Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
The TRANSIMS Model: Combining Travel Demand and Microsimulation Operating Paradigms Presented to 2012 ITE District 6 Annual Meeting by John Kerenyi, P.E.,
ARC’s Strategic Thoroughfare Plan Bridging the Gap from Travel Demand Model to Micro-Simulation GPA Conference Fall 2012 Presented By: David Pickworth,
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Transportation Planning Modeling with EMME/2. Interconnectedness.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Planning Applications: A City- wide Microsimulation Model for Virginia Beach Craig Jordan, Old Dominion University Mecit Cetin, Old Dominion University.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
Validate - A Nationwide Dynamic Travel Demand Model for Germany Peter Vortisch, Volker Waßmuth, PTV AG, Germany.
2010 Travel Behavior Inventory Mn/DOT TDMCC- Jonathan Ehrlich October 14, 2010.
The Impact of Convergence Criteria on Equilibrium Assignment Yongqiang Wu, Huiwei Shen, and Terry Corkery Florida Department of Transportation 11 th Conference.
Fuel Economy in Harris County-2007 Graciela Lubertino, PhD.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Travel Demand Modeling Experience Bellevue-Kirkland-Redmond Travel Demand Modeling Experience Jin Ren, P.E. City of Bellevue, Washington, USA October 19,
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
The Stockholm trials – Emme/2 as a tool for designing a congestion charges system 1.The trials and the congestion charges system 2.Observed effects 3.Transportation.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks.
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
1 Methods to Assess Land Use and Transportation Balance By Carlos A. Alba May 2007.
2004 Transportation M etropolitan A tlanta P erformance Report – Congestion Measures Presentation to ITS Georgia August 29, 2005.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
Quantify Uncertainty in Travel Forecasts
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Mesoscopic Modeling Approach for Performance Based Planning
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPDATE
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Technical Advisory Committee
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
Yijing Lu (Baltimore Metropolitan Council)
Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Development of New Supply Models in Maryland Using Big Data
Travel Demand and Traffic Forecasting
Problem 5: Network Simulation
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
An Analytical Modeling Tool for Active Transportation Strategy Evaluation Presented by: Jinghua Xu, Ph.D., PE May 16, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update 11/24/2018 Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update April 6, 2018 Iteris

VCTM– A Long History! New VCTM developed to Meet Key Application Needs First VCTM developed in 1992 with updates and conversions throughout the years with the last update completed in 2009. Land Use Based (Building Square Footage and LU Acres) Autos only (No Transit or Goods Movement/HDT Component) New VCTM developed to Meet Key Application Needs Environmental Analyses County General Plan Update SB 743 Impact Fee/Fair Share Needs Next Generation of Local Models

VCTM Consistency VCTM must be consistent with SCAG 2016 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS) Regional Travel Demand Model Subarea Model Development Tool SCAG Zone Structure 11,000+ zones – Used for trip distribution and mode choice Full Model run time upwards of 7-10 days VCTM 663 Ventura County zones Base Year 2012 – Forecast Year 2040 1,021 total zones Full Model run time 13-15 hours.

Traditional Four-Step Model Process Tries to Replicate Human Travel Behavior Trip Generation Do I make a trip? Trip Distribution Where do I go? Mode Choice What are my means of travel? Assignment What route do I choose?

Model Calibration & Validation (Comparing Model Outputs to Real World Counts) What needs Calibration? Trip Generation Rates and External Trips Trip Distribution Parameters Mode Choice Coefficients Freeway and Arterial Street Validation Criteria Count/Volume Comparison (FHWA & Caltrans) Freeways +/- 7% Major Arterials +/- 10% Minor Arterials +/- 15% Percent Root Mean Squared Error (%RMSE ) Caltrans = 40 and FHWA = 30 Coefficient of Determination (R2) (FHWA & Caltrans) 0.88 Caltrans Standard Deviation >0.75 Caltrans Criteria from the Caltrans Travel Forecasting Guidelines, November 1992 FHWA Criteria from the TMIP Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual

Model Validation Results

Model Outputs Performance Measures Assignment Loading (Volumes and Speeds) Internal/External Origins & Destinations V/C Ratios on Facilities Heavy Duty Vehicle Volumes Transit Ridership by Mode Active Transportation Modes Model Application Functional Class Plots With number of lanes With Speeds Volume to Capacity Plots Air Quality Speed Bin Outputs Automated Outputs Vehicle Miles of travel Vehicle Hours of travel Vehicle hours of delay All outputs developed for the following: Ventura County, General Plan Districts, TIMF Districts, Cities By Time of Day (AM peak period, Mid-day, PM peak period, Evening, Night) Performance Measures

AM Peak Period (6-9 AM) 2012 Validation 2040 Baseline VMT = 3,249,750 VHT = 79,550 VHD = 13,200 Average Speed = 40.9 MPH 2040 Baseline VMT = 3,714,000 VHT = 104,150 VHD = 26,850 Average Speed = 35.7 MPH

PM Peak Period (3-7 PM) 2012 Validation 2040 Baseline VMT = 5,090,500 VHT = 129,300 VHD = 24,100 Average Speed = 39.4 MPH 2040 Baseline VMT = 5,717,150 VHT = 163,200 VHD = 42,900 Average Speed = 35.0 MPH

Average Daily Traffic 2012 Validation 2040 Baseline VMT = 16,588,600 VHT = 386,800 VHD = 45,700 Average Speed = 42.9 MPH 2040 Baseline VMT = 18,850,900 VHT = 475,700 VHD = 83,000 Average Speed = 39.6 MPH

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD) U.S. 101 80,497 (2040) 162,642 (2040) 157,805 (2040) 63,945 172,924 (2012) 150,622 (2040) (2012) 203,849 (2040) 146,252 (2012) 166,597 (2012) 191,821 (2012)

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) by Speed Increase in low speed VMT Decrease in high speed VMT Overall increase in VMT of 14% 2040

Mode Choice Outputs Similar Mode Splits between 2012 and 2040 Transit Trips 1 – 1.114% Non-motorized Trips 4.79 – 5.0% Increase in total number of trips 3,220,374 (2012) – 3,780,041(2040)

Next Steps Coordination with General Plan US-101 HOV Lane Local Applications and Updates

Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update 11/24/2018 Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update April 6, 2018 Iteris