DEVELOPMENT OF AN ITALIAN FIRE PREVENTION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEVELOPMENT OF AN ITALIAN FIRE PREVENTION
Advertisements

F. Bozza M.C. Cameretti A. Senatore R. Tuccillo Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica per l’Energetica (D.I.M.E.) Università di Napoli “Federico II” Naples,
Piotr Wolański Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Federal department of environment, transport, energy and communications ETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Risk Assessment on Pipelines: the.
1 TONGJI UNIVERSITY Institute for Hydrogen Energy Technologies Study on the Harm Effect of Liquid Hydrogen Release by Consequence Modeling Institute for.
Flammable extent of hydrogen jets close to surfaces Benjamin Angers*, Ahmed Hourri*, Luis Fernando Gomez, Pierre Bénard and Andrei Tchouvelev** * Hydrogen.
DISPERSION TESTS ON CONCENTRATION AND ITS FLUCTUATIONS FOR 40MPa PRESSURIZED HYDROGEN A. Kouchi, K. Okabayashi, K. Takeno, K. Chitose Mitsubishi Heavy.
MODELING OF SUDDEN HYDROGEN EXPANSION FROM CRYOGENIC PRESSURE VESSEL FAILURE Guillaume Petitpas and Salvador M. Aceves Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Safety distances: comparison of the metodologies for their determination – M. Vanuzzo, M. Carcassi ICHS San Francisco, USA - September SAFETY.
ICHS 2007, San Sebastian, Spain 1 SAFETY OF LABORATORIES FOR NEW HYDROGEN TECHNIQUES Heitsch, M., Baraldi, D., Moretto, P., Wilkening, H. Institute for.
Determination of Clearance Distances for Venting of Hydrogen Storage Andrei Tchouvelev, Pierre Benard, Vlad Agranat and Zhong Cheng.
1 JRC – IE Pisa on CFD modelling of accidental hydrogen release from pipelines. H. Wilkening - D. Baraldi Int. Conf. on Hydrogen Safety Pisa Sept.
FIRE PREVENTION TECHNICAL RULE FOR GASEOUS HYDROGEN TRANSPORT IN PIPELINES International Conference on Hydrogen Safety - San Sebastian, 13 th of September.
Evaluation of Safety Distances Related to Unconfined Hydrogen Explosions Sergey Dorofeev FM Global 1 st ICHS, Pisa, Italy, September 8-10, 2005.
Industrial Prospective for Hydrogen Utilization - Safety Aspect - 10 September 2005 K.Takeno Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. 添付 -2.
Parameters for the thermal decomposition of epoxy resin/carbon fiber composites in cone calorimeter 4 th ICHS Conference, September 14, 2011 D. Quang Dao.
Lead Technology Task 6.2 Materials for mechanical pump for HLM reactors M. Tarantino – ENEA Work Package Meeting – ENEA Bologna, November 17th, 2010.
Thermal hydraulic analysis of ALFRED by RELAP5 code & by SIMMER code G. Barone, N. Forgione, A. Pesetti, R. Lo Frano CIRTEN Consorzio Interuniversitario.
Pro-Science 4 th International Conference of Hydrogen Safety, September 12-14, 2011, SAN FRANCISCO, USA EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF IGNITED UNSTEADY HYDROGEN.
ICHS4, San Francisco, September E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi Joint Research Centre - Institute for Energy and Transport
Large-Scale Hydrogen Release In An Isothermal Confined Area J.M. LACOME – Y. DAGBA – D. JAMOIS – L. PERRETTE- C. PROUST ICHS- San Sebastian, sept 2007.
Page 1 SIMULATIONS OF HYDROGEN RELEASES FROM STORAGE TANKS: DISPERSION AND CONSEQUENCES OF IGNITION By Benjamin Angers 1, Ahmed Hourri 1 and Pierre Bénard.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Simulation of the efficiency of hydrogen recombiners as safety devices Ernst-Arndt Reinecke, Stephan Kelm, Wilfried.
Hydrogen risk assessment in São Paulo State – Brazil Newton Pimenta Sandro Tomaz Giuseppe Michelino 4 th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety ICHS.
ICHS, September 2007 On The Use Of Spray Systems: An Example Of R&D Work In Hydrogen Safety For Nuclear Applications C. Joseph-Auguste 1, H. Cheikhravat.
Development of a RELAP5-3D thermal-hydraulic model for a Gas Cooled Fast Reactor D. Castelliti, C. Parisi, G. M. Galassi, N. Cerullo (San Piero A Grado.
Quantification of the Uncertainty of the Peak Pressure Value in the vented Deflagrations of Air-Hydrogen mixtures. San Sebastian - 12/September/2007 Marco.
Wu. Y., International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, September Initial Assessment of the Impact of Jet Flame Hazard From Hydrogen Cars In.
International Conference on Hydrogen Safety 2011 – San Francisco, 12 Sept 2011 Risk informed separation distances for hydrogen refuelling stations Frederic.
Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Release from Varying Diameter Exit
Experimental and numerical studies on the bonfire test of high- pressure hydrogen storage vessels Prof. Jinyang Zheng Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang.
HIGH PRESSURE HYDROGEN JETS IN THE PRESENCE OF A SURFACE P. Bénard, A. Tchouvelev, A. Hourri, Z. Chen and B. Angers.
Preparing for the Hydrogen Economy by Using the Existing Natural Gas System as a Catalyst // Project Contract No.: SES6/CT/2004/ NATURALHY is an.
25/12/ DRA/LPe Data for the evaluation of hydrogen RIsks onboard VEhicles : outcomes from the French project DRIVE ---- Gentilhomme O., Proust C.,
PRESENTATION OF CFD ACTIVITIES IN CV GROUP Daniel Gasser.
4th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, San Francisco, USA, September, J. Yanez, A. Kotchourko, M. Kuznetsov, A. Lelyakin, T. Jordan.
ME 475/675 Introduction to Combustion Lecture 31 Laminar flame speed and thickness dependence on unburned temperature, pressure, fuel and dilution, Ex.
Sandra Nilsen et. al Determination of Hazardous Zones Case study: Generic Hydrogen Refuelling Station.
© GexCon AS JIP Meeting, May 2011, Bergen, Norway 1 Ichard M. 1, Hansen O.R. 1, Middha P. 1 and Willoughby D. 2 1 GexCon AS 2 HSL.
CFD Simulation & Consulting Services Hi-Tech CFD | Voice: Optimizing Designs of Industrial Pipes, Ducts and.
S.G. Giannissi1,2, I.C.Tolias1,2, A.G. Venetsanos1
ICHS 2015 – Yokohama, Japan | ID195
Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
International Conference on Hydrogen Safety
Component Availability Effects
Audrey DUCLOS1, C. Proust2,3, J. Daubech2, and F. Verbecke1
International Conference on Hydrogen Safety
HOMOGENEOUS HYDROGEN DEFLAGRATIONS IN SMALL SCALE ENCLOSURE
ME 475/675 Introduction to Combustion
ICHS - October 2015 Jérôme Daubech
Risk Reduction Potential of Accident Mitigation Features
Combustor Model Simulation
Sandia National Laboratories
Korea Research Results “Fire resistance test”
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON AUTO-IGNITION OF HIGH PRESSURE HYDROGEN JETS
Analysis of acoustic pressure oscillation during vented deflagrations
Flammable extent of hydrogen jets close to surfaces
Modeling and Analysis of a Hydrogen Release in a Large Scale Facility
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
Data for the evaluation of hydrogen RIsks onboard VEhicles : outcomes from the French project DRIVE ---- Gentilhomme O., Proust C., Jamois D., Tkatschenko.
E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi
Flammability profiles associated with high pressure hydrogen jets released in close proximity to surfaces ICHS 6 Yokohama Hall, J., Hooker,
M. Vanuzzo, M. Carcassi. Università di Pisa
Natural and Forced Ventilation of Buoyant Gas Released in a Full-Scale Garage : Comparison of Model Predictions and Experimental Data Kuldeep Prasad, William.
Industrial Prospective for Hydrogen Utilization - Safety Aspect -
ICHS5 – 2013 September, Brussels, Belgium | ID161
CFD computations of liquid hydrogen releases
HYDROGEN – METHANE MIXTURES: DISPERSION AND STRATIFICATION STUDIES
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Release from Varying Diameter Exit
Presentation transcript:

DEVELOPMENT OF AN ITALIAN FIRE PREVENTION TECHNICAL RULE FOR HYDROGEN PIPELINES N. Mattei, M. Carcassi., N. Ciannelli, F. Pilo Università di Pisa Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Nucleare e della Produzione (DIMNP), University of Pisa ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

SUMMARY Italian regulation about hydrogen and methane Italian development of regulation Italian Working Group on Hydrogen Experimental facility and tests Data acquired and data elaboration Procedure followed to define safety distance Conclusions ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

REGULATION IN FORCE IN ITALY Right now no law or technical rule is available to install a pipeline for hydrogen Rules referring to natural gas and and gas with r ≤ 0.8 [kg/m3] must be followed: “D.M 16 aprile 2008” (distribution) “D.M. 17 aprile 2008” (transport) Moreover European laws already cover many aspects involved in design, building and safety issues, e.g. DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC (PED). ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

Italian Working Group on Fire Prevention Italian Methodology Ministry of Interior REGULATION Experimenthal activity CCTS FIRE PREVENTION TECHNICAL RULE FOR HYDROGEN PIPELINES Hydrogen Italian Working Group on Fire Prevention “D.M 16 aprile 2008” (distribution) Methane “D.M. 17 aprile 2008” (transport) ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

METHANE SAFETY DISTANCES Gauge Pressure inside pipe [MPa] 1° Type 2.4 < P ≤ 6 2° Type 1.2 < P ≤ 2.4 3° Type 0.5 < P ≤ 1.2 Categories A B D Pipe Diameter [mm] Safety Distance [m] ≤ 100 30 10 2.0 20 7 5 1.5 125 2.5 150 3.0 175 3.5 200 4.0 225 4.5 250 5.0 300 6.0 350 7.0 400 8.0 450 9.0 6.5 > 500 10.0 ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

to validate the calculation models EXPERIMETAL TESTS The Group has decided to support its work with an experimental activity, by means of a pilot plant named H.P.B.T. (Hydrogen Pipe Break Test) at University of Pisa. The plant has been used to: simulate hydrogen release its ignition and development of combustion. Data have been acquired about: the diffusivity of the gas the dimension of release jet the dimension of jet-fire as function of internal pressure and release hole diameter. to validate the calculation models ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

HPBT LAYOUT ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

PARAMETERS OF EXPERIMENTAL TESTS According to the draft, pipelines are categorized as function of internal pressure and diameter. The incidental scenario is defined by: Internal pressure (test pressure: up to 10 bar) release hole diameter/area (2.5 / 5; 5 / 20 and 11 / 95 mm / mm2) Hole diameter and internal pressure have been chosen in order to have a “steady” jet so that it was possible to measure it ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

DISPLACEMENT OF 9 SAMPLE POINTS HPBT-JR-8 HPBT-JR-8 HPBT-JR-19 x [mm] y [mm] z [mm] X4 290 -10 X5 500 20 X6 980 X7 2000 X8 2490 X9 480 70 X10 -50 X11 100 X12 -100 x [mm] y [mm] z [mm] X4 620 X5 930 X6 2000 320 X7 X8 3060 50 430 X9 -320 X10 1230 X11 240 X12 ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

AVAILABLE FOR EACH TEST H2 concentration vs. time SUMMARY OF DATA AVAILABLE FOR EACH TEST angle between wind direction and jet axis wind velocity spatial coordinates of sample points H2 concentration vs. time ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

EXAMPLE OF DATA ACQUIRED (Ø 2,5mm and P = 10bar) Start of release Temperature [°C] inside tanks Oxygen Concentration [%vol] Temperature [°C] next to release hole Pressure [barg] inside tanks ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

DATA ACQUIRED wind veolcity ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

JET-FIRE DIMENSION Ø 11 mm - P 10 bar Lateral view Front view 4 m ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

JET FIRE DATA ACQUIRED Internal Pressure [bar] Ø = 2.5 mm Ø = 11 mm Flame length [m] ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

CODE SIMULATION - EFFECTS 7.6 ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

CODE SIMULATION - FLACS v9.0 (CFD) ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIMETAL DATA AND COMPUTER SIMULATION CENTRAL AXYS [m] ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

RADIATIVE ENERGY PRODUCED BY A JET-FIRE DISTANCE FROM RELEASE HOLE vs. DISTANCE FROM RELEASE HOLE [m] kW/m2 5.4 12.5 ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

HEAT RADIATION (EFFECT) Hydrogen and methane radiative power due to equal hole and pressure hydrogen [kW/m2] methane 5,4 6,8 [m] ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

COMPARISON BETWEEN H2 AND CH4 FLOW critic flow mass flow energy flow same T and P same T and P same area ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

PROCEDURE FOLLOWED TO DEFINE SAFETY DISTANCE Pipes are categorized as a function of pressure and pipe diameter. A release hole diameter is associated to pipe diameter (Ø hole = 2.5% of pipe diameter). The resulting jet fire allows to evaluate the distance beyond which radiative power is lower than a defined value (3 kW/m2 according to Italian laws). (1) (1) D.M. 29 Maggio 2001: following the law, a person can be exposed to such a radiation undergoing to no more that reversible injuries ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

PROPOSED SAFETY DISTANCES Gauge Pressure allowed inside pipe [MPa] 1° Type 2.4 < P ≤ 6 2° Type 1.2 < P ≤ 2.4 3° Type 0.5 < P ≤ 1.2 Categories E Pipe Diameter [mm] Safety Distance [m] ≤ 100 3.5 3.0 2.5 125 4.0 150 5.0 4.5 175 5.5 200 6.0 225 7.0 6.5 250 7.5 300 9.0 8.5 350 10.5 9.5 400 12.0 11.0 8.0 450 13.5 > 500 15.0 10.0 ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14

Nicola Mattei (UNIPI-ITALY) n.mattei@ing.unipi.it THANK YOU. Contact Author: Nicola Mattei (UNIPI-ITALY) n.mattei@ing.unipi.it Presented by: Marco Carcassi (UNIPI-ITALY) carcassi@ing.unipi.it ICHS 2011 - San Francisco, USA - September 12 -14