Impact of Percutaneous Suprapubic Tube Drainage on Patient Discomfort after Radical Prostatectomy Louis Spencer Krane, Mahendra Bhandari, James O. Peabody, Mani Menon European Urology Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 325-331 (August 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.018 Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Percutaneous placement of a Prolene suture on a Keith needle to secure the percutaneous suprapubic tube. European Urology 2009 56, 325-331DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.018) Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Relationship of the suprapubic catheter with the abdominal wall and anterior bladder. European Urology 2009 56, 325-331DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.018) Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Correct placement of the suprapubic catheter and sterile button at the conclusion of the procedure. European Urology 2009 56, 325-331DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.018) Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 4 Continence rates of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. European Urology 2009 56, 325-331DOI: (10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.018) Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions