N. Kumar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, Z. Ali (Presenter) - Cisco Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OLD DOG CONSULTING Challenges and Solutions for OAM in Point-to-Multipoint MPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Ltd. Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems, Inc.
Advertisements

BIER Ping IETF 92 draft-kumarzheng-bier-ping-00
PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01
LSP-Ping extensions for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping- extensions-00 Nitin Bahadur Sami Boutros Rahul Aggarwal Eric Gray.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 IETF 84 – Vancouver August 2012 LSP Ping Support for P2MP PWs (draft-jain-pwe3-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-00.txt)
Draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple Nobo Akiya George Swallow Carlos Pignataro Loa Andersson Mach Chen Shaleen Saxena IETF 88, Vancouver, Canada.
Draft-akiya-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath Authors: Nobo Akiya (presenter) George Swallow Stephane Litkowski Bruno Decraene John E. Drake IETF 90, Toronto,
BGP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing
Draft-akiya-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping Nobo Akiya George Swallow Carlos Pignataro Nagendra Kumar IETF 88, Vancouver, Canada.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 IETF 84 – Vancouver August 2012 LSP Ping Support for E-VPN and PBB-
LSP-Ping extensions for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-extensions-01 Nitin Bahadur Sami Boutros Rahul Aggarwal Eric Gray 1IETF 77 MPLS WG IETF 77,
Connecting SPRING Islands over IP Networks draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-00 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Siva Sivabalan (Cisco) IETF89,
Draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospf-extension-03 draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-00 IETF 88, November 3-8, 2013 P. Psenak, S.Previdi,
IETF 67, Nov 2006Slide 1 VCCV Extensions for Multi- Segment Pseudo-Wire draft-hart-pwe3-segmented-pw-vccv-01.txt draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-04.txt Mustapha.
Konstantin agouros Omkar deshpande
BGP extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery in a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-pce-bgp-disco-attribute-03.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
Requirements for LER Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets
Connecting MPLS-SPRING Islands over IP Networks
Residence Time Measurement draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-02
IETF 67, MPLS WG, San Diego 11/08/2006
P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels
MPLS-TP Fault Management Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault-01
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
Use Cases for Using PCE to act as a Central Controller (PCECC) Component draft-zhao-teas-pce-central-controller-use-cases-00.txt 95th Buenos Aires.
PCEP Extension for Native IP ietf
IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS OAM
Explicitly advertising the TE protocols enabled on links in OSPF
RFC 3036 FECs RFC 3036 defines FECs used to bind labels to address prefixes in routing table Two FECs defined: Address Prefix FEC Host Address FEC Not.
Multi-Vendor Interoperability Testing Results Update to MPLS WG
MPLS Basics 2 2.
Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter-domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-01.txt Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems.
P. Psenak, S.Previdi, C. Filsfils – Cisco W. Henderickx – Nokia
draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00
Zhenbin Li, Shunwan Zhuang Huawei Technologies
A Unified Approach to IP Segment Routing
Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura Mach Chen Ilya Varlashkin
draft-ali-spring-bfd-sr-policy-00
Separating Routing Planes using Segment Routing draft-gulkohegde-spring-separating-routing-planes-using-sr-00 IETF 98 – Chicago, USA Shraddha Hegde
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-00
SPRING IETF-98 Tuesday, March 28.
Update on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-12
Draft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05.txt Parag Jain, Samer Salam, Ali Sajassi (Cisco), Sami Boutros (VMware), Greg Mirsky (ZTE) IETF 99, July 2017 Prague.
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
Ryan Zheng Lizhong Jin Thomas Nadeau George Swallow
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs
IETF 103 Bangkok, Thailand - November 2018
An MPLS-Based Forwarding Plane for Service Function Chaining
Return Path Specified LSP Ping
FlexE Design Team Presenter: Mach
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-02.txt SRv6 OAM
IETF 103 – Bangkok November 2018
draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-00
PW Control Word Stitching
Quan Xiong(ZTE) Gregory Mirsky(ZTE) Chang Liu(China Unicom)
OAM for Deterministic Networks draft-mirsky-detnet-oam
BGP VPN service for SRv6 Plus IETF 105, Montreal
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for EVPN Ethernet Segment Failover Use Case draft-zwm-bess-es-failover-00 BESS WG IETF104# Prague Sandy Zhang.
Kapil Arora Shraddha Hegde IETF-103
Parag Jain, Samer Salam, Ali Sajassi (Cisco),
Royi Zigler(Broadcom)
Supporting Flexible Algorithm Prefix SIDs in LSP Ping/Traceroute
MLDP Signaling over BIER
Pseudo-Wire Protection
EVPN control plane for Geneve draft-boutros-bess-evpn-geneve-03
Time-to-Live TLV for LSP-Ping draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-01 Sami Boutros Siva Sivabalan George Swallow Vishwas.
draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm-03
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-01.txt SRv6 OAM
Inter-AS OAM for SR Networks IETF 105, Montreal
Presentation transcript:

N. Kumar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, Z. Ali (Presenter) - Cisco Systems IETF 103 – Bangkok November 2018 draft-nainar-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-sids-00 LSP Ping/Trace for SR SIDs on MPLS N. Kumar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, Z. Ali (Presenter) - Cisco Systems

Problem Statement Segment Routing define different Segment ID with different associated semantics. RFC-8287 defines SR-IGP Prefix SID and Adjacency SID FEC extensions for MPLS LSP Ping and Traceroute. Defines the Target FEC Stack sub-TLVs, their format, and handling procedure. This draft defines the Target FEC Stack Sub-TLVs, format and the handling procedure for other Segment IDs: BGP Prefix SID BGP ePE SID Binding Path SID

Target FEC Stack – BGP Prefix SID Type = 12 Type = 13 Reuses existing Target FEC Stack defined in RFC 8029. No changes required on the procedure.

Target FEC Stack – BGP Peer Node SID Same TLV can be used for both IPv4/IPv6 Peer Nodes. Procedure changes are required when the peering node is a non-MPLS node or may not have route back to the source (explained in later slides).

Target FEC Stack – BGP Peer Adj SID Same TLV can be used for both IPv4/IPv6 Adjacencies Procedure changes are required when the peering node is a non-MPLS node or may not have route back to the source (explained in later slides).

Target FEC Stack – BGP Peer Set SID Peer Node Sub-TLV BGP Peer Set ID can be assigned to:: Peers in same/different ASN Adjacencies Procedure changes are required when the peering node(s) is/ are non-MPLS node(s) or may not have route back to the source (explained in later slides). Link Identifier Sub-TLV

Target FEC Stack – Path Binding SID Binding SID defined in draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid Carries Headend details to perform the FEC validation.

Procedure Initiator SHOULD set the TTL to 1 if the bottom most label is Path Binding SID. BGP ePE (Node/Adj/Set) SID OAM packet MAY not be leaked out of the domain. When the peering node(s) is/ are non-MPLS node(s) or may not have route back to the source. Initiator MAY set the TTL to 1 if the bottom most label is BGP ePE SID. Responder upon TTL expiry will process and perform FEC validation.

Next Steps Authors would like to request the WG for the feedback. The authors like to request Spring WG for adoption of this work.