Purpose Top-down approach for TGh from D1.1 to D2.0 Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx January 2002 Purpose Top-down approach for TGh from D1.1 to D2.0 Guides the group through the discussions Supporting information for the agenda Mika Kasslin, TGh chair John Doe, His Company
TPC Topics TPC.1) Power Constraint element (7.3.2.16) Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx January 2002 TPC Topics TPC.1) Power Constraint element (7.3.2.16) New format proposed in 01/664r0 TPC.2) Power Capability element (7.3.2.17) TPC.3) TPC Report element (7.3.2.19) Transmit Power field syntax TPC.4) Tolerances Transmit power Measurements, link margin TPC.5) TPC procedures (9.11) TPC.6) New definitions transmit power receiver power Mika Kasslin, TGh chair John Doe, His Company
General Topics GEN.1) Action Frame definition GEN.2) Reason Code Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx January 2002 General Topics GEN.1) Action Frame definition New format proposed in 01/665r0 Defined in 7.2.3.12 and used in 7.4 of 01/664r0 GEN.2) Reason Code Changes proposed in 7.3.1.7 of 01/664r0 GEN.3) Status Code Changes proposed in 7.3.1.9 of 01/664r0 GEN.4) New channels (5470-5725 MHz) listed GEN.5) PICS skeleton in 01/664r0 GEN.6) MIB proposal in 01/533r0 and 01/664r0 Mika Kasslin, TGh chair John Doe, His Company
DFS Topics DFS.1) Channel Switch Announcement element Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx January 2002 DFS Topics DFS.1) Channel Switch Announcement element Re-edit in 01/664r0 DFS.2) Use of containers Discussed in Austin Defined and used in 01/664r0 (frame -> element -> container) DFS.3) IBSS Proposal in 01/532r0 DFS.4) BSS Mechanism and reports in D1.1 DFS.5) DFS procedures Text proposal in 01/664r0 Mika Kasslin, TGh chair John Doe, His Company
DFS Framework Issues Start-up phase: Normal operation: Common: Ideas: Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx January 2002 DFS Framework Issues Start-up phase: start-up test period (no less than 30 seconds) How about upper limit? start-up phase rate Normal operation: periodicity of quiet periods to listen radar signals Tailored for HL/2 with 2 ms frames Amount of quiet periods (20%) channel switch time (6 ms) Common: response time (100 ns) Ideas: more heuristic methods taking into account radar characteristics frequency range periodicity Mika Kasslin, TGh chair John Doe, His Company