Prosecution Luncheon Patent February 2017

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The John Marshall Law School 57th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference Post-Grant Procedures Michael P. Tierney Lead Administrative Patent Judge.

Advertisements

By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.

© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.

Patent Strategy Under the AIA Washington in the West January 29, 2013.

Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.

An Inside Look at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Scott Boalick Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE A full transcript of this presentation can be found under the “Notes” Tab. Claim Interpretation: Broadest Reasonable.

1 Rule 132 Declarations and Unexpected Results Richard E. Schafer Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

Prosecution Luncheon Patent August Patent Office News PTAB Paralegal Telework Issues –Inspect Generals report: Waste and Mismanagement at the Patent.

PROSECUTION APPEALS Presented at: Webb & Co. Rehovot, Israel Date: February 14, 2013 Presented by: Roy D. Gross Associate St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens.

Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.

BIPC.COM STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OF POST ISSUANCE PATENTABILITY REVIEW: THE NEW, OLD, AND NO LONGER Presented By: Todd R. Walters, Esq. B UCHANAN, I NGERSOLL.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association CURRENT TRENDS/EFFECTS OF AIA on US Patent Practice at the US Patent.

William R. Covey Deputy General Counsel for Enrollment and Discipline and Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline William R. Covey Deputy General.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Update October 22, Chief Judge James Donald Smith Patent Trial and Appeal Board United States Patent and Trademark.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Counseling Clients re New USPTO Post Grant Proceedings and Interplay with Litigation.

A Comparative Analysis of Patent Post-Grant Review Procedures in the U

September 14, Final Rule Making on Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) Robert Spar Director of the Office of Patent.

FRCP & Ethics Money & Ethics Technology & Ethics USPTO & Ethics Advertising Ethics

Remy Yucel Director, CRU (571) Central Reexamination Unit and the AIA.

Post-Grant Proceedings Under The America Invents Act Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington in the West” Conference January 29,

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update on Inter Partes Disputes and the PTAB _____ John B. Pegram Fish & Richardson.

Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association EMERGING TRENDS IN INTER PARTES REVIEW PRACTICE TOM ENGELLENNER Pepper Hamilton, LLP.

Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.

Practice Before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

Prosecution Luncheon Patent August Calendar IPO Annual Meeting –Sept Chicago Indy Bar –At the Bar with the Bench Tonight, Aug. 20 th 5:30.

1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association Updates on the USPTO Chris Fildes AIPLA-JPAA Joint Meeting April 9, 2013.

Challenges Associated With, And Strategies For, U.S. Patent Litigation Russell E. Levine, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP LES Asia.

New Ex Parte Appeal Rules Patent and Trademark Practice Group Meeting January 26, 2012.

© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.

The New Tool for Patent Defendants - Inter Partes Review Daniel W. McDonald George C. Lewis, P.E. Merchant & Gould, P.C. April 16, 2014 © 2014 Merchant.

Prosecution Luncheon February 13, USPTO – TM Withdrawal Form may use form to request withdrawal. Removes info from the attorney and correspondence.

Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.

Prosecution Luncheon Patent October PDF’s Now Available on USPTO Website.

Patent Fee Proposal Patent Public Advisory Committee Hearing November 19, 2015.

McDermott Will & Emery Roundtable Updates from the PTAB February 25, 2013 James Donald Smith Chief Administrative Patent Judge Patent Trial and Appeal.

Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.

Patent Reexamination: Best Practices for Pursuing and Defending Parallel Reexamination and Litigation.

Appeals From AIA Trials 35 U.S.C. § 141 – Final Written Decision must be appealed to the Federal Circuit File a Notice of Appeal with the Director of the.

Introduction to Patent Law Class Notes: January 14, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 6 – Patent Owner Response 1.

Using the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS) for Post Grant Pilot Applications How to identify relevant information in AIA proceedings at the Patent.

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 9 – Final Written Decision and Appeal 1.

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 5 – Motions Practice, Discovery, and Trial Management Issues 1.

Section 285 Litigation Ethics Conflicts of Interest Prosecution Bars Grab bag

Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 3 – The Patent Owner Preliminary Response 1.

GOVERNMENT LAWYER’S REPRESENTATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES Craig E. Leen City Attorney City of Coral Gables *** With special thanks to Yaneris Figueroa,

1 Ethics and Patent Agents David Hricik Professor, Mercer University School of Law Of Counsel, Taylor English Duma LLP.

The Applicability of Patent-Agent Privilege After In re Queen’s University at Kingston Presented by Rachel Perry © 2016 Workman Nydegger.

PCT-FILING SYSTEM.

Omer/LES International/

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 1 – PTAB Basics and Procedure

TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD OVERVIEW

PTABLitigationBlog.com: PTAB Popularity and Reasons

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 12 – PTAB Popularity and Reasons

Discretionary Transfer of Cases to Tribal Court

POST Grant RevieW UPDATES

Article III of the Constitution The Courts

USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules

ADVANCED PATENT LAW INSTITUTE Venue Panel

Deputy Chief Administrative Patent Judge January 25, 2018

Lessons learned – Lab IP Enforcement

Prosecution Luncheon Patent March 2017

Update and Practical Considerations

PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 4 – The Institution Decision

PTAB Bar Association Conference—March 2, 2017

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING AS AN ORDERING AND REFERRING PROVIDER

Article III of the Constitution The Courts

Presentation transcript:

Prosecution Luncheon Patent February 2017

Web-Based Issue Fee Form (Web 85b) If you recall… You can pay issue fees with an online form.

Web-Based Issue Fee Form (Web 85b) Review Allowance Information

Web-Based Issue Fee Form (Web 85b) Update Information

Web-Based Issue Fee Form (Web 85b) Sign

Web-Based Issue Fee Form (Web 85b) PDF Form Automatically Created

Web-Based Issue Fee Form (Web 85b) Problem- firm Name Based on OED Records!

Web-Based Issue Fee Form (Web 85b) Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) Carriage Return

Web-Based Issue Fee Form (Web 85b) Fix in 2 Ways Online (instantly- need password): https://oedci.uspto.gov/OEDCI/SignIn.jsp USPTO Change of Address for Practitioners Form

Web-Based Issue Fee Form (Web 85b) USPTO Change of Address for Practitioners Form https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/ip-policy/current-practitioners/change-your-registration-information-access#heading-1

IPR Sovereign Immunity for Universities Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) dismissed three Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings against the University of Florida Research Foundation Incorporated (UFRF) based upon UFRF’s claim of sovereign immunity. Covidien LP v. University of Florida Research Foundation Inc., Case Nos. IPR 2016-01274; -01275, and -01276 (PTAB January 25, 2017)

IPR Sovereign Immunity for Universities PTAB Panel: On the whole, considering the nature of inter partes review and civil litigation, we conclude that the considerable resemblance between the two is sufficient to implicate the immunity afforded to the States by the Eleventh Amendment. Although there are distinctions, such as in the scope of discovery, we observe that there is no requirement that the two types of proceedings be identical for sovereign immunity to apply to an administrative proceeding. Further, we note that there are several similarities between civil litigation and inter partes review that are not unlike those compared in Vas-Cath for interferences.

Subject Matter Eligibility New USPTO Subject Matter Eligibility Examples: Business Methods Available here: https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ieg-bus-meth-exs-dec2016.pdf

Prosecution Luncheon Patent February 2017