Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Serum Creatinine Is an Inadequate Screening Test.
Advertisements

Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Reduced renal function in patients with simple renal cysts
From: A More Accurate Method To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine: A New Prediction Equation Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(6):
Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(7): doi: / Figure Legend:
The MDRD Study.
From: Using Standardized Serum Creatinine Values in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Equation for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate.
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Fig. 1. Distribution of eGFR according to baseline SCr
Estimating GFR Using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Creatinine Equation: More Accurate GFR Estimates, Lower CKD Prevalence Estimates, and.
Hydroxyethyl starch and change in renal function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery  Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, Robert J. Glynn,
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The predictive value of s-cystatin C for mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery  Alain Dardashti, MD, PhD, Shahab Nozohoor, MD, PhD, Lars Algotsson,
Prehypertension and chronic kidney disease: the ox or the plow?
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Refinement of survival prediction in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass surgery: Stratification by chronic kidney disease classification  Christopher.
Rise or fall of glomerular filtration rate: does it matter?
Masaru Horio  American Journal of Kidney Diseases 
Volume 76, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Erratum American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Better nephrology for mice—and man
Volume 77, Issue 8, Pages (April 2010)
Comparison of Drug Dosing Recommendations Based on Measured GFR and Kidney Function Estimating Equations  Lesley A. Stevens, MD, MS, Thomas D. Nolin,
Natalie Soulsby, Hugh Greville, Kingsley Coulthard, Chris Doecke 
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
The implications of anatomical and functional changes of the aging kidney: with an emphasis on the glomeruli  Richard J. Glassock, Andrew D. Rule  Kidney.
Disease-Specific Predictive Formulas for Energy Expenditure in the Dialysis Population  Enric Vilar, PhD, Ashwini Machado, RN, Andrew Garrett, PhD, Robert.
Volume 79, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
How to interpret the eGFR in patients with small body surface area
The online measurement of hemodialysis dose (Kt): Clinical outcome as a function of body surface area  Edmund G. Lowrie, Zhensheng Li, Norma Ofsthun,
Anemia as a risk factor for chronic kidney disease
Concordance Between Iothalamate and Iohexol Plasma Clearance
Natalie Soulsby, Hugh Greville, Kingsley Coulthard, Chris Doecke 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 70, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Within the Normal or Mildly Impaired Range and Incident Cardiovascular Disease  Alon Eisen, MD, Moshe Hoshen, PhD,
Martin K. Kuhlmann, Martina Heckmann, Werner Riegel, Hans Köhler 
Volume 72, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 76, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Within-Person Variability in Kidney Measures
Drug Dose Adjustments in Patients With Renal Impairment
Linda F. Fried, Trevor J. Orchard, Bertram L. Kasiske 
Methods for guideline development
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Lesley A. Stevens, MD, MS, Nicholas Stoycheff, MD 
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (May 2019)
Reduced renal function in patients with simple renal cysts
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Michael W. Steffes, Derek Schmidt, Rebecca Mccrery, John M. Basgen 
Arjang Djamali, Christina Kendziorski, Peter C. Brazy, Bryan N. Becker 
Homocysteine, renal function, and risk of cardiovascular disease
Douglas G Matsell, Colin T White  Kidney International 
Yasunori Kitamoto, Katsuhiko Matsuo, Kimio Tomita  Kidney International 
Volume 76, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 80, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Ann M. O'Hare, MA, MD  American Journal of Kidney Diseases 
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Glomerular filtration rate via plasma iohexol disappearance: Pilot study for chronic kidney disease in children  G.J. Schwartz, S. Furth, S.R. Cole, B.
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Jacob J.E. Koopman, MD, PhD  American Journal of Kidney Diseases 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages 1425-1436 (October 2003) Predicting GFR in children and adults: A comparison of the Cockcroft-Gault, Schwartz, and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulas  Annick Pierrat, Elisabeth Gravier, Claude Saunders, Marie-Véronique Caira, Zakia Aït-Djafer, Bernard Legras, Jean-Pierre Mallié  Kidney International  Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages 1425-1436 (October 2003) DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00208.x Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Values of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured or estimated in the different groups of children. (A) All children (C-All), all three groups (N = 198 patients). (B) Nonsingle kidney nontransplanted (C-NSK-NTR) (N = 138). (C) Single kidney (C-SK) (N = 30). (D) Transplanted kidney (C-TR), transplanted (N = 30). Abbreviations are: Cin, inulin clearance corrected for body surface area (BSA); Cinnc, noncorrected inulin clearance; Ccr, creatinine clearance corrected for BSA; Ccrnc, noncorrected creatinine clearance; Cck, estimation with Cockcroft-Gault formula; Sch, estimation with Schwartz formula; and MDRD, estimation with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease group urinary formula. See Methods section. *P vs. inulin clearance <0.05; **P vs. inulin clearance <0.02; ***P vs. inulin clearance <0.01; *****P vs. inulin clearance <0.0001 and less. Kidney International 2003 64, 1425-1436DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00208.x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Values of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured or estimation in children according to age groups. (A) Younger than 8 years old (<8) (N = 20). (B) Between 8 and 12 years old (8–12) (N = 62). (C) Older than 12 years (>12) (N = 116). Abbreviations are: Cin, inulin clearance corrected for body surface area (BSA); Cinnc, noncorrected inulin clearance; Ccr, creatinine clearance corrected for BSA; Ccrnc, noncorrected creatinine clearance; Cck, estimation with Cockcroft-Gault formula; Sch, estimation with Schwartz formula; MDRD, estimation with the Modification Diet in Renal Disease group urinary formula. See Methods section. **P vs. inulin clearance <0.02; ***P vs. inulin clearance <0.01; ****P vs. inulin clearance <0.001; *****P vs. inulin clearance <0.0001 and less. Kidney International 2003 64, 1425-1436DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00208.x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Values of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured or estimated in adults. (A) A-All (single kidney + transplanted) (SK+ TR) (N = 116 patients). (B) A-single kidney (SK) single kidney (N = 28). (C) A-transplanted (TR) (N = 88). Abbreviations are: Cin: inulin clearance corrected for body surface area (BSA); Cinnc, noncorrected inulin clearance; Ccr, creatinine clearance corrected for BSA; Ccrnc, noncorrected creatinine clearance; Cck, estimation with Cockcroft-Gault formula; MDRD, estimation with the Modification Diet in Renal Disease group urinary formula. See Methods section. *P vs. inulin clearance <0.05; **P vs. inulin clearance <0.02; ****P vs. inulin clearance <0.001; *****P vs. inulin clearance <0.0001 and less. Kidney International 2003 64, 1425-1436DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00208.x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in mL/min measured in children (C-All) (N = 198) by inulin clearance corrected for body surface area (BSA) and the estimated GFR using the Cockcroft-Gault formula (A); the Schwartz formula (B) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) group urinary formula (C). In each panel, the graph on the left represents the regression statistics. Inulin clearance is indicated on the Y-axis and the estimated value (Cockcroft-Gault, Schwartz, or MDRD) on the X-axis. The line represents the linear coefficient of regression r indicated in the graph with the values of the 95% interval of confidence in parenthesis. The graph on the right is the concordance study using the Bland-Altman method. X and Y are the values plotted on X- and Y-axis, respectively, in the linear regression graph on the left. The Y-axis is X—Y and the X-axis (X + Y)/2. The center line represents the mean of the differences between the two values for each individual; it is close to 0 (-2mL/min/1.73m2) for Cockcroft-Gault and different from 0 (-20mL/min/1.73m2) for both Schwartz and MDRD. The upper and lower lines indicate the 95% distribution of the population. Kidney International 2003 64, 1425-1436DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00208.x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in mL/min measured in adults (A-All) (N = 116) by inulin clearance corrected for body surface area (BSA) and the estimated GFR using the Cockcroft-Gault formula (A) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) group urinary formula (B). In each panel, the graph on the left represents the regression statistics. Inulin clearance is indicated on the Y-axis and the estimated value (Cockcroft-Gault or MDRD) on the X-axis. The line represents the linear coefficient of regression r indicated in the graph with the values of the 95% interval of confidence in parenthesis. The graph on the right is the concordance study using the Bland-Altman method. X and Y are the values plotted on X- and Y-axis, respectively, in the linear regression graph on the left. The Y-axis is X—Y and the X-axis (X + Y)/2. The center line represents the mean of the differences between the two values for each individual; it is close to 0 for Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD. The upper and lower lines indicate the 95% distribution of the population. Kidney International 2003 64, 1425-1436DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00208.x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions