Satire: An Overview

Satire: Definitions “Satire is like a mirror in which [a man] sees everyone’s face but [his] own.” ~Jonathan Swift Satire is a literary genre that uses irony, wit and sometimes sarcasm, to expose humanity’s foibles giving impetus to changes through ridicule. The author of a satire reduces the vaulted worth of something to its real- decidedly lower- worth.

Characteristics of Satire SATIRE IS NOT COMEDY, which just seeks to entertain or amuse. Satire, while implicitly humorous, has a moral purpose. 1. Moral lesson 2. Funny 3. Shared community standard of correct behavior (which begets the humor!) **The goal of satire is not just to abuse, but rather, to provoke change or reform.  

Satire and the triangle Speaker: Is it the author or persona/mask? Audience: Does it share morals with the speaker? Subject: What is the moral under attack?

Traditional Techniques in Satire: Invective: very abusive language (non ironical), swearing and name calling directed against a person or cause. This is the least inventive tool. A long invective is called a DIATRIBE.

Traditional Techniques in Satire: EXAMPLE OF INVECTIVE: Fawlty Towers

Traditional Techniques in Satire: Caricature: Exaggerating, for comic effect, a particular characteristic or characteristics of the target.

Traditional Techniques in Satire: Burlesque- ridiculous exaggeration in language; creates a distance between the situation and the way the character acts or speaks. (Examples: if a king speaks like a workman or if a president speaks like a ranch hand.)

Traditional Techniques in Satire: Mock Heroic: type of burlesque satire that sets up an absurd distance between elevated language and common events. Mock-heroic is an excellent tool for use when mocking pride (false pride). Finally, Mock heroic is usually conveyed in rhyming couplets:

Traditional Techniques in Satire: A satirical look at both the fairy tale and the mock-heroic style is found in the film version of The Princess Bride, which satirizes classics like The Three Musketeers and Ivanhoe, when Inigo Montoya and Fezzik form sentences, together creating rhyming couplets:

Traditional Techniques in Satire: Mock Heroic from Princess Bride Inigo Montoya: That Vizzini, he can *fuss*. Fezzik: Fuss, fuss... I think he like to scream at *us*. Inigo Montoya: Probably he means no *harm*. Fezzik: He's really very short on *charm*. Inigo Montoya: You have a great gift for rhyme. Fezzik: Yes, yes, some of the time. Vizzini: Enough of that. Inigo Montoya: Fezzik, are there rocks ahead? Fezzik: If there are, we all be dead. Vizzini: No more rhymes now, I mean it. Fezzik: Anybody want a peanut? Vizzini: DYEEAAHHHHHH.  

Traditional Techniques in Satire: Video clip from Princess Bride

Traditional Techniques in Satire: Irony- a stylistic device of speech in which the real meaning of the words is different from (and opposite to) the literal meaning. Irony, unlike sarcasm, tends to be ambiguous, bringing two contrasting meanings into play. Often, irony works by an incongruity between an action or a proposal and the moral words used to describe it. Irony becomes satiric when the real meaning appears to contradict the surface meaning (think: A Modest Proposal).

Traditional Techniques in Satire: See the example from The Onion and see if you can articulate the exact nature of the irony therein.

Traditional Techniques in Satire: Lampoon- a very harsh personal attack on a particular/ recognizable target characteristic, or general appearance.

Traditional Techniques in Satire: For example, Dick Cheney gets repeated lampooning related to his ethics and thus he is a repeated target of editorial cartoonist, Mike Luckovich’s lampooning:

Traditional Techniques in Satire: Parody-refers to a style that deliberately ridicules another style. The best parody writers possess the degree of skill as the art form they parody. Princess Bride, in addition to being an example of mock heroic, is also a parody of fairy tales/adventure stories.

Traditional Techniques in Satire: One example of a parody surpassing the original is in This is Spinal Tap, which parodies the excessive touring life of heavy metal bands.

Traditional Techniques in Satire: Reductio ad absurdum- (meaning: reduction to the absurd or reduction to the impossible) The author reduces the logic of the speaker to its most basic forms, extrapolates the example to absurd extremes. Swift’s A Modest Proposal is a great example (skinning children in the name of boots…)

Traditional Techniques in Satire: This handy fallacious technique of disputation can be effective in making any logical argument appear ridiculous, when it may not be, by stretching it to an extreme which goes far beyond the body or intent or scope of the argument.  Example 1: A. In America, citizens have the right to bear arms. B. Oh, so it's OK with you for hundreds of innocent kids to be killed each year with unregistered handguns? Example 2: A. Everyone in a free country ought to be able to live according to their own religious beliefs. B. Oh, so it's OK for witches to dig up bodies to cut out gall bladders for ingredients for their magic potions? From: http://maggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com/ archives/2130-Fallacy-of-the-Week- Reductio-ad-Absurdum.html

Tricks of Satire 1. SET UP A TARGET- the attackable conduct 2. DISTORT THE TARGET- in order to distort the target so that the audience still sees the “original” but so the distortions are funny.

Tricks of Satire 3. ATTACK THE DISTORTED TARGET- using “weapons of satire,”

Tricks of Satire The aim, here, is to deliver an unrelenting attack on the target that the audience can laugh at, so that the audience’s shared response, its laughter, can effectively deal with the behavior that the satirist wishes to attack.

Tricks of Satire PUSH TO THE EDGE- get to the irony- satiric irony-people (the audience) might be reluctant to accept. They might have a natural need to counter or neutralize the satire. Some of the ways an audiences neutralizes: a. The literal read: dismiss the satire as absurd b. Reject it because it is too rude c. Reject it because it is “unfair,” not true to life d. Reject it because it doesn’t respond to the ironies

Final questions How do we measure the effectiveness of a satire? Well, ask yourself: does it provoke its audience? Does the audience change as a result?