Key points for the future guidance on direct costing for large infrastructures in Horizon 2020 Brussels, 08 April 2013 Vittorio Morelli RTD.M.1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden First level controls - Certification of Expenditure INTERREG IIIC.
Advertisements

SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
OMB Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documen- tation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
© IMEC SIMPLIFYING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESEARCH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMMES EPP HEARING - EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT BRUSSELS, 1 SEPTEMBER 2010 Ingrid Reynaert.
Slide: 1 Website: DG ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION Finance, Legal Affairs and Partner.
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
European Union Cohesion Policy
1 Unit C3 Finance, legal Affairs and Partner support CALL FOR PROPOSALS APPLICATION PROCEDURE SPECIFIC ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL ISSUES Version
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 FOURTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
European Territorial Co-operation Eligibility of expenditure for co-operation programmes Art. 17(1) ETC Regulation 16th meeting of the Expert Group on.
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
Science, research and development European Commission THE FIFTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME B. Magis ACT/campagneinfo/slides/AG/AG6/5FP/conparEN.ppt.
European Union Cohesion Policy
3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010 Eligibility period and reporting eligible expenditure.
INTERREG and Tacis budgets Main differences: No breakdown of the Tacis budget between the partners is required; No strict limits for the project management.
Subsidy Contract Lead Partner seminar October 2008, Riga Arina Andreičika Managing Authority
SECTOR SKILLS ALLIANCES TOURISM AND CATERING GRANT AGREEMENT NO. EAC PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Communication campaign r. 2 Third parties & other sensitive relations Link with the projectLegal situations Carry out the projects (core tasks) 1. Beneficiary.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: Personnel costs & Other direct costs Antonio Requena Fernández FCH JU Financial Officer.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: - Subcontracting - Indirect Costs - Indirect Costs Thanos BATSILAS FCH JU Financial Officer.
Progress and Financial Reporting Geoff Butters, MDR Partners 05 March 2012, KB, The Hague.
International Accounting Standard 37
Financial Audit Autonomous Bodies AS 12 Session Accounting Standards 12 Accounting for Government Grants.
1 Financial Procedures in FP7 Projects Reporting and Audits Karolina Lis Research Assistant DCU, Finance Office
DG Research and Innovation
1 Emerging communities for collective innovation: ICT Operational tool and supporting methodologies for SME Associations 2010 January,
Funding Schemes. Legal and Financial Rules in the 7th Framework Programme PHOENIX Training Laulasmaa, 1 Sept 2007.
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
Eligibility of expenditure Relevant rules and regulations Workshop on Financial Management and auditing Rostock, 3 February 2005 Rostislav Zatloukal.
LIFE Platform meeting Denmark 2008 Tommy Sejersen, Financial Desks EC DG ENV – LIFE Unit Telephone
Financial and legal aspect in the context of proposal preparation Marija Šola, MSc. Project manager University of Belgrade School of Electrical Engineering.
Training Seminar on an Information Point for FP7 in Palestine Witkowski Jacob, BA,CPA, CIA Nicosia, Cyprus November 2008.
DAPHNE II Programme An investigation into forms of peer-peer bullying at school in pre-adolescent and adolescent groups: new instruments and preventing.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
LINKED Administrative & Finance overview18/03/2010 LINKED Leveraging Innovation for a Network of Knowledge on Education LIFE LONG LEARNING PROGRAMME LLP.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE-II Anna Cook Dita Mocova Reporting procedures & Financial Guidelines.
October 25, 2005 Pathways To Successful EU-Research Projects Financial management in FP 6 projects Praha, October 25, 2005 Claudia Labisch KoWi Office.
Required documents for accounting and auditing Albena Vutsova&Lora Pavlova.
“RACCE” Raising earthquake Awareness and Copping Children’s Emotions: Management and Financial Issues NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM – UNIV. OF CRETE (NHMC) Project.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
6 September 2012 GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS CORE 2012 CALL – ELIGIBLE COSTS AND FINANCIAL ISSUES ANNA FASTYN CHIEF EXPERT SECTION FOR BILATERAL PROGRAMMES AND.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: analysis per cost category Antonio Requena Fernández FCH JU Financial Officer.
1 An introduction to Project Cycle Management PCM DAY 3 Gori, 31/3 – 3/4/2015.
Budget Breakdown General Programme Solidarity & Management of Migration Flows European Return Fund (RF), the European Fund for the Integration of Third.
Bent Egebart - Receipts – Reduced contribution from the Commission? (3-parties in FP6 projects ?) Financial Guidelines for Indirect Actions.
Name, Surname, Position Event, Date, Place Financial issues.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: - Indirect Costs Thanos BATSILAS FCH JU Financial Officer.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the.
Volvox Finance 2 How we will manage the Finance Angela Pettit – Contracts Officer.
ADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL ISSUES DG ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION Finance, Legal Affairs and Partner Support unit-C3.
REPORTING, BUDGET, ELIGIBLE COSTS. Main steps of the financial management of the project.
1 Eurostat’s grant policy for 2010 Luxembourg, 23/03/2010 Unit A4 – Financial Management Section 3 – Grant procedures and agreements.
Financial Guidelines FP6 – IST Directorate C 1 st Evaluation proposals co-ordinators Briefing 17 July 2003.
Reporting requirements - contractual and financial issues NGO Kick-off meeting Lorenzina Bruno, Senior Financial Officer Manuel Montero Ramírez, Project.
Technical Assistance Office 1 SOCRATES - MINERVA GRANT AGREEMENT 2004 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs) The audit point of view.
Eligibility Rules Stefan Nyström, Managing Authority June 1, 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
© Shutterstock - olly Simplified Costs Options (SCOs)
Best practices related to procurement within a project (for part of the expenditure) implemented by the beneficiary itself (art. 67, par. 4 of Regulation.
- Special Education Needs (SEN) Network Administrative and Financial Aspects.
EU - China 11 Guidelines for Applicants rules for applications European Union Delegation to China & Mongolia Beijing Information Session 14 th November.
Interreg Atlantic Area Programme Eligibility Rules.
Simplified Cost Options: DG EMPL audit approach
Interreg Atlantic Area Programme Partner Budget & Eligibility Rules
Eligibility Rules Stefan Nyström, Managing Authority
Presentation by Mrs. Isabel Serra, EMPL/F/3
Financial Guidelines for Applicants
Communication campaign
Presentation transcript:

Key points for the future guidance on direct costing for large infrastructures in Horizon 2020 Brussels, 08 April 2013 Vittorio Morelli RTD.M.1

Content of the presentation 1.Background 2.Key points for the future guidance 1.Definitions 2.Categories of costs that may be declared as direct costs 3.Conditions for declaring such costs as direct costs 4.Costs covered by the flat rate 3.Next steps RTD.M.12

1. Background Commission's statement at the Council "Competitiveness" meeting on 10/11 October 2012 "For large infrastructures, the Commission will, based on best practices, issue guidelines on how some indirect costs can be moved to direct costs, i.e. where those costs can be directly attributed to the project". RTD.M.13

1. Background Actions undertaken by the Commission's services November 2012:Workshop on the H2020 Grant Agreement with the Legal and Financial NCPs January 2013:Technical workshop with beneficiaries (Universities and RTD and Research Organisations) February 2013:Workshop with representatives of associations involved in Research & Innovation (industries, …) February 2013 :Presentation to the RWG RTD.M.14

1. Background Outcome of those actions RTD.M.15 Input for key questions for the guidance Ideas on what is to be considered as direct eligible cost, in the case of an Infrastructure Under which conditions this would be justified, in the case of an Infrastructure Potential issue Some beneficiaries/associations consider their full organisational cost as "infrastructure" General feedback Some beneficiaries/associations considered stability of the rules as an asset Some beneficiaries/associations expressed their support to the EC proposal

2. Key points for future guidance RTD.M.16 Today's presentation: Represents the view of the Commission's services only Is the current state of reflection and may need certain adjustments in order to ensure a coherent approach for all types of costs Is valid only insofar as the legislator retains the Commission's proposal concerning the reimbursement of indirect costs through a flat rate

2. Key points for future guidance RTD.M.17 Today's presentation has the following main concerns: Keep simplification as a must Provide legal certainty

2. Key points for future guidance RTD.M.18 Today's presentation will provide and clarify: 2.1 Definitions 2.2 Categories of costs that may be declared as direct costs 2.3 Conditions for declaring such costs as direct costs 2.4 Costs covered by the flat rate

2.1 Definitions The Commission's statement refers to: infrastructures, which can be run by all beneficiaries costs can be directly attributed to the project 1.Definition of research infrastructure RTD.M.19 2.Definition of Direct Costs

2.1 Definitions: Research Infrastructure From a scientific & legal point of view, the term "Research Infrastructure" is defined with reference to the definition agreed upon during the inter-institutional discussions on the Commissions proposal for H2020. From an accounting point of view those Infrastructures are recorded in the accounts on the basis of a grouping of costs are of a wide range (property, plant, equipment, but also staff, repair & maintenance etc.) are specifically dedicated to the infrastructure and necessary to bring it to working conditions RTD.M.110

2.1 Definitions: Direct Costs direct costs "are costs which are directly linked to the implementation of the action and can therefore be attributed directly to it - which implies without using a cost driver or a proxy." In practice, these costs are: A) Costs that have been caused in full by the activities of the project B) Costs that have been caused in full by the activities of several projects, the attribution of which to a single project can, and has been directly measured (i.e. not attributed indirectly via an allocation key, a cost driver or an approximation) RTD.M.111

2.2 Categories of costs that may be declared as direct costs The proposed legal framework refers to financing of actions and not to financing of an organisation as a whole Hence, the future guidance will focus only on the costs of the research infrastructure and not on the full organisational costs of the beneficiary RTD.M Capitalized costs 2. Operating costs Group of costs

2.2 Categories of costs: capitalized costs "capitalized costs" of an infrastructure: all the different costs incurred to set up and/or renew the infrastructure recorded as an asset in the balance sheet (B/S) and expensed over several years corresponding to the actual use for the action charged to the project via the relevant depreciation charge cost of lease (but no finance fees) RTD.M.113

"operating costs" of an infrastructure: costs specifically incurred for the functioning of the infrastructure e.g. costs for administrative personnel and support staff, for the functioning of buildings, for equipment and facilities, including maintenance and repair, materials, facilities management, energy supply, necessary for the functioning of the infrastructure specificallyspecifically means incurred directly for the large infrastructure that is used for the project RTD.M Categories of costs: operating costs

2.3 Conditions for declaring such costs as direct costs Clear conditions will be established ensuring legal certainty on the acceptability of costs The future guidance will establish those conditions, defining a system feasible for the beneficiaries (simplification), while acceptable for the Commission (sound financial management of EU funds) RTD.M.115

2.3 Conditions for declaring such costs as direct costs a. General eligibility criteria b. Costs identifiable & verifiable c. Direct relationship with the infrastructure and with the project d. Non-discriminatory accounting principles to declare the costs e. Costs not already included under any other cost categories f. Costs directly measured RTD.M.116

2.3 Conditions a. General eligibility criteria Costs declared must respect the general eligibility criteria set out in Article of the Financial Regulation, and H2020 Model Grant Agreement e.g. actually incurred by the beneficiary, indicated in the estimated budget, justified and in compliance with the principle of sound financial management, etc. RTD.M.117

2.3 Conditions b. Costs identifiable & verifiable Costs declared must be supported by persuasive evidence allowing for a sufficient audit trail guidance will explain the kind of supporting evidence of the costs importance of the beneficiarys usual accounting principles, in particular for depreciation RTD.M.118

2.3 Conditions c. Direct relationship RTD.M.119 Costs declared must be directly linked to the project not the full organisational cost of the beneficiary's entity

2.3 Conditions c. Direct relationship for capitalized costs: the implementation of the project specifically requires the use of the infrastructure for operating costs: the functioning of the infrastructure specifically requires the assignment of support staff or the award if specific service or supply contracts guidance will explain kind of supporting evidence required: purchase order, delivery note, invoice, statement of work in progress, etc. beneficiary may prove the direct link through persuasive alternative evidence. RTD.M.120

2.3 Conditions d. Non-discriminatory accounting principles to declare the costs o Beneficiary must use its usual accounting principles "usual accounting principles" - the general and cost accounting principles, standards and procedures used to compile the legal/statutory financial accounts (i.e. Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss accounts and annexes), AND - analytical management information The usual accounting principles should not be set up «on purpose» RTD.M.121

2.3 Conditions e. Costs not already included under any other cost categories Beneficiary cannot declare costs already declared in the framework of another contract or grant financed from the Union budget Costs capitalized are declared through depreciation, and cannot be included (again) in another cost category Costs already financed by the Capacity program (FP7) cannot be declared again RTD.M.122

2.3 Conditions f. Costs directly measured RTD.M.123 Costs declared must be directly measured Time spent on the project should be recorded reliably

2.3 Conditions f. Costs directly measured RTD.M.124 The grant will finance the actual use of the infrastructure for the project

2.3 Conditions f. Costs directly measured RTD.M.125 Depending on the type of cost, the measurement will differ for capitalised cost: depreciation costs (and project time) for the building: rental or lease cost (and project time) for administrative personnel: time recording for other operating costs (maintenance and repair, consumables, materials and spare parts, facilities management, energy supply): specifically explicitly labelled invoice (and project time)

2.4 Costs covered by the flat rate In order to provide legal certainty, an indication of cost items considered as non-direct (i.e. indirect) will be established Those costs are deemed to be reimbursed through the application of the proposed flat rate RTD.M.126

3. Next Steps -During 2013: Formal adoption of guidance on direct costing for large infrastructures as part of the Commission's comprehensive set of guidance for H2020. RTD.M.127

Questions and Answers 28RTD.M.1