S52C-01 Outline of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes and lessons learned for a large urban earthquake in Tokyo metropolitan area Naoshi Hirata1, Aitaro.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE RELATION OF RADON CONCENTRATION WITH TECTONICS THAT CAUSED THE EARTHQUAKE OF SEPTEMBER 2009, IN GJORICA, WITH MAGNITUDE 5.5 Authors HAMZA RECI, SAFET.
Advertisements

WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
RECOVERY and RECONSTRUCTION after the PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE CHOOSING OPTIONS THAT WILL FACILITATE LONG-TERM RECOVERY THE OCTOBER 8, 2005 DISASTER.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS JAPAN PART 1A: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
A magnitude 7.3 earthquake occurred to the east of Kathmandu, in an area close to Mount Everest. This large earthquake is the largest aftershock so far.
Earthquakes Presented you to by the Hazard Committee Madeline Galac Nicole Barstrom.
Earthquakes By: Megan.
 The shaking or trembling caused by the sudden release of energy.  Usually associated with faulting or breaking of rocks.
Changes that IMPACT peoples lives! Changes to the Earth and Peoples lives in a matter of seconds.
Brainstorm: How to assess an Earthquake: Stroked off B.C. coast? Rapid Earthquake Risk Assessment Source Parameters USGS World Shake Maps USGS Shake Aftershocks.
Seismic Reflection Image along I-64 Pratt et al., 1988 Coruh et al., 1988.
BCP of Japanese Securities Industry July 5, 2007 Japan Securities Clearing Corporation.
EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT CITY BEING PLANNED FOR TOKYO A BACKUP IN CASE OF DISASTER Walter Hays Global Alliance For Disaster Reduction.
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
Iranian National Broadband Seismic Network (BIN)
Daily Review #4 Describe the 4 different pieces of evidence to support continental drift How does convection cause a plate to move? Discuss your answer.
The 03/11/2011 Mw9.0 Tohoku, Japan Earthquake Educational Slides Created & Compiled by Gavin Hayes & David Wald U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake.
Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization
Living in Earthquake Country Concept Maps. Overview Evidence from past earthquakes can help us predict the amount of damage to expect from future earthquakes.
GNS Science Natural Hazards Research Platform Progress in understanding the Canterbury Earthquakes Kelvin Berryman Manager, Natural Hazards Research Platform.
Important topics related to earthquake hazard Calling for Bi-lateral collaboration.
MAGNITUDE 6.3 EARTHQUAKE STRIKES TAIWAN (7:02 pm, October 31, 2013) Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Fig 3) Crustal Structure using the tomography method, in the central part of Itoigawa- Shizuoka Tectonic Line (ISTL). The central part of the Itoigawa-Sizuoka.
Relative quiescence reported before the occurrence of the largest aftershock (M5.8) with likely scenarios of precursory slips considered for the stress-shadow.
8.1 Earthquakes.
Earthquakes FAULTS EPICENTER MERCALLI SACALE FOCUS POTENCIAL ENERGY SEISMEGROPH MAGNITUDE Earthquakes AFTER SHACKS.
TOWARDS A NEW KOBE TWENTY YEARS AFTER THE JANUARY 17, 1995 EARTHQUAKE DISASTER Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. TAIWAN PART I: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Understanding Earth Sixth Edition Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES © 2011 by W. H. Freeman and Company Grotzinger Jordan.
GNS Science Operational Earthquake Forecasting in New Zealand: Advances and Challenges Annemarie Christophersen, David A. Rhoades, David Harte & Matt C.
EARTHQUAKES Week 2.
Abstract The space-time epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is a stochastic process in which seismicity is classified into background and clustering.
Earthquakes.
Introduction to Japan.
Tsunami Disaster Mitigation System in Japan
Earthquakes and Seismic Waves
II. Earthquakes Small magnitude earthquakes are much more common than larger magnitude earthquakes.
Geologic Hazards Geologic Hazards are those Earth processes that are harmful to humans and/or their property. Includes: Earthquakes Volcanic eruptions.
Earthquakes.
RECENT EARTHQUAKES. NEW ZEALAND
Earthquakes and tsunamis in the last week
Images courtesy of Google Earth (top), and USGS (bottom).
Images courtesy of Google Earth
8.3 Destruction from Earthquakes
Images courtesy of Google Earth (top), and USGS (bottom).
Section 3: Measuring and Locating Earthquakes
EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS, PATTERNS, AND RISK
Chapter 13.
Understanding Earth Chapter 13: EARTHQUAKES Grotzinger • Jordan
Faults and Earthquakes
RECENT SEISMIC MONITORING RESULTS FROM THE CENTRAL
The Valdivia earthquake
Magnitude 7.6, Sumatra, Sept
Do Now Please take out your earthquakes and seismic waves packets.
S52C-01 Outline of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, Earthquakes and lessons for a large urban earthquake in Tokyo Metropolitan area Naoshi Hirata1, Aitaro Kato1,
Central Philippines earthquake, February 06, 2012
Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later
Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later
VII. Earthquake Mitigation
There are more than 30,000 earthquakes worldwide each year!
K. Maeda and F. Hirose (MRI)
SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008
What is an Earthquake? Pgs
Section 3: Measuring and Locating Earthquakes
by Satoshi Ide, Annemarie Baltay, and Gregory C. Beroza
Earthquake Information
by Wenyuan Fan, and Peter M. Shearer
Earthquakes Rehana Rasool Assistant Professor Department Of Geography
Presentation transcript:

S52C-01 Outline of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquakes and lessons learned for a large urban earthquake in Tokyo metropolitan area Naoshi Hirata1, Aitaro Kato1, Kouji Nakamura2, Yohei Hiyama3 1 Earthquake Research Institute, the University of Tokyo 2 , Japan Metrological Agency 3 Geospatial Information Authority of Japan 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Tectonic setting Gray circles are epicenters of earthquakes with a depth < 60 km Blue star is the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake MTL: Median Tectonic Line 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Two large earthquakes with JMA seismic intensity 7 at Mashiki town in Kumamoto The April 14, 2016 earthquake with Mjma 6.5 (Mw5.2) The April 16, 2016 earthquake with an Mjma=7.3 (Mw7.0) 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Totally destroyed houses: 8,364 Fatalities: 154 Totally destroyed houses: 8,364 (as of Dec. 7, 2016) 2016, May 14th Naoshi Hirata@Mashiki town 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Cumulative number of earthquakes after each major inland event in japan (Mj≧3.5) 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Foreshocks and Mainshock 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Foreshocks and Mainshock 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Surface faulting and known active faults Right-lateral surface slip Along the Futagawa fault zone, about 30 km long, a series of surface faults are found. The maximum faulting is 2.2 m right-lateral slip at Mashiki town, Dozon area. 2016, May 14th Naoshi Hirata @Mashiki town 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Assessment of the Futagawa fault zone in February 2013 by ERC Along the Futagawa segment of the Futagawa fault zone, an earthquake with M7.0 may occur with a 2 m right-lateral slip. A chance of occurrence of the event is approximately 0 to 0.9% in 30 years. The segment is classified to belong to a “fairly high possibility” group among about 100 prominent active faults. 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Probability of M6.8+ in 30 years Entire Kyushu: 30-42% North Central South Central Kyushu:18-20% Cumulative distribution Probability (%) © Earthquake Research Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (HERP) 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

208 Mj ≧ 7 earthquakes for 148 years (1868-2016) Cumulative number M-T 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment A chance for Japanese Seismic Intensity 6- or larger in 30 years: as of Jan. 1, 2016 Probability of earthquake occurence+ site amplification Injury by traffic accidents: 24% Suffering from fire: 1.9% 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307 © HERP, ERC

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Mashiki Town 28% Kumamoto City 14% Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment A chance for Japanese Seismic Intensity 6- or larger in 30 years: as of Jan. 1, 2016 Probability of earthquake occurence+ site amplification Injury by traffic accidents: 24% Suffering from fire: 1.9% 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307 © HERP, ERC

New Guidelines for Seismic Forecast Information after Big Earthquakes ERC guidelines from 1988: JMA issues aftershock probabilities after any big earthquake. New ERC guidelines after the Kumamoto experience: JMA only warns about possible strong motion of similar level after a big earthquake (during about one week). If seismicity continues after the first week, JMA issues aftershock probabilities as a factor compared to the pre-earthquake probabilities. 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307

Summary The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes, Mj6.5 and Mj7.3, generate JMA seismic intensity 7 twice. Note that M7+ events occur once or twice every year in and around Japan. More than 200 foreshocks and aftershocks of Mj ≧ 3.5 occurred: the most active seismicity among in-land earthquakes in Japan. More than 150 were killed and 80,000 houses were totally destroyed by the events. The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes occurred on assessed active fault segments in an area of a high probability. However, local people and, to some extent, local government officials did not understand their earthquake risk. We need further efforts to communicate risk to the public and stakeholders. 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307 Basic comprehensive policy

End 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307