Cancer Research Early Diagnosis Research Conference: ECR Pechakucha presentation: 23-24 Feb 2017 Exploring patient and practitioner perspectives of QCancer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Advertisements

"What I really needed was the truth" Exploring the information needs of people with CRPS. Sharon Grieve 1,2, Jo Adams 2, Candida McCabe 1,3. 1 Royal National.
PHASE 1 Facilitating discussion on treatment preferences and advance care planning in cancer patients using the vignette technique Funding: Department.
Collaboration, Evidence Based Practice and Shared Governance: A coming together ! Richelle Buckley, Professional Development Facilitator, Heywood, Middleton.
Rehabilitative care approach in a specialist palliative day care centre: a study of patient’s perspectives Author: C.A. Belchamber October 2003.
Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Clinical Practice October 2014 Dawn Stacey RN, PhD Research Chair in Knowledge Translation to Patients Full Professor,
Achieving improved cancer outcomes- a pathway approach, engaging primary care and partners Kathy Elliott Programme Director – NHS Improving Quality (Delivery.
Systematic review: the barriers and facilitators for minority ethnic groups in accessing urgent and prehospital care Lincolnshire Community Health Services.
National Programme for Mental Health. WHAT IS CLINICAL GOVERNANCE? Clinical governance is a framework through which healthcare teams are accountable.
Division of Population Health Sciences Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Patient Safety and Clinical Prediction.
Self-reported cognitive and emotional effects and lifestyle changes shortly after preventive cardiovascular consultations in general practice Dea Kehler.
SIPS in primary health care: extending the existing evidence base Professor Eileen Kaner.
Knowledge, Attitude and Behaviour of prescribers after the introduction of the treatment guidelines in South Africa Pillay T, Hill SR University of Newcastle.
What is a Care Pathway? Ali El-Ghorr Implementation Advisor.
A qualitative descriptive study describing relapsed multiple myeloma patients’ experience of their care and the views of health care professionals in their.
Rosemarie Bernabe, PhD Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care Patient representatives’ contributions to the benefit-risk assessment tasks of.
National Cancer Survivorship Initiative Central Hall, Westminster Monday 21 September 2009 Self Management.
[NAME CCG] [DATE] [FACILITATOR] Early Diagnosis of Cancer Quality Improvement using Cancer Significant Event Analysis [CCG MAP]
Victorian Assistant Workforce Model (allied health) Final steering committee meeting [Insert project team details] [Insert organisation details and logo]
Managing Patient-Centered Care. Outcomes Look at patient-centered care and the impact on health care delivery systems. Analyze the implications of are.
Adult Autism Service ADULT AUTISM TEAM PRESENTATION JULY
The Invited Review Mechanism. Overview Introduction to the Invited Review Mechanism (IRM) What can the IRM tell us about Trusts and surgeons and problems.
Evidence Informed Public Health
Title of the Change Project
Results Background Objectives Methods Conclusions
Impact and the Physical Sciences
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
Perfect Information Pathway Project
Raising Awareness of Bowel Screening in the Workplace
1st International Online BioMedical Conference (IOBMC 2015)
The Development of a Vocational Training (VT) Foundation Programme for Community Pharmacists Heather Harrison1; Fiona McMillan1; Ailsa Power1; Harry.
Empathy in Medical Care Jessica Ogle (D
Lister Hospital & University of Hertfordshire
Dr Marcello Bertotti Senior Research Fellow
BTEC Health and Social Care L3
Jane E Scullion Respiratory Nurse Consultant
Community and Voluntary Action Tameside Developing a VCFS ‘Wellness Offer’ Anna Hynes Policy & Participation Manager July 2014.
Integration of Primary and Secondary Care Cardiology
Welcome Self Injurious Behaviour: Main title slide page
Effective evidence-based occupational therapy
A Path of Learning and Improvement
Quitting smoking after diagnosis of lung, bladder or upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) cancer: is it supported in primary care and does it improve prognosis?
Mallee Child and Youth Area Partnership Forum 9th September 2015
A qualitative assessment of factors impacting adoption and implementation of USPSTF age-based hepatitis C virus screening recommendations Amy B. Jessop,
Catherine Comiskey and Karen Galligan Date 24h /10/2017
Co-PI: Ben Coopwood, MD, FACS
ALZHEIMER’S AUSTRALIA AND RESEARCH
Professional Development Workshop on [title]
Somerset, Wiltshire, Avon and Gloucestershire (SWAG) Cancer Alliance
EARLY Combination Therapy in PAH: What Every Cardiologist Needs to Know.
Tips for Written assignment HSNS265
After the Baby Comes.
The impact of small-group EBP education programme: barriers and facilitators for EBP allied health champions to share learning with peers.
What are risk-scoring tools?
Chloe Saunders, Healthcare Project Officer, Macmillan Cancer Support
Regional Oncology Social Work
Our Commitments for Dementia in Sheffield: have your say
Expected impact – direct referral to MRI
Somerset, Wiltshire, Avon and Gloucestershire (SWAG) Cancer Alliance
How will the NHS Long Term Plan work in our community?
Improving Eye Health Objectives –
References and Resources
PAH Pathways: What Do the Data Tell Us?”
28 Day Faster Diagnosis Standard
Managing HF in Primary Care
Robyn Lennox, Hospital Discharge Hub Manager
Restorative Approaches with Families in Elder Abuse Cases
By: Andi Indahwaty Sidin A Critical Review of The Role of Clinical Governance in Health Care and its Potential Application in Indonesia.
Making it Easy: Health Literacy Outcomes to improve social care
Realistic Prescribing Pathways
Presentation transcript:

Cancer Research Early Diagnosis Research Conference: ECR Pechakucha presentation: 23-24 Feb 2017 Exploring patient and practitioner perspectives of QCancer use in primary care consultations Joseph Akanuwe PhD Student, Community and Health Research Unit, University of Lincoln

Introduction QCancer is a novel cancer risk assessment tool that combines risk factors and symptoms to estimate an individual’s risk of developing cancer within two years Rationale for the study: Evidence on the views of service users and practitioners on the use of QCancer in primary care consultation is limited

Methods Qualitative design: Individual and focus group interviews with service users from the general public and practitioners from general practices in Lincolnshire Analysis: The qualitative data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework approach

Results 36 participants interviewed: 19 service users (aged 21-71 years) 17 practitioners (aged 33 - 55 years)   4 key themes: Implications of quantifying risk using QCancer Usefulness of QCancer in consultations Communicating cancer risk to patients Potential challenges to the uptake of QCancer in consultations

Implications of quantifying cancer risk using QCancer Potential conflict with current cancer guidelines High risk symptoms need referral for further investigation whatever the quantified risk

Use of QCancer in consultations Quantifying cancer risk Supporting decision-making Identifying, raising awareness of and modifying health behaviours Improving processes and speed of assessment and treatment Personalising care

Communicating cancer risk to patients Tailoring visual representation of risk Openness and honesty Informing and involving patients in the use of QCancer Providing time for listening, informing, explaining and reassuring in the context of a professional approach

Challenges to uptake of QCancer primary care Additional time required Unnecessary worry/anxiety generated by cancer investigations Potential for over-referral Practitioner scepticism about using the tool Need for evidence of effectiveness before introducing QCancer in patient consultations

Conclusion QCancer will help in: quantifying risk; clinical decisions etc Communication needs of users and potential barriers for both users and practitioners should be considered in implementing QCancer Further research is needed to assess effectiveness on health outcomes