Mock Trial Procedures You and the Law.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Your Honor, I would just like to let you know that… Learning Goal: The student will understand what an objection is, how and why they are used, and what.
Advertisements

Rules of Evidence and Objections
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
Mock Trial.  GOAL IS TO MAP OUT YOUR CASE IN A STORY  TELL A STORY FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE  DO NOT ARGUE!
Mock Trial Procedures You and the Law. There are 2 sides: Prosecution Prosecution Responsible for proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Parts with Explanations
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
STEPS IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL. 1. OPENING STATEMENTS PROSECUTION ALWAYS GOES FIRST DEFENSE CAN DELAY UNTIL THEY BEGIN THEIR CASE. WHY? INTRODUCTION THIS IS.
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
Finish writing your trial “transcript” Each side will have a specific amount of time to present their opening argument (1-2 minutes). The prosecution will.
Review for Roles and Objections Retest. In order to retake:  Must have taken all the notes I am about to present  Must have a parent note verifying.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
People in a Courtroom. People in a courtroom Criminal Court Judge Jury Defendant Prosecutor Bailiff Defense Attorney Witness Civil Court Judge Defendant.
Trial Procedure. Theory of a case  Attorneys must present a logical argument demonstrating what really happened to the jury  This is prepared prior.
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Today’s Goal : Learn Mock Trial Procedures in preparation for our Mock Trial.
BURDEN OF PROOF STANDARD OF PROOF In a criminal case, it is the prosecution/state/Crown/Regina/R that has to prove that the person committed the crime.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
Trial Procedures Business Law Chapter 6. Trial Procedures Civil Cases are brought by individuals Civil Cases are brought by individuals Injured party.
OBJECTIONS! 13 Most Commonly Used Mock Trial Objections
Paper Preparation solo
Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices.
Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities
Direct Examination Direct is when you tell your side of the story
Brutus on Trial.
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Criminal Cases
Welcome to Law Fair! Washington School.
“A-B-C’s” of what you need to know for your mock trials!
Criminal Trial Process
The Criminal Trial Process
Criminal Legal Process
Copyright 2015 Ellis Partners in Management Solutions
Opening Statements & Closing Arguments
The basics of every objection allowed in a Mock Trial.
IHS Literature and the Arts
The basics of every objection allowed in the Mock Trial universe.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Lesson 6- Copy the following
Warm Up Who is the most important person in a courtroom? Why?
Criminal Trial Components
Circle Chart—Brainstorming
Lesson 5-2 Criminal Procedure.
OBJECTIONS.
Bellwork Give 2 examples of how owning a pet could lead to breaking a law. What do you think is the legal responsibility of a pet owner if that pet bites.
How Witnesses are Examined
Criminal Law Defenses Lesson 5-2 Quiz Review.
It is NOT the defendant’s job to prove that he/she is not guilty!
Steps in a Trial.
Arrest—Police arrest and “book” suspect by photographing and
The Court System A Trial.
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 2
The Court System A Trial.
What is Mock Trial? Steps in what we do…...
It’s a murder trial. Get ready.
Criminal Trial Process
Closing Arguments and Questioning
Rules of Evidence and Objections
Cole Matthews Vs. Society
Law 12 Criminal Trial Process.
Cookie Court.
Courtroom to Classroom:
Roles Regular Credit roles:
Mock Trial Objections Part II.
The Bases for Objecting During Witness Examination
Business Law Final Exam
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

Mock Trial Procedures You and the Law

There are 2 sides: Prosecution Defense Responsible for proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime. Defense Responsible for finding their client not guilty for the crime they are being charged with.

Burden of proof! Reasonable Doubt The prosecution has a burden. Their job is harder than the defense. The burden is called, “Beyond a reasonable doubt.” Therefore, the defense just has to create doubt!

So how do they do it? The trial: Opening Statements The trial Prosecution goes first. Defense goes second. Why do you think the Prosecution gets/has to go first? The trial Direct examinations Cross examinations Closing Statements Prosecution, then defense Rebuttal by Prosecution. (offering a contrary argument) Why do they get a rebuttal?

Opening Statements Imagine a movie preview. 3 minutes long Always phrased, “We are going to show you that…” or “We will prove that” or “You are going to see…” Give the jury an idea of what is coming. Never phrase it, “We already showed you”, or “This person did this…” Why? They haven’t seen the movie yet! 3 minutes long

Examinations Prosecution gets to direct examine their witnesses first. Direct Examination: Example of what’s right: Tell us where you were on the night of… or What happened after you went to your locker? Then what did you do? Example of what’s wrong: Isn’t it true that you loaded the gun the night before you killed your husband? The witness has to tell the entire story. The attorney may not “Lead” the witness in any way/shape/form to the answer. Rule of thumb: If the answer is yes/no, then you cannot ask the question in Direct Examination

Examinations Cross Examination: This is a hostile examination. One side’s attorney against the other side’s witness. They are from opposite teams. After the direct examination, the witness stays on the stand, and the cross-examiner approaches. Control the witness!!! Always ask them to answer all questions with a yes/no unless asked otherwise. Examples of what is okay: almost anything! As long as you are controlling the witness, leading and non-leading questions are OK.

Examinations Re-Direct – If you still have time (5 minutes for direct, 3 minutes for cross), then the direct examiner may re-approach and clarify anything brought up in the cross-exam. Nothing new. Re-Cross – same as Re-direct…must have time remaining.

Objections: Sometimes an attorney is breaking the rules: You need to protect your witness and your case. Only the attorney responsible for the witness on the stand may object…nobody else on the attorney teams!!! Judge can either Sustain (says it’s a good objection and doesn’t allow the question to be answered) or Overrule (says it’s a bad objection, that question should be answered.)

Objections Leading Argumentative Badgering Speculation Foundation Hearsay First-hand knowledge Ultimate Issue Asked and answered Outside the Scope

Leading Can only be used when a direct examination is happening. Asking yes/no questions Stating a question that has the answer built in to it so the witness just has to confirm the attorney is correct or incorrect.

Examples What did you have for lunch? Not leading You had a chicken caesar salad for lunch, didn’t you? Leading

Examples Isn’t it true, you have no siblings? OK in a cross examination How many siblings do you have? This is what you would ask in a direct examination

Argumentative/Badgering Arguing with the witness. Did you do this? “No.” Are you sure you didn’t do this? “Yes.” Positive you didn’t do this? “Yes.” You did this, why aren’t you admitting to it?!? Badgering Arguing with attitude.

Speculation & Foundation Speculation – Asking the witness to try and guess at what might have happened if circumstances were different. “Let’s say you went home instead…do you think…” or “What do you think might have happened if…” Foundation – Only happens on Direct examinations. This is a big one If the attorney has not established foundation for a question, they cannot ask it. Example: First question of the direct exam, “So when you were at the party…who did you see drinking alcohol? It hasn’t been established that there was a party, with drinking at it, and the witness was actually at that party and saw people drinking. All of that must be established first.

Hearsay/First-hand knowledge Asking questions that the witness doesn’t know from first-hand experience is not allowed. Was Jeshuan drinking that night? “Well, I heard (“Objection! Hearsay.”) that he was drinking.” So was he? “Yes.” How do you know? “I heard from Susie”

Ultimate Issue Cannot ask, straight up, with no foundation, “Did you commit this crime?” to the defendant. That’s the ultimate issue everyone is here trying to solve. EX: the defendant’s mental state

Asked and answered Sometimes an attorney will ask the same question over and over again. You killed him? Yes So you really killed him? Yes Like shot him in the face and he died? Yes

Outside the Scope Questions asked that do not pertain to the packet/trial. Can also be called an “Irrelevant Question”

Establishing a witness as an expert Only one type of witness may actually speculate and that is an “expert” witness. But they must be established as an expert during the direct examination. What are your credentials? Witness lists his/her background/academic credentials. Your honor, I’d like to establish this witness as an expert in his/her field. Judge: “Are there any objections from the prosecution/defense”? If none – the witness is declared an expert by the judge and they may now speculate on certain things.

The rule of 3 You want the jury to hear important things 3 times! But what objection does this sound like?

Closing statements Typically written as the trial is progressing. The attorney giving the closing will know what his/her side will be proving and attempting to prove so they can write some of it before the trial.

The end After the closing, the jury is sent out to deliberate the verdict.