Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

Accountability Reporting Webinar Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Determinations & Federal NCLB Accountability Status, State Accountability & Assistance.
Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
Superintendent Melinda J. Boone Alumni Auditorium, North High School October 21, 2013 Worcester Public Schools State of the Schools Address.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
Rhode Island Accountability Process Revisions for School Years 2015 and 2016 A Presentation to the Accountability 3.0 Statewide Webinar March 27, 2015.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
REVIEW OF 2014 SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY AND ACHIEVEMENT DATA, GOAL SETTING, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR 2014/2015 SAUGUS PUBLIC SCHOOLS CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
School & district accountability reporting Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 17, 2013.
ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
Merrymount Elementary School PTO Assessment Presentation December 4, 2014.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Accountability Report Dedham Public Schools October 3,
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Back to Table of Contents DART for English Language LearnersAnnual SnapshotDART for English Language LearnersAnnual Snapshot DART for English Language.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Braintree Public Schools Spring 2007 MCAS Tests Braintree High School.
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
PA School Performance Profile
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview
2012 Accountability Determinations
Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability & Assistance System
2016 Accountability Reporting
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS and 2017 Accountability Results
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Presentation to the Board of Elementary & Secondary Education
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Worcester Accountability Results
School Committee October 4, 2018
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL 2010 MCAS Presentation October 26, 2010.
NANTUCKET PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day
Watertown Public Schools School Committee Meeting November 13, 2017
English Learner Accountability Component
Presentation transcript:

Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status School Committee Meeting September 25th, 2013

MCAS Score Dissemination

Timeline September 20th 2013 – Official MCAS and Accountability Scores released to the public By October 1st, 2013 all parents/guardians will receive a copy of their child’s MCAS report

Parent/Guardian MCAS Report These reports will provide parents/guardians with detailed information pertaining to their students’ achievement level and growth. Please refer to your handouts for a sample report.

How is accountability measured?

Progress and Performance Index (PPI) Achievement CPI values for ELA, Math, Science (B) Growth/ Improvement SGP for ELA and Math (C) Cohort Graduation Rate High schools only (D) Annual Dropout Rate High schools only

Extra Credit Percent Warning/Failing Percent Advanced All districts, schools, and subgroups will be eligible to earn extra credit if they decrease the percent of students scoring at the Warning/Failing level on the ELA, mathematics, and/or science MCAS assessments by 10 percent from one year to the next. Percent Advanced All districts, schools, and subgroups will be eligible to earn extra credit if they increase the percent of students scoring Advanced on the ELA, mathematics, and/or science MCAS assessments by 10 percent from one year to the next.

Reduce proficiency gap by half by 2016–17 Example (non-Milton data): Math CPI, All Students 100-76 = 24 24/2 = 12 76 + 12 = 88 2017 Goal = 88 100 88.0 86.0 84.0 82.0 80.0 78.0 76.0

Student Growth Percentile (SGP)

Core PPI Indicators Core Indicators (Up to 7) Points Available ELA Achievement (CPI) 0-100 Mathematics Achievement (CPI) Science Achievement (CPI) ELA Growth/Improvement (Median SGP) Mathematics Growth/Improvement (Median SGP) Cohort Graduation Rate Annual Dropout Rate Maximum Possible Points: 700 NOTE: Extra credit points are added to the total number of points, but do not increase the number of core indicators

Cumulative PPI Assigned to all districts, schools, and subgroups with complete data over the most recent four years. Weighted average: 40% most recent score 30%, 20%, 10% for three prior years respectively. Reported on a scale 0-100 Used to classify schools in Levels 1 and 2 and is an exit criterion for Level 3 schools. Year Annual PPI Multiplier Points 2012 90 4 360 2011 80 3 240 2010 60 2 120 2009 70 1 Total Points: 790 Cumulative PPI (Total Divided by Number of Multipliers): 79

School Level Classification A school is classified into Level 1 if: The school’s aggregate cumulative PPI is 75 or higher; The school’s high needs subgroup cumulative PPI is 75 or higher; and The MCAS participation rate for all groups in the school is 95 percent or greater. A school is classified into Level 2 if: The school’s aggregate cumulative PPI is less than 75; or The school’s high needs subgroup cumulative PPI is less than 75; or The MCAS participation rate for any group in the school is between 90 and 94.9 percent. Districts are classified as the lowest level of any school in the district.

Milton Public Schools Proficiency and Growth Data (CPI and SGP)

District ELA Achievement Levels

District Math Achievement Levels

District Science Achievement Levels

District SGP - ELA

District SGP - Math

Milton Public Schools Accountability Data

Tucker Elementary School

Cunningham Elementary School

Glover Elementary School

Collicot Elementary School Commended for : High Achievement, High Progress, and Narrowing Proficiency Gaps

Pierce Middle School

Milton High School

District Accountability Status

Frequently asked questions

Which grades are tested? Which subjects? Answer: Grades 3-8 and grade 10 for ELA and Math Answer: Grades 5, 8, 9th or 10th for Science What’s the number of students needed in any subgroup for data to be reported? Answer: 30 students Which subgroups make up High Needs? Answer: English Language Learners (ELL), Low Income and Special Education students If we don’t have a subgroup reported, do we have the ability to look up data for the students in those subgroups? Answer: Yes – and we do so. How can the Aggregate PPI be 100 while High Needs is only 75? (Glover) Answer: The formula for this data is not an “average” thus giving a misrepresentation of the data point.

Making Connections Advancement Initiatives & Data

Emphasizing Early Literacy Achievement (k-3) Grade 3 ELA MCAS Scores Internal district wide assessments Closing the Proficiency Gaps (k-12) CPI and SGP Values for underperforming subgroups SAT and AP Scores Advancing Science and STEM Initiatives Grade 5, 8, 10 Science MCAS scores AP Science scores