BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure S1. Production of recombinant NS1 protein
Advertisements

Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Tat Stimulates Cotranscriptional Capping of HIV mRNA
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (April 1998)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Yingqun Huang, Renata Gattoni, James Stévenin, Joan A. Steitz 
A Human Nuclear-Localized Chaperone that Regulates Dimerization, DNA Binding, and Transcriptional Activity of bZIP Proteins  Ching-Man A Virbasius, Susanne.
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Stabilization of Chromatin Structure by PRC1, a Polycomb Complex
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (May 1997)
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
The Nuclear Hat1p/Hat2p Complex
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
DNA Topoisomerase I and PC4 Can Interact with Human TFIIIC to Promote Both Accurate Termination and Transcription Reinitiation by RNA Polymerase III 
Volume 125, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Heterochromatin Formation in Mammalian Cells
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (July 1996)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 24, Pages (December 2001)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Autoantigen La Promotes Efficient RNAi, Antiviral Response, and Transposon Silencing by Facilitating Multiple-Turnover RISC Catalysis  Ying Liu, Huiling.
Dimitra J. Mitsiou, Hendrik G. Stunnenberg  Molecular Cell 
Gaku Mizuguchi, Toshio Tsukiyama, Jan Wisniewski, Carl Wu 
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Rita Das, Zhaolan Zhou, Robin Reed  Molecular Cell 
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Human Pre-mRNA Cleavage Factor Im Is Related to Spliceosomal SR Proteins and Can Be Reconstituted In Vitro from Recombinant Subunits  Ursula Rüegsegger,
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Reconstitution of the Transcription Factor TFIIH
Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (October 2004)
Key functional sites of SPINDLIN1 could be phosphorylated by Aurora-A.
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
A SWI/SNF–Related Chromatin Remodeling Complex, E-RC1, Is Required for Tissue- Specific Transcriptional Regulation by EKLF In Vitro  Jennifer A Armstrong,
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (January 1996)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex Daniel A Bochar, Lai Wang, Hideo Beniya, Alexander Kinev, Yutong Xue, William S Lane, Weidong Wang, Fatah Kashanchi, Ramin Shiekhattar  Cell  Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 257-265 (July 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00030-1

Figure 1 Affinity Purification of the BRCA1-SWI/SNF Complex (A) Purification scheme. HeLa nuclear extract was fractionated using phosphocellulose (P11) chromatography. The 0.5 M KCl elution was concentrated on a DEAE-Sephacel column and further purified using an anti-BRCA1 antibody column (α-BRCA1). The bound proteins were washed with buffer containing 1 M KCl and eluted using either a peptide corresponding to the C20 epitope (4 mg/ml) or 0.2 M glycine, pH 2.5. (B) Polypeptide composition of the affinity-purified BRCA1-SWI/SNF complex. Affinity-purified BRCA1-SWI/SNF was analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining or Western blot analysis using antibodies delineated to the right of the figure. α-control represents the control protein A eluate. Molecular weight markers are shown to the left of the figure. (C) Mononucleosome disruption activity of the anti-BRCA1 affinity eluate. BRCA1-SWI/SNF (10 μl) was incubated with mononucleosomes in the presence or absence of ATP followed by digestion of the mononucleosomes with DNase I. Control lanes 1 and 2 represent free DNA and mononucleosome DNA. The arrows to the right denote the changes in nucleosome digestion pattern due to BRCA1-SWI/SNF activity. Cell 2000 102, 257-265DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00030-1)

Figure 2 Conventional Purification of BRCA1-SWI/SNF Complex (A) Purification scheme. HeLa nuclear extract was fractionated by chromatography as described in Experimental Procedures. The horizontal and diagonal lines indicate stepwise and gradient elution, respectively. Concentrations are given in molars. (B) Western blot analysis of the Mono Q fractions (15 μl) using antibodies shown to the right of the figure. (C) Western blot analysis and mononucleosome disruption assay of Superose 6 fractions (15 μl). Input (I) is the BRCA1 pool from the Mono Q column. The arrow at the bottom denotes the elution position of thyroglobulin. (D) BRCA1-SWI/SNF (15 μl) from the Superose 6 column was separated by SDS-PAGE (4%–12%) and visualized by silver staining. Molecular masses of marker proteins are indicated at the left. Protein assignments were based on Western blot analysis and by comparison to SWI/SNF complexes affinity-purified using antibodies to other SWI/SNF components (Wang et al. 1996a, Wang et al. 1996b). Cell 2000 102, 257-265DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00030-1)

Figure 3 BRCA1-SWI/SNF Does Not Contain RNAPII or Components of the RAD50 Complex (A) BRCA1-SWI/SNF lacks detectable RNAPII activity. Transcription assays were reconstituted with rTBP (15 ng), rTFIIB (15 ng), rTFIIF (20 ng), rTFIIE (20 ng), TFIIH (50 ng) in the presence or absence of 50 ng (1×) of RNAPII or 50 ng (1×) of BRCA1-SWI/SNF. (B) RNAPII fails to coelute during chromatography on Phenyl Sepharose. Western blot analysis of Phenyl Sepharose fractions (15 μl) using antibodies indicated to the right of the figure. The input and flowthrough are labeled I and FT, respectively. (C) RAD50 and MRE11 fail to coelute during Superose 6 chromatography. Western blot analysis of Superose 6 gel filtration, the last step of chromatography as shown in (Figure 2A), using antibodies indicated to the right of the figure. The arrow at the bottom denotes the elution position of thyroglobulin. The void was deduced from manufacturer's recommendation. Cell 2000 102, 257-265DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00030-1)

Figure 4 Affinity-Purification of Human SWI/SNF Complex (A) Purification scheme. Nuclear extract from Ini-1-11 or untagged HeLa cells was fractionated using an anti-Flag M2 affinity column. Bound proteins were further analyzed by chromatography on a Superose 6 gel filtration column. (B) Western blot analysis of the anti-Flag affinity eluates (15 μl) using antibodies shown to the right of the figure. (C) Western blot analysis of the Superose 6 fractions (15 μl) using antibodies shown to the right of the figure. The arrow at the bottom denotes the elution position of thyroglobulin. The void was deduced from the manufacturer's recommendation. Cell 2000 102, 257-265DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00030-1)

Figure 5 BRCA1 Directly Interacts with BRG1 (A) SDS-PAGE (6%) followed by Coomassie blue staining of purified recombinant Flag-tagged BRG1, BAF170, BAF155, Flag-tagged SNF5, and his-tagged BRCA1. (B) Recombinant proteins denoted on the top of the figure were incubated together according to the protocol outlined in Experimental Procedures. Following purification using an anti-Flag M2 affinity column, samples were subjected to Western blotting analysis using antibodies indicated to the right of the figure. NE represents HeLa nuclear extract (10 μl). (C) SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie blue staining of purified recombinant GST-BRCA1 fusion proteins synthesized as described in Experimental Procedures. (D) Recombinant GST-BRCA1 fusion proteins denoted on the top of the figure were incubated with recombinant BRG1 as outlined in Experimental Procedures. Following elution with glutathione, samples were subjected to Western blotting analysis using anti-BRG1 antibodies. Cell 2000 102, 257-265DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00030-1)

Figure 6 BRCA1 Transcription Activity Is Mediated through the SWI/SNF Complex (A) Transient transfection assays showing the stimulation of transcription by BRCA1 (5 μg). The mutant BRCA1 (Δ11, 5 μg) did not have any effect. (B) Transient transfection assays showing the BRG1 dominant-negative mutant (1×, 0.5 μg) abrogates the BRCA1 stimulation of transcription. The p53-G5B-CAT reporter was cotransfected into CEM cells with the indicated plasmids. (C) Pu3R-CAT (3 μg) or HIV-CAT (3 μg) was transfected with either a TAX (1.5 μg) or TAT (1.5 μg) plasmids. Five micrograms of dominant-negative mutant was used in these assays. Transfection experiments and CAT assays were performed as described in Experimental Procedures. The percent CAT conversion is given below each lane. Cell 2000 102, 257-265DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00030-1)

Figure 7 Analysis of Endogenous p53 Responsive Promoters (A) Multiprobe ribonuclease protection assay. Samples of total RNA after the indicated transfections were analyzed for the indicated mRNA species as described in Experimental Procedures. The protected fragment for each mRNA is smaller than the probe size (e.g., p53 probe 312 nt, protected 283 nt). Lane 1 represents the probe set not treated with RNase. L32 and GAPDH represent cytoplasmic and nuclear RNA controls for each lane, respectively. Lanes 10 and 11 represent the controls of HeLa RNA and yeast tRNA, respectively. (B) Quantification of fold induction of bclx, p53, and p21 mRNA in (A) after transfection with the indicated constructs. Cell 2000 102, 257-265DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00030-1)