Student Satisfaction Spring 2009

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation to TEACHING & LEARNING COMMITTEE 2010 International Student Barometer & Student Barometer.
Advertisements

2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Student Satisfaction Inventory Results Saint Joseph’s College March 12, 2013.
Austin Community College Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Executive Summary.
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2013 November 27th, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Fall 2008 Graduate Survey Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
Enhancing Parents’ Role in Higher Education Assessment Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research, Babson College.
Entering Student Surveys (UG & Grad) and Non-Enrolling Survey (UG): Fall 2011 November 1, 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
New Business Overall Satisfaction Ratings Rating Scale = Extremely Satisfied 6 = Very Satisfied 5 = Satisfied 4 = Neither Satisf. nor Dissatisfied.
Student Satisfaction Report: Pacific Oaks College: Addendum: Instructional Sites Vs. Cohorts Office of Institutional Research TCS Education System September.
Period 5 Survey Findings English 10 A. Parents  1 of 6 did attend the Prep, that 1 stated the Prep HAS changed since they attended  Satisfaction with.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
Alumni Survey Summer 2015 Undergraduate and Graduate.
Enrolling Student Surveys: Fall 2009 November 10, 2009.
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (long version) Institutional Research and Planning.
1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Entering Student Surveys: Fall 2010 Perry Deess, Ph.D. Institutional Research and Planning November 17, 2010.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
Cañada Noel-Levitz Results Spring 2010 Semester. What is the Noel-Levitz Survey? National survey of students conducted by hundreds of colleges every year.
Undergraduate&Graduate – Entering Students Survey Fall 2016
Capital Community College 2014 Graduate Survey
AUB Alumni Survey Report 2016
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
Community Survey Report
Faculty Diversity & Work Life Survey Review
Fall 2015 Faculty Satisfaction Survey
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
ELI 2012 Annual Meeting February 15, 2012 Austin, Texas
Interpreting, Editing, and Communicating MISO Survey Results
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey
Community Survey Report
Distance Education Programs
Student Experience in the Classroom & Beyond
Institutional Research and Planning
Institutional Effectiveness: Trends for Planning
Ellen Bara Stolzenberg, Ph.D. Assistant Director, CIRP
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2017
FGCU GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
2003 Student Satisfaction Survey
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Short Version
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
One Step Away Initiative
North Seattle College All College Meetings
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (Short version)
Employer Survey 2018 Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Report to the Board of Trustees November 2018
Hartnell Climate Results
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2018
Student Satisfaction: Undergraduate Spring 2010
Student Satisfaction Spring 2006 (Short version)
Closing the Loop on Student Feedback
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
McPherson College, Fall 2017
LibQual+ Survey Results 2002
Institutional Research and Planning
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2012
2009 Student Opinion Survey Results
Summary of Overall Responses to Survey Statements
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2018 Undergraduate Trends
2017 Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) Results
The NJIT Student Experience
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2019 Undergraduate Trends
Institutional Research and Planning
Fall 2018 Student satisfaction Survey
Presentation transcript:

Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Institutional Research and Planning

Undergraduate Student Sample (n = 1535) 31.4 % response rate

If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT? Undergraduate Students Comparison

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Importance and Satisfaction (percentage) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Importance and Satisfaction (means) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Histogram of Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied N = only those who answered this question.

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Overall Satisfaction Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Overall Satisfaction Trend Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction With NJIT Seven Year Comparison Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Academics

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Campus Life

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Computers

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Public Safety/Buildings & Grounds

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Student Services

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Comparison with 2008 Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Personal security and safety on campus Undergraduate Students Three Year Trend

General condition of buildings and grounds Undergraduate Students Three Year Trend

Relevance of coursework to career development Undergraduate Students Three Year Trend

Feeling of community on campus Undergraduate Students Three Year Trend

Overall quality of instruction Undergraduate Students Three Year Trend

Undergraduate Satisfaction Five Year Comparison Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Importance Vs. Satisfaction High importance, high satisfaction Personal security and safety on campus Quality of own academic program Library resources and facilities Assistance provided by library staff Overall usefulness of NJIT’s website High importance, low satisfaction Overall satisfaction with food services Quality of campus life

Undergraduate Correlation* Of Overall Satisfaction *Regression model run using SPSS to show academic and cultural variables that predict overall satisfaction. This is the 4rd year that the basic model has been validated.

Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School Academics Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Student Satisfaction By Undergraduate/Graduate Undergraduate Response Rate: 31.4% Graduate Response Rate: 36.5% Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Sample (n = 846) 36.5% response rate

If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT? Graduate students Comparison

Graduate Student Satisfaction Importance and Satisfaction (percentage) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Satisfaction Importance And Satisfaction (means) Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Satisfaction Comparison with 2008 Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Personal security and safety on campus Graduate Students Three Year Trend

Overall quality of instruction Graduate Students Three Year Trend

Overall of your own academic program Graduate Students Three Year Trend

General condition of buildings and grounds Graduate Students Three Year Trend

Histogram of Overall Graduate Satisfaction Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied N = only those who answered this question.

Overall Graduate Satisfaction With NJIT Five Year Comparison Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Satisfaction Five Year Comparison Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School Academics Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate Student Satisfaction By Enrollment Status Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Graduate importance vs. satisfaction High importance, high satisfaction Overall usefulness of NJIT’s website Overall quality of instruction Quality of own academic program Assistance provided by library staff Personal security and safety on campus High importance, low satisfaction Overall satisfaction with food services Opportunities to work on research projects with faculty

Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School ARCH Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School CCS Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School NCE Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School CSLA Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 1 Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction By School SOM Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Graduate Satisfaction Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School ARCH Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School CCS Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School CSLA Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School NCE Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Appendix 2 Overall Graduate Satisfaction By School SOM Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied