Cotton and Slavery 1815-1848.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cotton and Slavery
Advertisements

Southern Cotton Kingdom
Sectional Differences
Unit 3: Antebellum Slavery to Reconstruction
Antebellum America: North vs. South.
Chapter 10: A New Spirit of Expansion
Cotton and Slavery The Cotton Gin The invention of cotton gin in 1793 made short-staple cotton profitable. Thereafter, cotton and slavery began.
Cotton Boom Cotton Gin made cleaning cotton efficient The Cotton Gin made cleaning cotton more efficient – Designed for short-fibered cotton One worker.
Cotton and Slavery What was life like for a slave? How does the difference economies between the North and South lead to Civil War?
Explain Eli Whitney’s cotton gin and its effects. Including, on the emergence of the cotton culture in the South, and the revival of slavery after 1800.
ANTEBELLUM SLAVERY Southern Economy King Cotton Plantation Life Non-Gentry Class Slave Family.
James Monroe was overwhelmingly elected president in 1816 and 1820 Monroe’s presidency began during an era of increased nationalism after the War of 1812.
Essential Question: – How did American nationalism increase during the “Era of Good Feelings” under President James Monroe?
The Statistics of Slavery To “An American Slave Market” by Taylor, 1852.
Cotton Boom The cotton gin to made cleaning cotton more efficient The cotton gin to made cleaning cotton more efficient – Designed for short-fibered cotton.
Slavery and Southern Economy
The South’s Economy.
Cotton is King!.
Masters and Slaves.
Growth of the Cotton Industry Before the American Revolution, three crops dominated southern agriculture – tobacco, rice and indigo These crops, produced.
CH. 14 SECTION 3 COTTON KINGDOM IN THE SOUTH. OBJECTIVES How did the cotton gin improve cotton production in the South? How did the South become an agricultural.
Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin in 1793 Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin in 1793 It allowed seeds to be removed from cotton 50 times faster than.
Southern Cotton Kingdom
The invention of cotton gin in 1793 made short-staple cotton profitable. The invention of cotton gin in 1793 made short-staple cotton profitable. Pre-1793:
King Cotton & the Southern Slave Economy. The Rise of “King Cotton” “King Cotton” was the dynamic force driving the American economy from :
Cotton Boom Cotton Gin made cleaning cotton efficient The Cotton Gin made cleaning cotton more efficient – Designed for short-fibered cotton One worker.
CAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES CIVIL WAR. Top 5 causes of the United States Civil War Economic and social differences between the north and southEconomic.
The Industrial Revolution ■During the 19 th Century (1800’s) production of goods changed dramatically. ■Instead of one worker putting together an entire.
Plantations and Slavery Spread The Cotton Boom Eli Whitney invented a machine for cleaning cotton in English textile mills had created a huge demand.
The invention of cotton gin in 1793 made short-staple cotton profitable. The invention of cotton gin in 1793 made short-staple cotton profitable. Pre-1793:
Chapter 11 Cotton, Slavery, and the Old South. The Cotton Economy Much of the upper South continued in the 19 th century to rely on the cultivation of.
The Land of Cotton Chapter 7, Section 4. “King Cotton”  Two types of cotton that were grown  Long staple cotton – easy to clean, but very difficult.
Sectional Differences Chapter 7 Section 2. The North Embraces Industry Between 1815 and 1860 – U.S. developed an industrial sector Between 1815 and 1860.
SECTIONALISM.
Ch. 13, Section 3: Southern Cotton Kingdom pg. 397
Chapter 13.1 Growth of the Cotton Industry
American Expansion and the Civil War
Plantations and Slavery Spread
SOUTHERN POPULATION I. Big Planters in the South
Democratic Politics and Reform
The Sectional Divide United States History.
Cotton and Slavery
Essential Question: How did American nationalism increase during the “Era of Good Feelings” under President James Monroe?
Cotton and Slavery
Cotton and Slavery
What was the federal policy regarding Native (First) Americans in the 1830s?
Cotton Plantations & the Spread of Slavery
James Monroe was overwhelmingly elected president in 1816 and 1820
Bellwork What were the consequences (negative or positive) of the War of 1812? Who won the war?
The Industrial Revolution, Agriculture, and the American System
Rise of the Cotton Kingdom (9-1)
American Expansion and the Civil War
Southern Cotton Kingdom
The Land of Cotton Essential Questions: Do Now: Homework:
Unit 2: African-Americans in the New Nation ( )
For each item, answer the following questions:
The Land of Cotton.
Causes of The American Civil War
The Industrial Revolution, Agriculture, and the American System
American Expansion and the Civil War
Antebellum America: North vs. South
James Monroe was overwhelmingly elected president in 1816 and 1820
OBJECTIVE DO FIRST You will be able to explain 4 causes of slavery in the South What does “racism” look like today? Explain 2 examples.
James Monroe was overwhelmingly elected president in 1816 and 1820
On a full sheet of paper, make a 4 square
Southern Cotton Kingdom
Growing Tension Between North and South
The South.
SOL Quiz 16 US Expansion 1830s-1860 II.
North V South.
Presentation transcript:

Cotton and Slavery 1815-1848

Slavery in Colonial Times Tobacco, rice and sugar cane would slowly be replaced with cotton. A crop that became more and more valuable. While slavery began without cotton, its persistence in American society was a result of the growing cotton industry. Why Africans? Disease not an issue Did not rely on them for help, no agreements/treaties Not as organized to resist

Slavery in the North Couldn’t support large scale agriculture Farmers moved to more reliable work in factories Strong Quaker/Puritan backgrounds promoted anti-slavery for religious reasons Higher education promoted anti-slavery Newspapers promoted anti-slavery

The Cotton Gin The invention of cotton gin in 1793 made it possible to process more and more cotton each day. Thereafter, cotton and slavery began to expand - from the Atlantic Coast to Texas.

Cotton Production in the South, 1820–1860 Cotton production expanded westward between 1820 and 1860 into Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, and western Tennessee. As industrialization grew, so did slavery.

Cotton Production In 1800, the U.S. produced 73,000 bales of cotton. By 1820, cotton accounted for 39% of all American exports. By 1840, cotton accounted for 52% of U.S. exports. By 1860, cotton accounted for 58% of all American exports and 75% of the world’s entire supply of cotton.

Cotton Exports as a Percentage of All U.S. Exports, 1800–1860 After 1800, cotton rapidly emerged as the country’s most important export crop and quickly became the key to American prosperity.

Between 1820-1860, cotton fueled the entire American market economy! Southern planters sold the cotton and used the income to purchase supplies from the West and goods and services from the North. Northern factories made money by turning raw cotton into cloth and northern merchants profited from shipping the cotton and reshipping the finished textiles. Slavery provided the labor for this American market economy; thus, slavery was a NATIONAL institution that spread its influence throughout the entire nation!

Because slave labor produced the cotton, increasing exports strengthened the slave system itself.

Slave Population, 1820–1860 Slavery spread southwestward from the upper South and the eastern seaboard following the spread of cotton cultivation.

In 1820, cotton production and slavery was concentrated in the upper south. By 1860, cotton production and slavery had spread to the lower south. From the 1840s forward, cotton production made the southern economy stronger and wealthier than the northern economy.

In summary, the expansion of cotton - encouraged by the new technology of the cotton gin - stimulated the growth of slavery. This woodcut of a black father being sold away from his family appeared in The Child’s Anti-Slavery Book in 1860.

As slavery grew in the South, so did what many Northerners called “The Slave Power.” The planter aristocracy - a very small percent of southern society - controlled the social, political, and economic power of the south. From the first presidential election to the election of Lincoln, Southerners controlled the national government most of the time. The South held disproportionate political power under the Constitution.

The South held disproportionate political power under the Constitution In the Senate - while the North had 60% of the total population and 70% of the entire nation’s voters - they only sent 50% of the Senators to Congress as there was an equal number of slave and free states. In the House - the 3/5 compromise gave slave states an average of 20 more congressmen after each census than they would have had on the basis of a free populace. Slaves states had about 30 more electoral votes than their share of the voting population would have otherwise allowed.

From the first presidential election to the election of Lincoln, Southerners controlled the national government most of the time 49 of 72 years were controlled by Southern slave-owners. The only presidents who were reelected were slave-owners. 2/3 of the Speakers of the House and Presidents Pro Tem of the Senate were Southerners. For the entire 72 years, the majority of Supreme Court justices were Southerners and most were slave owners.

The planter aristocracy - a small percent of southern society - controlled the social, political, and economic power of the south In 1860, 25% of all Southerners owned slaves. Of that 25% 52% owned 1-5 slaves 35% owned 6-9 slaves 11% owned 20-99 slaves 1 % owned 100 or more slaves Those who owned 20 or more slaves - about 3% of the entire white population - controlled the social, political, and economic power of the South.

In addition, the white southern slave owners had a huge hold over the white, non-slave owning population. How, then, were they able to convince the vast majority of white southerners to fight for a system - slavery and the power of slaveholding aristocrats - in which they had no stake? Unfortunately, a belief in white supremacy.