On one set of runs (1“A,” 2 “C”) can measure correlation of A and C

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Complex Number System
Advertisements

5-2 Inequalities and Triangles
Bell inequality & entanglement
Finite Mathematics & Its Applications, 10/e by Goldstein/Schneider/SiegelCopyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 of 71 Chapter 1 Linear Equations and.
Chapter 22 The EPR paper and Bell's theorem by Steve Kurtz.
One Olympiad Problem SDMC Gauss class Instructor: David Balmin
Linear Equations and Functions
Chapter 3 Section 3.4 The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra.
In 1887,when Photoelectric Effect was first introduced by Heinrich Hertz, the experiment was not able to be explained using classical principles.
Chang-Kui Duan, Institute of Modern Physics, CUPT 1 Harmonic oscillator and coherent states Reading materials: 1.Chapter 7 of Shankar’s PQM.
Curt Mobley Sequoia Scientific, Inc Richards Road, Suite ext 109 Heavy stuff!!
PRESENTED BY MIDHUN.T - EC 3 - S 61 TOPIC – QUANTUM TELEPORTATION Presented by - MIDHUN T EC 3, S 6 ROLL NO. 20 Reg no
The Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals. Questions:  How do you determine if a vector field is conservative?  What special properties do conservative.
Borsós, K.; Benedict, M. G. University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary Animation of experiments in modern quantum physics Animation of experiments in modern.
Quantum mechanical phenomena. The study between quanta and elementary particles. Quanta – an indivisible entity of a quantity that has the same value.
Planar Graphs Graph Coloring
Wednesday, October 31 Ford Final Chapter (10). Agenda Announce: –Test Wednesday –Office Hours probably busy…better book appt. –Read Chs. 1-3 of Vilekin.
1 entanglement-quantum teleportation entanglement-quantum teleportation entanglement (what is it?) quantum teleportation (intuitive & mathematical) ‘ quantum.
The Triangle Inequality Triangle Inequality Theorem The sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
Fundamental Concepts of Algebra
Quantum Weirdness.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved Inequalities 2. Equations and Inequalities.
Bell’s Inequality.
A1 “BASIC QUANTUM MECHANICS, AND SOME SURPRISING CONSEQUENCES” Anthony J. Leggett Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Sullivan Algebra and Trigonometry: Section 12.9 Objectives of this Section Set Up a Linear Programming Problem Solve a Linear Programming Problem.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
ECOR 1101 Mechanics I Sections C and F Jack Vandenberg
Chapter 3 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. Questions QM answers 1) How is the state of a system described mathematically? (In CM – via generalized coordinates.
Vectors and Dot Products OBJECTIVES: Find the dot product of two vectors and use the properties of the dot product. Find the angle between two vectors.
南亚和印度.
Slide 4- 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Slide 1- 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing.
Unit 1 C Work Energy Power. Forms of Energy Mechanical Mechanical focus for now focus for now chemical chemical electromagnetic electromagnetic nuclear.
DPG 1 What is Realism in Physics? What is the Price for Maintaining It? A. J. Leggett Dept. of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 75 th.
Electromagnetic Waves
Chapter 9 (Part 2): Graphs
Linear Equations in Two Unknowns
What is Probability? Quantification of uncertainty.
Quantum Information Promises new insights Anthony J
Bell's inequality for a single measurement within EPR paradox.
Chapter 2 Sets and Functions.
An Hypothesis: There Is No Speed Barrier in the Universe
Introduction to the Olympiad Problem
THEORIES OF LIGHT Is light a wave or a stream of particles?
The Structure of a World Described by Quantum Mechanics
Linear Equations and Functions
The Structure of a World Described by Quantum Mechanics A. J
Announcements Exam Details: Today: Problems 6.6, 6.7
Electromagnetic Waves
12.3 The Dot Product.
Realism Versus Quantum Mechanics: Implications of Some Recent Experiments A. J. Leggett Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Precalculus Mathematics for Calculus Fifth Edition
Lesson 5-4 The Triangle Inequality
Quantum Computer Science: A Very Short Introduction (3)
Vectors for Calculus-Based Physics
“BASIC QUANTUM MECHANICS, AND SOME SURPRISING CONSEQUENCES”
Heisenberg Uncertainty
Quantum Technology programme
Warm-Up 3) 1) 4) Name the dimensions 2).
Use Green's Theorem to evaluate the double integral
Quantum Computer Science: A Very Short Introduction (3)
Electromagnetic Waves
Lecture # 2 MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
Reviewgamezone.com Go online to reviewgamezone.com and on the right (or scroll down to) where it says “Games By ID#” type in & Then scroll.
Reviewgamezone.com Go online to reviewgamezone.com and on the right (or scroll down to) where it says “Games By ID#” type in 4274 or Then scroll.
Electromagnetic Waves
SIDE SPLITTER Hot Potato; e together
T A. WHAT DO WE KNOW ON THE BASIS OF ALREADY PERFORMED EXPERIMENTS?
Linear Equations in Linear Algebra
Linear Equations in Linear Algebra
Presentation transcript:

On one set of runs (1“A,” 2 “C”) can measure correlation of A and C 10 km A C 1  2  SOURCE OF PAIRS ~ ~ B D SWITCH SWITCH A, B, C, D = ± 1. But for each pair, measure either A or B, and either C or D, not both. On one set of runs (1“A,” 2 “C”) can measure correlation of A and C A simple argument: For each particle 1, either A=+1 or A = -1, irrespective of whether A actually measured. Value of A unaffected by whether C or D was measured on “partner” (2) (etc.).  for each pair, quantities AC, AD, BC, BD exist, with A, B, C, D = ± 1 and A the same in (AC, AD) (etc.) Simple algebra  for each pair, Hence the correlations satisfy the inequality Obvious, right? So, let’s do the experiment. . . (“” = “cannot exceed”)

K cannot be greater than 2 (under any conditions) Recap: The simple argument says: K cannot be greater than 2 (under any conditions) Experiment finds that (under certain conditions) K is approximately 2 • 8! So, what has gone wrong? According to quantum mechanics, the idea that physical systems “have” definite properties even when these are not measured is just wrong. If we “inspect,” behavior is consistent with the “common-sense” idea that each system took either path 1 or path 2. If we do not “inspect,” behavior is NOT consistent with this assumption. INSPECTION “OPTIONAL” 1 SOURCE DETECTOR 2

PHOTONS In quantum mechanics, light comes in irreducible “chunks” —photons. A photon can have its “polarization” (direction of electric field) in any direction in the plane perpendicular to its motion. We can ask the photon “are you red or green?” with respect to any pair of perpendicular axes in the plane, eg. OR OR OR… If the photon polarization is exactly along red, it will answer “red..” If it is exactly along green, it will answer “green.” If the polarization is along some intermediate direction, e.g. Then it will sometimes answer “red” and sometimes “green.” . . . .

TWO IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES OF QUANTUM MECHANICS FOR PHOTONS: “NO-CLONING” THEOREM: It is impossible to build a device which is guaranteed to take a photon of arbitrary (unknown) polarization and produce accurate copies of it. (e.g. with , can copy or but not ) EPR PAIRS: It is possible to produce pairs of photons such that for any choice of measurement direction, if 1 replies “red” (“green”) then so does 2. Note: photon polarization can be “mapped” onto two states of particle of spin ½ ( maps to “  ”, to “ ”)