CLEPA analysis of belt contact width measurement (ref. GRSP/2018/6)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
51 st GRSP Session Draft new Regulation on child restraint systems Pierre CASTAING Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012, agenda item.
Advertisements

Mammography Industry: Review of Proposed Accessibility Standards U.S. Access Board May 8, 2012 Atlanta, Georgia.
GRSP December 2001 Session - P. CASTAING 1 ISOFIX SYSTEMS INTEGRATION IN R14, R16, R44.
Child safety with respect to vehicle protection and booster seats - a proposal for a CRF for children > 4yo 1 Informal document GRSP (55 th GRSP,
Federal Role & Safety Standards Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004.
47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (47th session, May 2010, agenda.
50th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on FI Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal document GRSP (50th GRSP, December 2011, agenda item.
ECE Regulation N°129 55th session of GRSP May 2013
ECE Regulation N°129 17/12/201354th Session GRSP December th session of GRSP December 2013 Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP,
Head Restraint GTR Status to AC th Session of WP.29 March 2007 Informal document No. WP , March 2007, agenda item II
49th Session of UN ECE GRSP (Working Party on Passive Safety Provissions) GRSP-49-XX May 16-20, 2011Page 1 Vehicle related requirements for -Size CRS Overview.
GRSP / IWG-CRS Status report for the fifty-seventh session (18-22 May 2015) of GRSP 17/05/2015the fifty-seventh session (18-22 May 2015) of GRSP1 Submitted.
Decision IWG ECRS General If no agreement can be found before the GRSP 56th meeting, GRSP should decide on the chairman proposal.
Status report GRSP IWG ECRS 53rd GRSP Geneva May 2013 Informal document GRSP (53 nd GRSP, May 2013, agenda item 19)
52 nd GRSP Session IWG on draft new Regulation on child restraint systems Pierre CASTAING Informal document GRSP (52 nd GRSP, December 2012,
CLEPA analysis Future i-Size approval possibilities FOR GRSP CONSIDERATION 15 May CLEPA logo Informal document GRSP (53 nd GRSP, May.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Clarification of Relaxation Area(s) for Flexible lower legform to bumper test Submitted by the expert from.
Forty-second session of GRSP December REGULATION No. 94 (Frontal collision) Proposal for draft amendments Proposal submitted by France Informal.
ISOFIX FRENCH PROPOSAL (DOCUMENTS TRANS/WP29/GRSP/2001/14Rev1; 2001/15Rev1 and 2001/16Rev1) GRSP 13-17/05/2002.
44th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (44th session, December 2008,
Dimensions of Universal Boosters 43th meeting of the GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems 25 th March 2014 Speaker: Franz Peleska.
46th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (46th session, December 2009,
Copyright © 2013 CLEPA. All rights reserved. Present status of ISO Resolution 311 – TF4 Compatibility, alternative booster seat envelope.
1 Research on Chest Injury Criteria JASIC 54 th GRSP December, 2013 Submitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP,
1 Submitted by the experts from European Commission, Korea, Japan Studies regarding to the questions from 57 th session of GRSP Informal document GRSP
Development of Guidelines for Improvement of Vehicle Safety Regarding Infant-Carrying Vehicles Presentation material by Japan for 53rd session of GRSP.
Japan’s Stance for the R129 Phase 2 43 rd GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint System 25 th Mar JASIC.
Proposal of the Informal Working Group on Head Restraints GTR Phase 2 JAPAN Informal document No. GRSP (43rd GRSP, May 2008, agenda item.
Task Force on Electro-magnetic Compatibility (TF EMC) Status report of TF to GRE-75 Friday, 8 April 2016 Informal document GRE (75 th GRE, 5-8 April.
Japan’s Proposal and Clarification 57th GRSP Informal Group on Child Restraint System 23rd March 2016 JASIC.
Pedestrian Safety Request For Clarification Of Test Procedures 49 th Session of UNECE GRSP, Geneva, 16 – 20 May 2011 Informal document GRSP (49th.
GRSP December 2015 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2 Informal document: GRSP (58th GRSP, December 2015, agenda item 15 an 19)
Japan’s Stance for the R129 Phase 2
Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-57-25
Review of GRSP e Proposal for amendments to R44 11/05/17
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
Regulation 129 CLEPA response to
Submitted by expert from France
Informal adhoc ELSA Working Group
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
ECE R129 Phase 3 Pierre CASTAING - UTAC CERAM
Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen
45th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS
Response to ANEC proposal for Booster phase out in R44
Unclear defined items in Regulation No.129
GRSP May 2016 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2
Approval categories and stature limits for booster seats
UN-Regulation No. 80 Additional Information to GRSP-62-35
Report and explanation document of SBR-TF
Status report GRSP IWG FI
Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129
52nd GRSP, 11 – 14 Decemer 2012, agenda item 14
Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129
Informal document GRSP Add.1
GRSP December 2016 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
Snow tyres provisions - status report
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Securing of children in buses and coaches
GRSP December 2016 ECE R129 Amendments N°1 & 2
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Transmitted by the IWVTA Informal Group
Submitted by the expert from Consumers International
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Securing of children in buses and coaches
Submitted by the expert
Transmitted by the IWVTA Informal Group
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Presentation transcript:

CLEPA analysis of belt contact width measurement (ref. GRSP/2018/6) Submitted by the expert from CLEPA   Informal document GRSP-63-13 (63rd GRSP, 14-18 May 2018 agenda item 13) CLEPA analysis of belt contact width measurement (ref. GRSP/2018/6) 63rd GRSP session, 14-18 May 2018 Palais des Nations, Geneva

Review of actions since GRSP 62nd Session The formal document GRSP/2017/39 proposed by NL defined a procedure to check the contact width between safety belt and the child. During this session the proposal was amended to further clarify the procedure which resulted in GRSP-62-33-Rev.1 (issued with slight modifications as formal document GRSP/2018/6 for the 63rd GRSP session) CLEPA and TSG were asked to check the procedure and provide their feedback in the 63rd GRSP session CLEPA investigated the proposed procedure and the findings are summarized in this presentation

Current proposal for belt contact width measurement (GRSP/2018/6) 6.2.12. In the case of non-integral child restraint systems, the ease with which the straps and tongue of an adult belt pass through the fixture points shall be examined. The simulated buckle, when installed on the bench, prior to all dynamic tests, shall not: (a) pass through the fixture points or belt guides of non-integral child restraint systems, or (b) permit a lie of the belt that leads to any contact narrower than 38 mm between the adult belt or simulated buckle and the child. Measurement method: The width of the contact between the belt and the dummy shall be assessed by measuring the minimum length between the effective sides of the belt. If the belt, as seen in a cross section, takes the shape of a curve, the outside contour of the curve is measured. If the belt in cross section has folds, the contact length is defined from side to side of the belt (see figure xx below). Examples how to measure certain cases: (Cross section of the belt) Flat belt Curved belt Folded belt

CLEPA feasibility study – Checked configurations (Installation according to R44, R44 test bench, P10 dummy) CRS #2 CRS #3 CRS #4 CRS #1 Overview Belt tension [N]

CLEPA feasibility study – Belt positioning CRS #2 CRS #3 CRS #4 CRS #1 Buckle side Non buckle side Front view

CLEPA feasibility study – Current proposal for belt contact width measurement CRS #1 A B Interpretation how to perform this measurement: The dummy is installed on the test bench acc. to the procedure described in R44 for a dynamic impact test The belt width at the first and last point of contact with the dummy needs to be measured (two measurement points) The measurement shall be carried out by inserting the measure tape under the belt and slide it towards the dummy until the belt begins to contact the dummy. Measured values at the example child seats:

CLEPA feasibility study – Current proposal for belt contact width measurement CRS #2 Examples for measurement cases: General: First contact of the belt with dummy is a spot whose definition is subjective, but regardless of the selected spot all tested CRSs pass the requirement Lap belt: Contact area on buckle side might be covered from shoulder belt Summary: Definition of measurement spots is subjective Procedure needs to be improved with regards to feasibility and consistency Measurement seem to add no value in assessing child seats as all tested CRS achieve similar values

Suggestions for amendments – Measurement on lap belt Belt width @ simulated buckle 16 mm (Heavily crumpled) CRS #1 48 mm CRS #2 CRS #3 CRS #4 Suggested measurement Belt width Safety belt Slot plate Observation: Lap belt contact width shows clear difference between two types of booster seat designs. The slot plate provides a suitable reference for measurement and allows good accessibility. Proposal: To assess the contact width of the lap belt it is proposed to measure the belt width at the slot plate of the simulated buckle.

Proposal to amend GRSP/2018/6 In the case of non-integral child restraint systems booster seats and booster cushions, the ease with which the straps and tongue of an adult belt pass through the fixture points shall be examined. The simulated buckle, when installed on the bench, prior to all dynamic tests, shall not: (a) pass through the fixture points or belt guides of non-integral child restraint systems, or (b) permit a lie of the belt that leads to any contact narrower than 38 mm between the adult belt or simulated buckle and the child, (b) permit a lie of the lap belt within the slot plate that has a width narrower than 38 mm as described in Figure 1 Figure 1 - Suggested measurement Belt width Safety belt Slot plate Measurement method: The width of the contact between the belt and the dummy shall be assessed by measuring the minimum width between the effective sides of the belt. Flat belt Curved belt Folded belt If the belt, as seen in a cross section, the outside contour of the curve is measured. If the belt in cross section has folds, the contact length is defined from side to side of the belt. (see figure xx below)