SiD IR Layout M. Breidenbach, P. Burrows, T. Markiewicz

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Chapter 6 Cranes Crane Operation • Industrial Cranes • Mobile Cranes • Crane Inspections.

Advertisements

SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)

1 IR Hall for GLD Oct Y. Sugimoto KEK. 2 Underground hall HybridPure CMS IR hall area (WxL)25x55 Beam height8.6 Crane max hook height20.5 Largest.

SiD assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC), May. 14, 2014 ALCW 2014, Fermilab Infrastructures & Timeline for Hybrid Access.

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Layout Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IP Layout What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.

1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.

CF Constraints to the Strawman BDIR Configuration Tom Markiewicz SLAC 07 January 2005 IR Hall Muon Wall Beam Dump Detector Photon Dump 4m tunnel with “Y”

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Backgrounds Update Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.

October 22, 2003H.J. Krebs1 LST Mechanical Design Review Mechanical Installation Preparation H. James Krebs October 21, 2003.

DH in Hybrid-A and ILD 2014/9/5 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.

Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.

Global Design Effort Detector concept Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Kurt Krempetz September 17, 2007.

SiD Forward Region Tom Markiewicz/SLAC KILC’12, Taegu, Korea 24 April 2012.

BDS Design Studies John Amann ILC Mechanical Engineering 10/24/06.

1 FD Support and Pacman for GLDc 27 Aug Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK.

Problem The basic cells of eRHIC’s two stacked FFAG accelerators are designed for the ~380m radius of curvature of the RHIC tunnel arcs. However, RHIC’s.

Philip Burrows MDI session, LCWS06 Bangalore, 10/3/06 SiD MDI Issues Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University Thanks to: Marty Breidenbach,

Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.

October 13, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 International Linear Collider Machine Detector Interface Materials for discussion at Engineering Forum: experiences.

Detector studies, Radiation Simulations, Organization FCC Hadron Detector Meeting July 27 th 2015 W. Riegler.

Philip Burrows SiD Meeting, Paris 11/02/081 Machine Detector Interface Issues Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University Thanks to: Tom Markiewicz.

September 18, 2007H. J. Krebs1 SiD Collaboration One Piece End Door Design Concept plus Forward Equipment Interfaces H. James Krebs SLAC September 18,

Si D in 14mrad/14mrad/z=0 ILC T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Advisory Group 14 August 2006.

SiD IR & MDI Engineering Progress Prelude to a Discussion of Integration with ILD and Based on Marco Oriunno’s Jan 2008 Talk at SiD CM Tom Markiewicz/SLAC.

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Geometries & Constraints on Forward Detectors Tom Markiewicz SLAC ALCPG SLAC 08 January 2004.

1 SiD Push-pull Plans Marco Oriunno, SLAC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva, October 2010 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010.

EAR2 Beam Line Report on the Status C. Weiss EAR2 Beam Line - Report on the Status1.

SiD Engineering and Solenoid Kurt Krempetz (Layer 5) (Layer 1) VXD.

GLD experimental hall and detector assembly Y.Sugimoto KEK 27 Sep

SiD Collaboration Meeting Highlights Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 08 May 2007.

Global Design Effort Magnetic and Mechanical FEA of SiD IRENG07 Bob Wands September 18, 2007.

March 22, –  Design Concept & Hall Layout  Access Tunnel  Top heading Tunnel  Displacement of detector hall by push-pull operation.

Philip Burrows MDI Panel Meeting 15/08/06 Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University SiD and IR/MDI Issues.

September 20, 2007H. J. Krebs/B. Wands/B. Cooper1 SiD Collaboration Preliminary End Door Design Concept Support of Forward Systems H. James Krebs Bob Wands.

SiD MDI Issues Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Beijing ACFA/GDE Meeting 05 February 2007.

SHMS SUBASSEMBLY BREAKDOWN AMSEC LLC 10/27/2010. Key Plan CG (TYP) 90 (dotted line)

1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.

Philip Burrows SiD Monthly Phone Meeting, 4/10/071 IR Issues from IRENG07 Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.

12 July 2007IRENG07 WG-A M. Breidenbach1 SiD Concept SiD is relatively modest in scale compared to the LHC detectors, and comparable to SLD: Tracker Radius.

Implication of gamma-gamma on 14mr tunnels discussion (questions for discussion with WG-C and WG-A) Valery Telnov Budker INP IRENG07, Sept.19, 2007, SLAC.

1 Cryogenic System of Interaction Region (SiD, ILD, QD0, QF1, Crab Cavity) in the Japanese Mountain Site WebEx meeting : June 19 th, 2012 IPNS/Cryogenic.

SiD MDI Update Topics for Discussion Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 15 May 2007.

Comments on Services Elba Comments on Services & … Bill Wisniewski SLAC.

IRC 2009 OVERALL. SITE PLAN PROPERTY LINES LOCATION OF BUILDING GRADES STREETS.

M.Oriunno, SLAC 1 SiD installation with horizontal access shafts Marco Oriunno, SLAC SiD/ILD Engineering Meeting SLAC, December 2011.

Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions

Machine Detector Interface Design Updates

Detector Hall Design and Cost Information CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES

Platform Design for the Target Spectrometer using Heavy-Weight Rollers J. Lühning, GSI Darmstadt, Three design goals for Platform: Low construction.

Updated Design of Detector Hall

SBN Far Detector Installation & Integration

Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/2/1 ILD integration meeting

Experimental hall design in Japanese site

Present status of the flux return yoke design

PANDA Yoke of the Magnet

Layout of Detectors for CLIC

BDS Cryogenic System RDR Status and EDR Plans

Extract from: Minimal BDS and other thoughts

Update of experimental hall in Japanese mountain site

SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach 29 July 2010 M. Breidenbach.

Changes to SiD since the DBD

Sub-Detector Assembly Area Summary of discussion at ALCW2015

Radiation Physics requirements for the IR

Extract from today’s talk given to DCB

SiD IR Layout M. Breidenbach, P. Burrows, T. Markiewicz

A 12-min Introduction to The ILC Machine Detector Interface and SiD

NLC 2001 Beam Delivery Layout

IR Beam Transport Status

Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures

Presentation transcript:

SiD IR Layout M. Breidenbach, P. Burrows, T. Markiewicz SiD Collaboration Meeting 16-17 December 2005 Fermilab

2005.10.11 Discussion SiD Dimensions from 2005-05 files Barrel radius=6.450m Barrel half-length=2.775m EC Yoke=3.12m thick EC Yoke ends at 5.895m=2.775+3.120m Garage assembly requirements 3m shielding wall between beamline position & garage Assuming self-shielding [which seems OK: see L. Keller, 2005.12.13 SLAC BDS mtg.] wall needed for commissioning only 5m free space between shield wall & rotated barrel yoke3 2m free + 2m assembly fixture+1m free 4m free space between rotated barrel yoke & rotated barrel HCAL 1m free + 2m assembly fixture+1m free 5m free space between rotated barrel HCAL & pit wall

Detector Access Guesstimates Door support leg overhang= 3.2m~25% door height (=barrel diameter=12.9m) Door opening= 3.0m Free space to walk around door ends= 1.9m Reserved radius = 8.0m (6.45 iron +1.55m services) Free space between dressed barrel & pit walls= 2.0m PACMAN annulus= 3.0m [1m Fe, 2m concrete] Other Tunnel diameter 3.2m Assumed beam height=Barrel radius + 1m

SiD closed, on beamline, in 20m x 28m Pit Wall Barrel Foot Door Tunnel 3.0 m 5.105 m Mobile PAC1 Fixed PAC2 Foot Shield Wall

R20 Detail 38cm OD Support Tube Crab 40cm OD SiD Aperture 1m wide platform

SiD open, on beamline, in 20m x 28m

Half SiD in 48m x 28m IR anamorphic scale Shield Wall 3.00 m 5.00 m Barrel Yoke rotated 6.45 m 4.00 m HCAL rotated 6.45 m 5.00 m

SiD (closed) in 48m x 28m IR x-scale=y-scale

Elevation View Pit Elevation: 30m ? 1.000 Barrel-floor 12.90 Detector diameter 12.90 Free space above detector 3.000 Crane bridge and hook

Remaining Issues Door opening sequence If 3.0m long PacMan moves over leg (how?) to outside 55cm clearance between door radius and PacMan seems marginal On Shielding wall side, assuming shielding not needed after commissioning, infinite space available On far side of garage, 10m is arbitrary 12m is approximate maximum for 2 IR Baseline Configuration Push-Pull not analyzed yet Maybe move it out radially, then back (in z) to tunnel wall 5.105m long PacMan either stays in position, surrounding final doublet/crab support platform, or itself opens radially to move to far walls, permitting 3.0m PacMan to open slightly & move back to pit wall Many beamline devices including Crab Cavity within 14m of IP It would be very, very good to have these devices in the tunnel Suggest we adopt a 18m wide hall by minimizing to ~ZERO both: 1.9m free space at end when door opens (SLD was ~0.5m) 3.2m door support length pocket in wall for door support legs use legless scheme for earthquake proofing / moving

Si D Open in a 20m x 18m Data Pit Support Legs in pockets, screw drive earthquake constraints, etc. Pit Wall at z=+9m

Half SiD in 48m x 18m IR Hall Anamorphic scale

SiD (open) in 48m x 18m IR X scale = y scale