1/10 prototype support tube

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Granite table 1000×1500×500, 2.2tons CFRP SUS Channel 100x50 → 150x75 Level Jack < 5000kg Dec. 04,’03 KEK H. Yamaoka.
Advertisements

DISPLACEMENT TRANSMISSIBILITY IN BASE EXCITATION
1 Support system of final quadrupole magnet in a Detector Contents -Introduction -Calculations -Installation -Conclusions Nov., ’08 KEK H. Yamaoka.
1 Vibrations studies at KEKB/Belle KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka.
Designing for Stiffness
MODULE 10 EXPERIMENTAL MODAL ANALYSIS Most vibration problems are related to resonance phenomena where operational forces excite one or more mode of vibration.
Ian Bailey Cockcroft Institute/ Lancaster University October 30 th, 2009 Baseline Positron Source Target Experiment Update.
Development of a mover having one nanometer precision and 4mm moving range Y. Morita, S. Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo Y. Higashi, M. Masuzawa,
Structures and stress BaDI 1.
Typical Steps of field Balancing Illustration with model 907
Resistors Resistors can be either fixed or variable in value Resistors can be either fixed or variable in value Fixed resistors come in a variety of different.
Minimum Weight Wing Design for a Utility Type Aircraft MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AE 462 – Aerospace Structures Design DESIGN TEAM : Osman Erdem.
 All objects have a NATURAL FREQUENCY at which they tend to vibrate. This frequency depends on the material the object is made of, the shape, and many.
Status on MONALISA presented by D. Urner 6 th stabilization day 9. June 09.
1 New suspension study for LCGT Erina Nishida Ochanomizu University The Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences The Division of Advanced Sciences/ NAOJ.
The Finite Element Method
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS CONVERSION FACTORS FOR NATURAL VIBRATIONS OF BEAMS Austin Cosby and Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete Rensselaer at Hartford.
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008
ACOUSTIC JOURNAL BEARING – A SEARCH FOR ADEQUATE CONFIGURATION Tadeusz Stolarski Rafal Gawarkiewicz Krzysztof Tesch ITC 2015, Tokyo, Japan Gdansk University.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Finite Element Analysis (FEA) for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Rene Herrmann Compounding and Composites. FEM static load analyzes The purpose of the static test is to define areas of large strain. It is these areas.
1 H. Yamaoka R. Sugahara M. Masuzawa IR stability at SuperKEKB June 14, ‘10 H. Yamaoka.
Start Presentation September 27, nd Homework Problem In this homework problem, we wish to model a mechanical system. The problem deals with a simple,
Support Tube Dynamic Analysis KEK’s ANSYS simulation –model details –Single Point Response Spectrum analysis SUGGESTED improvements –beam model –Harmonic.
MECH 391 Instrumentation Lab 9 Vibration Analysis of an Aluminum Cantilever Beam Performed: 03/15/04 Sinan Ozcan : I believe I performed 100% of this lab.
An alternative spectrograph mount Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/14/04.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 1. Introduction Both cavities will be supported by the fundamental power coupler and a number of blade flexures.
Summary of Support tube R&D Nov. 11, ’04 KEK H. Yamaoka.
LATHE VIBRATIONS ANALYSIS ON SURFACE ROUHHNESS OF MACHINED DETAILS LATHE VIBRATIONS ANALYSIS ON SURFACE ROUHHNESS OF MACHINED DETAILS * Gennady Aryassov,
Advanced LIGO UK 1 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Modal testing facility for Advanced LIGO Caroline Cantley University of Glasgow Advanced LIGO SUS Workshop,
Two Layers SAS: Damping of Torsion Mode Feb. 5th, 2011 F2F Meeting Takanori Sekiguchi, Riccardo DeSalvo, Ryutaro Takahashi 1/8.
LIGO-G R Inverted pendulum studies for seismic attenuation Ilaria Taurasi University of Sannio at Benevento, Italy September 20, 2005 Supervisor.
GDE 4/Mar/20081 Lorentz Detuning Calculation for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two modes” model Method of the.
1 MME3360b Assignment 0310% of final mark Due date:March 19, 2012 Five problems each worth 20% of assignment mark.
Modal Testing 523L (Session 5). Frequency Response Frequency Response Function – System characteristics in frequency domain How to find FRF – Mathematical.
1 KEK Hiroshi Yamaoka Vibration analysis of the ILD QD0-support system Oct, 2 nd '09 KEK H. Yamaoka - Results of Vibration analysis - Coherency measurement.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
Ian Bailey Cockcroft Institute/ Lancaster University September 30 th, 2009 Baseline Positron Source Target Experiment Update LCWA09.
1 Investigation of vibration properties of the KEKB tunnel after the Great East Japan Earthquake Contents Situations after the earthquake Geological survey.
SPM Users Basic Training August 2010 Lecture VIII – AC Imaging Modes: ACAFM and MAC Imaging methods using oscillating cantilevers.
Date of download: 6/20/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Modal Testing 421L/521L (Lab 9) 10/21/2016. Frequency Response Frequency Response Function – System characteristics in frequency domain How to find FRF.
Date of download: 9/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Linseed oil + Styrene + Divinylbenzene
Estimation of Fundamental Natural Frequency, Damping Ratio and Equivalent Mass 421L/521L (Lab 8)
Experimental Dynamic Substructuring Coupling and Decoupling
Period of Simple Harmonic Motion
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
SCRF 21-25/Apr/2008 Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz Detuning for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two.
Xiaomin Pang, Yanyan Chen, Xiaotao Wang, Wei Dai, Ercang Luo
Vibration studies for the QD0-support system
Clic Vertex Thermal Setup and stave studies
By Arsalan Jamialahmadi
Crab Cavity support system update
Introduction to Structural Member Properties
Material Joining and Beam Bending
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Introduction to Structural Member Properties
Effective bending moment method
Tuned Mass Damper Investigation for Apache Struts
Introduction to Structural Member Properties
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
Vibration Basics and Shaker Selection
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
The First Free-Vibration Mode of a Heat Exchanger Lid
Comb Driven Double Ended Tuning Fork
Music Examples Answers
Introduction to Structural Member Properties
Presentation transcript:

1/10 prototype support tube July 30, ’03 KEK H. Yamaoka 1/10 prototype support tube Thin Tube Prototype support tube Shaker This figure shows the drawing of the prototype support tube. The size of the support tube is 80mm diameter and 10mm thick. And this is assembled from four pieces. And these support tubes are connected by this thin tube. Size is 200mm length and 3mm thick.

Tube with taper flange Connection tube Tube with flat flange Configuration of one piece is like this. Both ends of the tube have flanges to join another tube. And end configuration is taper. And I prepare another type of prototype support tube. This is with flat flanges. Purpose is comparison with the vibration properties between these two.

○ Test items Joining bolts Cantilever ・Taper flange/Flat flange - Measuring oscillation properties - Compare to the ANSYS calculation - Effects of joining strength Both-ends supported - Thickness of connection tube connection tube Test items are with the taper flange type and flat flange type, measuring oscillation properties and compare to the ANSYS calculation. At this item, by changing the number of joining bolts, effects of joining strength was measured.

○ Tests(Hammering test) FRF(Frequency Response Function) Xi: Output Acc. Fj: Input force Input FRF Table Input FFT Output Output FRF Prototype support tube is set-up like this. Tube is mounted on this support base like this. In this test, shaker was not used. Test was done by hammering/impulse method. This test is, by using this hammer, impulse is given to the support tube and output signal is measured. This hammer is mounted the load cell, so I can know the input force. Input and output signals are like this and output signal are like these. After FFT, force can be input this frequency range, so output signal is like this. These peaks indicates resonant frequencies. By carrying out the same thing at each point, It can be made this table. And from amplitude and phase angle, mode shape can be made. FFT

○ Results (Taper flange, 12-M6) A: 77.5Hz B: 90Hz C: 258Hz D: 522Hz B G-sensor 20 21 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 B D C A Fixed Fixed A: 77.5Hz B: 90Hz C: 258Hz This is the test result in case of taper flange type with joining 12 bolts. Data was taken at these points from 1 to 9. And these plots show the FRF results. Each peak shows the resonant frequency and each line show the measurement data.. First peak is A. This mode shape is like this. It’s only rotation. Tube is not bending/deformed. This is due to the stiffness of the connection. If this connection is stiffer, this mode will be disappeared. Next mode is like this, 129Hz. This is the typical 1st mode of cantilever type. Second mode is 585Hz. This mode is also deformed the joining point. 3rd mode is like this at this frequency. D: 522Hz

○ FEM 76Hz 256Hz 489Hz t15x230x80(Al) 5(height)x170(width)x80 100(dia.)x94(inner)x200(length) 110(dia.)x60(inner)x20(length) 80(dia.)xt10:Al 76Hz 256Hz I compare to the ANSYS calculation. ANSYS model is defined like this. These lines show the support tube. And input the stiffness such as moment of inertia and area of cross section. This purple lines show these flanges. Support base was modeled like this. Result is, first mode is 117Hz like this mode shape, 2nd mode is 656Hz, and third mode, 4th mode. 489Hz

Effects of joining strength Joining bolts Taper Flange: 3-M6 6-M6 12-M6 1st: 78.5 77.7 78.2 1st’: 89.2 88.2 88.4 2nd: 255 256 255 3rd: 512 520 521 Flat Flange In progress. Next, I have studied the effects of joining strength. In this test, when changing the number of joining bolts, difference of vibration properties were measured. The number of joining bolts were changed 3, 6 and 12. Then each resonant frequencies was measured like these. In this figure, horizontal line shows the axial force reacted to the bolt. If the support tube is connected by 12 of M6 bolts, axial force in the bolts is about 3300 kg. In case of 6 bolts, it’s about this and in case of 3, it’s about this. And solid line shows in case of the taper flange, and dotted line shows the flat flange. Result is, difference between the number of joining bolts, at first mode is not so change, but at the higher mode, difference is larger. Resonant frequency become lower. This is the same meaning as the stiffness decreasing. Difference between taper and flat flange, first mode is not so large, but according to increase the resonant frequency, difference is larger. So taper flange is effective to keep the stiffness.