of given velocity υ 𝜎 𝐸 𝜈 =2𝜋 1 𝑣 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 nuc 2 𝜙 𝑒 2 𝐺 𝐹 2 2 𝛿 𝐸 𝜈 + 𝑚 𝜈 +Δ− 𝐸 𝑥 −𝑏 𝐸 𝜈 +𝑏≥Δ+ 𝑚 𝜈 𝑚 𝜈 ≈1 eV 𝜙𝑒: electron wavefunction Δ: mass difference of the two neutral atoms 𝑏: electron binding energy 𝐸𝑥: final state energy 𝐺𝐹: Fermi’s constant 2018-11-24 KIMS

The Formalism 𝑁 𝜈 𝐸 𝜈 = Φ 𝜈 𝜎 𝐸 𝜈 = 𝑛 𝜈 ( 𝑟 0 )2𝜋 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 nuc 2 𝜙 𝑒 2 𝐺 𝐹 2 2 𝛿 𝐸 𝜈 + 𝑚 𝜈 +Δ− 𝐸 𝑥 −𝑏 𝑁= 𝑁 𝜈 𝐸 𝜈 𝑓 𝐸 𝜈 𝑑 𝐸 𝜈 =𝜉 𝑛 𝜈 2𝜋 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 nuc 2 𝜙 𝑒 2 𝐺 𝐹 2 2 𝑓( 𝐸 𝑥 +𝑏− 𝑚 𝜈 −Δ) 𝜉= 𝑛 𝜈 ( 𝑟 0 )/ 𝑛 𝜈 𝑓 𝐸 = 1 𝑘 𝑇 0 𝑒 − 𝐸 𝑘 𝑇 0 , 𝑘 𝑇 0 =1.5× 10 −4 eV 𝑛 𝜈 ( 𝑟 0 ): the density of neutrinos in our vicinity 𝑛 𝜈 : the relic neutrino density 𝑓(𝐸): neutrino energy distribution (gravitationally bound) 2018-11-24 KIMS

The Formalism Neutrino capture 𝑁= 𝑁 𝜈 𝐸 𝜈 𝑓 𝐸 𝜈 𝑑 𝐸 𝜈 =2𝜋𝜉 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 nuc 2 𝐺 𝐹 2 2 𝜙 𝑒 2 1 𝑘 𝑇 0 𝑒 − 𝐸 𝑥 +𝑏− 𝑚 𝜈 −Δ 𝑘 𝑇 0 𝑛 𝜈 Electron capture with the final state energy 𝐸 𝑥 ′ 𝑁 𝑒−capture = 1 2𝜋 2 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 ′ nuc 2 𝜙 𝑒 2 𝐺 𝐹 2 2 (Δ− 𝐸 𝑥 ′ −𝑏) 2 𝜆 𝑎 𝜆 𝑐 = 𝑁 𝑁 𝑒−capture = 2𝜋 3 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 nuc 2 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 ′ nuc 2 𝜉 𝑛 𝜈 (Δ− 𝐸 𝑥 ′ −𝑏) 2 𝑘 𝑇 0 𝑒 − 𝐸 𝑥 +𝑏− 𝑚 𝜈 −Δ 𝑘 𝑇 0 2018-11-24 KIMS

The Formalism Let 𝜖= 𝐸 𝑥 +𝑏− 𝑚 𝜈 −Δ 𝑁 𝑁 𝑒−capture = 2𝜋 3 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 nuc 2 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 ′ nuc 2 𝜉 𝑛 𝜈 (Δ− 𝐸 𝑥 ′ −𝑏) 2 𝑘 𝑇 0 𝑒 − 𝜖 𝑘 𝑇 0 Choose 𝐸 𝑥 ′≠ 𝐸 𝑥 since 𝐸 𝑥 >∆−𝑏+ 𝑚 𝜈 , 𝐸 𝑥 <∆−𝑏 Given a very fine setting: 𝜖≈𝑘 𝑇 0 ≈ 10 −3 eV,Δ− 𝐸 𝑥 ′ −𝑏=100 keV and known parameters: 𝑛 𝜈 ≈56 cm −3 & assuming nuclear matrix elements of the same order 𝑁 𝑁 𝑒−capture =0.4× 10 −11 𝜉 2018-11-24 KIMS

The Formalism The Uncertainty Principle Suppose that there is a resonance in the final nucleus at an energy 𝜖 above the value Δ− 𝑏+ 𝑚 𝜈 with a width Γ= 𝜖 1+𝛿 , 𝛿≪1 𝛿 𝐸 𝜈 + 𝑚 𝜈 +Δ− 𝐸 𝑥 −𝑏 → 2 𝜋 Γ ( 𝐸 𝑥 −(Δ−𝑏+𝜖+ 𝑚 𝜈 )) 2 + ( Γ 2 ) 2 Integrate from 𝐸 𝑥 =Δ−𝑏+ 𝑚 𝜈 to 𝐸 𝑥 =Δ−𝑏+ 𝑚 𝜈 +Γ 2018-11-24 KIMS

The Formalism Antineutrino capture 𝑁=2𝜋𝜉 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 nuc 2 𝐺 𝐹 2 2 𝜙 𝑒 2 1 𝑘 𝑇 0 𝑒 − 𝐸 𝑥 +𝑏− 𝑚 𝜈 −Δ 𝑘 𝑇 0 𝑛 𝜈 →2𝜋𝜉 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 nuc 2 𝐺 𝐹 2 2 𝜙 𝑒 2 𝑛 𝜈 1 𝑘 𝑇 0 𝐾 𝛽,𝛿 𝐾 𝛽,𝛿 =− 1 𝜋 𝑖 𝑒 − 1 2 𝑖 𝛿+1 𝛽−𝛽 − 𝐸 1 1− 𝑖 2 𝛿+1 𝛽 + 𝑒 𝑖 𝛿+1 𝛽 𝐸 1 1− 𝑖 2 𝛿+1 𝛽 − 𝐸 1 1 2 𝑖 𝛿+ 1+2𝑖 𝛽 + 𝐸 1 1 2 𝛿+1 −𝑖− 2 𝛿+1 𝛽 + 𝑒 𝑖 𝛿+1 𝛽 𝐸 1 1− 𝑖 2 𝛿+1 𝛽 − 𝐸 1 1 2 𝑖 𝛿+ 1+2𝑖 𝛽 − 𝐸 1 1− 𝑖 2 𝛿+1 𝛽 + 𝑒 𝑖 𝛿+1 𝛽 𝐸 1 1− 𝑖 2 𝛿+1 𝛽 − 𝐸 1 1 2 𝑖 𝛿+ 1+2𝑖 𝛽 + 𝐸 1 1 2 𝛿+1 −𝑖− 2 𝛿+1 𝛽 𝐸 ㅜ = 1 ∞ 𝑒 −𝑧𝑡 𝑡 𝑛 𝑑𝑡 ,𝛽= 𝜖 𝑘 𝑇 0 2018-11-24 KIMS

The Formalism Electron capture 𝑁 𝑒−capture = 1 2𝜋 2 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 ′ nuc 2 𝜙 𝑒 2 𝐺 𝐹 2 2 (Δ− 𝐸 𝑥 ′ −𝑏) 2 → 1 2𝜋 2 𝑀𝐸 𝐸 𝑥 ′ nuc 2 𝜙 𝑒 2 𝐺 𝐹 2 2 𝜖 0 2 Λ( 𝜖 𝜖 0 ,𝛿) Λ 𝜖 𝜖 0 ,𝛿 = 4 𝜋 𝜖 𝜖 0 2 𝛿 𝛿+1 + tan −1 2 𝛿+1 − tan −1 2 ≈ 4 𝜋 𝜖 𝜖 0 2 3 5 𝛿(1− 92 25 𝛿) 2018-11-24 KIMS

The Formalism 2018-11-24 KIMS

The Formalism 𝑁 𝑁 𝑒−capture = (2𝜋) 3 𝜉 𝑛 𝜈 𝜖 0 2 𝑘 𝑇 0 𝐾 𝛽,𝛿 Λ 𝜖 𝜖 0 ,𝛿 Average energy available for de- excitation after ordinary 𝑒−capture= Δ−𝑏+ 𝜖 , 𝜖 =𝜖 4 𝜋 3 5 𝛿(1− 23 25 𝛿) 2018-11-24 KIMS

Some Results 𝑘 𝑇 0 ≈ 10 −3 eV, 𝑛 𝜈 ≈56 cm −3 → 𝑛 𝜈 𝜖 0 2 𝑘 𝑇 0 =1.6× 10 −13 ε/keV δ 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.4 N/N(e-capture)/10-17ξ 10.9 5.68 3.92 3.04 2.56 0.1 6.96 3.60 2.52 1.96 1.64 0.05 5.56 2.88 2.00 1.56 1.32 2018-11-24 KIMS

Some Results (7.7× 10 −22 , 5.8× 10 −23 , 1.4× 10 −23 ) obtained for Q=2.3, 2.5, 2.8 keV respectively for the target 163Ho L. Lusignoli and M. Vignati, Phys. Lett. B 697, 11 (2011), arXiv:1012/0760 (hep-ph) 6.6× 10 −24 for tritium A. Cocco, G. Magnamo, and M. Messina, JCAP 0706, 015 (2007), ; J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 110 (2008) 08214, arXiv:hep/ph/0703075. However…… 2018-11-24 KIMS

Specific Example – 157TB 157Tb (71 y)→ 157Gd (g.s.) & 157Gd (54 keV) 𝑄 𝐸𝐶 =60.1 −62.9 keV (Δ), 𝑏 𝐾 =50.24 keV, 𝑏 𝐿1 =8.38 keV , 𝑏 𝐿2 =7.93 keV , 𝑏 𝐾 = 7.24 keV Assume 𝑏 𝐿 =8 keV Only L-capture to the excited state is allowed The ratios of K- & L- capture = 7.36 2018-11-24 KIMS

Specific Example – 157TB Branching Ratio 𝑁 𝑁 𝑒−capture = (2𝜋) 3 𝜉 𝑛 𝜈 𝜖 0 2 𝑘 𝑇 0 𝐾 𝛽,𝛿 Λ 𝜖 𝜖 0 ,𝛿 Adopt the view that the branching ratio for L-capture toe the 54 keV state < that dictated by the phase-space vector by a factor of 10 Ex) 𝜖=50 eV, 𝛿=0.02, 𝑚 𝜈 =1 eV→ 𝜖 =6 eV → 𝑇 𝜈 = 𝜖 − 𝑚 𝜈 =5 eV (1/10)(5/104)2=2.5⨯10-8 (104 eV: K-capture energy to the g.s. of 157Gd 2018-11-24 KIMS

Specific Example – 157TB Branching Ratio (𝜉= 10 6 ) 2018-11-24 KIMS

Discussion If exists a resonance around (Δ−𝑏+𝜖+ 𝑚 𝜈 ) with a width 𝜖 1+𝛿 , there can be a relatively large rate for 𝜈 absorption. However, EC capture just below (Δ−𝑏+ 𝑚 𝜈 ) cannot be suppressed completely for 𝛿≠ 0. If the final state is populated by EC capture, the average energy available for de- excitation is Δ−𝑏− 𝜖 ( 𝜖 =𝜖 4 𝜋 3 5 𝛿 1− 23 25 𝛿 ), smaller than (Δ−𝑏+𝜖+ 𝑚 𝜈 ) If 𝛿≤ 10 −10 & 𝜉 is large enough, 𝜆 𝑎 𝜆 𝑐 can be larger than 1. 2018-11-24 KIMS

Conclusion The possibility of observing relic neutrino with neutrino absorption in a nucleus strongly depends on the properties of the target nuclide. Trituim, 187Re in beta-decay sector and 163Ho – considered as possible candidates But the rate is too small If some resonance conditions are met, a considerable enhancement of the associated rates can be obtained. Mass difference = b 𝜖=relic neutrino total energy 157Tb→157Gd meets the conditions, while the nuclide above don’t. 2018-11-24 KIMS