Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Advertisements

Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Th9 Cells Drive Host Immunity against Gastrointestinal Worm Infection
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Community Behavior and Spatial Regulation within a Bacterial Microcolony in Deep Tissue Sites Serves to Protect against Host Attack  Kimberly M. Davis,
Local Inflammatory Cues Regulate Differentiation and Persistence of CD8+ Tissue- Resident Memory T Cells  Tessa Bergsbaken, Michael J. Bevan, Pamela J.
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Cheryl Y. Chan, Ashley L. St. John, Soman N. Abraham  Immunity 
Lung Natural Helper Cells Are a Critical Source of Th2 Cell-Type Cytokines in Protease Allergen-Induced Airway Inflammation  Timotheus Y.F. Halim, Ramona H.
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Formed at the Infection Site Control the Induction of Protective T Helper 1 Responses against Leishmania  Beatriz León,
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 165, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Keratinocyte-Specific Deletion of the Receptor RAGE Modulates the Kinetics of Skin Inflammation In Vivo  Julia S. Leibold, Astrid Riehl, Jan Hettinger,
A Mutation in the Nlrp3 Gene Causing Inflammasome Hyperactivation Potentiates Th17 Cell-Dominant Immune Responses  Guangxun Meng, Fuping Zhang, Ivan Fuss,
Interferon-γ-Responsive Nonhematopoietic Cells Regulate the Immune Response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis  Ludovic Desvignes, Joel D. Ernst  Immunity 
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Pivotal Role of Dermal IL-17-Producing γδ T Cells in Skin Inflammation
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Oral Tolerance Can Be Established via Gap Junction Transfer of Fed Antigens from CX3CR1+ Macrophages to CD103+ Dendritic Cells  Elisa Mazzini, Lucia Massimiliano,
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Pei Xiong Liew, Woo-Yong Lee, Paul Kubes  Immunity 
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
CD40, but Not CD40L, Is Required for the Optimal Priming of T Cells and Control of Aerosol M. tuberculosis Infection  Vanja Lazarevic, Amy J Myers, Charles.
Melissa B. Uccellini, Adolfo García-Sastre  Cell Reports 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
T Cells with Low Avidity for a Tissue-Restricted Antigen Routinely Evade Central and Peripheral Tolerance and Cause Autoimmunity  Dietmar Zehn, Michael.
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Karima R.R. Siddiqui, Sophie Laffont, Fiona Powrie  Immunity 
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
COMMD10-Guided Phagolysosomal Maturation Promotes Clearance of Staphylococcus aureus in Macrophages  Shani Ben Shlomo, Odelia Mouhadeb, Keren Cohen, Chen.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 145-158 (January 2015) Liver-Resident Macrophage Necroptosis Orchestrates Type 1 Microbicidal Inflammation and Type-2-Mediated Tissue Repair during Bacterial Infection  Camille Blériot, Théo Dupuis, Grégory Jouvion, Gérard Eberl, Olivier Disson, Marc Lecuit  Immunity  Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 145-158 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.020 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Immunity 2015 42, 145-158DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Lm Induces Local Proliferation of Liver Macrophages Livers were harvested from WT mice 3 dpi after intravenous infection with 5 × 105 Lm unless specified. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of liver cells. Percentages of Ki67+ cells are out of CD45+F4/80+ cells (n = 6, Mann-Whitney test, experiment repeated three times). (B and C) Confocal imaging of frozen sections of the liver. Sections are stained for macrophages (F4/80), proliferating cells (Ki67), and either Listeria (B) or neutrophils (Ly-6G) (C). Scale bars represent 10 μm. The experiment was repeated three times. (D and E) Quantification over time of F4/80+Ki67+ among total F4/80+ cells on frozen sections of the liver (D) and kinetics of liver bacterial load from WT mice (E). The experiment was repeated two times. Mean ± SD are shown. See also Figure S1. Immunity 2015 42, 145-158DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Lm-Induced Liver Macrophage Proliferation Requires M-CSF and Basophil-Derived IL-4 Livers were harvested from WT mice 3 dpi after intravenous infection with 5 × 105 Lm unless specified. (A) Quantification of F4/80+Ki67+ cells on representative fields of liver sections. Mice were fed or not with 2 mg of the M-CSFR inhibitor GW2580 bid 7 days before Lm infection and the 3 following days (n = 4, M-W test, experiment repeated two times). (B) Flow cytometry analysis of gated CD45+F4/80+ liver cells. Percentages of Ki67+ cells are out of CD45+F4/80+ cells (n = 3, M-W test, experiment repeated two times). (C) Quantification of F4/80+Ki67+ among total F4/80+ cells on frozen sections of the liver cells in the liver of WT, WT basophil-depleted, or Il4−/− mice (n = 8, M-W test, experiment repeated three times). (D) Flow cytometry analysis of liver CD45+ cells. Basophils were defined as CD49bintFcεR1int cells (n = 4, M-W test, experiment repeated two times). (E) Confocal imaging on frozen sections of the liver stained for F4/80 (green), CD200R3 (red), and nuclei (blue) (n = 3, M-W test, experiment repeated two times). Scale bars represent 20 μm. The inset is an enlargement of squared area. One representative field is shown. (F) ELISA of IL-4 in supernatants of the homogenized liver of Lm-infected mice (n = 4, M-W test, experiment repeated two times). n.d. indicates not detected. (G) Relative expression of Il4 in sorted liver basophils obtained from uninfected or infected mice (n = 3, experiment repeated two times). (H) Lm bacterial burden in the liver of Lm-infected WT, WT basophil-depleted, or Il4−/− mice (n = 8, M-W test). See also Figure S2. Immunity 2015 42, 145-158DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Proliferating Macrophages Derive from Recruited Monocytes (A) Flow cytometry analysis on gated CD45+F4/80+ liver cells isolated from uninfected mice or 1, 3, and 9 dpi (n = 6). The experiment was repeated three times. KCs are CD11bloLy-6Clo, Mos are CD11bintLy-6Chi, and MoMs are CD11bhi Ly-6Cint. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of liver KCs obtained from WT mice. Mice were transferred with GFP+ monocytes obtained from MaFIA mice concomitantly with the infection by 5 × 105 bacteria. Liver cells were obtained at 1 dpi and gated as described above (n = 4, M-W test, experiment repeated two times). (C) Quantification of F4/80+ (left) and F4/80+ Ki67+ cells (right) on at least five representative fields of liver sections of WT, Ccr2−/−, or chimeric WT→Ccr2−/− (n = 4, M-W test). The experiment was repeated three times. Bottom: Confocal imaging of frozen sections of the liver obtained from Ccr2−/− or chimeric WT→Ccr2−/− mice at 3 dpi. Sections are stained for F4/80 and Ki67. Scale bars represent 10 μm. One representative of at least five randomly chosen fields is shown (n = 4, experiment repeated three times). (D) Confocal imaging on frozen sections of liver obtained from WT→MaFIA-GFP mice and stained for F4/80 (white) and Ki67 (red). GFP fluorescence of M-CSFR-producing cells is shown in green. Scale bars represent 20 μm. One representative of at least five randomly chosen fields is shown. (E) Quantification on five representative fields of liver sections of F4/80+ GFP+ (top) among total F4/80+ (bottom) cells of chimeric mice WT→MaFIA-GFP over indicating periods after inoculum (n = 3 mice non-infected and 2 mice per time point after inoculum). Mean ± SD are shown. Please also see Figure S3. Immunity 2015 42, 145-158DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Lm Induces Kupffer Cell Necroptosis (A) Confocal imaging on frozen sections of the liver obtained from WT mice and stained for F4/80 (green) and Lm (red). Scale bars represent 20 μm (left) or 5 μm (right). One representative of at least five randomly chosen fields is shown. Livers were obtained from mice at 4 hpi after intravenous infection with 1 × 108 Lm. Quantification of the distribution of bacteria within cells under these conditions of infection. 100 infected cells from 3 mice were randomly chosen and analyzed. (B) As in (A), PI fluorescence is shown in purple. Scale bar represents 5 μm. (C) Quantification by flow cytometry of PI-permeable cells among gated KCs, Mos, or MoMs. Livers were obtained from mice at 1 dpi with 5 × 105 Lm (n = 4, M-W test, experiment repeated two times). (D) Quantification of F4/80+ PI-permeable cells on representative fields of frozen sections of the liver of WT, Irf3−/−, Ifnar−/−, Casp1−/−, and Rip3−/− or WT mice treated with necrostatin-1 or necrostatin-1s (1 single i.v. injection 90 min prior to the infection of indicated amount) (n = 3, M-W test). The experiment was repeated two times. ns indicates non-significant. The scale expresses the relative amount of dying macrophages between the different conditions, the WT being fixed to 100 for clarity. See also Figure S4. Immunity 2015 42, 145-158DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Hepatocyte-Derived IL-33 Induces Monocyte-Derived Macrophage Proliferation (A) Il33 gene expression assay (left) and ELISA of IL-33 (right) in supernatants of homogenized livers obtained from WT mice after intravenous infection with 5 × 105 Lm. Mice were sacrificed at indicated time points after inoculation (n = 4, t test, experiment repeated two times). Mean ± SD are shown. (B) Quantification of IL-33+ cells on representative fields of frozen sections of the liver of WT mice treated or not with 10 μg of necrostatin-1s after intravenous infection with 5 × 105 Lm. Mice were sacrificed at 4 hpi (n = 4, M-W test, experiment repeated two times). (C) Quantification of F4/80+Ki67+ cells on representative fields of frozen sections of the liver of WT mice treated or not with 10 μg of necrostatin-1s. Mice were sacrificed at 3 dpi (n = 4, M-W test, experiment repeated two times). (D) Quantification of F4/80+Ki67+ cells on representative fields of frozen sections of the liver of WT, t1/st2−/−, or WT mice treated with an anti-T1/ST2 antibody or 3 dpi after i.v. infection with 5 × 105 bacteria (n = 4, M-W test, experiment repeated three times). See also Figure S6. Immunity 2015 42, 145-158DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Early Type 1 Inflammatory Response to Lm Is Followed and Counterbalanced by the Type 2 Response (A) Ym1 gene expression assay in supernatants of homogenized livers obtained from WT mice after i.v. infection with 5 × 105 bacteria. Mice were sacrificed at indicated time points after inoculation (n = 6). The experiment was repeated two times. Mean ± SD are shown. (B) Relative expression of Ifnγ, Retnla, Arg1, and Ym1 genes in sorted liver macrophages obtained from uninfected or infected mice (n = 6). The experiment was repeated two times. Mean ± SD are shown. (C) Lm burden in the liver of indicated mice i.v. infected with 5 × 105 bacteria for indicated time points. Dagger (†) indicates dead mouse. Mice were injected with IL-4c every 48 hr or daily with IFN-γ from the day −1 before infection and then sacrificed at indicated time points (n = 4, t test). The experiment was repeated two times. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver sections obtained from these mice at 7 dpi (n = 4, M-W test, experiment repeated two times). Mean ± SD are shown. See also Figure S7. Immunity 2015 42, 145-158DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Lm-Induced Macrophage Proliferation Dampens Inflammation, Allowing the Liver to Return to Homeostasis (A) Confocal imaging on representative fields of frozen sections of the liver obtained from Flk1-GFP mouse untreated or basophil-depleted and i.v. infected with 5 × 105 bacteria at 0-, 3- or 30-dpi and stained for F4/80 (green). GFP fluorescence of Flk1+ cells is shown in white. Scale bars represent 20 μm (n = 4). The experiment was repeated two times. (B) Left: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver sections obtained from WT mice non-infected or i.v. infected with 5 × 105 bacteria 21 dpi. White arrows indicate inflammatory infiltrates. Scale bars represent 200 μm. Right: Quantification of the number and the size of inflammatory infiltrates. One whole slice of the liver (more than 100 fields) was used for the quantification (n = 3, t test). The experiment was repeated two times. Mean ± SD are shown. See also Figure S7. Immunity 2015 42, 145-158DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions