Day 2 Session 2 Biological reference points - Supplementary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some Comments on SSB msy and Indicators of Healthy Size Structure Rainer Froese, GEOMAR WKGMSFD D3 Copenhagen, 4-5 September 2014.
Advertisements

Sheng-Ping Wang 1,2, Mark Maunder 2, and Alexandre Aires-Da-Silva 2 1.National Taiwan Ocean University 2.Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission.
CSIRO WEALTH FROM OCEANS FLAGSHIP Review of the harvest strategy for the Commonwealth small pelagic fishery Tony Smith Hobart, March 24, 2015.
Are pelagic fisheries managed well? A stock assessment scientists perspective Mark Maunder and Shelton Harley Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
Descriptor 3 for determining Good Environmental Status (GES) under the MSFD was defined as “Populations of all commercially exploited fish and shellfish.
Incorporating Ecosystem Objectives into Fisheries Management
WP4: Models to predict & test recovery strategies Cefas: Laurence Kell & John Pinnegar Univ. Aberdeen: Tara Marshall & Bruce McAdam.
CMM Evaluation WCPFC6-2009/IP17 WCPFC6-2009/IP18 SPC Oceanic Fisheries Programme Noumea, New Caledonia.
Cetacean by-catch M.B. Santos Workshop Marine Environment and fisheries.
Three Simple Rules for Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management Rainer Froese GEOMAR, Kiel, Germany Presentation at the ICCAT workshop in Madrid, Spain, 9-11.
ASSESSMENT OF BIGEYE TUNA (THUNNUS OBESUS) IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN January 1975 – December 2006.
A REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL REFERENCE POINTS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE CHILEAN JACK MACKEREL Aquiles Sepúlveda Instituto de Investigación Pesquera, Av. Colón 2780,
Revisiting the SSC Decision to Use all Available Data to Calculate Average Landings/OFLs/ABCs Southeast Fisheries Science Center.
FTP Yield per recruit models. 2 Objectives Since maximizing effort does not maximize catch, the question is if there is an optimum fishing rate that would.
Mrs Nafisat Bolatito IKENWEIWE (PhD) DEPARTMENT OF AQUACULTURE AND FISHERIES MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA FISH STOCK ASSESSMENT
Fisheries 101: Modeling and assessments to achieve sustainability Training Module July 2013.
Balanced Harvesting: Not Supported by Science Rainer Froese GEOMAR, Kiel, Germany Pew Fellows Meeting, Rio Grande 16 October 2015.
ASSESSMENT OF BIGEYE TUNA (THUNNUS OBESUS) IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN January 1975 – December 2005.
1 Climate Change and Implications for Management of North Sea Cod (Gadus morhua) L.T. Kell, G.M. Pilling and C.M. O’Brien CEFAS, Lowestoft.
Yellowfin Tuna Major Changes Catch, effort, and length-frequency data for the surface fisheries have been updated to include new data for 2005.
For 2014 Show the line of R producing SSB, and SSB producing R, and how they would spiderweb to get to equilibrium R. Took a long time, did not get to.
Data requirement of stock assessment. Data used in stock assessments can be classified as fishery-dependent data or fishery-independent data. Fishery-dependent.
Stock Assessment Workshop 30 th June - 4 th July 2008 SPC Headquarters Noumea New Caledonia.
Day 3 Session 1 Model fitting. So, how do you assess a stock assessment model? There are five key questions you should ask yourself: 1.Assumptions What.
PRINCIPLES OF STOCK ASSESSMENT. Aims of stock assessment The overall aim of fisheries science is to provide information to managers on the state and life.
Age-structured models. Background readings Lawson TA & Hilborn R (1985) Equilibrium yields and yield isopleths from a general age-structured model of.
Fish stock assessment Prof. Dr. Sahar Mehanna National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries Fish population Dynamics Lab November,
Rainer Froese HOSST-TOSST Seminar 07 April 2016 GEOMAR, Kiel, Germany
Abundance Trends and Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species
When is Spawning Biomass a Good Proxy for Stock Reproductive Potential? A Case Study of Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in the Gulf of Mexico SEFSC.
Towards Sustainable and Profitable Fisheries in the Mediterranean Sea
Status and Exploitation of European Fish Stocks
IBFMPs Goals and Objectives
State and Development of European Fish Stocks
Age-structured models Yield-per-recruit, reference points, MSY
Stock-Recruitment Population Numbers Recruitment Natural Mortality
Relative Values.
Maximum Sustainable Yield & Maximum Economic Yield
Day 1 Sessions 1-3 Revision
Day 3 Session 1 Parameter Estimation – Natural Mortality and Fishing Mortality
MSFD Descriptor 3 population age and size distribution indicative of a healthy stock Gerjan Piet & Thomas Brunel.
MSFD Indicators and Reference Points for Data-Limited Stocks
GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION COMMISSION GÉNÉRALE DES PÊCHES
Day 5 Session 1 Biological reference points
Biodiversity of Fishes Stock-Recruitment Relationships
11/19/2018 Day 3 Session 3 Special Session – Uncertainty, the stock recruitment relationship and “steepness”
Current developments on steepness for tunas:
Estimation of Potential yields in (more or less) virgin stocks
Introduction The WCPO region comprises many different countries and territories, all of whom have direct or indirect fisheries based economic interests.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Day 6 Revision.
Day 4 Session 2 Biological reference points
Report of the Scientific and Statistical Committee
Country level implications
Descriptor 3 Spain DG ENV meeting Paris, April 2012.
Review of objectives for this week?
Update on previous year’s discussion on Descriptor 3
Models used for stock recruits and parent stock
BIOMASS PER RECRUIT MODEL
Maximum Sustainable Yield
YIELD CURVES.
Fisheries Models To produce a good fisheries model, we must account for all contributions to reproduction, growth, and mortality, throughout the life cycle.
Pay Structure Chapter 9 HRM-300.
MSFD Indicators and Reference Points for Data-Limited Stocks
Presentation to the MSFD Descriptor 3+ Meeting
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Descriptor 3+
John Hampton & Shelton Harley SPC Oceanic Fisheries Programme
Saint Matthew blue king crab stock status and rebuilding projections
MULTIFAN-CL implementation of deterministic and stochastic projections
U.S. NMFS contracts the CIE to review assessments
Presentation transcript:

Day 2 Session 2 Biological reference points - Supplementary

Spawning Potential Ratio

Spawning Potential Ratio What is the “spawning potential ratio”? Spawning potential ratio (SPR) is also referred to as the spawning potential per recruit. SPR is a measure of the impact that fishing has on the ability of each recruit (i.e. the average recruit) to contribute to spawning. One definition for spawning potential ratio (SPR) is: the number of eggs that could be produced by an average recruit over its lifetime when the stock is fished… … divided by…. the number of eggs that could be produced by an average recruit over its lifetime when the stock is unfished. In other words, SPR compares the spawning ability (or reproductive capacity) of a stock in the fished condition to the stock's spawning ability (or reproductive capacity) in the unfished condition. (Refs: http://afrf.org/primer3/, and SC5-ME-WP-01)

Spawning Potential Ratio What is the “spawning potential ratio”? The expected lifetime reproductive potential of an average recruit is often defined as the spawning stock biomass per recruit (SSBR). This is believed to correlate closely to the potential for growth of a population. Subsequently, you will often see SPR expressed as the ratio of the fished to unfished spawning stock biomass per recruit: Spawning Potential Ratio (SPR) = (SSBR fished/SSBR unfished) Ultimately, SPR provides “a basis for evaluating the condition of the spawning stock and the establishment of criteria for managing the spawning potential of the stock” (Goodyear 1989). (http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/2597/rp33_vol1_yield_estimates.pdf)

Spawning Potential Ratio How is SPR used as a reference point? In general, a specific level of SPR is set as the reference point. For example: SPR = 0.4 What does this mean? It means the reference level of SPR is 40% of the unfished stocks SPR (which is often stated as SPR0). In other words, the reference point is reached when the SPR has been reduced by 60% due to fishing**. The level at which it is set depends on whether it is being used as a target or limit reference point. **get checked.

Spawning Potential Ratio How is SPR used as a reference point? It can also be expressed as the fishing mortality rate associated with that level of depletion in the SPR, e.g.: F40%SPR This is translated as “the fishing mortality rate that reduces the spawning potential to 40% of the unfished level” You can think of this in a similar manner to how you explain Fmsy (the fishing mortality rate that will result in the maximum sustainable yield) **get checked.

Spawning Potential Ratio How is SPR used as a reference point? And in a similar manner to Fmsy indicators, we can use the level of F to define “overfishing” Hence under the above example, overfishing is occuring if: Fc>F40%SPR **get checked.

Spawning potential ratio Example only: Limit Reference Point (TRP) 0.8 1.0 Target Reference Point (TRP) Fcurrent/F40%SPR Time

Spawning Potential Ratio What are the potential pros and cons of using SPR based reference points? SPR based reference points are not dependent on the stock recruitment relationship being known. This means that the uncertainty inherent in MSY based reference points due to the high uncertainty over “steepness”, is not an issue that limits the use of SPR. SPR are, however, like MSY reference points, very sensitive to changes in gear selectivity, hence having appropriate information and data available for accurate estimates of selectivity is important for the calculation of SPR based reference points Other…… **get checked.

Spawning Potential Ratio How do you determine what the appropriate reference level is for SPR? ***Need to talk to Nick, Joel etc…

Spawning Potential Ratio Is SPR used elsewhere? Yes, for example: SPR is widely used in U.S. fisheries managed under the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act, usually in the context of a percentage of the unfished spawning stock per recruit (SSBR). Its implementation is intended to be risk-aversive through selection of minimum acceptable levels above which stocks maintain acceptable productivity. (http://fishweb.ifas.ufl.edu/Allenlab/courses/Goodyear%201993.pdf)

Spawning Potential Ratio What data and information is required to calculate SPR? SPR reference point calculations are reliant on estimates of selectivity, maturity and natural mortality being available: Selectivity: this will determine which components of the stock are being most impacted by the gear (along with fishing effort and catchability), and this information combines with estimates of: Maturity at age: which defines the average productivity of fish in each age class (which should increase as they get older) Natural mortality: will act upon the unfished population and the fished population and is needed to help estimate numbers at age:

Spawning Potential Ratio UNEXPLOITED POPULATION EXPLOITED POPULATION Age 1 (0 eggs/fish ) Age 2 (50 eggs/fish ) Age 3 (100 eggs/fish ) SPR = (200/5)/(300/5) = 67% 0 eggs 0 eggs 150 eggs 100 eggs 200 eggs 100 eggs

Depletion based reference points

Depletion based reference points What are depletion based reference points? Depletion based reference points are generally biomass based reference points that define a reference level of depletion of either the total or, more commonly, the spawning biomass: e.g. 30% of total biomass (B30%); 20% of spawning stock biomass (SSB30%) ……..with the level specified dependant upon whether it is intended to be used as a limit or target reference point. In general they are used as limit reference points. The level of depletion is calculated as: Bcurr/B0 or SSBcurr/SSB0 ….the ratio of the current or recent average biomass (Bc) to the initial (starting) biomass of the population

Depletion based reference points What are depletion based reference points? Depletion based reference points are generally biomass based reference points that define a reference level of depletion of either the total or, more commonly, the spawning biomass: e.g. 30% of total biomass (B30%); 20% of spawning stock biomass (SSB30%) ……..with the level specified dependant upon whether it is intended to be used as a limit or target reference point. In general they are used as limit reference points. The level of depletion is calculated as: Bcurr/B0 or SSBcurr/SSB0 ….the ratio of the current or recent average biomass (Bc) to the initial (starting) biomass of the population An advantage of depletion-based reference points that use the candidate indicators (SSBcurr/SSB0), is that they are relatively stable from assessment to assessment (despite changes in those assessments), and in many of the tuna and tuna-like stock assessments have provided the least variation in the range of results across a range of steepness values used (e.g. Kolody et al, 2010, Anon, 2010).

Depletion based reference points What are the potential advantages of depletion based reference points? Depletion based reference points might typically be preferred when….. An advantage of depletion-based reference points that use the candidate indicators (SSBcurr/SSB0), is that they are relatively stable from assessment to assessment (despite changes in those assessments), and in many of the tuna and tuna-like stock assessments have provided the least variation in the range of results across a range of steepness values used (e.g. Kolody et al, 2010, Anon, 2010).

Depletion based reference points What are depletion based reference points? For candidate indicators and the limit reference points itself, it has been noted in the tuna stock assessments in other RFMOs (as above) that use of SSB is preferable over total biomass (TB), because the most recent recruitment estimates are least reliable, whereas for the estimates of SSB, there are more data in the stock assessment model to estimate these and they, therefore, tend to be estimated more reliably. Depletion levels can be calculated from stock assessment model output (e.g. the Mulitfan-CL output produced from the SPC assessments). They require an estimate of the initial or reference time SSB and last year, or years, of the stock assessment SSB. The stock assessments themselves require a considerable amount of data (e.g. Harley et al 2010).……

Depletion based reference points What are depletion based reference points? ME: the level of depletion at which recruitment becomes impacted is still no clearer for depletion or SPR based indicators than it is for MSY based indicators Essentially the SPR and depletion based estimates are not pretending that that point is known and instead rely on observations across fish stocks with varying life history characteristics and productivity to provide a reference level which perhaps “experience” in other fisheries suggests would be an appropriate (low risk) limit in the current fishery The concern can be of course that the limits are too precautionary and could potentially lead to foregoing potential yield. …..talk to Nick and Adam and Joel about this.

Depletion based reference points Tuna assessments and depletion estimates Depletion estimates are in fact already included in the WCPO tuna assessment papers (along with a suite of MSY and other reference points)

Depletion based reference points What are depletion based reference points? Its important not to confuse depletion based estimates which use the unfished starting biomass as the comparison point with estimates which use the predicted biomass at each time point if the fishery had not occurred (i.e. fishing mortality had been zero)

Depletion based reference points What are depletion based reference points? The reference points which are based on predicted biomass in the absence of fishing can provide quite different levels of depletion, particularly if there are trends in recruitment over time (e.g. BET 2010): 0.32 v 0.17………can you think of why they are so different?