Comparison of y-scaling for electrons and hadrons

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BigBite K.Egiyan Probabilities of SRC in Nuclei Measured with A(e,e / ) Reactions K. Egiyan (Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia and Jefferson.
Advertisements

Introduction Glasgow’s NPE research Group uses high precision electromagnetic probes to study the subatomic structure of matter. Alongside this we are.
1 Eta production Resonances, meson couplings Humberto Garcilazo, IPN Mexico Dan-Olof Riska, Helsinki … exotic hadronic matter?
The Color Glass Condensate and RHIC Phenomenology Outstanding questions: What is the high energy limit of QCD? How do gluons and quarks arise in hadrons?
P461 - Nuclei I1 Properties of Nuclei Z protons and N neutrons held together with a short-ranged force  gives binding energy P and n made from quarks.
BASIC CONCEPTS.  Summary-1  The net nuclear charge in a nuclear species is equal to + Ze, where Z is the atomic number and e is the magnitude.
The Electromagnetic Structure of Hadrons Elastic scattering of spinless electrons by (pointlike) nuclei (Rutherford scattering) A A ZZ  1/q 2.
Motivation We study the dynamics of the quark-gluon plasma, as created in heavy-ion collisions using real-time lattice calculations of coupled particle-field.
Proton, Pion and Kaon Transparency Measurements Overview of existing (& new kaon!) transparency data Questions: A-dependent analysis – any improvements.
Nuclear models. Models we will consider… Independent particle shell model Look at data that motivates the model Construct a model Make and test predictions.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
P461 - Nuclei I1 Properties of Nuclei Z protons and N neutrons held together with a short-ranged force  gives binding energy P and n made from quarks.
EURISOL User Group, Florence, Jan Spin-Dependent Pre-Equilibrium Exciton Model Calculations for Heavy Ions E. Běták Institute of Physics SAS,
Charge-Changing Neutrino Scattering from the Deuteron J. W. Van Orden ODU/Jlab Collaborators: T. W. Donnelly and Oscar Morino MIT W. P. Ford University.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Force Spin dependent  difference in neutron scattering cross.
Lecture 5: Electron Scattering, continued... 18/9/2003 1
Lecture 10: Inelastic Scattering from the Proton 7/10/2003
The angular dependence of the 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16  N and H(e,e’K + )  F. Garibaldi – Jlab December WATERFALL The WATERFALL target: reactions on.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
The Color Glass Condensate Outstanding questions: What is the high energy limit of QCD? How do gluons and quarks arise in hadrons? What are the possible.
P Spring 2003 L9Richard Kass Inelastic ep Scattering and Quarks Elastic vs Inelastic electron-proton scattering: In the previous lecture we saw that.
Parton Model & Parton Dynamics Huan Z Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Los Angeles Department of Engineering Physics.
Monday, Jan. 27, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 27, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino-Nucleon DIS 2.Formalism of -N DIS.
Extending the Bertini Cascade Model to Kaons Dennis H. Wright (SLAC) Monte Carlo April 2005.
Duality: Recent and Future Results Ioana Niculescu James Madison University Hall C “Summer” Workshop.
Future Physics at JLab Andrew Puckett LANL medium energy physics internal review 12/14/
Inelastic scattering When the scattering is not elastic (new particles are produced) the energy and direction of the scattered electron are independent.
The CGC and Glasma: Summary Comments The CGC, Shadowing and Scattering from the CGC Inclusive single particle production J/Psi Two Particle Correlations.
Chiral phase transition and chemical freeze out Chiral phase transition and chemical freeze out.
M. Cobal, PIF 2003 Resonances - If cross section for muon pairs is plotted one find the 1/s dependence -In the hadronic final state this trend is broken.
Lecture 12: The neutron 14/10/ Particle Data Group entry: slightly heavier than the proton by 1.29 MeV (otherwise very similar) electrically.
Size and Structure Mikhail Bashkanov University of Edinburgh UK Nuclear Physics Summer School III.
Total photoabsorption on quasi free nucleons at 600 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, A.Ignatov, A.Lapik, A.Mushkarenkov, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL collaboratiion.
Nucleon-Nucleon collisions. Nucleon-nucleon interaction at low energy Interaction between two nucleons: basic for all of nuclear physics Traditional goal.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
CEBAF - Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility.
Edexcel A2 Physics Unit 4 : Chapter 3 : Particle Physics 3.1: Probing Matter Prepared By: Shakil Raiman.
Neutrino-Nucleus Reactions at Medium and Low Energies [contents] 1. Neutrino and weak interaction 2. Cross section for ν-A and e-A reactions 3. EMC effect.
Crystal Ball Collaboration Meeting, Basel, October 2006 Claire Tarbert, Univeristy of Edinburgh Coherent  0 Photoproduction on Nuclei Claire Tarbert,
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electromagnetic moments Electromagnetic interaction  information about.
Simultaneous photo-production measurement of the  and  mesons on the nucleons at the range 680 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL.
Monday, Jan. 31, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 31, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Lab Frame and Center of Mass Frame 2.Relativistic.
Nuclear Physics, JU, Second Semester,
Stephen Wood, Jlab FNAL, March 14, 2003 Neutrino/Electron scattering comparison Similarities and differences between electron on neutrino scattering Comparing.
Transverse Spin Physics with an Electron Ion Collider Oleg Eyser 4 th International Workshop on Transverse Polarisation Phenomena in Hard Processes Chia,
HADRON 2009, FloridaAnar Rustamov, GSI Darmstadt, Germany 1 Inclusive meson production at 3.5 GeV pp collisions with the HADES spectrometer Anar Rustamov.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Photon energy.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
V. Nuclear Reactions Topics to be covered include:
Efficient transfer reaction method with RI BEams
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Nuclear Effects in the Proton-Deuteron Drell-Yan Reaction.
Overview The Structure of the Proton Quark-Parton Model lecture-1
PHL424: γ-decay γ-decay is an electromagnetic process where the nucleus decreases in excitation energy, but does not change proton or neutron numbers This.
Nadia Fomin University of Virginia
Nuclear Reactions --Part 2
p+p p+p p-n p-n p-p p-p Consider the scattering reactions:
Modification of Fragmentation Function in Strong Interacting Medium
QM2 Concept Test 18.1 A particle with energy
QM2 Concept Test 18.1 A particle with energy
Units in Nuclear Physics
Chapter 4 Mechanisms and Models of Nuclear Reactions
New Results on 0 Production at HERMES
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #3 Wednesday, Jan. 26, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu
PHYS 3446, Spring 2012 Andrew Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #5 Monday, Feb Dr. Brandt
Addition of angular momentum Clebsch-Gordan coefficients
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of y-scaling for electrons and hadrons R. J. (Jerry) Peterson University of Colorado USA Much has been learned from inclusive electron scattering from nuclei at intermediate energies and momentum transfers. Scaling, with several variables condensed into just one, has served to unify many efforts. Electron-nuclear physics goes by a very well-known reaction mechanism. Although the strong interaction complicates analysis of inclusive hadron scattering at similar energied and momentum transfers, there is much to be learned from the data available. Today—rules, constraints and a few examples for (p,px), (p,nx), (p,px), (p,p0x) and (K+,K+x).

Assumptions: One and only one elastic collision between the beam particle and a bound nucleon, for “billiard ball” kinematics. Thus, combine q and w data to a single scaling variable=y today. In-medium elastic cross sections are known from free space scattering, with known off-shell effects. The number of one-and-only-one collisions can be computed with the eikonal Glauber model, which depends upon in-medium total beam-nucleon cross sections. Trivial for electrons. Copy the lessons learned from electron scaling for the hard case of hadron quasifree scattering.

This is interesting because we can probe the interactions among nucleons within the nucleus by quasifree scattering from one of them while it is interacting, but need to match the quantum numbers of the probe and the interaction.

Correlations are caused by forces that depend on spin and isospin

Scaling of the Second Kind For electron charge scattering, the response is independent of A. Is this true for hadrons? We need Aeff or Neff for computing F(y), so this is a test of our Glauber method. We force this scaling by changing the in-medium beam-nucleon total cross section, with ratio b of in-medium/free total cross sections =0.70-0.75

Superscaling, both first and second kinds Include the expected nucleon Fermi momentum by plotting Y = y / kFermi f(Y) = F(y) x kFermi

Is the beam energy high enough?

Scaling of the First Kind The one-and-only-one scattering is tested by being independent of momentum transfer q, as found for electron scattering, but not obvious for hadrons.

Scattering of the Third Kind Are the responses for carbon near q=550 MeV/c the same for ALL hadrons? Another test of the Glauber method.

Scaling for Quality Control

Conclusions 1. Hadron scattering can meet the conditions for quasifree scattering, and thus can sense in-medium beam-hadron single-interactions, as shown by scaling of the First Kind, best for light nuclei. 2. We can count the nucleons struck elastically once and only once by the Glauber method, if smaller in-medium total cross sections are used, giving scaling of the Second and Third Kinds. 3. The isospin responses of nuclei can be separated with hadrons, and are not the same. 4. At the special beam momentum of 750 MeV/c, pion SCX can separate transverse spin responses.