Ashley Lombardo, Steve Scanlon, Jack Portnoy, Peter Hwang

Problem Lack of transparency between law enforcement and society Current solutions lack benefits for law enforcement "This is not a problem just of Ferguson, Missouri. This is a national problem.” - President Obama Talk about current events that have to do with police brutality and how it affects society longer court processes Talk about how we interviewed cops and how they didn’t like body cameras because it didn’t benefit them

There is clear evidence of the effectiveness of body cameras There is clear evidence of the effectiveness of body cameras. For example, in Rialto California, the use of force incidents decreased by 45 when body cameras were implemented and citizens’ complaints decreased by 33 when body cameras were implemented in 2012. STATISTICS

Solution - Google Glass Utilizing Google Glass Live streaming capability Facial recognition GPS Bluetooth Google glass has all the technology necessary Better than body camera because it livestreams back to the dispatcher and the dispatcher is then able watch over the officer Facial recognition will help protect police officers during traffic stops GPS system will help locate officer if something ever happened to them Wireless for safety reasons Google Glass Application Live-streaming/recording of what officers see Two-way communication with dispatcher

Got Your Back Prototype https://www.justinmind.com/usernote/tests/19900868/19900877/19900879/index.html

Process Model – How it works Briefly go over the process

Benefits Law Enforcement Society Accountability of citizens Lower court fees Increase safety Increase officer productivity and effectiveness Accountability of police officers Lower taxes Decrease police brutality Transparency Good morale Less court time https://publicservice.asu.edu/sites/default/files/ppd_spi_feb_20_2015_final.pdf

Business case

Cost Benefits “...citizen complaints declined by 88 percent.” - Vox Talk about how the net benefit could lower taxes, increase police salaries, increase budget for safety equipment, etc. Est. we could reduce Baltimore settlements/awards and legal fees by 80% based on how 92% reduction with dash cameras vox.com stating that police precincts using body cameras saw a 88% decrease in the number of citizen complaints There are clear cost benefits for implementing Got Your Back Source 6 (http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-settlement-confidentiallity-20141227-story.html#page=1) Source 7 (http://www.vox.com/2014/9/17/6113045/police-worn-body-cameras-explained) Source 8 (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/14/google-glass-price_n_5322986.html) “...citizen complaints declined by 88 percent.” - Vox

Competitive Analysis Got Your Back Traditional Body Cameras New Market Dynamic Two-way communication Back up capabilities GPS Facial recognition POV Growing Market Static No two-way communication Battery life No head rotation New market – nothing exactly like this out there so they need to create the market and Dynamic – it allows connection between the police officers and the dispatcher – which also creates transparency to society The two way connection - allows police officers to have another set of eyes, they are able to speak to each other about the situation and make the best possible situations Back up capabilities – as the video is streaming, the dispatcher is also able to see what is going on and pin point and flag certain parts of the video GPS, facial recognition – capabilities that come with the google glass itself that you cannot get with traditional body cameras POV – police turns head

Risks Resources Privacy Trigger/End Public Access Battery Connectivity Resources – will all police departments be able to afford the google glass and this technology - Especially ones without funding Privacy – on both sides For society - going into homes For cops – recording depending on what they are doing when they aren’t attending to a call Trigger/end – need to work closely with the police departments to decide when the streaming/recording will begin and end When it comes to the start of the call, getting out of a car, etc. Public access – does society get access to these footage? What would the conditions be? Does this cause any problems? Battery – the current google glass model doesn’t have a good battery life But there are options to extend - portable batteries, car chargers Connectivity – need wifi/cellular network when it comes to the connection between the dispatcher and officer - Still can record video

Implementation Strategy Plan Design Final Application Deploy Monitor 2 Months 4 Months 6 Months 9 Months Continuous

Questions ?

Appendix

Prototype Screenshots

Porter’s 5 Forces Bargaining Power of Suppliers High Google Glass - only technology like this out there Google has the power to control price and how our technology is implemented with the Glass Threat of Substitutes High Body cameras and radios Most police departments already have them Rivalry between Competitors Low Emerging market Nothing like this yet Threat of Potential Entrants Medium Expertise needed, this market does not exist but can be copied Will need to start with own idea Bargaining Power of Buyers Medium Police department and government Potential product to increase safety and transparency  

System Architecture