Systematic Mapping of RNA-Chromatin Interactions In Vivo

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
Advertisements

Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
A Robust Network of Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways Governs Genome Integrity during C. elegans Development  Daphne B. Pontier, Marcel Tijsterman 
Volume 18, Issue 13, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 3-5 (January 2013)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (February 2017)
Taichi Umeyama, Takashi Ito  Cell Reports 
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Anna Kloc, Mikel Zaratiegui, Elphege Nora, Rob Martienssen 
Discovery and Characterization of piRNAs in the Human Fetal Ovary
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
X-Inactivation: Xist RNA Uses Chromosome Contacts to Coat the X
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Origin of Immunoglobulin Isotype Switching
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (November 2016)
Supplemental Figure 3 A B C T-DNA 1 2 RGLG1 2329bp 3 T-DNA 1 2 RGLG2
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 20, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Alex M. Plocik, Brenton R. Graveley  Molecular Cell 
A Major Epigenetic Programming Mechanism Guided by piRNAs
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Systematic Mapping of RNA-Chromatin Interactions In Vivo
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Doris Bachtrog, Nicholas R.T. Toda, Steven Lockton  Current Biology 
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Evolution of Alu Elements toward Enhancers
Volume 151, Issue 7, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Dynamic Regulation of Nucleosome Positioning in the Human Genome
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 7, Pages (September 2018)
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Doxorubicin Enhances Nucleosome Turnover around Promoters
Divergent Transcription from Active Promoters
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (July 2018)
STAT4 facilitates a permissive epigenetic landscape (H3K4me3) in activated NK cells. STAT4 facilitates a permissive epigenetic landscape (H3K4me3) in activated.
Remembering the Prolonged Cold of Winter
Genome-wide “Re”-Modeling of Nucleosome Positions
Taichi Umeyama, Takashi Ito  Cell Reports 
Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
Enhancer Control of Transcriptional Bursting
Volume 18, Issue 13, Pages (March 2017)
Mutant TERT promoter displays active histone marks and distinct long-range interactions: A, cell lines that were used in the study with their origin and.
Presentation transcript:

Systematic Mapping of RNA-Chromatin Interactions In Vivo Bharat Sridhar, Marcelo Rivas-Astroza, Tri C. Nguyen, Weizhong Chen, Zhangming Yan, Xiaoyi Cao, Lucie Hebert, Sheng Zhong  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 602-609 (February 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.011 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2017 27, 602-609DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schema for the MARGI Technology (A) Linker sequence. The linker is composed of double-stranded DNA in the center and single-stranded DNA on the two ends. The top strand of the linker is 11 bases longer than the bottom strand, leaving 10 bases of single-stranded DNA at the 5′ end and 1 base of single-stranded DNA at the 3′ end. The 5′ end of the top strand is adenylated (5′App), and the 5′ end of the bottom strand is phosphorylated (Phos). N, random base. Letters in blue: BamHI restriction site. (B) RNA-linker ligation. RNA with 3′-OH was produced by T4 PNK treatment. (C) Linker-DNA ligation. A single base “A” tail (in red) is added to the 3′ end of DNA, which enables a sticky-end ligation to the linker. (D) Circularization and re-linearization. After BamH1 digestion, the linker sequence is split and re-allocated to the two ends, which were, by design, complementary to the library construction primers. (E) Another perspective of the ligation and reverse transcription steps as shown in (A)–(D). See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2017 27, 602-609DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MARGI-Identified caRNAs (A and B) Composition of the four nucleotide bases on every position of paired-end reads in a HaeIII library (A) and in a sonication library (B). Arrow, increased proportions of cytosine (C) in the first two positions, which is specific to Read 2 (DNA end) of the HaeIII library. (C–F) Scatterplots of lincRNAs with MARGI RNA-end read counts per gene (y axis) plotted against gene length (x axis) from pxRNAs (C and D) and diRNAs (E and F). (G–J) Numbers of non-coding pxRNAs (G and H) and diRNAs (I and J) categorized by RNA type. Proc_transcripts, processed transcripts; misc_RNA, miscellaneous other RNA. See also Figure S4. Current Biology 2017 27, 602-609DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Genome View of Mapped MARGI Read Pairs The mapped MARGI reads are plotted with Genome Interaction Visualizer (GIVe; http://give.genemo.org/?hg38), where the reference genome is plotted horizontally, twice (top and bottom bars). The top and the bottom bars can be zoomed in or out independent of each other. The mapped RNA ends are shown on the top bar (genome), and the DNA ends are shown on the bottom bar (genome). Each MARGI read pair is represented as a line linking the locations of the RNA end (top) and the DNA end (bottom). The HEK diMARGI data at are shown with MALAT1 locus (top) versus the entire chromosome 11 (bottom) (A), the SNHG1 locus versus the entire chromosome 11 (B), and the XIST locus versus the entire chromosome X (C). Red arrows point to known caRNAs. Current Biology 2017 27, 602-609DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 caRNA-Associated Genomic Regions (A) Size distributions of pxPeaks (red) and diPeaks (blue) from HEK cells (solid line) and ESCs (dashed line). (B) Proportions of pxPeaks and diPeaks in promoters, UTRs, exons, introns, downstream regions, and distal intergenic regions. (C and D) RNA attachment levels (RALs) (white) in 20,000 bp flanking regions of all (34,475) non-redundant TSSs (GRCh38), as derived from pxMARGI (C) and diMARGI (D) in descending orders. Shown in parallel are H3K4me3 (red), H3K27ac (orange), H3K9me3 (green), and H3K27me3 (blue, ESCs only, no available data for HEK cells) intensities and gene expression levels. Yellow curve, smoothed average of gene expression levels. TSS, transcription start site. (E) Scatterplots of 1,000 bp genomic windows with histone modification levels (y axis) versus RALs (x axis). Each data point represents the average of 100 windows. (F) RALs were plotted for all identified pxPeaks and diPeaks and their 20,000 flanking regions (white). Shown in parallel are H3K9me3 levels on the same regions (green). See also Figures S2 and S3. Current Biology 2017 27, 602-609DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions