Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Advertisements

Sweetly Expanding Enzymatic Glycodiversification
Structure of TAR RNA Complexed with a Tat-TAR Interaction Nanomolar Inhibitor that Was Identified by Computational Screening  Zhihua Du, Kenneth E Lind,
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 9-16 (January 2010)
Qing Zhang, Kazuo Harada, Ho S Cho, Alan D Frankel, David E Wemmer 
The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
The Contribution of Entropy, Enthalpy, and Hydrophobic Desolvation to Cooperativity in Repeat-Protein Folding  Tural Aksel, Ananya Majumdar, Doug Barrick 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Finding the Missing Code of RNA Recognition by PUF Proteins
Thomas E. Edwards, Bruce H. Robinson, Snorri Th. Sigurdsson 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2004)
Structural Basis of Rho GTPase-Mediated Activation of the Formin mDia1
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
RecA-Binding pilE G4 Sequence Essential for Pilin Antigenic Variation Forms Monomeric and 5′ End-Stacked Dimeric Parallel G-Quadruplexes  Vitaly Kuryavyi,
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Highly Efficient Self-Replicating RNA Enzymes
Redesign of a Dioxygenase in Morphine Biosynthesis
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Tau Mutations Cause Frontotemporal Dementias
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Beena Krishnan, Lila M. Gierasch  Chemistry & Biology 
Riboswitches: Fold and Function
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of a Novel Globular Domain in RBM10 Containing OCRE, the Octamer Repeat Sequence Motif  Bryan T. Martin, Pedro Serrano,
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Structure and Site-Specific Recognition of Histone H3 by the PHD Finger of Human Autoimmune Regulator  Suvobrata Chakravarty, Lei Zeng, Ming-Ming Zhou 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Structural Diversity in Integrin/Talin Interactions
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
The Unmasking of Telomerase
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Rahul Raman, V. Sasisekharan, Ram Sasisekharan  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Mark S. Dunstan, Debraj GuhaThakurta, David. E. Draper, Graeme L. Conn 
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
The AXH Domain Adopts Alternative Folds
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Binding Specificity of Retinal Analogs to Photoactivated Visual Pigments Suggest Mechanism for Fine-Tuning GPCR-Ligand Interactions  Sundaramoorthy Srinivasan,
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
RecA-Binding pilE G4 Sequence Essential for Pilin Antigenic Variation Forms Monomeric and 5′ End-Stacked Dimeric Parallel G-Quadruplexes  Vitaly Kuryavyi,
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 557-566 (May 2009) Structural Basis for Stabilization of the Tau Pre-mRNA Splicing Regulatory Element by Novantrone (Mitoxantrone)  Suxin Zheng, Yu Chen, Christine P. Donahue, Michael S. Wolfe, Gabriele Varani  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 557-566 (May 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.03.009 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sequences of Wild-Type and Mutant Tau SREs (A) Sequences and secondary structures of wild-type and mutant human tau exon 10 SREs. Destabilizing mutations at the +3, +13, +14, and +16 (in red) positions is linked to familial neurodegenerative diseases and increases inclusion of exon 10 (Goedert et al., 1999; Hutton et al., 1998; Morris et al., 1999; Spillantini et al., 1998). In contrast, stabilizing mutations at +10 and the I17T insertion (in blue) decreases inclusion of exon 10 in vitro (Donahue et al., 2006). (B) The sequence of the wild-type tau SRE containing nucleotides G−5 to C+19 used in our NMR structural studies. Chemistry & Biology 2009 16, 557-566DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.03.009) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of MTX and Spectra of NMR titration of Tau SRE RNA (A) Structure of MTX. (B) NMR titration of tau SRE RNA with increasing concentrations of MTX recorded at 4°C. From the bottom, spectra correspond to the following ratios of MTX/RNA: 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0. The label in the bottom spectrum corresponds to the assignments for the free RNA, whereas the top label corresponds to the MTX-bound RNA. Chemistry & Biology 2009 16, 557-566DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.03.009) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Titration of Tau SRE RNA with MTX Monitored by UV/Vis Spectroscopy The experiments were carried out in buffer solution (10 mM; pH 6.0) containing 10 μM MTX in the presence of different RNA concentrations. RNA/MTX are as follows: 0.0 (a); 0.02 (b); 0.05 (c); 0.1 (d); 0.2 (e); 0.5 (f); 1.0 (g). The absorbance was saturated after the ratio of RNA/MTX reached 1.0. Chemistry & Biology 2009 16, 557-566DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.03.009) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Two-Dimensional NOESY Experiment Recorded at 4°C on the Complex between MTX and Tau SRE RNA (A) Regions of the spectrum corresponding to intra- (MTX) and intermolecular (MTX and RNA) NOEs are boxed and labeled. (B) The intermolecular NOE observed for G+17H1' and MTXH2/3. “b” refers to the bound component. For example, H13-G+17bH8 refers to the NOE between the MTXH13 and the G+17-bound H8. Chemistry & Biology 2009 16, 557-566DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.03.009) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structure of the Tau SRE RNA-MTX Complex (A) Superposition of the ten best calculated structures (heavy atoms only) represented with MOLMOL (Koradi et al., 1996). The RNA is shown in blue and MTX is shown in red. (B) The best calculated structure. MTX is shown in yellow stick representation and the RNA backbone is shown in brown with Pymol (DeLano, 2002). (C) Close-up view of the tau SRE RNA-MTX interaction. The carbon atoms of MTX are shown in yellow and the RNA in green with Pymol (DeLano, 2002); some key intermolecular NOEs between the H1' of G+17 and H2/3 of MTX are shown by blue dashed lines. Chemistry & Biology 2009 16, 557-566DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.03.009) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions