Asymmetries in international Trade in Goods

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reasons for Discrepancies in Chinas External Trade Statistics with partners: the Particular Role of Processing Trade By Hongman JIN Statistics Department.
Advertisements

National Seminar on Developing a Program for the Implementation of the 2008 SNA and Supporting Statistics in Turkey Eyüp Mehmet DİNÇ 10 September 2013.
Summary overview of the Overseas Trade Statistics (OTS) Published by: HM Revenue & Customs – Trade Statistics Cust. Services:
1 Asymmetries in bilateral trade statistics Refer to Discussion Paper by Vladimir Markhonko Ronald Jansen Chief of the Trade Statistics Branch United Nations.
China’s Practice in Statistics of Goods for Processing By Hongman JIN Statistics Department General Administration of Customs the People’s Republic of.
1 Problems of measurement and analysis in the national accounts under rapidly growing globalization. Soli Peleg Central Bureau of Statistics, Israel.
Gerry Brady CSO Meeting of the Enterprise Statistics Liaison Group External Trade in Goods November
WORLD TRADE. OUTLINE STATISTICS CANADA THE WORLD TRADE ANALYZER –WHY IT WAS DEVELOPED –MAIN FEATURES –THE ADJUSTMENTS –WHY THE ADJUSTMENTS –THE FUTURE.
1 Data mining of the UN Comtrade database in cooperation with Customs Ronald Jansen Chief of the Trade Statistics Branch United Nations Statistics Division.
1 1 Trade between Ukraine & Norway Mirror and reconciliation exercises for external trade statistics between Norway and Ukraine Joint EFTA/UNECE/SSCU Seminar:
Business Statistics and Registers
Responses to UN - proposed revisions to IMTS concepts and definitions International Trade Conference September 2008 Ken Smart.
International Marketing Chapter 15
Exporting and Logistics: Special Issues for Business Chapter 15 McGraw-Hill/Irwin© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Practical issues International trade statistics, 4 Business Statistics and Registers 1.
1 Calculation of unit value indices at Eurostat Training course on Trade Indices Beirut, December 2009 European Commission, DG Eurostat Unit G3 International.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. International trade statistics Demarcation, principles and methods, 1 1 Business Statistics.
Expert Group Meeting on Intra-African Trade Addis-Ababa, 5-7 October TRADE DATA PROCESSING IN CENTRAL AFRICA Jules Rommel TOUKA Statisticien économiste.
Implementation of the new recommendations of IMTS 2010 and MSITS 2010 in Hungary Challenges Anita Bány Hungarian Central Statistical Office Foreign Trade.
Regional Programme of Statistics in the Mediterranean Region MEDSTAT Phase II This project is funded by the European Union 1 Workshop on Data Compilation.
ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics
TIS Stats Norwegian adjustments to MSITS Global Forum on Trade Statistics Geneva – Switzerland 02 – 04 Feb 2011 Country perspective on adjusting.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT ÉCONOMIQUES OECDOCDE 1 The OECD ITCS database in the.
1 This presentation has been prepared by Jørn Kristian Undelstvedt, Gisle Berge and Håkon Skullerud Pilot study on import and export of waste Overview.
MIRROR EXERCISES FINLAND - RUSSIA Seminar on External Trade Statistics (ETS) 6-7 March 2006 Luxembourg.
10. Work Programme MEDSTAT III – Task Force Trade and BOP Sector - 14/15 December 2010 – Luxembourg 1/16 MEDSTAT III Trade and BOP Sector Outline: 1.Type.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT ÉCONOMIQUES OECDOCDE 1 Integrating HS 2002 into ITS.
Item 4a: Implementing the improved methodological guidelines for IMTS United Nations Statistics Division Global Forum on Trade Statistics, Geneva, 2-4.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
(UNSD introduction followed by open discussion)
UNSD Presentations 37th Session of UN Statistical Commission
BPM6 and 2008 SNA recommendations on processing and merchanting – data requirements UNECE Workshop on the implementation 2008 SNA in EECCA countries and.
Dissemination Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive Trade Statistics May 2008,
Session 7.1 Data Quality 1.
International Trade in Goods Statistics in the EU Lídia Bassó
Technical Workshop on International Merchandise Trade Statistics: Focusing on goods traded under the preferential trade agreements 26 February to 2 March.
International Trade in Goods Statistics Methodology Akos Gerencser
Recent developments in Israel Foreign Trade Statistics Methodology
workshop on trade in services, FDI and FATS rOMA 7-8 JUNE 2011
MEDSTAT III – TRADE and BOP Task Force Luxembourg December 2010
Price Indices for External Trade of Goods Eleonora Baghy 26/05/2013
Sub-Regional Workshop on International Merchandise Trade Statistics Compilation and Export and Import Unit Value Indices 21 – 25 November Guam.
4. Manufacturing services / goods for processing
Canada’s trade in services by industry
Estimation techniques for missing intra-EU trade
MEDSTAT III training course on IMTS
International Trade Information Systems in 2020
IMTS 2010 recommendations Akos Gerencser
Summary of the Main Recommendations and Encouragements contained in IMTS 2010 and their relationship with IMTS, Rev.2.
Item 7: Imports and Exports
Event Name Here 2/16/2019 CDS Tariff Overview.
Item 7: Imports and Exports
Administrative Data and their Use in Economic Statistics
Data collection including specific goods Lídia Bassó
Sub-Regional Workshop on International Merchandise Trade Statistics Compilation and Export and Import Unit Value Indices 21 – 25 November Guam.
Session 9: Data Dissemination Principles
Seminar on External Trade Statistics (ETS)
Market Access Database (MADB)
Republic of the Marshall Islands
Michaela Grell – Unit G1 – SBS
Synthesis of Asymmetry Studies
Trade in Goods Statistics Data Transmission and Dissemination
4.3 National Methodological Handbook
Linking trade statistics with business statistics
MEDSTAT III Trade and BOP Sector Task Force of December, 2010
1st Meeting sub regional group (EJPAI)
#8 Misinvoicing – Trade Asymmetry
ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics
Simplification of Intrastat: Current State of Play
Further Processing of Data on Trade Flows in IOT
Presentation transcript:

Asymmetries in international Trade in Goods Session 7.2 –Quality and Mirror exercises Asymmetries in international Trade in Goods MEDSTAT III training course on IMTS 17-19 April 2012

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES I - Main reasons for asymmetries Trade System Coverage Under reporting Identification of Partner countries Valuation Time of recording Others… II - MEDSTAT Asymmetry studies

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Trade System Several trade systems are defined by UNSD: general trade, special trade (strict definition or “relaxed” definition) Differences affect in particular inclusion or exclusion of transactions linked to free trade areas or Customs warehouse Use of different systems by countries leads to asymmetry Use of General trade is recommended by UNSD

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Coverage 1. Geographical definition of territories: Definition of the statistical territory may differ according to countries: Examples: inclusion or not of overseas territories (USA/Puerto Rico; France/West indies islands) or specific Customs territories (China/Hong Kong) Use of different geographical definitions leads to asymmetry International cooperation to harmonise definitions and practices

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Coverage 2. Military Equipment Military Equipment is sometimes excluded from trade statistics for confidentiality reasons (whereas it is often included in data of main producer/exporters) Inclusion of military equipment is recommended by UNSD Application of confidentiality rules allow to include military equipment without specific disclosure of this kind of trade

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Coverage 3. Specific goods not easily registered by Customs Some specific goods may not be subject to Customs declarations: Examples: Ships and aircrafts, sea products, electricity, software… Follow recommendations by UNSD about inclusion/exclusion of specific goods Find alternative sources of information for goods not reported to Customs (ex: registers for ships/aircrafts, direct reporting from companies,…)

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Under reporting or no reporting Under reporting may occur for various reasons: Application of thresholds by Customs Unformal trade (shuttle trade) Fraudulent trade Apply international recommendations by UNSD about full coverage of trade statistics Production of estimates for trade below threshold and for unformal trade (shuttle trade surveys)  Fraudulent trade is not to be included in trade statistics, but production of estimates useful for BOP and National Accounts

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Identification of partner countries According to IMTS recommendations, Imports should be allocated to the country of origin (and in addition by country of consignment with IMTS 2010) Exports should be allocated to the country of last known destination In case of re-exports, the re-exporting country will not be considered as the partner country in the mirror imports Exporters are not always aware of the real country of last destination

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Valuation According to IMTS recommendations, Imports are valuated at the CIF value (including the cost of international transport and insurance) Exports are valuated at the FOB value (excluding the cost of international transport and insurance) For each transaction, imports should be higher than mirror exports (except between neighbor countries with a mode of transport by land)

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Valuation In case of merchanting, the value of imports are increased by the margin of the intermediate operator. Example: the firm b in country B buys goods to the firm a in country A and sells the goods to the firm c in country C. Goods are dispatched directly from a to c value of exports by a to c: 10 000 value of transport from a to c: 200 margin of b: 1000 value of imports by c from a: 11200

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Time of recording Period of recording may differ between the export in country A and the import in country B Causes: duration of transport, storage in a free zone or in a Customs warehouse

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Other reasons… 1. Currency conversion: Exchanges rate may differ when measured at export side or import side: due to the delay of transport due to the rules applied (daily rate, monthly average,…)

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Other reasons… 2. Confidentiality rules: Part of data may not be disclosed at detailed level if the trade is concentrated on one (or two) firm(s). Confidential trade is sometimes hidden in a specific chapter (often chapter 99) Confidentialisation leads to asymmetries for specific products, but not at total trade level. It is recommended to include confidential trade at the most possible level of detail by product (for instance HS-4 or HS-2 digit) and by partner country

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Other reasons… 3. Errors in the Customs declarations: Errors can be introduced by declarants without fraud purpose Errors are limited when Customs administrations use computerised procedures including validation rules. It is important that Customs administration carry out validation rules on export side as well as on import side

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Other reasons… 4. Difficulties to classify products under the accurate commodity code in the detailed classification: Products classifications are often sophisticated, particularly at detailed level (> 5000 items for the Harmonised System, often more than 10 000 items in the national classifications) Often items with label “other goods…” Classification of goods may differ between the export declaration and the import declaration. Asymmetries are often increasing with the level of detail by product:

MAIN REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Level of asymmetry is increasing with the level of detail: example of intra-EU trade (year 2000) …   mirror flow missing asym>90% 90%>asym>50% 50%asym>20% asym<20% Total Total Products 0,2 0,6 10,6 88,6 100 HS-2 0,1 4,2 5,8 28 61,9 HS-4 9 10,8 14,2 29,2 36,8 HS-6 15,5 16,4 25,2 27,4 CN-8 20,6 18 16,8 21,8 22,8

REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Link with International recommendations Some asymmetries are due by the non application of IMTS international recommendations. Nevertheless, some asymmetries can occur even with the full application of these recommendations. The following table summarises which source of asymmetry can be solved by the application of recommendations:

REASONS FOR EXTERNAL TRADE ASYMMETRIES Link with International recommendations Causes of asymmetry Solved by application of IMTS recommendations Use of different Trade systems Yes Differences in the definition of geographical territories Yes, partly Exclusion of specific goods Under reporting due to threshold Under reporting due to unformal trade Under reporting due to fraudulent trade No Indirect Trade, Reexports CIF - FOB valuation Merchanting Time of recording Exchange rate Confidentiality Errors by declarants

II - MEDSTAT ASYMMETRY STUDIES Mirror analysis between EU and MED partner countries Asymmetry studies were carried out during phase II of program MEDSTAT (2006-2009) and are renewed under phase III (2010-2013): - Between the EU and 8 countries partners - Also on internal asymmetries between 4 partner countries (Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Palestine) The studies are carried out with a common methodology, leading to comparable results “Top-down” approach: identification of the main chapters leading to asymmetries, then analyze at more detailed level by product and partner country for the main chapters. Extraction of data from international data bases, production of a draft report, one week mission in the partner country, sometimes contacts are necessary with the EU Member States Production of a whole set of recommendations discussed with each partner country

II - MEDSTAT ASYMMETRY STUDIES Which is the magnitude of the discrepancies between the mirror flows of the EU and the Mediterranean countries ?

II - MEDSTAT ASYMMETRY STUDIES

II - MEDSTAT ASYMMETRY STUDIES Detailed analysis of asymmetries between the EU and MPCs shows that the main reasons for discrepancies are: - Differences in the trade systems; - Difficulties with measuring trade involving Free zones; - Confidentiality concerning the partner country in some EU countries (in particular for HS27); - Repairs of aircraft (HS88, HS84 and HS90); - Non-use of registers to measure trade in vessels and aircraft (HS88 and HS89); - Difficulties with measuring trade in diamonds (HS71); - Registration of the country of origin for used cars in accordance with international recommendations; - Possible under-declaration of values.

MEDSTAT ASYMMETRY STUDIES As there is still room for improvement in most MPCs, a set of recommendations was made for each partner country. The most frequent recommendations are: - Adopt the international classifications (of products and partner countries); - Check for full coverage; - Adopt the ‘general trade system’; - Improve the information on trade via Free zones; - Continue and step up the cooperation with customs authorities; - Lay down new rules on confidentiality; - Make better use of registers for vessels and aircraft (HS 88 and HS 89); - Improve checks for under-declared trade values; - Check processing activity, particularly in the textile, car and jewellery sectors; - Organise national workshops; - Re-organise customs procedures, adopting the Kyoto Convention; - Proceed periodically with new asymmetry studies.

CONCLUSIONS Various reasons can explain international trade asymmetries It is very useful to carry our periodic asymmetry studies with main partners and to identify the main sources of asymmetry Level of relative asymmetries can be considered as a quality indicator and introduced as such in a quality report The level of asymmetries is generally increasing with the level of detail of product classification Application of international recommendations limits the amount of asymmetries, but cannot suppress them completely

Thank you for your attention CONCLUSIONS Thank you for your attention Questions and remarks ?