Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (June 2017)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Popliteal artery damage during total knee arthroplasty Dimitrios V. Papadopoulos, MD, MS, Panagiotis Koulouvaris, MD, PhD, Marios G. Lykissas, MD, PhD,

Advertisements

Changes in health-related quality of life after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for great and small saphenous varicose veins Katy A.L. Darvall,

Changes in health-related quality of life after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for great and small saphenous varicose veins Katy A.L. Darvall,

Total knee arthroplasty in multiple sclerosis

Kirk Kindsfater, MD, Jim Lesko, PhD Arthroplasty Today

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (June 2018)

Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (December 2017)

Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (September 2018)

Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (March 2018)

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (June 2018)

Pain during bone marrow aspiration: prevalence and prevention

Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (June 2018)

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (June 2018)

Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (September 2018)

Fracture risk of tapered modular revision stems: a failure analysis

Early fracture of the modular neck of a MODULUS femoral stem

Fracture of an uncemented tantalum patellar component

Severe heterotopic ossification and stiffness after revision knee surgery for a periprosthetic fracture Maher Baroudi, MD, Pascale Derome, MD, Michel.

Superior rim fracture of a vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liner leading to total hip arthroplasty revision Brett G. Brazier,

Traumatic anterior knee dislocation after total knee arthroplasty

Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (September 2018)

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (June 2018)

Allison K. Tetreault, BA, Brian J. McGrory, MD, MS Arthroplasty Today

Lumbar chance fracture after direct anterior total hip arthroplasty

Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (December 2018)

Is a shortened length of stay and increased rate of discharge to home associated with a low readmission rate and cost-effectiveness after primary total.

Arthroplasty in organ transplant patients

Bilateral atypical femoral fracture and end-stage arthritis of the hip, treated with total hip arthroplasty Scott M. Sandilands, DO, Jesus M. Villa,

Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (March 2018)

Total femoral allograft with simultaneous revision total hip and knee arthroplasty: 18 year follow-up Ryan N. Harris, DO, Trevor M. Owen, MD, Joseph.

Martin Bédard, MD, FRCSC, Simon Corriveau-Durand, MD

Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (December 2017)

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings total hip arthroplasty in young patients

Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (March 2019)

Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (March 2019)

Don't forget the hip! Hip arthritis masquerading as knee pain

Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (December 2017)

Hirokazu Takai, MD, Tomoki Takahashi, MD, PhD Arthroplasty Today

Volume 393, Issue 10172, Pages (February 2019)

Inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy after total hip arthroplasty

Does regional anaesthesia improve outcome?

Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (December 2018)

Empiric treatment is less costly than Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization in total joint arthroplasty patients Jacob Stirton, MD, Joseph.

Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (June 2015)

Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (March 2017)

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (June 2018)

Llion Davies, Kylie Bainton, Robyn Milne, Peter Lewis

Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (March 2017)

Kevin Nishida, MS, Daniel Choi, MEng, Mathias Bostrom, MD

Arthroprosthetic cobaltism associated with cardiomyopathy

Rapidly destructive osteoarthritis can mimic infection

Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (March 2018)

Joseph T. Moskal, MD, Susan G. Capps, PhD, John A. Scanelli, MD

Is a shortened length of stay and increased rate of discharge to home associated with a low readmission rate and cost-effectiveness after primary total.

The American Joint Replacement Registry—the first 5 years

Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)

Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (March 2019)

Michael A. Yee, MD, Thomas J. O'Keefe, MD, Suzanne Winter, MS, CCRC

Continuing versus discontinuing antiplatelet drugs, vasodilators, and/or cerebral ameliorators on perioperative total blood loss in total knee arthroplasty.

Characterizing extremely negative reviews of total joint arthroplasty practices and surgeons on yelp.com Jaymeson R. Arthur, MD, David Etzioni, MD, Adam.

Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (December 2017)

A randomized trial of the effect of low dose epinephrine infusion in addition to tranexamic acid on blood loss during total hip arthroplasty Ø. Jans,

Fibrinogen plasma concentration before delivery is not associated with postpartum haemorrhage: a prospective observational study O. Karlsson, A. Jeppsson,

Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (June 2019)

Procedure coding in the American Joint Replacement Registry

Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (June 2019)

Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2019)

Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (March 2019)

Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (June 2019)

Presentation transcript:

Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 125-130 (June 2017) Prospective quality of life assessment after hip and knee arthroplasty: short- and mid- term follow-up results Juan Pablo Martinez-Cano, MD, MSc, Juan Pablo Herrera-Escobar, MD, Ana Sofía Arango Gutierrez, MD, Alfredo Sanchez Vergel, MD, Alfredo Martinez-Rondanelli, MD Arthroplasty Today Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 125-130 (June 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.008 Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Study population. FVL, Fundación Valle del Lili Joint Registry; AFNF, acute femoral neck fracture; PMCM, primary musculoskeletal cancer or metastasis; PPF, periprosthetic fracture; PKR, primary knee replacement; PHR, primary hip replacement; RKR, revision knee replacement; RHR, revision hip replacement. Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 125-130DOI: (10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.008) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Box-plot diagram comparing presurgery vs short-term Oxford knee score/Oxford hip score follow-up. Box plots show the interquartile range (box), median values (horizontal line inside the box), 10th/90th percentile values (whiskers), and outlier values (dots). (a) Overall comparison. (b) Subgroup comparisons by type of arthroplasties. Group 1: PKR, primary knee replacement; group 2: PHR, primary hip replacement; group 3: RKR, revision knee replacement; group 4: RHR, revision hip replacement. Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 125-130DOI: (10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.008) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Box-plot diagram comparing presurgery vs mid-term Oxford knee score/Oxford hip score follow-up. (a) Overall comparison. (b) Subgroup comparisons by type of arthroplasties. Group 1: PKR, primary knee replacement; group 2: PHR, primary hip replacement; group 3: RKR, revision knee replacement; group 4: RHR, revision hip replacement. Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 125-130DOI: (10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.008) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Box-plot diagram comparing short-term vs mid-term Oxford knee score/Oxford hip score follow-up. (a) Overall comparison. (b) Subgroup comparisons by type of arthroplasties. Group 1: PKR, primary knee replacement; group 2: PHR, primary hip replacement; group 3: RKR, revision knee replacement; group 4: RHR, revision hip replacement. Arthroplasty Today 2017 3, 125-130DOI: (10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.008) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions