P.E.A.S. paragraphs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P.E.A. paragraphs.
Advertisements

Using someone else’s words: Quote, Summarize and Paraphrase.
Writing a Synthesis Essay
The Kite Runner Theme Essay Outline/Rough Draft
Lecture Five Making and Supporting a Sociological Argument.
Critical Reading Strategy
“Don’t Quote Me!” …Actually, go right ahead!. Why Quote? To support your ideas with evidence from other authors. These other authors (sources) are helping.
P.E.A. PARAGRAPHS. P OINT -E VIDENCE -A NALYSIS The Point-Evidence-Analysis Paragraph is a simple paragraph structure that can be used for any type of.
P.E.A. PARAGRAPHS. P OINT -E VIDENCE -A NALYSIS The Point-Evidence-Analysis Paragraph is a simple paragraph structure that can be used for any type of.
ANNOTATIONANNOTATION Critical Reading Strategy. Why annotate? How many times have you had to read something more than once to comprehend it? How many.
How to Construct a Body Paragraph…
Don’t assume agreement—always support claims with evidence
Short Stories September 6, 2016.
1. Complete the MC questions on the sheet provided.
The Essay.
An easy way to plan and organize an outstanding speech.
Paraphrasing Class #8 February 14, 2013.
Writing an Argumentative Paragraph
Argument Writing Grade 8 Copyright © 2015 by Write Score LLC.
How to write an Introductory Paragraph
Writing Paper Three Monday, November 2.
How to write a compare and contrast essay!
How to Document Evidence in the Position Paper
Thesis-based Writing.
The in-class essay Please make sure you write legibly…if I can’t read it, I can’t guess as to what it says.
Paragraph 1 Give arguments for the opposite point of view Paragraph 2
SUMMARIZING AND RESPONDING
Five-Paragraph Essay INTRODUCTION Hook Thesis Map BODY PARAGRAPH 1
P.E.A. paragraphs.
Students will be able to:
How to write a literary essay
Argument Writing Grade 8 Copyright © 2015 by Write Score LLC.
Expository/ Informative Essay
Pages 3 and 4 of “text” (packet in your binder)
Conflict Essential part of fiction (without it, you don’t have a story) usually represents some obstacle to the main character’s goals.
Moving from Prewriting to Essay
Unit 1 – English III Mary Holmes
Argument Writing Grade 8 ©Copyright by Write Score LLC.
Writing Strong Body Paragraphs
Referencing and Citations
Session 12 Writer’s Workshop
Moving from Prewriting to Essay
The Quote Sandwich Miss Romeo English II.
(in general… and for this essay)
Moving from Prewriting to Essay
Reading and Writing Basics
The connection between a claim and evidence
What is it? How do I write one? What is its function?
Tackling Timed Writings
Writing the Persuasive Essay: Step by Step to a 5
Reading and Writing Basics
Welcome! March 15th, 2017 Wednesday
Writing Genres Ms. Haynes February 5, 2013.
Moving from Prewriting to Essay
Thesis Statement Tells the reader how you will interpret the significance of the subject in the prompt.  is a road map for the paper; in other words,
Moving from Prewriting to Essay
SWBAT draft an introductory paragraph to their Argumentative essays by including a well-developed thesis statement and hook. Do Now: With a partner, discuss.
Moving from Prewriting to Essay
The Writing Process.
The Introductory Paragraph
How to Use Quotes in Your Writing: Remember to ICE Them!
Moving from Prewriting to Essay
Moving from Prewriting to Essay
Ms. Stinson 9th Grade Literature
The Painted Drum In-Class Paragraph.
Writing an Argumentative Paragraph
Synthesis Unlike AP USH…. Doesn’t Require Recognizing Bias
Theme Thesis Statement
Critical Reading Strategy
Presentation transcript:

P.E.A.S. paragraphs

what is it? Point Evidence Analysis Summary PEAS is a simple paragraph structure that can be used for ANY type of writing. It is a format that will help you throughout high school and college! It consists of four parts:

A Point Your Point should be a strong statement OR argument, something that needs to be supported or illustrated with specific evidence and/or details. Your Point should be directly related to your documents’ overall thesis statement (main idea) or purpose. Ex: Grocery stores need to start carrying more pie than cake.

Some Evidence Following the point, there should be immediate Evidence to illustrate and support the point you just made. In most cases, evidence is quoted or paraphrased material from your sources. Ex: According to Marie Callender, the nations leader in frozen desert sales, “pies outsold cakes in 2013 by a count of nearly 3 to 1.”

The Analysis Following your evidence, you need to provide Analysis, some sort of insight or further discussion of your ideas and how they support and defend your point/thesis statement. Establish a direct connection between your evidence and your thesis statement. Clearly, the numbers speak for themselves. Based on this evidence, we need to demand that our local grocery stores make a change.

The Summary At the end of your paragraph, you need to conclude your ideas; essentially, a Summary of what you just wrote. You need to clarify the main point again. No new information should be introduced here! As we can see, both customers and grocers would be much happier with a larger selection of pie than cake.

Lets look at the following paragraph… Today, Americans are too self-centered. Even our families don’t matter as much anymore as they once did. Other people and activities take precedence. James Gleick says in his book Faster, “We are consumers on the run…the very notion of the family meal as a sit down occasion is vanishing. Adults and children alike eat…on the way to their next activity” (148). Sit down meals are a time to share and connect with others; however, these connections have become less valued, as families begin to prize individual activities over shared time, promoting self-centeredness over group identity. It is time for Americans to value building connections and relationships.

Lets Identify the P-E-A-S Use a highlighter or pen/pencil to highlight or underline/circle/box the Point, the Evidence, the Analysis and the Summary in this paragraph.

point Today, Americans are too self-centered. Even our families don’t matter as much anymore as they once did. Other people and activities take precedence. James Gleick says in his book Faster, “We are consumers on the run…the very notion of the family meal as a sit down occasion is vanishing. Adults and children alike eat…on the way to their next activity” (148). Sit down meals are a time to share and connect with others; however, these connections have become less valued, as families begin to prize individual activities over shared time, promoting self-centeredness over group identity. It is time for Americans to value building connections and relationships.

evidence Today, Americans are too self-centered. Even our families don’t matter as much anymore as they once did. Other people and activities take precedence. James Gleick says in his book Faster, “We are consumers on the run…the very notion of the family meal as a sit down occasion is vanishing. Adults and children alike eat…on the way to their next activity” (148). Sit down meals are a time to share and connect with others; however, these connections have become less valued, as families begin to prize individual activities over shared time, promoting self-centeredness over group identity. It is time for Americans to value building connections and relationships.

analysis Today, Americans are too self-centered. Even our families don’t matter as much anymore as they once did. Other people and activities take precedence. James Gleick says in his book Faster, “We are consumers on the run…the very notion of the family meal as a sit down occasion is vanishing. Adults and children alike eat…on the way to their next activity” (148). Sit down meals are a time to share and connect with others; however, these connections have become less valued, as families begin to prize individual activities over shared time, promoting self-centeredness over group identity. It is time for Americans to value building connections and relationships.

Summary Today, Americans are too self-centered. Even our families don’t matter as much anymore as they once did. Other people and activities take precedence. James Gleick says in his book Faster, “We are consumers on the run…the very notion of the family meal as a sit down occasion is vanishing. Adults and children alike eat…on the way to their next activity” (148). Sit down meals are a time to share and connect with others; however, these connections have become less valued, as families begin to prize individual activities over shared time, promoting self-centeredness over group identity. It is time for Americans to value building connections and relationships.

Lets Identify the P-E-A-S Use a highlighter or pen/pencil to highlight or underline/circle/box the Point, the Evidence, the Analysis and the Summary in this paragraph.

Lets look at the following paragraph… Environmentalists have over exaggerated global warming. With the drastic number of fires, floods, tornado, and droughts, they are quick to blame the rising temperatures on pollution. However, scientists have found that the earth has warmed only one degree over the past century (Caruba). A century ago there were not the automobiles and factories there are today, so perhaps pollution is not the cause. So if pollution is not contributing to global warming, then what is? Scientists have known about hole in the protective ozone layer for decades. Environmentalists blame the hole on pollution. The hole then admits harmful UV rays. This then causes global warming. Scientists argue that these holes may be a natural occurrence (Caruba). They are supposed to happen, just like leaves falling off the trees in autumn. In fact, pollution and the depletion of the ozone layer seem to have little effect on our air. The EPA reports that since 1970, air quality has steadily improved (“The Environment”). Obviously, the environmentalists are not looking at scientific fact when it comes to global warming. There is still a large need for environmentalists to research and draw factual conclusions to the mystery behind global warming.

Point Environmentalists have over exaggerated global warming. With the drastic number of fires, floods, tornado, and droughts, they are quick to blame the rising temperatures on pollution. However, scientists have found that the earth has warmed only one degree over the past century (Caruba). A century ago there were not the automobiles and factories there are today, so perhaps pollution is not the cause. So if pollution is not contributing to global warming, then what is? Scientists have known about hole in the protective ozone layer for decades. Environmentalists blame the hole on pollution. The hole then admits harmful UV rays. This then causes global warming. Scientists argue that these holes may be a natural occurrence (Caruba). They are supposed to happen, just like leaves falling off the trees in autumn. In fact, pollution and the depletion of the ozone layer seem to have little effect on our air. The EPA reports that since 1970, air quality has steadily improved (“The Environment”). Obviously, the environmentalists are not looking at scientific fact when it comes to global warming. There is still a large need for environmentalists to research and draw factual conclusions to the mystery behind global warming.

Evidence Environmentalists have over exaggerated global warming. With the drastic number of fires, floods, tornado, and droughts, they are quick to blame the rising temperatures on pollution. However, scientists have found that the earth has warmed only one degree over the past century (Caruba). A century ago there were not the automobiles and factories there are today, so perhaps pollution is not the cause. So if pollution is not contributing to global warming, then what is? Scientists have known about hole in the protective ozone layer for decades. Environmentalists blame the hole on pollution. The hole then admits harmful UV rays. This then causes global warming. Scientists argue that these holes may be a natural occurrence (Caruba). They are supposed to happen, just like leaves falling off the trees in autumn. In fact, pollution and the depletion of the ozone layer seem to have little effect on our air. The EPA reports that since 1970, air quality has steadily improved (“The Environment”). Obviously, the environmentalists are not looking at scientific fact when it comes to global warming. There is still a large need for environmentalists to research and draw factual conclusions to the mystery behind global warming.

Analysis Environmentalists have over exaggerated global warming. With the drastic number of fires, floods, tornado, and droughts, they are quick to blame the rising temperatures on pollution. However, scientists have found that the earth has warmed only one degree over the past century (Caruba). A century ago there were not the automobiles and factories there are today, so perhaps pollution is not the cause. So if pollution is not contributing to global warming, then what is? Scientists have known about hole in the protective ozone layer for decades. Environmentalists blame the hole on pollution. The hole then admits harmful UV rays. This then causes global warming. Scientists argue that these holes may be a natural occurrence (Caruba). They are supposed to happen, just like leaves falling off the trees in autumn. In fact, pollution and the depletion of the ozone layer seem to have little effect on our air. The EPA reports that since 1970, air quality has steadily improved (“The Environment”). Obviously, the environmentalists are not looking at scientific fact when it comes to global warming. There is still a large need for environmentalists to research and draw factual conclusions to the mystery behind global warming.

Summary Environmentalists have over exaggerated global warming. With the drastic number of fires, floods, tornado, and droughts, they are quick to blame the rising temperatures on pollution. However, scientists have found that the earth has warmed only one degree over the past century (Caruba). A century ago there were not the automobiles and factories there are today, so perhaps pollution is not the cause. So if pollution is not contributing to global warming, then what is? Scientists have known about hole in the protective ozone layer for decades. Environmentalists blame the hole on pollution. The hole then admits harmful UV rays. This then causes global warming. Scientists argue that these holes may be a natural occurrence (Caruba). They are supposed to happen, just like leaves falling off the trees in autumn. In fact, pollution and the depletion of the ozone layer seem to have little effect on our air. The EPA reports that since 1970, air quality has steadily improved (“The Environment”). Obviously, the environmentalists are not looking at scientific fact when it comes to global warming. There is still a large need for environmentalists to research and draw factual conclusions to the mystery behind global warming.

Write a PEAS paragraph telling me… your Turn… Write a PEAS paragraph telling me… Prompt One: Explaining why you think the short story you read defines Ms. Swanson and how you know. Prompt Two: Explaining why you think people are or aren’t what they read and why you think that. Things to consider: What you know about Ms. Swanson and her favorite author What do you like to read and does it define you

your Turn… Now…find a way to highlight the 4 parts of your PEAS paragraph. Doing this will allow you to see if your paragraph is focused and without extra filler or words/sentences that do not belong. I have some highlighters in the bin you can use. When you finish, you’re actually going to re-write your PEAS paragraph on a loose-leaf sheet of paper for homework. In class you’ll exchange with a partner, and ask them to label it as well. The idea is that your partner labels your PEAS the same way as you did. If they didn’t, a conversation needs to take place in order to see where the mistake occurred.