Meson Production Efficiencies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Advertisements

Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Participants WP3total Imperial College CERN STFC University Warwick CRNS University Oxford6 6 Total Euro  - WP3.
Meson Production at 8 GeV for IDS120h X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Dec. 27, 2011.
Meson Production Comparison between Hg and Ga at 8 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 04, 2011.
Meson Production Comparison between HG and GA at 8 GeV (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 18, 2011.
Muon Collider 2011 Workshop Jun 27-July 1 in Telluride, CO Gollwitzer & Nagaitsev presented Attending: Ankenbrandt, Lebedev, Pasquinelli, Popovic, and.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
1 Meson Production Simulations X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL N u F a c t th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams.
Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Calculations 1 st Princeton/Oxford High-Power Targets Workshop Oxford May 1-2, 2008.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Optimization David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
A 3 Pass, Dog-bone Cooling Channel G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Considerations for Nufact and Superbeams ISS Meeting RAL April 26, 2006.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Gallium as a Possible Target Material for a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk,
 Stephen Brooks / RAL / April 2004 Muon Front Ends Providing High-Intensity, Low-Emittance Muon Beams for the Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
Progress at BNL Vitaly Yakimenko. Polarized Positrons Source (PPS for ILC) Conventional Non- Polarized Positrons: In our proposal polarized  -ray beam.
Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs A.Farricker 1, R.M.Jones 1, R.Ainsworth 2 and S.Molloy 3 1 The University.
Cold versus Warm, parameters impacting LC reliability and efficiency contribution to the discussion on risk factors Giorgio Bellettini, Seul ITRP meeting,
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Meson Production of Carbon Target at 3 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies 17/18/13.
ISS Muon Bunch Structure Convenors: S Berg, BNL, and G H Rees, RAL.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
1 Muon Capture for a Muon Collider David Neuffer July 2009.
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer December 4, 2014.
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Summary Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab, USA.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Muon Production and Capture for a Neutrino Factory European Strategy for Future Neutrino Physics CERN October.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Introduction Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab,
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
Muon Acceleration using 8 GeV Proton Driver Linac
NuSTORM - μ Storage Ring with Injection
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Some CEPC SRF considerations
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
Why CeC is needed? High luminosity of US future electron-ion collider(EIC) is critical for success of its physics program 2018 NAS Assessment of U.S.-Based.
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
CEPC APDR SRF considerations(4) -LEP Cavity Voltage &BBU
Simulation check of main parameters (wd )
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
General Issues for a Multi-MW driver
Presentation transcript:

Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008

Proton Driver Parameters Proton driver power: 4 MW Proton driver repetition rate: 50 Hz Proton energy: around 10 GeV 3 proton bunches in train 1.7×1013 protons per bunch at 10 GeV Bunch length 1–3 ns Train length at least 200 μs Repetition rate: stored energy in muon RF cavities is essentially thrown away. Higher rep rates, more energy thrown away, higher power requirements. May be challenging to get proton driver to rep higher anyhow. Proton energy: significant drop off in performance per unit power around 5 GeV, steady drop off at higher energies. Higher energies may be nicer for achieving short bunches (later) and reaching higher power (less charge required at low energy). But higher energy makes high rep rate harder, increases proton driver machine cost. Bunches in train: fed one at a time, separated by at least 17 μs (time to get through FFAG stage) to target. Less current per bunch, easier to get short bunches. More bunches means a longer storage ring: this requires digging deeper (water table issues), increased storage ring cost. Bunch length: performance flat to 1 ns, drops by about 7% at 3 ns. Train length: need to replace energy in accelerating cavities between passes. Input power into coupler is limited, thus one needs enough time between bunches to get the power in.

The Neutrino Factory Target Concept

The Target/Collection System Count all the pions and muons that cross the transverse plane at z=50m. For this analysis we select all pions and muons with 40 < KE< 180 MeV.

50GeV Beam-Mesons at 50m 40MeV<KE<180MeV

Mesons at 50m ISS Results reported April, 2006 Mesons/Proton Mesons/Proton normalized to beam power ISS Results reported April, 2006

Hg Jet Target Geometry Previous results: Radius 5mm, θbeam =67mrad Θcrossing = 33mrad

Step 1: Vary the Target Radius Rmax=0.48cm

Step 2: Vary the Beam Angle beam=89mrad

Step 3: Vary the Beam/Jet Crossing Angle crossing=25mrad

Optimized Target Parameters Target Radius Proton Beam Angle

Beam/Jet Crossing Angle

Meson Production Normalized to Beam Power

Process mesons through Cooling Consider mesons within acceptance of ε┴ = 30π mm and εL = 150π mm after cooling 180 MeV

Compare 50m to Post-Cooling

Summary At 20 GeV we have a 10% loss in efficiency Peak meson production efficiency for a Neutrino Factory Hg Target system occurs in the region of 6 to 10 GeV At 20 GeV we have a 10% loss in efficiency At 40 GeV we have a 20% loss in efficiency At 80 GeV we have a40% loss in efficiency

Backup Slides

Optimizing Soft-pion Production

Post-cooling 30π Acceptance