The OCT in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optic Disc Evaluation IN Glaucoma
Advertisements

Visual Field Examinations
Cirrus HD-OCT. Small footprint and 90 degree orientation
OCT= Optical Coherence Tomography
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN GLAUCOMA
Understanding and Comparing Confocal Scanning Lasers to Optical Coherence Tomography for Optic Nerve Head Analysis (ONH) A presentation courtesy of Zeiss.
SPECTRALIS® Glaucoma Module Premium Edition
Oct interpretation Ghanbari MD This is what we wanted.
Presented by A. Rismanchian MD Farabi Hospital Clinical Aspects Of OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN GLAUCOMA.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss and Quality of Life in Glaucoma Gracitelli CPB,
The Eye.
Vision.
Stratification of Normative Data
Dr. Ayesha Abdullah Learning outcomes By the end of this lecture the students would be able to; Correlate the structural organization of the.
1 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 24 Neuro-ophthalmology in Medicine E.R. Eggenberger and J. Pula.
OCT in Amblyopia Lionel Kowal.
CIRRUS HD-OCT Version 7.6 CIRRUS HD-OCT Version 7.6 for Models 4000/400 Advancing Smart OCT CIR.7250.
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Gella Laxmi 2009PHXF013P.
Eye anatomy.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Gene Therapy for Leber Congenital Amaurosis Caused.
Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Ultra-high.
Date of download: 11/13/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomographic Characteristics.
1. Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology
and Microperimetry visual field parameters for Glaucomatous Loss
Anterior Segment OCT in Strabismus
Fundus Image Enhancement and Glaucoma Detection
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;54(14):ORSF68-ORSF80. doi: /iovs
Iwona Helemejko, MD 1; D. Robert Iskander, PhD2
P-WT-294 Comparison of red-free photography, swept-source OCT and spectral-domain OCT for evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Gilda WK Lai,
Asymmetry Analysis of Retinal Thickness
Volume 123, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Figure 1 (A) Illustration of the retina
Chapter 9: The Eye.
Structure-Function Relationship Between the Bruch Membrane Opening-based Minimum Rim Width and Visual Field Defects in Advanced Glaucoma Serhat Imamoglu,
From: Relationship Between Optic Nerve Appearance and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness as Explored with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
Direct Ophthalmoscopy
From: Central Glaucomatous Damage of the Macula Can Be Overlooked by Conventional OCT Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Analyses Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech..
Special Senses Chapter 8.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;54(4): doi: /iovs Figure Legend:
Outer Retinal Tubulation as a Predictor of the Growth Rate of Geographic Atrophy in Age Related Macular Degeneration Amirhossein Hariri 1, Muneeswar G.
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Optical Coherence Tomography
Copyright © 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Quantitative analysis of retinal OCT
Clinical effect of citicoline combined with choline alfoscerate for treatment of glaucomatous optic neuropathy Karliychuk M.A., Pinchuk S.V. Department.
Optic Nerve Head Analysis
Volume 122, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Histology of the Eye.
David B Henson Medical School University of Manchester
Vision Seeing is Believing.
Eyes & Vision.
Glaucoma Diagnosis Ophthalmology Glaucoma
Comparison between Lamina Cribrosa Depth and Curvature as a Predictor of Progressive Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma 
Mohamed S. Sayed, MD, Michael Margolis, MD, Jessica L
Direct Ophthalmoscopy
Figure 2 Optical coherence tomography of the human retina A) Detailed retinal segmentation sample on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Position of Central Retinal Vascular Trunk and Preferential Location of Glaucomatous Damage in Myopic Normal-Tension Glaucoma  Kyoung Min Lee, MD, Martha.
Optic neuritis: A mechanistic view
Sarah H. Van Tassel, MD, Sanjay G. Asrani, MD  Ophthalmology Glaucoma 
Figure 1 Example OCT scan
the new generation in fundus imaging
A Map for Horizontal Disparity in Monkey V2
Changing Light Waves to Neural Impulses
Atsuya Miki, MD, PhD, Yasushi Ikuno, MD, Robert N
Detecting Glaucoma Progression Using Guided Progression Analysis with OCT and Visual Field Assessment in Eyes Classified by International Classification.
Histology of the Eye.
Physiology of Vision Retina Dr. Sumera Gul.
Regeneration: New Neurons Wire Up
Nervous System III Anatomy and Physiology
Encoding Light Intensity by the Cone Photoreceptor Synapse
Presentation transcript:

The OCT in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma Murray Fingeret, OD

Disclosures Consultant Alcon, Aerie, Allergan, B & L, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Heidelberg Engineering, Topcon

OCT in Glaucoma An overview Interpretation of the printout How it works Interpretation of the printout Image artifacts Examples of OCT loss Progression

OCT: AN OVERVIEW Optical coherence tomography is a rapidly emerging biomedical imaging technology Obtains high-resolution, cross-sectional images of biological microstructures Images are provided in situ and in real-time Non-invasive does not require excision and processing of specimens

OCT TECHNOLOGY: SPECTRAL DOMAIN Spectral domain OCT (also called Fourier-domain or high-definition OCT) was FDA approved in 2006 Spectral domain OCT uses a stationary reference arm and eliminates the need for a moving mirror; it does so by using a spectrometer as a detector

Fourier Domain OCT SLD FFT Reference mirror stationary Broadband Light Source SLD Interferometer Combines light from reference with reflected light from retina Grating splits signal by wavelength In Fourier domain OCT. The reference mirror is kept stationary. The interference between the sample and reference reflections is split into a spectrum and captured by a line camera. The spectral interferogram is Fourier transformed to provide an axial scan. The absence of moving parts allows the image to be acquired very rapidly. Process repeated many times to create B-scan Spectrometer analyzes signal by wavelength FFT Spectral interferogram Fourier transform converts signal to typical A-scan Entire A-scan created at a single time Slide courtesy of Dr. Yimin Wang, USC

All Retinal Layers Are Visible internal limiting membrane blood vessels choroid external limiting membrane inner photoreceptor segm. photoreceptor segm. interface outer photoreceptor segm. retinal pigment epithelium RPE cell bodies? choriocap.? nerve fiber layer ganglion cell layer inner plexiform layer inner nuclear layer outer plexiform layer outer nuclear layer

Optic Nerve Head – Detail RPE ends BMO RNFL GCL PLT Sclera LC

OCT Analysis

What Do You Look For When You Evaluate a Scan Quality score Illumination Focus OK Image centered Any signs of eye movement Segmentation accuracy B Scan Centration

What Do You Look For When You Evaluate a Scan RNFL Thickness Map Hot colors present? Any areas in yellow or red? What areas? Do they correlate to other sections of printout? RNFL Deviation Map Any areas flagged? Is so, yellow or red? How large? Location of area flagged

What Do You Look For When You Evaluate a Scan Sector and quadrant map Any areas flagged? How many? Yellow or red? Parameters Which ones flagged? One eye or both? Any gray areas?

When is the OCT Abnormal? The average RNFL thickness is 107um at the 95% The green range for average RNFL is from 107-75um Flips to yellow at 75um There are from 4-8 steps of detectable change while the RNFL is in the green range Visual field loss occurs at 75um thickness for average RNFL Flips from yellow to red for average RNFL at 67um Floor effect at approximately 55um Will not go any lower Visual field may be present when at floor

Macula Testing in Glaucoma Imaging to detect glaucoma damage has concentrated around RNFL and optic nerve evaluation Complicating the assessment of the optic nerve when evaluating for glaucoma damage is: High variability of the ONH size and shape Even among healthy individuals Wide range of optic cup shapes and sizes Variable size and configuration of blood vessels Variable angle of penetration into the eyeball of the optic nerve (tilted disc) Parapapillary changes such as atrophy These are the reasons why it is difficult to detect early glaucomatous damage

Macula Testing in Glaucoma Imaging allows measurement of features that are not possible otherwise Imaging can detect changes in the macular region The eye has about 1 million retinal ganglion cells, and their numbers are densest in the macula about six cells deep About 50% of ganglion cells are in the central 4.5 mm of the retina an area that represents only 7% of the total retinal area This area is not well covered in most visual field testing

Retinal Ganglion Cells extend through three retinal layers RNFL Ganglion cell axons Ganglion cell complex (GCC) Ganglion cell layer Ganglion cell bodies Ganglion cell dendrites Inner plexiform layer Inner nuclear layer GCC is: Nerve Fiber Layer – Ganglion cell axons Ganglion cell layer – Cell bodies Inner-Plexiform Layer - Dendrites Outer plexiform layer Outer nuclear layer IS / OS Junction RPE Layer

Macula Testing in Glaucoma Compared to the optic nerve, the macula is a relatively simple structure Devoid of large vessels Has multiple cellular and plexiform layers with central depression (fovea) devoid of retinal ganglion cells The RGC layer (shape) within the macula is generally less variable in healthy individuals than RNFL or ONH Perhaps reduction may offer better sensitivity in recognizing glaucoma damage

Macula Testing in Glaucoma The inner layer of the retina is composed of the nerve fiber layer (the ganglion cell axons), the ganglion cell layer (the cell bodies), and the inner plexiform layer (the dendrites) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) can measure the thickness of the ganglion cell complex so the clinician can evaluate it over time to determine progression of glaucoma Importantly, analysis of the ganglion cells might allow clinicians to detect damage before there are changes in the retinal nerve fiber layer

Measuring the ganglion cell complex directly (ILM – IPL) Inner retinal layers and provides complete Ganglion cell assessment: Nerve fiber layer (g-cell axons) Ganglion cell layer (g-cell body) Inner plexiform layer (g-cell dendrites) The speed and resolution of the RTVue is also very useful in glaucoma diagnosis. In the Advanced Imaging for Glaucoma study, we use the RTVue to measure the ganglion cells over a wide macular area. Images courtesy of Dr. Ou Tan, USC

Macula Testing in Glaucoma Other advantages of macula testing Easier for patient to perform since involves central, not eccentric fixation Measurement variability is less with macula testing Macula thickness in healthy eyes – 280-300 um RNFL – 80-100 um

Overlay of the RNFL and GCC (OS) with RTVue FD OCT pRNFL GCC

What is EDI? Enhanced Depth Imaging For spectral domain, sensitivity is highest at top of window (vitreous) and declines with depth With EDI, sensitivity in window is flipped and now sensitivity is higher on bottom (lamina or choroid) Loss of sensitivity at top (vitreous) Advantage of swept source is less drop off in sensitivity with depth of imaging All OCTs have ability to shift sensitivity with depth

Enhanced Depth Imaging (EDI) Without EDI Vitreous / Retinal interface highlighted Bruch’s membrane opening (Neural Canal Opening - NCO) The new EDI function will further enhance the penetration into tissue. Choriocapillaris for retina and Lamina Cribrosa for glaucoma. With EDI Anterior surface of lamina cribrosa Posterior surface of lamina cribrosa 23

Enhanced depth imaging (EDI) Enhanced depth imaging (EDI) was developed for SD OCT to improve image quality of the deep structures of the posterior segment However, although EDI is an effective method for visualizing the deep structures of the optic disc, it is disadvantageous for observing axially extended structures in highly myopic eyes in their entirety because its signal intensity decays with axial distance.

Anterior Segment Imaging

Artifacts in Taking OCT Images Each OCT image/printout needs to be carefully analyzed Some may not be of sufficient quality and should be evaluated with caution may mislead the clinician There are different reasons why an OCT image may not of adequate quality Poor quality images may appear to be abnormal and glaucomatous when an artifact is the cause of the problem

Artifacts in Taking OCT Images Poor Quality Images Out of focus Reduced illumination Not properly illuminated Reduced signal strength Dry eye, cataracts, other media opacities or small pupils There is a relationship between signal strength and RNFL thickness

Artifacts in Taking OCT Images Poor Quality Images Want signal strength to meet manufacturer’s recommendations Use carefully any image in which quality scores are below recommendations Even if Quality score is acceptable, there may still be problems with image

Image Artifacts Blink cutting off image Scan too high or too low cutting off image Eye movement Hi Myopia Large optic disc and / or PPA RNFL circle too small - encroahces on optic disc/PPA Floaters obscuring tissue underneath Pathologies such as epiretinal membrane or chorioretinal scar

Artifacts in Taking OCT Images Algorithm failure Segmentation errors B scan segmentation inaccurate Retinal assessment (RNFL, GCC, Retina thickness) Disc margin error Throws off disc size Cup not properly outlined (material in cup throwing segmentation off) Can not over ride this with Cirrus

Artifacts in Taking OCT Images Any of these problems can lead to inaccurate images Possibly giving the sense of an abnormal scan and a glaucoma diagnosis when the problem is with the scan and not the eye

Progression

Cirrus HD-OCT GPA Analysis IMAGE PROGRESSION MAP Two baseline exams are required*. Follow up exams are registered to the baseline to ensure accurate comparison. SS = 10 Baseline Registration  SS = 8 Registration  SS = 9 Third exam is compared to the two baseline exams Sub pixel map demonstrates change from baseline. Yellow pixels denote change from both baseline exams Third and fourth exams are compared to both baselines. Change identified in three of the four comparisons is indicated by red pixels; yellow pixels denote change from both baselines Change refers to statistically significant change, defined as change that exceeds the known variability of a given pixel based on a study population. *with software version 5.0, the two baseline exams can be obtained on the same day 03/2010 CIR.2804 Carl Zeiss Meditec

Cirrus HD-OCT GPA Analysis TSNIT PROGRESSION MAP TSNIT values from each exam are shown Significant difference is colorized yellow or red Yellow denotes change from baseline exams Red denotes change from 3 of 4 comparisons SUMMARY PARAMETER TREND ANALYSIS Rate and significance of change shown in text RNFL thickness values for Overall Average, Superior Average, and Inferior Average are plotted for each exam Yellow marker denotes change from both baseline exams Red marker denotes change from 3 of 4 comparisons Confidence intervals are shown as a gray band Legend summarizes GPA analyses and indicates with a check mark if there is possible or likely loss of RNFL 03/2010 CIR.2804 Carl Zeiss Meditec

RNFL/ONH Summary includes item “Average Cup-to-Disc Progression”. Updated Guided Progression Analysis (GPA™) Optic Nerve Head information now included Average Cup-to-Disc Ratio plotted on graph with rate of change information. RNFL/ONH Summary includes item “Average Cup-to-Disc Progression”. Printout includes an optional second page with table of values, including Rim Area, Disc Area, Average & Vertical Cup-to-Disc Ratio and Cup Volume. Each cell of the table can be color coded if change is detected. Miscellaneous updates to the report design. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc Cirrus 6.0 Speaker Slide Set CIR.3992 Rev B 01/2012