Prodcom ESTP course October 2010 The future of Prodcom

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Combining administrative and survey data: potential benefits and impact on editing and imputation for a structural business survey UNECE Work Session on.
Advertisements

Transport ECR/IRU/TISPOL "Access to the profession" seminar 18 October 2012 Conclusions and the way forward DG MOVE D.3 18/10/2012.
Electronic reporting in Poland 27th Voorburg Group Meeting Warsaw, Poland October 1st to October 5th, 2012 Central Statistical Office of Poland.
1 Calculation of unit value indices at Eurostat Training course on Trade Indices Beirut, December 2009 European Commission, DG Eurostat Unit G3 International.
Eurostat ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics April 2013 Point 2 of the agenda Legal framework for EU trade statistics.
Privatisation: 10 years on Jeremy Colman, UK National Audit Office.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
PRODCOM methodology Inge Feldbaek, PRODCOM November 2002.
The Citizen in the centre in EU, Bratislava November,2005
Towards more flexibility in responding to users’ needs
EXTRASTAT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE MODERNIZED COMMUNITY CUSTOMS CODE
Cost analysis of key statistical products
EU Programme for Authorised Economic Operators
Cathy Hughes and Neil Crosby
ESTP – Course Structural Business Statistics
ESTP COURSE ON PRODCOM STATISTICS
Finland: Compiling merchanting according to BPM6
General features of the system of the European System of Accounts (ESA 2010) THE CONTRACTOR IS ACTING UNDER A FRAMEWORK CONTRACT CONCLUDED WITH THE COMMISSION.
Item 8a: Globalisation, Goods for processing and Quasi-transit trade
ECONOMIC and SOCIAL CLASSIFICATIONS Introductory course Day 2 – second afternoon session PRODCOM Marie-Madeleine Fuger INSEE – France Hans Van Hooff CBS.
User Support Network Group
PRODCOM-Statistics in Austria
Eurostat Task force on victimisation surveys,
Prodcom ESTP course October 2013
PRODCOM survey in Poland
Prodcom ESTP course October 2013
Prodcom ESTP course October 2013
Publication of the Prodcom Figures
Overview of Regulatory Directives
Eurostat A short introduction
Item 8a: Globalisation, Goods for processing and Quasi-transit trade
PRODCOM SURVEY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
Prodcom ESTP course October 2010
ESTP COURSE ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL CLASSIFICATIONS Introductory course Day 2 – second afternoon session PRODCOM Marie-Madeleine Fuger INSEE – France.
Prodcom ESTP course October 2010 Regulatory Framework
Giuliano Amerini Unit E6 (Transport)
Regional Seminar on Developing a Program for the Implementation of the 2008 SNA and Supporting Statistics Gülçin ERDOĞAN September 2013 Ankara.
ECONOMIC AND ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATIONS
Zsófia Ercsey - KSH – Hungary Marie-Madeleine Fuger - INSEE – France
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review
Session 7 – Eurostat 2017 SBR User Survey
Commission Activities Eurostat : Latest developments
Identifying regulatory documents
Prodcom ESTP course October Variables and their definitions
National versions of NACE Rev. 2
Task Force on GDP Flash estimates at t+30 days
Prodcom ESTP course October 2013
Prodcom Working Group - 21st October 2013
EU Programme for Authorised Economic Operators
Prodcom Working Group - 21st October 2013
ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics
Adult Education Survey Anonymisation Point 6
Prodcom Working Group Item 03.6 The integration of PRODCOM in FRIBS
Brexit: VAT & Customs Duties
Prodcom Working Group Item 03.5 – Confidentiality & dissemination of PRODCOM statistics Prodcom Working Group 18th -19th September 2014.
Prodcom Working Group Item Quality reporting and indicators
PRODCOM WORKING GROUP TF proposal on sub-contracted operations and a better coverage of services Prodcom Working Group 18th -19th September 2014 Item.
Business architecture
General features of the system of the European System of Accounts (ESA 2010) THE CONTRACTOR IS ACTING UNDER A FRAMEWORK CONTRACT CONCLUDED WITH THE COMMISSION.
Linking trade statistics with business statistics
Skopje, 21 November 2017, General Population Survey results– launch
The Use of PRODCOM Data in Trade Defence Investigations
ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATIONS Advanced course Day 1 – second afternoon session National version of NACE Rev.2 Marie-Madeleine Fuger INSEE – France Gheorghe.
European Safety Survey : News on the draft Council and European Parliament Regulation Task Force Victimisation 17 February 2011.
PRODCOM Working Group JMO M November 2012
Item 2. Latest developments as regards the population and housing census round 2021 in the ESS  Luis del Barrio Enlargement, neighbourhood.
Prodcom Working Group JMO M November 2012
« Survey on PRODCOM data collection in other MS
Zsófia Ercsey - KSH – Hungary Marie-Madeleine Fuger - INSEE – France
ESS conceptual standards for quality reporting
Presentation transcript:

Prodcom ESTP course 20 - 22 October 2010 The future of Prodcom

The need for a new regulation The current Prodcom regulation dates from 1991 It needs to be brought into line with more modern regulations Much of it is ambiguous October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

This list of issues needs to be refined Issues to be resolved In November 2009 a possible list of issues to be resolved was presented to the Prodcom Working Group This list of issues needs to be refined Each of the issues needs to be addressed, to find agreement on how to resolve it. October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

Issues to be resolved What is Prodcom for? How do we define what Prodcom is measuring? Who should report production by a subcontractor? Should the value and volume be coherent? What criteria should be used to assess coverage? How should we deal with long manufacturing chains The 1% rule The burden imposed by the Prodcom survey Quality October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

To measure the manufacturing activity of enterprises? 1. What is Prodcom for? To measure the manufacturing activity of enterprises? To record the value and volume of goods produced? To measure the contribution of manufacturing to the economy? Something else? October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

2. How do we define what Prodcom is measuring? Sold production: production Sold production: sales Production intended for sale Total production Stock movements October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

3. Who should report production by a subcontractor? The subcontractor? The principal? October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

4. Should the value and volume be coherent? Case of inconsistency: value of production based on invoices (what is actually sold during the year, including goods taken out of stock) volume based on what is actually produced in the year October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

5. What criteria should be used to assess coverage? The 90% rule is problematic because: It does not specify what the 90% should be measured against If you know that you have achieved 90%, you know what 100% is. The generally accepted yardstick is turnover of enterprises classified to that NACE class. However a) not all turnover results from manufacturing activity and b) there is a poor correlation between the product code and the NACE class to which the producer is classified Coverage measured at the level of the NACE class can hide variations at the level of individual products October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

6. Long manufacturing chains Increasingly, a number of enterprises are involved at various stages of manufacture of a product. The final stage that effectively creates the usable version of the product may be quite trivial, e.g. assembly, compression of a powdered drug into a tablet etc. Should we try to reflect the amount of effort or intellectual and financial capital contributed at different stages of the process? If so, how? October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

The regulation should specify what the 1% is measured against 7. The 1% rule The rule was established when there were only 15 Member States. It is a lot easier to fall below 1% of the production of 27 countries than of 15. Should the percentage be changed? The regulation should specify what the 1% is measured against October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

8. Burden on businesses The European Commission has been very concerned in recent years about the burden imposed on industry by “red tape”. This applies not only to the burden from statistics but from other regulations. Should the regulation say something about the burden imposed by the Prodcom survey, and how it can be minimised? October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

9. Quality The regulation will need to specify that a quality report should be sent to the European Council and European Parliament every year, in order to bring it into line with modern standards for EU regulations October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

Other developments MEETS (Modernisation of European Enterprise and Trade Statistics): a project to modernise business statistics in the ESS The Vision paper: a strategy paper looking at how the processing of different statistics should be integrated in future October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

We will start this during the Prodcom Working Group in November Next steps We need to conduct a debate about how these questions should be answered We will start this during the Prodcom Working Group in November A new Prodcom regulation needs to wait until it is clear how MEETS and the Eurostat Vision will affect Prodcom October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course

Thank you October 2010 Prodcom ESTP course