Purpose Top-down approach for TGh from D1.1 to D2.0

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Brief Introduction to the IEEE802.11h Draft
Advertisements

September 2002 Ophir, Texas Instruments Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /621r0a Submission Forward Compatibility Hooks for h Lior Ophir Texas Instruments.
Doc.: IEEE /455r0 Submission July 2002 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Harmonized Standard from BRAN#29 Mika Kasslin.
September 2002 Ophir, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /623r0a Submission Forward Compatibility Hooks for h Part Two Lior Ophir Texas.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
Doc.: IEEE /462r0 Submission July 2002 Bill McFarland, Atheros CommunicationsSlide 1 Backwards/Forwards Compatibility for 11h There will exist.
January 2003 Ophir, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /111r0a Submission Extending TGh Mechanisms to 4.9GHz and 5GHz Band in Japan (and getting.
VHT Capabilities and Operation elements and VHTC field
Support for Dynamic Channel Selection (DCS) in v
Month 1998July 2000 doc.: IEEE /xxx January 2001
LB97 20/40 BSS Coexistence Date: Authors: July 2007
doc.: IEEE /479r0 Mika Kasslin TGh chair
doc.: IEEE /479r0 Mika Kasslin TGh chair
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
TGd Agenda March 2000 Meeting Albuquerque, NM March 2000
Preliminary Evaluation of Japan Band Issues
High Throughput Coexistence issues – a personal comment
“ Radio Measurements in Support of WLAN Management”
Benefits of Extended DFS Reports in h
DFS/DCS and TPC Requirement References
doc.: IEEE /xxx Mika Kasslin TGh Chair
doc.: IEEE /xxx Mika Kasslin TGh chair March 15, 2001
Reasons for DFS Requirement in Europe
Enhanced Channel Access Joint Proposal
Overview of Cisco Per-client Extensions to MIB
IEEE TGh Overview Mika Kasslin TGh Chair March 2001
doc.: IEEE /xxx Terry Cole AMD
Proposed Modifications in TGh Draft Proposal
Mika Kasslin, TGh chair January 19, 2001
Co-existence with IEEE a
CID#102 - Channel Allocation
Fair Quiet for DFS Date: Authors: February 2008
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
AP Location Capability
TGh Final Report for the March 2002 Session
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
doc.: IEEE /133r0 Mika Kasslin TGh chair
doc.: IEEE /479r0 Mika Kasslin TGh chair
TGh Status, meeting objectives and agenda
Discussion of straw poll results
802.16a Draft D4 Unlincensed Band Coexistence
CID#89-Directed Multicast Service (DMS)
Channel Allocation March 2008 Authors: Date: Month Year
TGh Scope, Purpose and Status
MIB TruthValue Usage Patterns Presentation
Mika Kasslin, Steve Gray, Juha Heiskala Nokia
Final Comments on TPC and DFS Proposal (01/169r2)
Straw Polls and Motions on 256 QAM and BW: Optional-Mandatory Features
Synchronization of Quiet Periods for Incumbent User Detection
VHT NAV Assertion Date: Authors: Month Year
Month Year doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
Month Year doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0
Request Element for DFS in TGh
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
TGh Wednesday Report Mika Kasslin Nokia January 2001
Comment Resolution Actions
TGg Submissions List for January 2002 Session
Proposed Normative Text Changes Concerning Distributed Admissions
Beacon Content Protection
TGh Status and Objectives
Pekko Orava, Henry Haverinen, Simon Black (Nokia)
Month 2000 doc.: IEEE /xxx July b-Cor1 Final Report
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
1MHz Dup Mode Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
VHT Capabilities and Operation elements and VHTC field
The way forward A set of straw polls to guide TGh through
Proposed amendment to table 7-8
Clause Comment# 775,778,1558,1559 Resolutions
Scheduling Allocations Over Multiple Channels
Presentation transcript:

Purpose Top-down approach for TGh from D1.1 to D2.0 Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx January 2002 Purpose Top-down approach for TGh from D1.1 to D2.0 Guides the group through the discussions Supporting information for the agenda Mika Kasslin, TGh chair John Doe, His Company

TPC Topics TPC.1) Power Constraint element (7.3.2.16) Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx January 2002 TPC Topics TPC.1) Power Constraint element (7.3.2.16) New format proposed in 01/664r0 TPC.2) Power Capability element (7.3.2.17) TPC.3) TPC Report element (7.3.2.19) Transmit Power field syntax TPC.4) Tolerances Transmit power Measurements, link margin TPC.5) TPC procedures (9.11) TPC.6) New definitions transmit power receiver power Mika Kasslin, TGh chair John Doe, His Company

General Topics GEN.1) Action Frame definition GEN.2) Reason Code Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx January 2002 General Topics GEN.1) Action Frame definition New format proposed in 01/665r0 Defined in 7.2.3.12 and used in 7.4 of 01/664r0 GEN.2) Reason Code Changes proposed in 7.3.1.7 of 01/664r0 GEN.3) Status Code Changes proposed in 7.3.1.9 of 01/664r0 GEN.4) New channels (5470-5725 MHz) listed GEN.5) PICS skeleton in 01/664r0 GEN.6) MIB proposal in 01/533r0 and 01/664r0 Mika Kasslin, TGh chair John Doe, His Company

DFS Topics DFS.1) Channel Switch Announcement element Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx January 2002 DFS Topics DFS.1) Channel Switch Announcement element Re-edit in 01/664r0 DFS.2) Use of containers Discussed in Austin Defined and used in 01/664r0 (frame -> element -> container) DFS.3) IBSS Proposal in 01/532r0 DFS.4) BSS Mechanism and reports in D1.1 DFS.5) DFS procedures Text proposal in 01/664r0 Mika Kasslin, TGh chair John Doe, His Company

DFS Framework Issues Start-up phase: Normal operation: Common: Ideas: Month 2000 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/xxx January 2002 DFS Framework Issues Start-up phase: start-up test period (no less than 30 seconds) How about upper limit? start-up phase rate Normal operation: periodicity of quiet periods to listen radar signals Tailored for HL/2 with 2 ms frames Amount of quiet periods (20%) channel switch time (6 ms) Common: response time (100 ns) Ideas: more heuristic methods taking into account radar characteristics frequency range periodicity Mika Kasslin, TGh chair John Doe, His Company