Human Intrusion in Deep Geologic Repositories in the U.S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on NRC Low-Level Waste Program – Major Activities Large Scale blending of LLRW -Issued guidance to agreement states for reviewing proposals for.
Advertisements

Risk Assessment for Cultural Institutions: Fire Testing vs Computer Modeling Frederick W. Mowrer, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Fire Protection Engineering.
Radiation Benefit and Risk Assessment ©Health Physics Society.
Use of reference biospheres to prove long-term safety of repositories for radioactive waste Workshop, Berlin, August 2008.
Perspectives on USNRC Study Request Nuclear & Radiation Studies Board April 26, 2010 Ralph Andersen, CHP Senior Director – Radiation Safety & Environmental.
Release of Patients Treated with I-131: An Update Michael Fuller Team Leader Medical Radiation Safety Team U.S. NRC.
Protection of the public and the environment standards? Rodolfo Avila.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Regulations Part II: Basic Concepts and Definitions Day 8 – Lecture 5(2)
Mrs. Brandi Robinson Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation Center for Veterinary Medicine Regulating Animal Drugs.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Workshop on the Safe Disposal of Low Level Radioactive Waste WG3 debriefing.
Definition, Role and Documentation of the Safety Case: Quick Review
The Way Forward in the US: Nuclear Waste Management Allison Macfarlane AAAS San Diego February 19, 2010.
Safety Assessment Methodologies and Implementation of Monitoring and Control Programmes Dr. Japie van Blerk AquiSim Consulting (Pty) Ltd Wednesday, 24.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment Summary from CSM on Human Action And Intrusion.
Performance Assessment Issues in Waste Management and Environmental Protection Annual Meeting of the Baltimore-Washington Chapter of the Health Physics.
Decision making process / basic options assessment Mercury Storage and Disposal LAC Two Countries Project Gustavo Solórzano Ochoa, Consultan t Montevideo,
IAEA Technical Meeting on Future Human Actions at Disposal Sites IAEA, Vienna, Austria September 24-28, 2012 Overview of NRC Approach to Human Intrusion.
1 LICENSING A U.S. GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORY WILLIAM BORCHARDT Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
September 2014 Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61 Tom Corbett, Governor E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
ILW disposal in the UK Presentation at IAEA TM-45865, September 2013 Cherry Tweed – Chief Scientific Advisor.
Human Intrusion and Future Human Actions in relation to Disposal of Radioactive Waste TM September 24, 2012 Presented by: L. Bailey on behalf of.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Nicolas Solente Workshop on Regulatory Requirements to Ensure Safe Disposal of Disused Sealed Sources for Operators and Regulators Amman, JORDAN 7-11 April.
Long-Term Spent Fuel Management in Canada International Conference on Management of Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors Vienna, Austria May 31, 2010.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Lucy Bailey HIDRA Human Intrusion in the context of Disposal of RadioActive waste Closing Summary for.
David G Bennett December 2014
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
1 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Commission canadienne de sûreté nucléaire Julie Mecke – Senior Project Officer Shizhong Lei – Geoscience Technical.
Clear thinking on Nuclear: Waste disposal 1.One site for high-level radioactive waste is easier to monitor, regulate, and secure 2.A repository will provide.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Prediction and Yucca Mountain Jeremy Van Cleve Global Climate Change and Society Summer Program August 8 th, 2002.
Safety-related Issues for the Disposal of Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) Dr. Jürgen Wollrath Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) Department Safety.
Waste and site related issues Fredrik Vahlund SKB.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.2. Principles of radioactive waste management Basic technical management solutions: concentrate and contain, storage.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Siting Strategies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Requirements for.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Potential Working Groups.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM Technical Meeting to Discuss Human Intrusion and Future Human Actions in relation to Disposal of Radioactive.
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC’s Risk-Informed and Performance- Based Approach to Decommissioning DOE Workshop on Risk-Based End States.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC Views on Risk-Based Cleanup Waste Management 04 March 2004 Tucson, AZ John T. Greeves,Director Division.
EPRI Comments Re: NRC “Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal”
LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM--FALL 2014 MEETING
Requirements for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Minimization Plans Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Implementation of the Revised Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning,
Regulations Part II: Basic Concepts and Definitions
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XIX Waste management Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and.
Proposed Revisions to 10 CFR Part 61
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations
Report on the outcome from the consultancy
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Fall Low Level Waste Forum Meeting
Earl Fordham, Deputy Director, Office of Radiation Protection
TOPICAL TRAINING SESSION TENORM
Status of Disposal Capabilities for Greater-Than-Class C (GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste Theresa J. Kliczewski GTCC EIS Document Manager Office of.
Ruth E. McBurney, CHP CRCPD NCRP
Revisions to the Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position A. Christianne Ridge Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery,
Tom Wolf, Governor Patrick McDonnell, PA DEP Secretary
LLW FORUM Part 61 Working Group SRM overview
Intrusion scenarios in radwaste repositories
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018
REGULATORY ASPECTS OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN TURKEY Dr
Introduction: IAEA activities / Documents on human intrusion
Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Human Intrusion in Deep Geologic Repositories in the U.S. Christopher Markley, PhD US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

National Academy of Sciences: Recommendations for Human Intrusion Standards Not possible to make scientifically supportable predictions of the probability of human intrusion. The key to the intrusion consequence analysis is whether the repository performance would be substantially degraded. The stylized, single borehole intrusion scenario is recommended because it removes a number of "imponderables."

Regulations for HLW Disposal (a) The applicant must determine the earliest time after disposal that the waste package would degrade sufficiently that a human intrusion could occur without recognition by the drillers. (b) The applicant must demonstrate that there is a reasonable expectation that the reasonably maximally exposed individual receives, as a result of human intrusion, no more than the following [mean (1) or median (2)] annual dose: (1) 0.15 mSv (15 mrem) for 10,000 years following disposal; and (2) 1.0 mSv (100 mrem) after 10,000 years, but within the period of geologic stability. (c) The applicant’s analysis must include all potential environmental pathways of radionuclide transport and exposure.

DOE’s Performance Assessment Results for Human Intrusion

NRC’s Technical Evaluation of DOE’s Human Intrusion Analysis The TSPA for the human intrusion calculation is performed separately from the TSPA for individual protection and is consistent with the guidance criteria. The TSPA model for the human intrusion calculation assumes the specified characteristics. The estimate of the mean dose is statistically stable. The dose estimate is consistent with the overall repository performance and the assumed characteristics of the human intrusion scenario.

DOE’s Human Intrusion Scenario for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)

Passive Institutional Controls at WIPP Any compliance application shall include detailed descriptions of the measures that will be employed to preserve knowledge about the location, design, and contents of the disposal system. Any compliance application shall include the period of time passive institutional controls are expected to endure and be understood. The Administrator may allow the Department to assume passive institutional control credit, in the form of reduced likelihood of human intrusion.